Really? A judge can force this?!? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 131 Old 11-10-2010, 02:15 PM - Thread Starter
 
StephandOwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 8,809
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

In our court order it says nothing about living with a partner without being married. But apparently shortly after we got that court order the Judge started putting it in every court order that you can't have overnight guests of the opposite sex with your children in the house. This includes long term relationships and living together.

 

DS and I have been living with dp for over 3 years.

 

I just talked to my lawyer and she said that the Judge made an offhand comment to him like "she'd better be married before she steps foot in my courtroom again" (she being me). Seriously?!? I told her that dp and I are getting married on January 1st. She said that will be a problem if we end up in court before that (and it's likely we will as ex's lawyer contacted my lawyer today). WTF?!? Am I really risking upsetting the Judge over 2 freaking months? LESS than 2 months? And how in the world is me not being married for the next 2 months detrimental to ds?!? Getting married even 1 day before January 1st will mean we (as a family) will lose over $10,000 next year (with my grant money for school and with my tax returns). That's bullsh*t that a judge is going to give me a hard time about this.


Steph, DH Jason (1-1-11), DS Owen (10-3-03) and DS Kai (10-13-11)

StephandOwen is offline  
#2 of 131 Old 11-10-2010, 02:46 PM
 
vannienicole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

It's not in your order though, so I am not sure how they can force that.

vannienicole is offline  
#3 of 131 Old 11-10-2010, 03:02 PM
 
doubledutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

don't even stress about this right now!  hug2.gif  and don't even think about what it would mean to you financially to get married this year.  why on earth would you?  there would have to be a court order not for you to get married but barring you from living with dp, and then that would have to be enforced, and how on earth would anyone even know at this point?  and if it came down to it and you really had to either live separately or get married - uh, wouldn't you save your $10k and have him sleep on a buddy's couch for a few weeks?  i'm sorry this even came up, your lawyer shouldn't have bothered mentioning to you, imo.

doubledutch is offline  
#4 of 131 Old 11-10-2010, 03:07 PM
ssh
 
ssh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,716
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I don't understand how this can be legal. People with children cohabit all the time. I could understand prohibitions against spending the night with a casual relationship but with a long term one. Doesn't that violate your civil rights?

ssh is offline  
#5 of 131 Old 11-10-2010, 03:26 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cover letter he!!
Posts: 6,548
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Um....whats the judge gonna do?  Flip custody over it?  I don't think so.  I wouldn't worry about it, and make it VERY clear that if that goes in your order, you will be appealing the ruling to a higher court.  I don't think it can be enforced, not on you, since it wasn't in your original order.  The comment made to your atty by the judge was also HIGHLY unprofessional, and the next time he says something like that (hopefully its on the record), your atty should say something about it (backed up by law, and precedent).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Super~Single~Mama is offline  
#6 of 131 Old 11-10-2010, 05:57 PM
 
Katwoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alaska
Posts: 665
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by StephandOwen View Post
he said that the Judge made an offhand comment to him like "she'd better be married before she steps foot in my courtroom again" (she being me).


Or what?  Seriously?  Did the lawyer say what the law says the judge can do if you are not living up to her personal values?  (I say this because if it's not in your original order, it seems to me it would have to be placed in an order before a judge can do anything about it.)  So lets say you go into court before Jan 1st.  The judge would have to issue an order for your living arrangements to change.  Then you could have DP crash on someone's couch until Jan 1st. 

 

It seems like it will take a bit of time to get this on the docket - even if it's a week or two that takes you to the beginning of December.   After you go to court she has to issue her ruling/hand down an order.  You're closer to Jan 1st than it feels like right now. 

 

I'm not saying this as lightly as a written method makes it seem.  I know that I would do anything to make sure that my kids didn't end up with someone that wouldn't take care of their individual needs.  (I've read about your ex in other posts.)  But I do think this is another way to cause you stress.  You are living within the order that was issued.  You've documented everything.  Unless the judge issues an order in the next couple of days, I don't think you should run out and get married on the THREAT of something legal happening.

 

Now I'm not a lawyer and your lawyer can help you with this much more than anything a stranger could say.  I just can't believe this is something that should be hanging over your head or changing your plans because it was so offhanded.  Judges have rules to live by too - even if they don't do it very well, all the time.

 

Katwoman is offline  
#7 of 131 Old 11-10-2010, 06:00 PM - Thread Starter
 
StephandOwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 8,809
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I agree, this is totally bogus. Unfortunately, as we've seen before in this forum, some judges are highly unpredictable and can make your life hell for no reason. Sure, we could appeal it. But by that time we'll be married and it will be a moot point. All we have to do is fly under the judge's radar for another 51 days and then we're good (eta- actually only 46 days as dp and I leave days before our wedding for our honeymoon so the judge sure as heck can't tell us what to do then).

 

I've got to talk to my lawyer more about it but I think we have a plan. If it works then it'll get us through the end of the year without going to court. And I'll only have to be somewhat nice to ex

 

Worst case scenario- dp moves into his parents house until the end of the year. No biggie as they only live 5 minutes away. However, I get the impression that the Judge will still be pissed about that just because we aren't married. And the messed up thing is I've been living with dp longer than ex has been married to Chickadee. I've known dp for WAY longer than ex has known Chickadee. And yet just because they have a little piece of paper signed (that they've already said wouldn't have been signed had she not gotten pregnant) they are seen as "better" or "more stable" in the eyes of the Judge than dp and I. Messed up, huh?


Steph, DH Jason (1-1-11), DS Owen (10-3-03) and DS Kai (10-13-11)

StephandOwen is offline  
#8 of 131 Old 11-10-2010, 06:04 PM
 
vannienicole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I was just thinking....if the judge has been putting it into orders since just after yours was issued, maybe he/she thinks it's in yours too?

vannienicole is offline  
#9 of 131 Old 11-10-2010, 06:22 PM - Thread Starter
 
StephandOwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 8,809
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by vannienicole View Post

I was just thinking....if the judge has been putting it into orders since just after yours was issued, maybe he/she thinks it's in yours too?



No, I know my lawyer pointed out to him that it wasn't in our order. He said he didn't care, that he had "given them enough time and leniency" (meaning dp and myself). My lawyer tried to explain the whole financial side of it but the Judge didn't care at all.

 

What really sucks is that the Judge is apparently going to make THIS a battle, but is totally letting ex get away with not providing ds with insurance (which was court ordered over 6 years ago and he still hasn't done it). Ex even told me this summer that he does have it available through work and "I'll look into it" (aka "there's not a darn chance I'm getting ds on insurance"). If he's going to make a battle of something, why the heck not battle over something HE ORDERED and ISN'T BEING FOLLOWED! The insurance is the reason we didn't get married years ago (dp was working as a contractor back then so had crappy insurance and it wouldn't have covered ds's therapy- which he needed a lot of). Ex has refused to get insurance for ds even though it's available to him and he was court ordered to do it so ds has been on Medicaid. Now dp has a good, stable job with decent benefits (not wonderful, but good enough). Now we are confident that we can get married and ds's therapy won't suffer. Before, there would have been no way to afford all his therapy and ex sure as heck wasn't offering up any money (even though, again, it was court ordered he pay 76% of uncovered medical expenses). Isn't it wonderful how ex can totally ignore all court orders but when I do something that wasn't even in a court order I am threatened? Lovely system we got going on here.


Steph, DH Jason (1-1-11), DS Owen (10-3-03) and DS Kai (10-13-11)

StephandOwen is offline  
#10 of 131 Old 11-10-2010, 06:40 PM
 
vannienicole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Question: does all that stuff he hasn't paid go on one big bill he has to pay later, or are you just SOL?

vannienicole is offline  
#11 of 131 Old 11-10-2010, 06:52 PM - Thread Starter
 
StephandOwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 8,809
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Since ds is on medicaid currently (since ex won't get insurance for ds and dp can't put him on his insurance until we're married) then Medicaid pays for most expenses. The stuff it doesn't pay, dp and I do. I've never asked ex to reimburse for anything (and we see how much it pays to be nice, eh?).

 

But I'm done playing nice. He will get billed for his portion of every single thing. I think how it works is I submit the bills to the friend of the court and they just take it right out of his paycheck and deposit it into my bank account. That's how they do child support currently. When January hits and ds is on dp's insurance the friend of the court will re-evaluate the child support and raise it so ex is paying me back a portion of the money we'll be paying for insurance for ds) and they'll raise it for cost of living increase since we haven't had one in 3 years). Then he's also responsible for his portion of uncovered (76% is what it's been for 6 years, I don't know if it'll change). So I should get reimbursed for a portion of the insurance and uncovered. Whether that happens or not is anyone's guess.


Steph, DH Jason (1-1-11), DS Owen (10-3-03) and DS Kai (10-13-11)

StephandOwen is offline  
#12 of 131 Old 11-10-2010, 07:03 PM
 
montlake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Ugh a friend of mine got divorced earlier this year and has the same in her order. The judge was originally willing to agree to no guests that are not relatives in the house EVER. So even her female friends in the neighborhood would not be allowed to come in and have a cup of coffee, which her ex requested but backed off of. Sorry you are dealing with this.

montlake is offline  
#13 of 131 Old 11-10-2010, 11:13 PM
 
LoveOhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: In Writing Mode!
Posts: 1,953
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I live in a very liberal state and you still come across judges who feel being married is more significant than a "healthy" long term relationship.  In all fairness a judge can only go by what is on paper filling the gaps of that with their own personal experience and belief structure.  They can't take your word for Jason being a healthy partner, they can't take your word for ex's marriage being doomed.  And honestly once O's dad got married it did change the game in regards to court......  Given your positive history with the judge have you considered that maybe the judge is not trying to make this thee battle but level the playing field between your ex and you.  Even though he is a judge he has to dot his "I" and cross his "T" should your ex appeal decision, request a different judge, etc.  He could be suggesting you tie up the only claim your ex can bring (since you withhold ds will be laughed at)  I say this is true respect for you it will look better in court for you to be married but don't stress out over something so minor.

 

All that said, I suggest delaying court until after the new year when you are married.  You can use a number of reasons such as O's school schedule, your work, etc.  Hopefully the court calendar will not have anything until early January due to the holiday / vacations / etc. IF you do have to go before you are married I would show up with Jason and your engagement band on your finger and IF questioned you can state your wedding date has been set for 1.1.11 and that you had to book the location a year in advance but you are both sooooo very excited about it.  Also have the teacher you just spoke with write a letter about O's relationship as told to her by O with his dad (dad meaning Jason) and doctors,etc. who can say Jason is hands on in O's life do the same ---- after all it's better to have it and not need it than to want it and not have it.

 

On a side note: I do value a judge making a conservative ruling in custody orders and I would respect it if it was added to mine.  While Jason has been wonderful to you and O I have read many stories here on MDC and elsewhere where "shacking up" has been more stress than good for the child.  IRL I know one mom to a three year old and the mom has had three live in boyfriends - the child felt abandoned already by the father and now she faces further abandonment when each boyfriend leaves.  I also have a friend my age who was sexually violated by a live in boyfriend her mom had when she was young.  It sucks to have someone else tell you how to live your adult life but there is some merit to it and there *must* be something that made the judge decide to add it to all his orders when he was not doing it before.  He may have good intentions even if it does not feel that way.  But all of that is mute since it's not in your order.


"There are two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; not going all the way and not starting." - Buddha.
LoveOhm is offline  
#14 of 131 Old 11-11-2010, 05:36 AM
 
Ione's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 805
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

It seems to me that judges can pretty much do whatever they want, until they get slapped down for it by a higher court.

 

That being the case, I would do whatever it took to actually be married before setting foot in that judges courtroom again. The financial hit you might take this year if you have to get married before 1/1/11 will probably be less than the cost of appealing a bad (for Owen) judgement. Especially since much of that $$ you can someday recoup indirectly from your ex because he will owe you a lot more... even if it means getting aggressive about his paying you what he owes.

 

Ask your lawyer to be "unavailable" when scheduling the hearing until after 1/1. Between the holidays and the court's schedule, you might be able to get away with just delaying on scheduling until after the fatal date of 1/1/11.

 

In the mean time, has Owen started kindergarden (or even pre-K) yet? Because it seems (from what I gather from various moms I know with kids with autism here and in other states) that many school districts offer the appropriate therapies for free to school-aged kids. Does your local school have a social worker on staff? You could set up an appointment with them to discuss what the school system can offer.

 

Another thing to check. Does your STBDH (soon-to-be-DH)'s insurance through work have open enrollment (i.e. enrollment any time of the year)? Or are there specific times of the year for enrolling? If it's the latter, you might be able to make a case with Medicaid to maintain O's coverage through them after you get married until the next enrollment date. 

 

As for tax returns, did you calculate the financial hit based on 'married filing jointly' or 'married filing separately'? If you only calculated it with the first, re-run the numbers with the second. It might not be as bad of a hit that way.

 

In regard to the grants, not much you can do, I suspect. 

 

All that said, I do have one question: on the $10K you say your family will lose, is that $10K you need to re-pay? Or $10K you just won't get? If it's the latter, it still sucks but isn't quite as bad as the former. 

 

Good luck.

Ione is offline  
#15 of 131 Old 11-11-2010, 06:44 AM - Thread Starter
 
StephandOwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 8,809
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


I have no idea how this new board will work with this so I'm going to try to answer all questions in a different color so it might make sense!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ione View Post

It seems to me that judges can pretty much do whatever they want, until they get slapped down for it by a higher court.

 

That being the case, I would do whatever it took to actually be married before setting foot in that judges courtroom again. The financial hit you might take this year if you have to get married before 1/1/11 will probably be less than the cost of appealing a bad (for Owen) judgement. Especially since much of that $$ you can someday recoup indirectly from your ex because he will owe you a lot more... even if it means getting aggressive about his paying you what he owes.

 

Ask your lawyer to be "unavailable" when scheduling the hearing until after 1/1. Between the holidays and the court's schedule, you might be able to get away with just delaying on scheduling until after the fatal date of 1/1/11.

 

Great idea. We will do what it takes to delay being in court. I don't know how it will work, but it can't hurt to try! We might have some leeway with the delaying because we live out of state so it will be a burden to just randomly go up there for court, ya know? I have a feeling ex is going to insist on it being in court before our next visitation date (December 10/11/12). So if I can hold him off for 4 weeks then even if he files after that visitation date it probably won't end up in court before the new year (we can stall/delay until then).

 

In the mean time, has Owen started kindergarden (or even pre-K) yet? Because it seems (from what I gather from various moms I know with kids with autism here and in other states) that many school districts offer the appropriate therapies for free to school-aged kids. Does your local school have a social worker on staff? You could set up an appointment with them to discuss what the school system can offer.

 

He's in 1st grade so he's been in this school for preschool, Kindergarten and now 1st grade. He has been receiving therapy though the school district since he started preschool and it's helping a lot. But they do not offer all the therapy he needs (such as feeding). So ds still needs to receive some outside of the school. Before he started the school he was in 5 hours a week of outside therapy (at $140-190/hour, depending on which therapy it was). Then he went down to 3 hours a week outside the school. Now he's down to 1 hour a week for the moment. His therapist wants to bump him back up to 2 hours a week but we're having trouble fitting it into her schedule. During summer breaks he bumps back up to 3 hours a week of outside therapy.

 

Another thing to check. Does your STBDH (soon-to-be-DH)'s insurance through work have open enrollment (i.e. enrollment any time of the year)? Or are there specific times of the year for enrolling? If it's the latter, you might be able to make a case with Medicaid to maintain O's coverage through them after you get married until the next enrollment date. 

 

They do not have open enrollment. They have once a year enrollment and then you can do another enrollment if you have a "life changing event" (such as getting married). I've talked to the Medicaid office and they don't give a darn. They say that once we're married dp's income counts and ds gets kicked off Medicaid immediately.

 

As for tax returns, did you calculate the financial hit based on 'married filing jointly' or 'married filing separately'? If you only calculated it with the first, re-run the numbers with the second. It might not be as bad of a hit that way.

 

Both ways. Either way we do it, we take a big hit.

 

In regard to the grants, not much you can do, I suspect. 

 

Nope. The only way I can get the grants it to file single. The only way I can file single is if I'm not married on December 31st.

 

All that said, I do have one question: on the $10K you say your family will lose, is that $10K you need to re-pay? Or $10K you just won't get? If it's the latter, it still sucks but isn't quite as bad as the former. 

 

Thankfully it's the latter. It's not money we would have to repay, but we will be in big trouble financially without it. We count on that money to keep us afloat while I'm in school. Without it I don't know what we'll do. I'll have to find a full time job, which will create all sorts of headaches with what to do with ds after school (he can't go in the after school program at his school because the supervision sucks and with his autism he's a runner/wanderer so he'll escape in no time). Most daycares won't take him because of his behavior issues. Obviously if it comes down to it then we'll do whatever is necessary.

 

Good luck.


Steph, DH Jason (1-1-11), DS Owen (10-3-03) and DS Kai (10-13-11)

StephandOwen is offline  
#16 of 131 Old 11-11-2010, 07:26 AM
 
New_Natural_Mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I don't see how your lawyer discreetly telling the judge that you *do* have a wedding date could be a problem.  You booked the tickets (he doesn't know that people aren't invited) but it could be some big elaborate ceremony, what is he going to do?  Tell you to scrap it and get it done faster?  I would explain the reason you didn't get married previously was because you couldn't afford therapy for your DS because ex wasn't doing his court ordered duty.  Throw that right back at the judge. 


goorganic.jpgwife to footinmouth.gif, currently WOH and geek.gif on my doctorate. (I'm dissertating!) We: novaxnocirc.giftoddler.gifgd.giffamilybed1.gif  with DS (4/09)!
New_Natural_Mom is offline  
#17 of 131 Old 11-11-2010, 08:55 AM
 
GranoLLLy-girl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,150
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Good grief...this new board...OK, from what I know in Virginia--it has to be in the court order...my lawyer originally said to add it in to ours...but I didn't do it because I thought, what if a friend is traveling from somewhere and comes to see us...it would be on the off chance...but still.  I'll be curious to hear what else you find out.

GranoLLLy-girl is offline  
#18 of 131 Old 11-11-2010, 08:56 AM
 
GranoLLLy-girl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,150
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Cool...where did the peace sign come from?  Very me...who knew.

GranoLLLy-girl is offline  
#19 of 131 Old 11-11-2010, 10:03 AM
 
AllyRae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,391
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

How does the $10K balance out if you factor in the higher child support and more of the co-pays being paid that you'll get once you get that re-evaluated?  Does it even out enough to make a courthouse wedding worth it if necessary?


~Brandon Michael (11/23/03), Jocelyn Lily Nữ (2/4/07, adopted 5/28/07 from Vietnam), Amelia Rylie (1/14/09), & Ryland Josef William (9/7/05-9/7/05 @ 41 wks). 
AllyRae is offline  
#20 of 131 Old 11-11-2010, 12:33 PM - Thread Starter
 
StephandOwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 8,809
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by AllyRae View Post

How does the $10K balance out if you factor in the higher child support and more of the co-pays being paid that you'll get once you get that re-evaluated?  Does it even out enough to make a courthouse wedding worth it if necessary?



It doesn't come close to balancing it out. In order to re-coup $10,000 next year his child support would have to increase by $833/month. Obviously that isn't going to happen. Or anything close to that. The increase in child support will probably *just* barely cover the increase in health insurance costs. Then for co-pays I'll cover 24% of it and ex will cover 76% of them (well, I'll cover 100% of it and then wait to be reimbursed).


Steph, DH Jason (1-1-11), DS Owen (10-3-03) and DS Kai (10-13-11)

StephandOwen is offline  
#21 of 131 Old 11-11-2010, 02:36 PM
 
meemee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Norther California
Posts: 12,773
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)

ok i am TOTALLY LOST here.

 

how can a judge legally do that?

 

it seems to me an ACLU issue - if you want to go that way.

 

essentially it is saying all single divorced parents HAVE TO BE married. they cant live together. common law cant apply to them.

 

that is taking away our first amendment isnt it.

 

i have to say i am surprised. this was a judge whose known you since a little girl hasnt he? ah but then you are a bad girl. liing in sin winky.gif

 

unfortunately it means MORE bullshit for you.

 

have you booked your flight or hotel to show you are going to get married at VI in jan.

 

any emails that you can print out with headers.

 

i hope you can stall the case till next year.


 treehugger.gif Co-parent, joy.gifcold.gifbrand new homeschooling middle schoolerjoy.gif, and an attackcat.gif 
meemee is offline  
#22 of 131 Old 11-11-2010, 02:52 PM
 
GoBecGo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,596
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Ok.  I was a single mama, i am now a co-habiting parent with a blended family (one DD with XP, one with my now-partner who i refer to, for confusing reasons, as DH but to whom i am NOT married and NOT intending to marry).  I am actually opposed to marriage (for me, i don't care what anyone else does) and i am STAGGERED that a judge could tell me i have to get married.  Staggered.  Surely that isn't something a judge can rule?

GoBecGo is offline  
#23 of 131 Old 11-11-2010, 04:51 PM
 
VocalMinority's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: surrounded by testosterone
Posts: 1,303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

#1, That sounds really surprising!  Indiana's a pretty conservative state, but 13 years ago when my ex and I agreed and put in writing that neither of us would have boyfriends/girlfriends spend the night when the kids were with us, attorneys scoffed at how ridiculous and unenforceable that was.  "No judge would ever presume to get that involved in your love life!"  And later, when he only became interested in having overnight visits AFTER he started shacking up with a girl I *knew* he wasn't serious about (i.e., she wasn't going to be a lasting part of our kids' lives), I COULD NOT FIND an attorney willing to stand in front of a judge and make the argument that my ex and I should stick to our agreement...an agreement HE drafted and signed. 

 

#2, If the judge really does give you problems, get prepared to appeal.  I can't imagine that any sanctions he would give you could stand up to an appeal, especially since his pet clause isn't even in your orders.  Besides, the spirit of the judge's approach is that it's better for kids not to form attachments that FEEL like family, with people who aren't going to stick around.  But if you and your partner have already stuck together for 3 years and are only a couple months from your wedding, obviously he's not some guy they're going to start calling "Daddy Joe", only to have him disappear from their lives by spring!!!  I mean, there's moralizing and then there's just silliness.

 

#3, What kind of society have we created, when there's a financial DISadvantage to you marrying the man you love, live with and are raising children with???


One woman in a house full of men:  my soul mate:    or... twin sons:(HS seniors) ... step-son:  (a sophomore) ... our little man:   (a first grader) ... and there is another female in the house, after all:  our
VocalMinority is online now  
#24 of 131 Old 11-11-2010, 05:49 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cover letter he!!
Posts: 6,548
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

TOTALLY off topic, but GoBecGo - PLEASE tell me thats your placenta!  It totally freaked me out for a minute until I figured out what it was!!!

Super~Single~Mama is offline  
#25 of 131 Old 11-12-2010, 03:50 AM
 
GoBecGo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,596
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

LOL, yes, it's my placenta (or DD2's..?).  It was heart-shaped, with a velamentous and marginal insertion and a true knot in the cord, and we had an uneventful 55minute first stage with 6mins of pushing and a 20min 3rd stage, apgars 10, 10, 10 at HOME.  I like looking at it because so many doctors i know freak out at ONE of those "complications" as a possibility and i had 2 of them cited as "dead baby" cards when i was PG with DD1, yet we had a bunch and everything was fine.

GoBecGo is offline  
#26 of 131 Old 11-12-2010, 05:43 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cover letter he!!
Posts: 6,548
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Wow!  I'm so glad everything went so smoothly!!  I wish I could see the picture a little bigger so that I could pick all that out (I can tell its heart shaped, but nothing else)!

 

Placenta's are pretty cool, it just took me a second to figure out what that was!

 

Sorry Steph for thread-jacking!  orngtongue.gif

Super~Single~Mama is offline  
#27 of 131 Old 11-12-2010, 05:37 PM - Thread Starter
 
StephandOwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 8,809
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Super~Single~Mama View Post

Sorry Steph for thread-jacking!  orngtongue.gif


LOL! No problem ;)

 

I don't want to start a new thread just for this but holy crap I am so frustrated! So I called ex on Thursday morning and he ignored both his cell and home phone (guess it's a good thing it wasn't an emergency?). Then Thursday night he called ds. During his call ds had to go pee so threw the phone at me. I picked it up and explained to ex that ds was peeing and would be back in a minute. I asked (very politely... y'all would be proud of me!) if he had seen that I called. He said yes, but he didn't want to call me back until it was time to call ds. Okaaaay. So I asked if I could call him back after ds was in bed so we could discuss some stuff. He told me "I'm busy with the baby tonight. I'll send you a text tomorrow morning letting you know when I can talk". So this morning comes and I didn't hear from him at all. Then tonight I got a text from him. I don't know if I can post the exact message (mods.... can I?) but the basics of it is he doesn't want to talk to me unless there's an emergency with ds. And if there's an emergency with ds he'll be willing to talk to me Sunday afternoon. WTF?!? So not only is he unwilling to even talk to me about parenting issues, but we have to schedule emergencies? So if we were in a car accident tonight I'm "not allowed" to contact him until Sunday afternoon??

 

Seriously. That blows my mind. And it's in text form so the Judge can clearly see it. If the Judge wasn't pissed about the marriage thing I would be sooo going after sole custody right now. He just proved he doesn't want to even talk to me about anything that's related to his joint legal custody (school, medical, religious). DS has an ARC meeting Tuesday (for his annual review for school). This is where we make all his goals for the next year and decide what services he'll receive. It's a pretty big deal! I had actually planned on talking to ex about that and getting his input (since he's claiming he wants to be involved with ds's life I figured that would be a good way to start). I was going to see if he wanted to be able to call into the meeting (it's at a time where he wouldn't be working so there's no reason he can't call in and contribute). But..... it's not an emergency so I'm "not allowed" to contact him about it.

 

And yet he wants to co-parent?!?

 

ARGH!


Steph, DH Jason (1-1-11), DS Owen (10-3-03) and DS Kai (10-13-11)

StephandOwen is offline  
#28 of 131 Old 11-12-2010, 06:15 PM
 
doubledutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
what a ... um ... (sigh) well you know. hmm. what a matt thing to say/do. it's not like you call him all the time for stupid crap or bug him with details of your personal life. at least you have the text.
doubledutch is offline  
#29 of 131 Old 11-13-2010, 10:18 AM
 
smeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,812
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)

Matt is completely nuts, IMO. But we already knew that, heh. I agree with PPs about postponing as much as possible and getting proof (tickets, etc.) that the wedding IS set for 1/1/11.

 

Just a question, though... I know your plan is to basically overwhelm him with financial responsibilities to the point that he hopefully just signs over his rights and Jason (O's REAL dad as far as O and I'm pretty sure everyone else is concerned!) can adopt Owen. But I was just wondering....if he were to sign over his rights, would that include you waiving the back money he's already racked up to that point? I'm *thinking* that signing over rights doesn't always automatically mean that, but I could be wrong. And, if he normally would still owe everything up to that point, would you be willing to offer waiving it in order to get him to sign over his rights? This is really just my own curiosity, so don't mind me. :)


- Emy . Single mom to DS nut.gif Ezra (15.12.05), angel2.gif Thames (reincarnated 18.04.08) and DD rainbow1284.gif babyf.gif Allora (11.02.11) and dog2.gif Hoppylactivist.gif  novaxnocirc.gif  waterbirth.jpg fambedsingle2.gif bfinfant.giffemalesling.GIFcd.gif

smeep is offline  
#30 of 131 Old 11-13-2010, 10:56 AM
 
cycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,195
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I am sure he has been advised to keep communications with you to writing, which you should be doing too.  I would not be communicating anything to him verbally because it ends up being your word against his.  You should be emailing or texting him about anything related to O, that way you have proof  that you let him know.  If you don't he will just deny that you ever told him of meetings, appointments, etc. 

cycle is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off