Ergo vs. Chicco aluminum frame backpack - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-05-2012, 01:13 PM - Thread Starter
 
andromedajulie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delaware Valley, PA
Posts: 164
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Hi Mamas,

 

DD is 20 mo old and 25+ lbs and counting. This time around, I'm older, and it feels harder to wear baby much longer! I've been using the Ergo, wearing baby on my back now. I am wondering if a frame backpack has any advantages - does it sit baby differently and/or make the weight feel easier? I love to hike but haven't been doing as much with my almost 2 yr old. She likes to walk, but that's a different type of hike! :) A friend is selling her Chicco frame backpack so I wondered if it might be a better option. Any thoughts or recommendations would be appreciated.

andromedajulie is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-05-2012, 06:04 PM
 
jocelyndale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 3,546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

A wrap or SSC will keep your child much closer to your center of gravity.  I find dayhiking easier with the Ergo than with our Deuter framepack.

 

That said, I like the Deuter when I need to schlep extra gear, want a water reservoir, or when it's just too hot to have extra body warmth right on top of me.  Kiddo can see forward more easily, too, as he's up higher and set back from me.  A framepack adds weight and a bit of energy expended in maintaining balance.  I hike with poles whether using the framepack or the Ergo.


Chasing DS since April 2007 and pumping for DD March 2013.

jocelyndale is offline  
 

Tags
Babywearing
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off