Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On my couch
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Originally Posted by NYCVeg
Hmm...spinningbabies includes both "back to the right side" and true posteriority as things that could lead to a longer, harder labor and/or c/s. Are they just being alarmist, then?
Originally Posted by starlein26
Interesting info! I didn't think ROA would even be an issue. One question, when your body is actually ready to birth the baby...would the baby get into that ideal position on it's on if it isn't completely posterior?
|67 members and 10,097 guests|
|Annaintoronto , beckybird , belltree , blissful_maia , bluefaery , bruna , bubbagirl , Elison Smith , Ewus , farmermomma , firmfoot , FluffyFlamingo , geehee , Incubator , japonica , joandsarah77 , jtkurt , jul511riv , katelove , lilmissgiggles , LiLStar , lilyofjudah , LittleLlama , LoveOurBabies , LTurtle , Mamasboy2015 , marilyn612 , Marumi , Milk8shake , Moonix13 , NaturallyKait , Nemi27 , newmamalizzy , NuzzleNudge , pers , Ponyomum , prettylady5 , primalmom , RosemaryV , rubelin , Sandeep , SandiMae , sarafl , SarahBethie , Satori , Serafina33 , Smokering , sofreshsoclean , SophiaG , SplashingPuddle , Springshowers , spruce , Tiffa , Tigerle , TourmalineMama , TrishWSU , verofol , winterpromise31 , zebra15 , zohandoe|
|Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.|