New study suggests parents feed breastfed newborns a bottle a day of formula to prevent allergies? For real? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 19 Old 07-15-2010, 06:49 PM - Thread Starter
 
WTHamI?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Um...let me look out the window...
Posts: 374
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0714162145.htm

Really interested in what others have to say about this. I find it interesting that they note that if parents don't introduce formula in the first 2 weeks of life that they should wait until a year. But instead of recommending waiting until a year, he recommends starting at birth.

Full-time RVing wifey, TTC #1 and working towards living debt-free!
WTHamI? is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 of 19 Old 07-15-2010, 07:02 PM
 
fruitfulmomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Between the Rockies and a Flat Place
Posts: 4,197
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Quote:
and possibly for the World Health Organization, which currently recommends that a woman switch from breast to bottle at the three-to-five month period.
??? What is he talking about? The WHO recommends bf'ing for at least two years.
fruitfulmomma is online now  
#3 of 19 Old 07-15-2010, 07:19 PM
 
KempsMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Central Minnesota
Posts: 843
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My guess is he's twisting the WHO's recommendations on the best time to introduce bottles of expressed breastmilk when necessary.

Heathyr hang.gifBlessed Catholic Wife to DHwheelchair.gif Devoted Mama to DS1 biglaugh.gif(3/17/08) and DS2blowkiss.gif (8/5/2010)familybed1.gifcd.giflactivist.gifribboncesarean.gifx2 
KempsMama is offline  
#4 of 19 Old 07-15-2010, 07:32 PM
 
balancedmama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 999
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
He did disclose his funding from the India Dairy Board

SugarMama to Chatterbox Zoe (almost 4) and Locomotive Miles (2)
balancedmama is offline  
#5 of 19 Old 07-15-2010, 07:49 PM
 
Theoretica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Inside my head (it's quiet here!)
Posts: 3,663
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
There's nowhere to contact him, anyone have an email? I went to the Tel Aviv main site and still didn't find anything for commenting or contacting. His WHO info is WAY off.

GOOD moms let their kids lick the beaters. GREAT moms turn off the mixer first!
Humanist Woman Wife , & Friend Plus Mama to 6 (3 mos, 2, 9, 13, 17, 20)
Theoretica is offline  
#6 of 19 Old 07-15-2010, 08:11 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lost in a good book (in San Diego)
Posts: 4,729
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Here ya go, debunking of that study...
http://www.amotherinisrael.com/does-...age-allergies/

Dairy sponsorship of the study is just the beginning of the faults here.
St. Margaret is offline  
#7 of 19 Old 07-16-2010, 01:56 AM
 
PatioGardener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,993
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
nak

a more balanced news report here:

http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2010/...ure-study.html

i have many issues with the methods of the study - will post when not nak'ing!
PatioGardener is offline  
#8 of 19 Old 07-16-2010, 02:16 AM
 
spughy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 5,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think it's possible that there is some mechanism for early exposure to foreign proteins to be protective against subsequent exposure at a later, more vulnerable stage. Whether the relative degree of protection, weighed against the known risks of formula (expecially the powdered, non-sterile formula likely to be used), is significant, or useful, remains to be seen. Whether the results of this study can be successfully replicated to a more genetically diverse population remains to be seen. Whether extremely early exposure to foreign proteins has any effect on childhood, as opposed to infancy, instances of allergy, remains to be seen.

It's unfortunate that this is being spun as a potential knock against breastfeeding; despite the dairy industry funding it's an interesting notion. Many cultures DO insist on very early exposure to different foods and substances besides breastmilk, is it possible that there is a grain of scientific rationale behind these practices?

Postpartum doula & certified breastfeeding educator, mama to an amazing girl (11/05) and a wee little boy (3/13).

spughy is offline  
#9 of 19 Old 07-16-2010, 10:18 AM
 
Raine822's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 140
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It is very possible that there is some truth to it. However, as stated in the rebuttal article milk allergies are rare and often not severe(not saying that they can't be). Introducing formula that early can lead to supply issues as BM is supply and demand. And, of course, this is one study while there have been many on the multiple benefits of BF.

IMO this study is a fear-mongering tactic. It is playing on parents fears of a severe allergy by providing misleading information( incorrectly stating the WHO recommendation, making milk allergies sound more common and worse than they actually are). The fact that it is funded by a company that would profit from the increased sale of milk products makes it even more unreliable.

I am probably being a conspiracy theorist here but I beleive this is just another way for a company to scare parents into spending money on a product they otherwise would not. I see no issue if a fully informed person decides it would be beneficial but without all the information being correct this type of thing could lead someone to follow this advice when they otherwise would not have(and possibly regret it later).
Raine822 is offline  
#10 of 19 Old 07-16-2010, 10:36 AM
 
KempsMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Central Minnesota
Posts: 843
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm no expert-but wouldn't an EBF babe be exposed to milk protein through his mother's milk? Assuming she consumed dairy products.

Heathyr hang.gifBlessed Catholic Wife to DHwheelchair.gif Devoted Mama to DS1 biglaugh.gif(3/17/08) and DS2blowkiss.gif (8/5/2010)familybed1.gifcd.giflactivist.gifribboncesarean.gifx2 
KempsMama is offline  
#11 of 19 Old 07-16-2010, 10:39 AM
 
AllyRae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,192
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Whaaa??? All of my children have had formula (my 2 that breastfed had it through an SNS due to severe low supply), and all of them have multiple food allergies. INCLUDING allergies to dairy/milk protein.

It just doesn't make sense...haven't allergies skyrocketed in the past year? And formula use has gone up too?

~Brandon Michael (11/23/03), Jocelyn Lily Nữ (2/4/07, adopted 5/28/07 from Vietnam), Amelia Rylie (1/14/09), & Ryland Josef William (9/7/05-9/7/05 @ 41 wks). 
AllyRae is offline  
#12 of 19 Old 07-16-2010, 11:28 AM
 
crunchy_mommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KempsMama View Post
I'm no expert-but wouldn't an EBF babe be exposed to milk protein through his mother's milk? Assuming she consumed dairy products.


Plus they threw out all the infants who were exclusively formula-fed! And many people I know who formula-fed from birth ended up having kids with milk allergies...

I don't think this was a well-done study, based on what I've read so far. I'm sure a "vaccination-effect" is theoretically possible (i.e. the peanut allergy 'cure' which works on a similar principle of small exposures) but I don't think the results of this study prove anything except that the dairy industry wants everyone to drink milk. Then again, I'm in the "humans shouldn't drink cow's milk" camp so I am admittedly quite biased...

Co-sleeping is really wonderful when your child actually SLEEPS!! familybed1.gif
crunchy_mommy is offline  
#13 of 19 Old 07-16-2010, 11:39 AM
 
kittywitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Room of Requirement
Posts: 13,061
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Three of my kids had milk allergies. One went to formula (not non-dairy-that wasn't covered for me to buy and couldn't afford it) for supply and dairy issues. He still has continuing dairy issues.

My two girls I ebf dairy free as soon as I caught whiff of the allergy. Theirs went away by 2 years old even though they were originally severe. I know dozens of people who formula fed who have kids with dairy allergies. This study is a load of horse manure.

AP Mom to 5 knit.gifhomeschool.giftoddler.gif
 
  

kittywitty is offline  
#14 of 19 Old 07-17-2010, 04:07 PM
 
blessedwithboys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
From www.aaaai.org:

"The findings of this study are not meant to discourage breastfeeding, but rather to encourage early complementary feeding with cow’s milk along with breastfeeding to promote oral tolerance."


Bring back the old MDC
blessedwithboys is online now  
#15 of 19 Old 07-17-2010, 06:52 PM
 
PatioGardener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,993
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by blessedwithboys View Post
From www.aaaai.org:

"The findings of this study are not meant to discourage breastfeeding, but rather to encourage early complementary feeding with cow’s milk along with breastfeeding to promote oral tolerance."

um, yeah, because we really want to base something as important as infant feeding practices on one poorly conducted observational study...
PatioGardener is offline  
#16 of 19 Old 07-23-2010, 04:07 AM
 
WC_hapamama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: California
Posts: 1,604
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I pumped breastmilk for my firstborn child for the first 9 weeks of his life, and supplemented with milk based formula, until my supply crapped out.

By 4 months old, he had developed allergies to milk and soy.

So much for that theory.
WC_hapamama is offline  
#17 of 19 Old 07-25-2010, 03:07 AM
 
shelbean91's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 9,290
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm not a scientist and I don't care to look up study after study to back up my thoughts......

My thoughts on the subject are this: formula has only been around 100 years or so. Food allergies are at an all time high and are much more severe than even a generation ago (anectodal, again, not wanting to look up studies, but I didn't know a *single* person with a life threating food allergy, now there are 3-4 in my daughter's class and more throughout her school). Given that we, as humans, have been around MUCH longer than the past 100 years leads me to believe that EBF is probably sufficient to help prevent these allergies moreso than formula and/or it's something ELSE in our diets that is causing the allergies.

So, nothing scientific, just some logical deduction.

Michelle -mom to Katlyn 4/00 , Jake 3/02, and Seth 5/04
shelbean91 is offline  
#18 of 19 Old 07-26-2010, 08:39 AM
 
Heba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UAE
Posts: 610
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
There are flaws in the study. Here's one very good response to it:
http://www.analyticalarmadillo.blogspot.com/
Heba is offline  
#19 of 19 Old 07-26-2010, 05:00 PM
 
mambera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,297
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by shelbean91 View Post
My thoughts on the subject are this: formula has only been around 100 years or so. Food allergies are at an all time high and are much more severe than even a generation ago (anectodal, again, not wanting to look up studies, but I didn't know a *single* person with a life threating food allergy, now there are 3-4 in my daughter's class and more throughout her school). Given that we, as humans, have been around MUCH longer than the past 100 years leads me to believe that EBF is probably sufficient to help prevent these allergies moreso than formula and/or it's something ELSE in our diets that is causing the allergies.

So, nothing scientific, just some logical deduction.
http://generallordisimo.files.wordpr...al-warming.jpg

Me, DH, DD1 (5/2009) and DD2 (10/2011).
I'm not crunchy. I'm evidence-based.

Vaccines save lives.

mambera is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off