If you've had a c-section, do you feel that it was necessary? - Page 3 - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#61 of 73 Old 04-11-2007, 12:25 PM
 
Al Dente's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: A safe place
Posts: 1,718
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Mine was necessary. 43 wks, heart rate dropping every day, transverse breech until 41 wks, cervix never thinned or dialated, not engaged whatsoever. He was lodged between my hip bone and ribs, no room to maneuver at all...would've died if I hadn't given up my ideal of a natural birth.
Al Dente is offline  
#62 of 73 Old 04-11-2007, 12:43 PM
 
georgia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: tl;dr
Posts: 26,063
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hi, everyone ! A friendly reminder:

Quote:
MDC serves an online community of parents, families, and parent, child and family advocates considering, learning, practicing, and advocating attachment parenting and natural family living. Our discussions concern the real world of mothering and are first and foremost, for support, information, and community. Mothering invites you to read and participate in the discussions. In doing so we ask that you agree to respect and uphold the integrity of this community. Through your direct or indirect participation here you agree to make a personal effort to maintain a comfortable and respectful atmosphere for our guests and members.
and

Quote:
Do not post to a thread to take direct issue with a member. If you feel a member has posted or behaved inappropriately in a discussion, communicate directly with the member, moderator or administrator privately and refrain from potentially defaming discussion in a thread.
Thanks so much

I have retired from administration work, so if you have a question about anything MDC-related, please contact Cynthia Mosher. Thanks!
 
georgia is offline  
#63 of 73 Old 04-12-2007, 07:43 AM
 
Turkish Kate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Body in Jax FL, Heart in Istanbul
Posts: 1,646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Unfortunately, yes, it was necessary. After 80 hours of labor at home (hands and knees, shower, pool, birth ball, pulling, pushing, squatting, kneeling, you-name-it), my cervix had not effaced or dilated one bit. Apparently one too many surgeries for cervical dysplasia did the trick.
Turkish Kate is offline  
#64 of 73 Old 04-12-2007, 09:35 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,334
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
As disappointed as I was having a c-s after going 27 hours naturally, i guess it was necessary. i didn't know what to write at first. Baby's heartrate dropped to 80bpm and my body was totally worn out. 9.5 cm but i had no more strength to push (long story) and the baby was stressed (midwive had had me push at 9cm telling me i was 10...his head caved in from ramming on my bone and he was distressed). Sometimes i felt like i was just so close no drugs all natural, why did i have to have a csection? BUT, i never would have forgiven myself. i don't think the doctors wanted to deal with me and help me finish it off, but i think i made the best choice, and we are both healthy and happy.
mkmama is offline  
#65 of 73 Old 04-12-2007, 03:11 PM - Thread Starter
 
AugustLia23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: In the present
Posts: 3,574
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for all the responses mammas, very informative.

Non Practicing Midwife, going back to school! Mamma to my 3 loves, living each day to the fullest.
AugustLia23 is offline  
#66 of 73 Old 04-12-2007, 03:57 PM
 
kbstanley3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 362
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yes, my c-sec, which I had a week and two days ago, was necessary (unfortunately). I labored for three days and finally dilated to 10, pushed for 3 1/2 hours befor they realized my pelvic bones were too small for him to fit through (she literally had her hand up there feeling his head for 30 minutes). Also, after he was born, they realized he was actually sunny side up. If he would have been turned the right way, I probably could have given birth to him vaginally. Unfortunately, no one realized he was turned the wrong way (even when she had her hand up there!). If they would've realized it sooner (before he was stuck) they probably could have manually turned him. But since no one did, my c-section was necessary. I wasn't given a choice at that point.
kbstanley3 is offline  
#67 of 73 Old 04-12-2007, 04:03 PM
 
LiLStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: WA
Posts: 3,362
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
kbstanley, that sounds exactly like my birth story. only my midwife could feel that she was posterior. And she DID try to spin her around and she didn't wanna budge. My midwife described it like, with some people, the baby's head fits through the pelvic bones like a key fits into a lock. If its not turned *just right* its simply not happening. I sure like that explanation better than "the baby is too big" or "your pelvis is too small for a vaginal birth"

dd (7) ds (5), ds (2) &3rdtri.gif hbac.gif and the furbabies cat.gifZeus, Dobby, Luna, & Ravenclaw
LiLStar is online now  
#68 of 73 Old 04-13-2007, 03:26 AM
 
pampered_mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Somewhere short of crazy
Posts: 4,540
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiLStar View Post
My midwife described it like, with some people, the baby's head fits through the pelvic bones like a key fits into a lock. If its not turned *just right* its simply not happening. I sure like that explanation better than "the baby is too big" or "your pelvis is too small for a vaginal birth"
I would completely agree with you here. I think your mw's explanation accurately addresses your situation at the time, but w/out making you feel like anything was "broken" or "too small" as so many women often feel when given the other explanation. a big "way to go" to your mw!
pampered_mom is offline  
#69 of 73 Old 04-13-2007, 04:50 AM
 
ericswifey27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,748
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Mine was definitely NOT neccessary. I was lied to by the doctors and staff, scared into having a csection with the "your baby's in distress" line, oh and "you're not progressing" among other things. Got the records. We were both totally healthy. I was progressing, in spite of the situation. They just didn't want to wait around any longer until I was ready, had to get to their holiday parties...

Bottom line, I had the wool pulled over my eyes. It's actually made me stronger and I have learned so much...but I can't say I would do it again if I were able to choose.

Mama to my spirited J, and L, my homebirth: baby especially DTaP, MMR (family vax injuries)
ericswifey27 is offline  
#70 of 73 Old 04-13-2007, 02:47 PM
 
sonrisaa29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 972
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i was induced 2 weeks early as there was too much amniotic fluid and then my baby's heartbeat dropped considerably and required a c-section.
sonrisaa29 is offline  
#71 of 73 Old 04-13-2007, 08:59 PM
 
katytheprincess2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Trying to find a way to go on.....
Posts: 1,870
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Short answer NO!!!

My first child was a very quick very easy vaginal delivery with no meds or interventions.
My second child was frank breech. My water broke and I was already 6 CM + when I arrived at the hospital and there is no doubt in my mind that I could have delivered my 5#13 oz breech boy with no problems but the hospital wouldn't allow it.
My third child was a scheduled C-Section because at 35 weeks I was informed that my MW/OB office would no longer be allowing VBAC's.
I am due to have another repeat c-section in a week and there isn't a doubt in my mind that this is a totally unneeded major surgery.

With all that said I do know several people who had C-Sections that saved thier children's lives without a doubt! So I am not saying that every section is unneeded just the ones I have had if that makes sense.
katytheprincess2 is offline  
#72 of 73 Old 04-13-2007, 09:26 PM
 
fenwickmama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Star City
Posts: 1,383
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
in the end, yes. it started with a coerced induction at 40.5 weeks. after 2 days of pitocin and an overnight of cervadil, & no progress at all, doc recommended c/s or go home & do it all over again on monday (this was friday afternoon). after much debate that i won't go into, we decided in favor of surgery. turns out the "very short" cord was tightly wrapped 3 times round his neck & had to be cut before he could be lifted outta me....so, although i wish i hadn't been induced i guess it could have been very traumatic for ds had we labored?

Kelly, :Mama to Kevin, 10/1/05 & Seth, 7/7/06. ::
fenwickmama is offline  
#73 of 73 Old 04-13-2007, 09:44 PM
 
erikandgregsmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New York, 60 miles north of NYC
Posts: 135
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
and I guess I would have to say that the first one SHOULDN'T have been, which led to the 2nd one having to be.

#1 - after doing my own research and becoming friendly with someone who happens to be a midwife, my first son was almost certainly posterior. Midwives have ways of detecting a posterior lie and trying exercises prior to and during labor that usually turn the babe anterior making for an easier vaginal birth. I ended up on labor day with the one practitioner in my practice who I didn't like - a male OB with a "what's the difference" attitude about vaginal birth. I saw him for a sum total of about 30 minutes over the course of a 19 hour labor, and his only solution to my FTP was the knife.

#2 - after 22 hours of labor and 2 hours of pushing, the baby's head hadn't descended past -3 station. When they opened me for the c/s, they found the beginning of a rupture - as well as extensive scar tissue from my first c/s. So I guess that one saved me and my son.
erikandgregsmom is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off