Annoy the anti-gay... - Page 2 - Mothering Forums

Thread Tools
#31 of 33 Old 01-08-2004, 12:03 PM
Arduinna's Avatar
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Listening to William Control
Posts: 31,346
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)

it was so nice to have this be the first thread I read this morning when I came online. you guys don't know how much it all means to me.
Arduinna is offline  
Sponsored Links
#32 of 33 Old 01-12-2004, 11:56 AM
DebraBaker's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 4,995
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My BIL and SIL emailed me that petition and I signed it (the other way ) I didn't say anything to the inlaws, though (someday but not now)

That was a few months ago, however.

Here are my thoughts about rights and people giving you rights.

You (everyone, editorial you) have certain inherent rights regardless of the opinions of others.

'problem is when someone is a minority they are at the mercy of what the majority is willing to give.

I think a culture can be measured by how much the majority (or people in power) acknowledge about the inherent rights of minorities.

And, yes, the Bible says to love (your neighbor, your enemies, 'sinners') so, unless the Fundies are secretly having gay feelings, they should be focusing on their duty to be kind and loving instead of pointing out what part of the bibe others should be focused on.

This always gets me.

Debra Baker
DebraBaker is offline  
#33 of 33 Old 01-12-2004, 01:53 PM
chfriend's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: in a red state
Posts: 4,560
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hi Debra,

You know I've spent my life saying "It's all about how you (we) treat babies and old people." I think it's fair to judge groups on that basis.

Your broader way of looking at it is clearly more accurate. I wonder often why it's not in everyone's interest for dp to be obligated to care for our child as she would if the state allows us to marry. Or dp and I to be obligated to provide each other's necessities and pay each other's debts.

(While I believe it would be immoral, and therefore don't,) I could apply for financial aid for school or other benefits for my child on my salary alone, even though we live on both salaries. Nepotism rules have had to be expanded to include domestic partnerships even when benefits are not.

Rights and responsiblities go hand in hand. I have the moral responsibilities...I wish I had the legal rights to go with them.
I keep wondering what interest this serves for the majority?
chfriend is offline  

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Online Users: 16,375

26 members and 16,349 guests
afinemess , blessedwithboys , cfaokunla , debigebi , Deborah , emmy526 , girlspn , greenemami , hillymum , iryna.prokh , Janeen0225 , katelove , Lydia08 , MeanVeggie , Michele123 , moominmamma , Moringa , MylittleTiger , NaturallyKait , Nazsmum , oshenalchem , sarrahlnorris , sciencemum , zoeyzoo
Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.