Can you lose glandular tissue?? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 5 Old 07-01-2009, 06:21 PM - Thread Starter
 
RunnerDuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,358
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I know people have blamed lack of milk supply on having "insufficient glandular tissue" - and by "blamed" I mean that is the cause, not that they made up some lame excuse because they wanted to use formula.

I had no problems nursing my son. I don't know how my boobs compared size-wize with him when I was done nursing, compared to before I had him... I think they were the same.

I did not make enough milk for my twins.

I recently weaned them both (I have had no PPAF and I am not getting any younger, with PCOS and all I don't feel like I can afford to wait much if I want another...) ... there was no engorgement whatsoever during the first few days without. (With my son I had porn star hooters for a few days)

When I feel them now... I swear I feel like I have less than ever. Less breast tissue, that is. And it's not like I was ever blessed in that area. (I am soooooooooooooooo jealous of moms who can wear shirts that show cleavage... )

I am wondering if I have another, a singleton, if my hopes to exclusively nurse one more baby won't happen? Is it possible I have lose glandular tissue since I had my son??

Seems like you hear of people not having enough milk for one baby, then it works the next time. Doesn't usually work the other way. I don't know if my problem was having two babies or if I am actually losing boobs!

DS T 11/16/03 DDs K & E 3/28/08
nak DS S 4/1/11
RunnerDuck is offline  
#2 of 5 Old 07-01-2009, 06:29 PM
 
Ruthla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 47,599
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
I don't think it's possible to lose glandular tissue, except surgically. But I certainly don't know everything!

I'm a little bit confused- you had engorgement after your son was born, but not after your twins were born, or are you talking about engorgement after weaning?

If it was lack of engorgement after giving birth, then it's likely that the PCOS led to hormonal imbalances, and the "lack of the right hormones" meant that your breasts didn't make enough milk, even though you had the glands to do so. It can be very difficult, sometimes impossible, to recoup milk supply if it's not properly established in the first few days/weeks after birth.

It's also possible that you were making the same amount of milk after each birth-perhaps enough for 1.5 babies. That would mean too much milk for one baby, but not enough for two.

Ruth, single mommy to Leah, 19, Hannah, 18, and Jack, 12
Ruthla is offline  
#3 of 5 Old 07-02-2009, 12:34 PM - Thread Starter
 
RunnerDuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,358
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Sorry, what I meant was, when I weaned my son, I was REALLY full for a few days. With my daughter (only one was still nursing past 12m) I had NO fullness. I even thought about nursing her again 2 days later or so but it was like empty city. NO fullness at all after weaning. I guess my supply was pretty much down to zip even while I was still nursing... I really wonder if there was ever a point with these two where I was making enough for ONE baby. (They had bottle and breast till 4 weeks or so, then breast only till 4 or 5 months when they were starving - I was trying so hard not to supplement... Then they had both again till 1 year at which point one went on a bottle strike and would only nurse, which is why I had to wean the other one - the nursing one was getting solids, too, luckily, or she probably would have been starving...)

Hope that makes sense.

I just feel like I have less boobs than I used to and don't know if that is even possible! I can understand losing fat but it feels like my milk making abilities are gone, too.

Maybe it's just that the whole pregnancy and delivery and newborn days were so crappy... maybe more ideal circumstances there would have meant more milk... Everything with my son was perfect as can be.

DS T 11/16/03 DDs K & E 3/28/08
nak DS S 4/1/11
RunnerDuck is offline  
#4 of 5 Old 07-02-2009, 01:47 PM
 
spughy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 5,293
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It's not possible to lose glandular tissue.

What is possible is that for second or subsequent babies, the prolactin receptor sites on the alveoli can be insufficiently stimulated, resulting in less milk production and less secondary engorgement, particularly if the birth was traumatic or there was significant separation between mama and babe(s) after birth. PCOS can also mess with this.

What is also possible - and likely - is that over time, the connective tissues in the breast lose their resiliency and strength, resulting in a less-firm feeling. If your breasts were small to begin with you might not notice the droop, and there might not even BE a droop, depending on your physique. But it's largely inevitable and largely simply an aging thing.

Postpartum doula & certified breastfeeding educator, mama to an amazing girl (11/05) and a wee little boy (3/13).

spughy is offline  
#5 of 5 Old 07-02-2009, 02:37 PM
 
SophieAnn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I thought it was possible to lose breast tissue, but that it's an old-age thing. As in, after menopause breast tissue is lost... which is why you see the.. uh... deflated balloon look in National Geographic...

I did a quick search and found some backup (gerontology book):
http://books.google.ca/books?id=vYon...sult&resnum=10

"In women, after menopause and the resulting decrease in estrogen levels, there are changes in breast tissue that result in less glandular tissue, reduced elasticity, and more connective tissue and fat. These changes lead to a sagging seen in older women's breast tissue, but the size of the breast may not change, as the glandular tissue is replaced by fat."

So yes, glandular tissue can be lost, but I would think in the absense of some major hormonal imbalance it shouldn't be occuring before menopause.

dog2.gifcrochetsmilie.gif Lovin' my sweetheart, pregnant with #1 (EDD Feb.2013) stork-suprise.gif

SophieAnn is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off