Head Circumference at Birth - Mothering Forums

Old 04-10-2006, 01:49 PM - Thread Starter

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Up to my eyeballs in TF GFCFEF
Posts: 2,134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
What's average?

What's large?

Do I need to clarify that I mean the [B]baby's[B] head circumference?

No matter what the measurement, the head is really only about 10cm's at the actual time of vaginal delivery, right? Or did I actually dilate to 13ins and 14.5 ins (ds1 and ds2, respectively)?

Dh and I were talking about this and just wondering. We have a friend who just had a 12in baby and he thought that our two were giants. I thought they were average, but not sure. Ahhh, the conversations we have when both boys are asleep...
Anguschick1 is offline

Old 04-10-2006, 01:53 PM

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 27,052
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
10 cm should be the diameter not the circumference.

I thought you dilated to 10cm and then the baby's head both squished down and stretched you a bit more?
sapphire_chan is offline
Old 04-10-2006, 01:57 PM - Thread Starter

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Up to my eyeballs in TF GFCFEF
Posts: 2,134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Duh! Diameter vs Circumference! Geometry was never my strong suit...nor trigonometry...nor calculus...nor algebra...

So, what's the average circumference then?
Anguschick1 is offline

Old 04-10-2006, 02:48 PM

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,019
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
a quick google search shows that the average head circumference at birth is around 35cm (13.7 inches). Common range from 33-38.

My 2nd was 15 inches and everyone acted like that was really big. It didn't look big to me.

Dilation is considered complete at 10 but it can and does stretch further than that to allow the baby to pass.
erin_brycesmom is offline
Old 04-10-2006, 03:25 PM

Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Training in Houston
Posts: 4,364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My first had little heads, my third was average and I felt my 4th was on the bigger side at 14.5 but her head didn't look big.
Let us not forget that their head also squishes as it comes out so I think both are factors - we can stretch beyond a 10 and they squish a bit while coming out so I believe their heads are bigger after they are out since they aren't being squished.

Keri

Â Keri wife and MamaÂ toÂ  Cory 17,Â  Brendan 15,Â  Kerianne 8,Â  Avery 7,Â  Lilia 3
Old 04-10-2006, 04:53 PM

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern Berkshire County, MA
Posts: 1,535
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Although dilation is done in centimeters, it seems that often the babies head cicumferance measurement is given in inches. This pretty much ranges from 12-15.5 inches. So possibly the 13 and 14.5 figures from the OP were inches circumference?

But getting back to metric. 10 cm dialation would equal a 31.4 cm (pi*d)circumference opening. Since that's quite a bit smaller than average head size, I think we can assume that there is additional dilation and/or stretching combined with head smooshing going on there.
Rico'sAlice is offline
Old 04-10-2006, 05:09 PM

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 27,052
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
That's where "soft spots" come from, right? Those squishy looking places on the skull that make petting a baby's head somewhat nervous-making and where you can see their heart beat?
sapphire_chan is offline
Old 04-10-2006, 05:13 PM

Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 15,097
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think ds was 13.5" around and I've heard that's pretty average.

Mom of a 7 yr old, 4 yr old, and 1 yr old. Wow. How did that happen?
~Megan~ is offline
Old 04-10-2006, 05:33 PM - Thread Starter

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Up to my eyeballs in TF GFCFEF
Posts: 2,134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
The "soft spots" are where the plates of the skull don't meet. The skull plates are soft and able to slide under/over one another to "squish" down in order to fit throught the mother's pelvic outlet.

Ahhhh, once again, I mis-type. I meant "inches" not "centimeters" in the op. (Edited now) Let's see...

1 centimeters = 0.393700787 inches
33.02 centimeters = 13 inches
36.83 centimeters = 14.5 inches

So at "complete" we are dilated to 31.4 centimeters in circumferance or 12.3622047 inches. As if birth wasn't impressive enough!
Anguschick1 is offline
Old 04-10-2006, 05:37 PM

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: somewhere between here and there
Posts: 4,647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm glad to read this thread b/c my aunt just gave birth a couple of weeks ago (medicated, hospital - it wasn't an elective C because I got her some books on it, but anyway ...) and the Dr. did this really horrible, deep episiotomy on her. Everyone keeps saying in awe - well, her son had a 14 inch head!

I just keep thinking that she probably didn't need it anyway and now the dr. is just covering his you-know-what.

Woman. Mother. Activist.
kalisis is offline
Old 04-10-2006, 08:51 PM

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My baby's head was 14 1/2 inches with no molding. Everyone remarked that he had the head shape of a few-months-old infant, at least. I also ended up with an episiotomy after amost an hour of pushing...but I still have to wonder what would have happened without it. (As far as I can tell I had no other tears.)
LaceyTX is offline
Old 04-10-2006, 11:16 PM

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 4,244
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
My 1st ds was 7lb 15 oz head 14.5 in... DS2 -8lb12oz head 14.5... DS 3 -9lb8oz head 14.75 in. My mother laughed and said she can guess my pelvic size

Jeana Christian momma to 4 sons Logan 18, Connor 15, Nathan 6, and bonus baby Jack 1
JBaxter is offline
Old 04-11-2006, 01:23 AM

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vancouver, (Not BC) WA (Not DC)
Posts: 2,933
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My dd had a 14.75inch head she was 8lb, 2oz

Heather Mike Married 8/1/99 Mom to Charlotte Aug 04, Nov 06, and Katherine Oct 07
Belle is offline
Old 04-11-2006, 02:31 AM

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mystery Island
Posts: 3,200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My head is written as 19 around... they thought I had water on the brain (can't remember. Hydroencephalous?). THAT'S big.
I didn't have it, I probably had IUGR. My head is still kinda big, but not abnormally so.

My mom had me vaginally. No pain killers.

Babs + Curtis - Parents of Tempest (08/07/03 ), Jericho (11/01/05 ), Xan (10/03/06 ), Zephyra (06/02/11 ). @ babyslime.livejournal.com

littleteapot is offline
Old 04-12-2006, 12:18 AM

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
my sons head was 14". what impressed me the most is that his chest was 14.75"! nearly an inch bigger. i remember yelling OUCHIES when his shoulders were born and after seeing his measurements i'm not at all suprised i felt that.

everyone kept telling me he had a huge head although he was so chubby all over it looked small to me. but then he was a big'un at 9lbs 10oz.

Jami (25) Roland (27) & Caleb (5), Jacob (3.5) , Kaitlyn (2)
CalebsMama05 is offline
Old 04-12-2006, 01:18 AM

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington State
Posts: 604
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My DD's head was 14", but she was only 7 pounds, 4 ounces and 18" long. And she came so freakin' fast that her head didn't mold - seriously, round as a cantaloupe. She was a wee little thing but her head seemed gigantic, at least to me. Surprisingly, I only needed one long stitch, thanks to some good support while I was pushing.

I say this was karmic revenge for me saying, when I was pregnant, that I didn't care how big the baby was, as long as it had a little-bitty pinhead. Funny in retrospect!

Mama to DD : (7/23/03) & DS : (10/27/06) married to DH 7/20/01
and yet 90% more mainstream than the rest of MDC
Old 04-13-2006, 01:15 AM

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,491
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
our smallest was 14, the others were 15. babies ranged from 7-9lbs and Thats average I guess.

Carrie, The Birthteacher CCE and Doula, real mom to five; and womb-mom to G. born at 23w by emergency C. 12/09
Rockies5 is offline
Old 04-13-2006, 10:18 AM

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The 'burbs
Posts: 2,205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Both my kids had 14" heads. One was 7 lbs. 9 oz. and the other was 9 lbs. 1 oz. but their heads were the same, I think that is funny. Neither had any molding and with the second I only had the tiniest tear. The vagina really is amazing! I remember reading with my first that 13.9"-14" is average for newborn boys so probably a little smaller for girls?

I think the 10 cm diameter of dilation versus x inches of head circumference confuses a lot of people. I remember having to sit down with a calculator and convert it all after my first was born, because it just didn't seem possible!
Undercover Hippie is offline
Old 04-13-2006, 11:30 AM

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 962
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
When I had my older son, I was told the average head circumference was 13".
Everyone was commenting because my son's head was 16" at birth - it was HUGE. He still has a big head, though he's really started to grow into it over the past few years. Yes, he DID have a conehead. That was my first comment on seeing my newly born, firstborn child... "He's got a CONEHEAD!" lol... Poor kid. I often wonder if his head was so large because he was so late. But his weight was normal (8lbs, 4ozs).

I remember knowing he had a big head, because beside having to push for an hour to get just his head out, I couldn't buy any of those cute little baby hats for him - when he was a little boy, I always had to get adult hats for him or open the back latch to the biggest point.

So, your babes sound normal to me. My second son had a "normal" sized head (14").
Raynbow is offline
Old 04-13-2006, 12:46 PM

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sweatville, USA
Posts: 282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by LaceyTX My baby's head was 14 1/2 inches with no molding. Everyone remarked that he had the head shape of a few-months-old infant, at least.
Me too. I did tear... but then I was in a modified lithotomy position and my DD was posterior with her hand up near her face. It's amazing what the human body can do
myniyer is offline