Papal Infallibility - Page 2 - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#31 of 43 Old 10-27-2007, 04:49 PM
 
StacyL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Banned - period.
Posts: 3,575
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tradd View Post
Oh, but the 7th Ecumenical Council was important and combated heresy (Iconoclasm). But then, the veneration of icons is not as important in the west as it is in Orthodoxy. "Icons safeguard a full and proper doctrine of the Incarnation." (Bishop Kallistos Ware, The Orthodox Church, p. 33). Since Christ became flesh, he can be portrayed (as well as the Theotokos and the saints). To deny the importance of icons, is to not fully believe in the importance of the Incarnation. As my priest says, it reveals a defective Christology. Rome does have some icons, they're just not venerated as among the Orthodox - I've never seen a Catholic kiss an icon, although they are placed on walls, usually too high for veneration (kissing) that I've seen. You have the Black Madonna, a Byzantine icon of the Theotokos and Christ, much venerated among Catholics of Polish background, known as Our Lady of Czestochowa:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bla...of_Czestochowa

Catholics also have "Our Lady of Perpetual Help," a Byzantine icon original known as the "Theotokos of the Passion" - because the angels are carrying the instruments of the crucifixion that Christ is looking at.
http://www.skete.com/index.cfm?fusea...Category_ID=27

The 7th Council was called in 787 by Empress Irene. When she died, iconoclasm reared its ugly head again under Emperor Leo V the Armenian. When the last iconoclast emperor, Theophilus, died in 842, his widow, the Empress Theodora as regent for her young son (eventually became Emperor Michael III "the Sot"), called a local council in Constantinople to affirm restoration of the icons. The icons were restored on the first Sunday of Great Lent, 843. To this day, the first Sunday of Great Lent in the Orthodox Church is known as the Sunday of Orthodoxy or the Triumph of Orthodoxy, with processions of icons in the churches.


I think you misread my post. I meant "VII" as in, "Vatican II" not "7th."

Carry on!
StacyL is offline  
#32 of 43 Old 10-27-2007, 05:27 PM
 
mamabadger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,840
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CherryBomb View Post
I'm not sure what you mean. The filioque showed up officially as early as 410AD, well before it was added to the Nicene Creed. It was common belief amongst most Christians. Just because it wasn't officially added to the NC until such and such a time doesn't mean God held anything back from us. That's like saying God held back the truth about gravity just because it took an apple bonking someone on the head to make it official.
The Filioque was certainly known of for centuries. So were a lot of ideas which were rejected by the Church as incorrect. There were other versions or mistranslations going around, including "proceeds from the Father through the Son." It seems that some individuals in the early Church may have added the phrase with the intention of contradicting Arianism, which was an understandable motive, but they had no authority to change the Creed. It was spread around a lot in western Europe, but was never accepted in the east or by the majority of bishops or Christians. More to the point, it did not just develop as a new belief, it attempted to replace an established one.

The Filioque was not in the Creed which was agreed upon at the Council of Nicea, or the later Council of Constantinople. The Popes of the time did not use the Filioque. Pope Leo III even had the text of the original (without Filioque) Nicene Creed engraved on two silver tablets, one in Greek and one in Latin, and placed in the wall of St. Peter's Cathedral, along with the statement that anyone who changes the Creed in any way is anathema. That seems conclusive, but I suppose you could argue that Pope Leo was in error.
mamabadger is offline  
#33 of 43 Old 10-27-2007, 05:39 PM - Thread Starter
 
Arduinna's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 32,562
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks mamabadger, that is what my problem is with this.

I still haven't gotten an adequate answer as to how if the pope is infallible that the creed was agreed on without the filioque in the first place. The pope was there when the creed was voted on without the filioque from the beginning.

The concept that the pope would only speak infallibly if the matter was in controversy makes no sense to me. Why would something have to be in controversy to be declared? I totally get that he would only speak infallibly on matters of dogma ( ok I'm sure there is a more accurate word, but I can't think of it at the moment). But the creed was/is foundational belief of the Churches so why would the counsels that voted on the original creed vote something that is wrong?
Arduinna is offline  
#34 of 43 Old 10-27-2007, 05:45 PM
 
Tradd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,160
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arduinna View Post
Thanks mamabadger, that is what my problem is with this.

I still haven't gotten an adequate answer as to how if the pope is infallible that the creed was agreed on without the filioque in the first place. The pope was there when the creed was voted on without the filioque from the beginning.
Also, I believe at each ecumenical council (including the 7th) that the council reaffirmed the original text of the Creed (after the second council which gave us the Creed in the current text used in the Orthodox Churches).

lady.gif
Tradd is offline  
#35 of 43 Old 10-27-2007, 05:45 PM
 
Tradd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,160
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by StacyL View Post


I think you misread my post. I meant "VII" as in, "Vatican II" not "7th."

Carry on!
Sorry - I've seen the shorthand of "V2" but not "VII."!

lady.gif
Tradd is offline  
#36 of 43 Old 10-27-2007, 06:16 PM
 
Tradd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,160
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ledzepplon View Post

The New Advent article I posted in my previous reply says that ecumenical councils can also issue infallible statements, but their infallibility comes through the power of the pope, who convenes such meetings. (See Section III, Part A on Ecumenical Councils.)
When you state that the pope convened ecumenical councils are you talking about the first 7 or more recent ones such as Vatican I & II?

Because if you're talking about the first 7 councils (325-787), the reigning emperor (or empress, for that matter), convened the council. Just off the top of my head, Constantine the Great convened the 1st council in 325, and the Empress Irene called the 7th council in 787.

A good book (from the Orthodox view) is Popes and Patriarchs: An Orthodox Perspective on Roman Catholic Claims. It's published by Conciliar Press. I read it earlier this year, twice and then passed it onto an Orthodox convert friend who is battling with her convert Roman Catholic mother (they all started out as Presbyterian).

About the only book in English to focus on the first 7 councils is The First Seven Ecumenical Councils by Leo Donald Davis (a Jesuit, by the way). I heard a series of podcasts on the 7 councils from an Orthodox parish in TN, and then went in search of the book, as it was mentioned as lot.

lady.gif
Tradd is offline  
#37 of 43 Old 10-27-2007, 06:37 PM
 
mommaduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Land of the Rappin' Buggies
Posts: 1,149
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tradd View Post
To deny the importance of icons, is to not fully believe in the importance of the Incarnation. As my priest says, it reveals a defective Christology.
How so? (sorry, I find this to be a very presumptuous statement...but am curious as to how you/your priest comes to this conclusion)

Orthodox Mama
mommaduck is offline  
#38 of 43 Old 10-28-2007, 12:31 PM
 
ReadingMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the South
Posts: 1,557
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arduinna View Post
If the Pope is infallible then I just find it hard to believe that God held back the info that the holy spirit proceeds from the father and the son for over 1000 years. The creed that includes this is recited at the Divine Liturgy, Mass ect and it's part of the foundational definition of the Trinity. It just doesn't make sense to me that God would hold back the filioque for so many years. Maybe it's one of those things you have to take on faith? If that is the case, I'm not sure how I can do that.
As a convert to Catholicism, I have a hard time with several doctrines and dogmas. I'd like for that not to be the case. Our priest was very helpful in explaining to me the difference between voluntary doubt and involuntary doubt. He said I have involuntary doubt about certain Catholic teachings because I was raised as a Protestant. It's hard to just change beliefs you've had your whole life! (My beliefs mesh most closely with the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, actually.)

Book-lovin', relaxed homeschoolin', dog snugglin' mom of the best kid EVER!  AND...waiting for baby #2, due 5/9/14!  stork-boy.gif

ReadingMama is offline  
#39 of 43 Old 10-28-2007, 05:36 PM - Thread Starter
 
Arduinna's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 32,562
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Oh thanks for that link, that was helpful to me
Arduinna is offline  
#40 of 43 Old 10-29-2007, 01:42 PM
 
CherryBomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 8,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Maybe these links will help?

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06073a.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11049a.htm
http://www.catholic.com/library/filioque.asp
http://www.catholic.com/library/Can_Dogma_Develop.asp
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07790a.htm

Sorry, I know that's a lot!
CherryBomb is offline  
#41 of 43 Old 11-01-2007, 11:27 AM
 
mommaduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Land of the Rappin' Buggies
Posts: 1,149
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tradd View Post
To deny the importance of icons, is to not fully believe in the importance of the Incarnation. As my priest says, it reveals a defective Christology.
I'm still wondering on this. Would you be willing to explain?

Orthodox Mama
mommaduck is offline  
#42 of 43 Old 11-12-2007, 06:53 PM
 
AngelBee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Brighton, MN
Posts: 20,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am struggling SOOOOOO with this issue.

Mama to 9 so far:Mother of Joey (20), Dominick (13), Abigail (11), Angelo (8), Mylee (6), Delainey (3), Colton (2) and Baby 8 and Baby 9 coming sometime in July 2013.   If evolution were true, mothers would have three arms!

AngelBee is offline  
#43 of 43 Old 11-28-2007, 08:50 PM - Thread Starter
 
Arduinna's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 32,562
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I was looking for info on the first Christian communities ( which are lightly touched on in this thread ) and came across this.

bumping now :
Arduinna is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off