Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in la la land, or so they say...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Originally Posted by pp
Also your quote states that those children WERE NOT appropriately vaccinated. So why would that be an argument *against* the vaccine?
|Of the 10,650 children 3 months to 4 years of age with
reported pertussis during 1990–1996 and known vaccination
status, 54% were not age-appropriately vaccinated with DTaP." So, approx 50% of cases were in children fully vaccinated. With such low efficacy, we decided any benefit of the vaccine was not worth the risk.
|33 members and 8,383 guests|
|Azik's mom , bluefaery , cocoheart , elliha , ezrapie , fayebond , happyhats , Jolanda , katelove , lerlisha , Lifted , LiLStar , Marikireifs , metafisica , Milk8shake , Mommiee2010 , primalmom , prosciencemum , rainydaywoman , RollerCoasterMama , SandiMae , sarafl , shantimama , Snydley , sofreshsoclean , Springshowers , SummerStorm22 , swede , zebra15|
|Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.|