Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in la la land, or so they say...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Originally Posted by pp
Also your quote states that those children WERE NOT appropriately vaccinated. So why would that be an argument *against* the vaccine?
|Of the 10,650 children 3 months to 4 years of age with
reported pertussis during 1990–1996 and known vaccination
status, 54% were not age-appropriately vaccinated with DTaP." So, approx 50% of cases were in children fully vaccinated. With such low efficacy, we decided any benefit of the vaccine was not worth the risk.
|23 members and 14,819 guests|
|amccutcheon31 , anisaer , bdmaidul , Choochoo52812 , cxsandoval , Dave RW , Geozxc , girlspn , hillymum , katelove , Katherine73 , LouiseCD , manyhatsmom , Mirzam , moominmamma , oaksie68 , SchoolmarmDE , sciencemum , Springshowers , sren|
|Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.|