Join Date: Dec 2008
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Former wearing, ing, pole dancing, pushing, survivor & single mama extraordinaire to .
Now that's a mouthful!!!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Please think a little before posting. She doesn't have a choice about letting the kids go with him unless she's got clear evidence that he's going to be seriously endangering them. Having an expired license and past DUIs won't do it for the judges. His showing up drunk, yes.
If she refuses to let them go she can lose custody. Do you still think it would be smart for her to refusing to let them go?
It'd be nifty if they came and did that. But, pranamama, here's the conversation I'm foreseeing between the OP and the judge. It boils down to the fact that the suspended license does not have a single thing to do with his ability to drive safely on the evening of January 17th, unless there's evidence that he's still drinking and driving, in which case the OP may be able to do something. But that should also be done through the court.
Otherwise, the suspended license is between himself and the state, and I'm betting the judge would want to know why you felt it was necessary to insert yourself.
|48 members and 17,537 guests|
|agentofchaos , Alini , bananabee , beep , CricketVS , Daffodil , Dakotacakes , Deborah , DeepLearner , emmy526 , fljen , floss&ferd , girlspn , happymamasallie , Honey, Lamb & I , ian'smommaya , Janeen0225 , katelove , kathymuggle , lilmissgiggles , lisak1234 , Lydia08 , Michele123 , moominmamma , NaturallyKait , oaksie68 , ok1990 , oldsmom , pokeyac , RollerCoasterMama , rubelin , saphire , sciencemum , sgpcs4hnv , Socks , Springshowers , sren , Tweety_Bird , VsAngela , Wolfcat , worthy , Xerxella , xthoney , zebra15 , zoeyzoo|
|Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 01:21 PM.|