How could a Christian vote Democrat? - Page 3 - Mothering Forums

Thread Tools
#61 of 63 Old 10-18-2004, 07:36 PM
girlndocs's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: discreet, my @ss
Posts: 4,131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Originally Posted by 01txaggie
I give money, time, and stuff to many groups and people who need it more then I do. My point is that I do that and I don't want the Goverment deciding who and why somebody gets it.
Oh, I see. You want to be able to discriminate on your own.
girlndocs is offline  
Sponsored Links
#62 of 63 Old 10-18-2004, 08:34 PM
its_our_family's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: does it really matter?
Posts: 9,117
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Originally Posted by girlndocs
Oh, I see. You want to be able to discriminate on your own.
I agree....

Govt programs, if used for what they are intended for, are to help those down and out. Were we on Medicaid and WIC...yes because we needed it. Are we now? No. Do we qualify? Yes, and for more now. But I don't because I live with my parents who provide food for us.

Use it if you need it, support it when you don't.

I honestly don't see a problem with a govt that provides insurance for children and food for moms and toddlers.

Single Mom to 2 amazing little men. T(7) and B(5)
its_our_family is offline  
#63 of 63 Old 10-22-2004, 06:43 PM
Mommiska's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,434
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I haven't had much time to look around different forums these days, and had given up on having a political discussion with other Christians - i'm sorry I've missed this for so long!

I don't have time to read the whole thread right now, but I just wanted to comment on the idea that the government shouldn't be meeting economic needs, but that individuals/churches should be doing that instead.

Nice idea - but it wouldn't ever work. Someone would always be left out. Either because they didn't fit the 'criteria' established by a particular religious group (i.e., they were gay, it was a single mom with kids by different fathers, etc - in other words, certain people aren't going to 'live up to' other peoples' ideas of morality, and these people are likely to be left out of the 'helping'.

But aside from that (huge) point - you NEED a central body coordinating the help. Sure the government isn't perfect, but it's a heck of a lot better than 1,000 different churches in a given state helping here and there, but no one knowing who had been/hadn't been helped and by how much. Such a charitable system would be open to both blatant abuse (i.e., individuals being 'helped' by 10 different churches) and many, many people falling through the cracks and being helped by no one at all.

People who say that all welfare should be through charitable donations and the government should have no role haven't thought things through.
Mommiska is offline  

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Online Users: 16,175

28 members and 16,147 guests
Beth D , BirthFree , Deborah , girlspn , gizzypeach , greenemami , hillymum , IsaFrench , jamesmorrow , JElaineB , Kelleybug , LeaveHerWild , lhargrave89 , lisak1234 , Lydia08 , manyhatsmom , moominmamma , motherVS , MountainMamaGC , MylittleTiger , piratemere , RollerCoasterMama , Skippy918 , worthy
Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.