Parents Magazine slams breast milk donation & says to formula feed instead - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 24 Old 04-15-2009, 10:50 PM - Thread Starter
 
UberMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,534
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A friend posted this elsewhere and I felt it important to post on MDC.

---

This month's Parents magazine includes a Q&A section that basically slams breast milk donation, deeming it dangerous, even when the milk is from a known donor! I want to encourage everyone who disagrees to call, write, or e-mail Parents magazine. You can e-mail your thoughts/comments to support@parents.com

I have several arguments against their answer in the Q&A section. They recommend formula as a better alternative than donated breast milk. Why is this? Seems a little suspicious that formula manufacturers make up a large chunk of Parenting magazines' advertisement revenue: $$$. Also, they argue that even breast milk from screened donors may contain "harmful bacteria and viruses." Instead of offering up the idea of home pasteurization for milk recipients concerned about this, Parents magazine skips ahead to...recommend formula, of course. (No mention of the recent studies of dangerous contaminants being found in baby formula...)

I am disappointed that they didn't suggest 1.) having one's milk donor screened for communicable diseases, 2.) home pasteurization as an option for those worried about it, 3.) milk donation and wet/cross nursing as a healthy and beneficial practice. While not mainstream in the American culture, wet nursing and cross nursing have historical roots and are still practiced today - in other countries, as well as America.

Anyway, Parents mag will be getting a nice steamed-up letter from me, and I'm debating on canceling my subscription to prove my point. (At the very least, I won't be renewing it!)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is the excerpt:

The question: "Is it safe to borrow pumped breast milk from my sister if I'm having trouble producing it?"

And, their answer:

Quote:
"Although you have seen the video of Salma Hayek breastfeeding a hungry baby in Africa (and we give her high marks for good intentions), the truth is that the risks of sharing human breast milk outweigh the possible benefits for healthy babies. Breast milk can carry diseases such a hepatitis B, HIV, and tuberculosis. (Milk from milk banks - used mostly for preemies- is pasteurized.) Even if you know that your sister is perfectly healthy, her milk could contain bacteria and viruses that are harmless to her baby because he shares her immunity, but are not as safe for yours. Your child wouldn't necessarily have the antibodies to protect her against those illnesses, and preterm babies are especially vulnerable, explains Parents adviser Jane Morton, MD., a clinical professor of pediatrics at Stanford University School of Medicine.

Your best bet is to see a lactation consultant about ways to increase your supply, or you might try supplementing your milk with infant formula."
UberMama is offline  
#2 of 24 Old 04-15-2009, 11:17 PM
 
jimblejamble's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central California
Posts: 2,864
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Harmful bacteria huh? What about formula with melamine in it?

Babies getting sick from disease-carrying breastmilk is only bad for babies receiving donations of breastmilk from other people? What about the woman's biological child who consumes the same woman's breastmilk?

I was just reading some articles on Parents' website the other day and thought to myself, "I'm glad I don't subscribe to this magazine". Now I'm REALLY glad!!!

Formerly known as "JessicaRenee".  hang.gif  Single mama to Jude (Sept '09)!  biggrinbounce.gif

jimblejamble is offline  
#3 of 24 Old 04-16-2009, 12:10 AM
 
Meredith&Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't think their statement is all that far out there- even LLL officially discourages cross-nursing and milk sharing. Their official policy statement reads: "A Leader shall not ever suggest an informal milk-donation arrangement, including wet-nursing or cross-nursing. If a mother wishes to discuss these options, the Leader’s role is to provide information about the risks and benefits so that the mother can make her own informed decision based on her situation."

http://www.llli.org/llleaderweb/LV/LVJulAug95p53.html

That article from Leaven addresses many issues with wet nursing and cross nursing, including infection, but also milk composition and bonding isues.

None of this has kept me from donating milk privately and nursing babies who needed it whether or not they were mine, but it's not as reflective of the formula company's influence as you might think.
Meredith&Alexander is offline  
#4 of 24 Old 04-16-2009, 12:14 AM
 
bignerpie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Harpers Ferry, WV
Posts: 418
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
But don't the antibodies come from the breastmilk? Isn't that how "her baby" shares "her" immunity?

Apparently this woman has never read the WHO guidelines that breastmilk from another mother is recommended instead of infant formula.

ribboncesarean.gif 2/4/2009.  hbac.gif 9/6/2011!

bignerpie is offline  
#5 of 24 Old 04-16-2009, 12:47 AM
 
BugMacGee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,548
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Lame. Lame lame lame.
BugMacGee is offline  
#6 of 24 Old 04-16-2009, 12:49 AM
 
gcgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I personally think cross-nursing and wet nursing is normal for humans. I don't get the alarm bells ringing over it.
gcgirl is offline  
#7 of 24 Old 04-16-2009, 11:25 AM
 
MaryJaneLouise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toddler Heater Blanket
Posts: 3,252
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Just another symptom of boob-phobia.

Twin boys 04/2005 : Support breastfeeding rights at FirstRight.Org : warrior
Face the rear for MORE than a year! Toddlers' necks are safest in a rear facing carseat
MaryJaneLouise is offline  
#8 of 24 Old 04-16-2009, 06:23 PM
 
JudiAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Where creepy facebook-featured threads can't find me
Posts: 3,616
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
I have never heard of that WHO recommendation. Do you have a link?
JudiAU is offline  
#9 of 24 Old 04-17-2009, 03:54 PM
 
bignerpie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Harpers Ferry, WV
Posts: 418
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
This is the commonly used quote:

According to the World Health Organization, artificial formula is considered the fourth choice for infant feeding. First choice is a mother breastfeeding her own baby, next is expressed breast milk from an infant’s own mother, then breast milk from a healthy wet-nurse or a human-milk bank. Last is a breast milk substitute.

Here is the best I could find from WHO directly:

http://www.who.int/nutrition/publica.../en/index.html

"18. The vast majority of mothers can and should breastfeed, just as the vast majority of infants can
and should be breastfed. Only under exceptional circumstances can a mother’s milk be considered
unsuitable for her infant. For those few health situations where infants cannot, or should not, be
breastfed, the choice of the best alternative – expressed breast milk from an infant’s own mother,
breast milk from a healthy wet-nurse or a human-milk bank, or a breast-milk substitute fed with a cup,
which is a safer method than a feeding bottle and teat – depends on individual circumstances."

ribboncesarean.gif 2/4/2009.  hbac.gif 9/6/2011!

bignerpie is offline  
#10 of 24 Old 04-17-2009, 04:12 PM
 
farmers_wife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 44
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Oh Lordy I bet stock up on formula then because I am almost 24 weeks pregnant with triplets and I plan to nurse AND let my sister supplement me with her breastmilk (I am still nursing my youngest who is 2 and I don't want to get a milk shortage once my next three arrive) Golly gee, which formula to buy? Maybe I should get the one with the most ads in Parents (just kidding by the way!)
farmers_wife is offline  
#11 of 24 Old 04-18-2009, 12:10 AM
 
leosmommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 333
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
.
leosmommy is offline  
#12 of 24 Old 04-18-2009, 02:27 AM
 
PhoenixMommaToTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Formerly of AZ, now in Nebraska
Posts: 320
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My SIL just read this article to me over the phone. She's supposedly very pro-bf'ing but because of this article has changed her mind about wet nurses and all that. Totally frustrating. I stopped getting Parenting magazine because of their advice and articles. I got to the point where I was yelling at the magazine .

"We submit to the majority because we have to. But we are not compelled to call our attitude of subjection a posture of respect."
Ambrose Bierce 
PhoenixMommaToTwo is offline  
#13 of 24 Old 04-18-2009, 03:59 AM
 
homewithtwinsmama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I just sent my letter with my experience of my friend's donation of her recently deceased son's pumped breastmilk to my own preemie baby before my delayed milk supply came in.
homewithtwinsmama is offline  
#14 of 24 Old 04-18-2009, 04:03 AM
 
Ruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: A big city in a big state
Posts: 453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I hate Parenting Magazine. I throw it away whenever I see it in a stack of magazines.

Many years ago, I nursed a five-day-old foster baby who was with us for only 10 days.
Ruth is offline  
#15 of 24 Old 04-18-2009, 09:24 PM
 
Sanveann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 368
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I believe the OP said it was in Parents magazine, not Parenting. (Parenting is the one that has Dr. Sears on staff, isn't it?)
Sanveann is offline  
#16 of 24 Old 04-18-2009, 10:50 PM
 
filiadeluna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I saw this, and it made me : . Thankfully my subscription was a FREE one that I got when I purchased a Boppy. I do not plan on renewing once it's up, but I figured there would be an *occasional* useful article in there. Plus, I use magazines for scrapbooking.

-
filiadeluna is offline  
#17 of 24 Old 04-19-2009, 07:26 PM
 
Ruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: A big city in a big state
Posts: 453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanveann View Post
I believe the OP said it was in Parents magazine, not Parenting. (Parenting is the one that has Dr. Sears on staff, isn't it?)
I like Dr. Sears, didn't know he was related to Parenting. I still think Mothering is the best magazine in the world (and now I like American Girl - which I first hear about here years ago!). I have been known to buy a year's worth of old Mothering magazines and give them to family members when they have a new baby.
Ruth is offline  
#18 of 24 Old 04-19-2009, 10:41 PM
 
Samhain Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Where the windhorses dance.
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth View Post
Many years ago, I nursed a five-day-old foster baby who was with us for only 10 days.
Samhain Hunter is offline  
#19 of 24 Old 04-19-2009, 10:54 PM
 
claddaghmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,074
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanveann View Post
I believe the OP said it was in Parents magazine, not Parenting. (Parenting is the one that has Dr. Sears on staff, isn't it?)
That would be a shame if true. Parenting is worthless too.

Mama to expecting Babe 2
claddaghmom is offline  
#20 of 24 Old 04-19-2009, 10:59 PM
 
MovingMomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 2,340
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Did you catch the little Q&A on how to breastfeed in public (A: as discreetly as humanly possible) in the same issue?

-Shannon, momma to H reading.gif 8/03, N heartbeat.gif 9/06, & P homebirth.jpg 8/11, missing S brokenheart.gif born at 11 wks 1/09 

 


 
   

MovingMomma is offline  
#21 of 24 Old 04-20-2009, 12:02 AM - Thread Starter
 
UberMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,534
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingMomma View Post
Did you catch the little Q&A on how to breastfeed in public (A: as discreetly as humanly possible) in the same issue?
*vomit* As soon as my friend told me about this, I recycled the issue I got in the mail. (Free subscription, I'd never pay for this, lol)
UberMama is offline  
#22 of 24 Old 04-20-2009, 07:40 AM
 
filiadeluna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingMomma View Post
Did you catch the little Q&A on how to breastfeed in public (A: as discreetly as humanly possible) in the same issue?
Yeah, that one REALLY pissed me off. Being discreet is a personal choice, not a requirement (in most states anyway). For them to strongly suggest that breastfeeding should be hidden regardless of the mother's feelings and state law is ludicrous.

-
filiadeluna is offline  
#23 of 24 Old 06-10-2009, 03:27 PM
 
withHisgrace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think the LLL has been misrepresented on their position on donated milk and cross-nursing, etc.

http://www.llli.org/llleaderweb/LV/LVJulAug95p53.html

"The Leader shall inform any mother interested in using donated human milk for her baby, whether on an occasional or on a long term basis, of the documented risks and benefits connected with this form of infant feeding."

It looks to me like they're just covering their butts to avoid any accusations of influencing/forcing a woman to donate milk or use donated milk, or backlash from someone if something were to happen, unfortunately, when cross-nursing.

I believe in informed consent, and think it's best that they provide information about cross-nursing and wet nursing, including the dangers. I don't believe LLL would benefit from misrepresenting the facts... I'm sure if it was safer, they would be all over endorsing it as opposed to formula! They present the dangers, and recommend that

"If a mother asks about cross nursing, a Leader can suggest that a substitute nursing mother needs to be screened carefully using the following criteria:

* She should be healthy, well-nourished and taking no medication. Ideally, she has an infant about the same age as the one she would be cross nursing.
* She should be screened for tuberculosis, syphilis, hepatitis-associated antigen, cytomegalovirus, herpes virus, HIV and other infectious agents.
* She should not smoke, drink alcohol, or consume large amounts of caffeinated or artificially sweetened beverages.
* Her own infant should be healthy, gaining well and free of all infections."

It is very clear in the guidelines that they are to facilitate women who approach them about these options, and it is good that they offer the facts but at the same time respect the mothers' decisions and offer support if they make that choice, it being an informed decision.
withHisgrace is offline  
#24 of 24 Old 06-10-2009, 04:46 PM
 
MovingMomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 2,340
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by withHisgrace View Post
I think the LLL has been misrepresented on their position on donated milk and cross-nursing, etc.

It is very clear in the guidelines that they are to facilitate women who approach them about these options, and it is good that they offer the facts but at the same time respect the mothers' decisions and offer support if they make that choice, it being an informed decision.
Yup. LLL neither encourages nor discourages these practices. LLL is all about giving mothers information and empowering them to make their own decisions.

-Shannon, momma to H reading.gif 8/03, N heartbeat.gif 9/06, & P homebirth.jpg 8/11, missing S brokenheart.gif born at 11 wks 1/09 

 


 
   

MovingMomma is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off