What is your difinition of Extended Nursing? - Page 2 - Mothering Forums

View Poll Results: At what age do you consider nursing you baby as Extended Nursing?
Nursing a baby over 12 months old. 115 100.00%
Nursing a baby over 2 years old. 123 100.00%
Nursing a child over 3 years old. 35 100.00%
Nursing a child over 5 years old. 15 100.00%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
#31 of 45 Old 08-03-2002, 10:49 PM
 
Irishmommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: In the bat cave with heartmama
Posts: 45,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Extended nursing is anything longer than me! Dd2 is 25 months and is showing no signs of quitting!!
Irishmommy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#32 of 45 Old 08-09-2004, 08:23 AM
I would consider the line for extended breastfeeding soon after the baby "really" does not need breastfeeding insofar as his / her basic nutritional needs are concerned. That could be around two years or so, that is also prescribed in our religion. I would give a damn about what the society thinks "tolerable" so far as me bf'ing my baby is concerned. But the definition of "extended bf'ing" (in terms of baby's age) does not mean that one should deny the breast to the baby thereafter or weaning gets justified and be induced. Actually his /her "emotional needs" might continue much beyond that type of cut off definition (age) and the mother would be doing only her natural duty in allowing the baby / child to suckle even afterwards. I am told that sometimes because of such emotional needs even school going children seek bf'ing though it might not be regular, nor even for milk. Mothers rarely admit that they occasionally allow suckling to the child aged even 8 or more years. it is not necessary either (being a secret bond between the mother and the child) but not perverse in anyway (perversity is in the minds of those who are self styled representatives of society). For a better understsanding of the bf relationship, however, such statistics must also be explored.
Uzra
[email protected] is offline  
#33 of 45 Old 07-24-2007, 04:31 PM
 
nicey4887's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phila Pa
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I definitely think it depends on society but in my opinion I would say over 4 but that wasnt an option so I said over 3... but that doesn't make it wrong though .. my dd is 18 months old and still nurses, although she does see to be slowing down ( weaning IDK ) and people gasp when I say I still nurse.. and the fact that I'm younger doesn't make it any better
nicey4887 is offline  
#34 of 45 Old 07-24-2007, 04:34 PM
 
PiePie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: completely present with my children
Posts: 7,085
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i answered beyond 12 based on the fact that i live in the us. i think elsewhere the answer might be more like 24+.
PiePie is offline  
#35 of 45 Old 07-24-2007, 05:07 PM
 
JamieCatheryn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SW Pa
Posts: 5,288
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joan View Post
my vote is: "The phrase 'extended nursing' should be stricken from the language, so that there is simply...nursing."

How's that?

"Extended" implies a "stretching out" of something--I haven't stretched out my children's nursing time, I've just met their needs.
: This is what I was going to say.
JamieCatheryn is offline  
#36 of 45 Old 07-24-2007, 05:16 PM
 
the_lissa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,838
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I voted 2 years because that is the recommended minimum, but I agree extended shouldn't be used.

Jam 7, Peanut Butter 5, and Bread 2.

the_lissa is offline  
#37 of 45 Old 07-24-2007, 05:35 PM
 
Aliviasmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,198
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I voted over 12 months.

Culturally, here, in my location, I don't run into moms that nurse past 6 MONTHS (if that ) very often, and those that do, generally go for the long-haul.

I do, however, know one mom who nursed twins for 9 or 10 months and another who pumped (got BM about 50% of the time she said) for twins for about 6-7 months. As a mom of only a singleton, I'm REALLY amazed by these women. I know how hard it was for me to nurse soooo much (but I loved EVERY second of it!) those first few months, that I can't IMAGINE doing it for two at a time. Maybe it's just MY view point, but I think nursing/pumping for twins (or more!!) for 6 months deserves more recognition than for a singleton.

I'm sure, however, if I was in a different location and breastfeeding long-term was more "the norm", it wouldn't faze me as much.
Aliviasmom is offline  
#38 of 45 Old 07-24-2007, 07:07 PM
 
gcgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,311
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I went with after 3 years because I've been reading that most kids wean themselves naturally before then. Culturally, that's waaay out of bounds, I realize. If we're talking U.S. expectations, then past 1 year is definitely it.
gcgirl is offline  
#39 of 45 Old 07-24-2007, 10:49 PM
 
Zadee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Slightly north of sane
Posts: 711
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I picked 2, but, really, extended nursing is one year older than my kids current age. Right now, that is 2.

Quote:
Maybe it's just MY view point, but I think nursing/pumping for twins (or more!!) for 6 months deserves more recognition than for a singleton.
You are super sweet. :

Mostly sane mother to twins.
Zadee is offline  
#40 of 45 Old 07-24-2007, 11:06 PM
 
Aliviasmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,198
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zadee View Post
You are super sweet. :
Aww! And here I thought I'd be FLAMED for it! :
Aliviasmom is offline  
#41 of 45 Old 07-25-2007, 05:03 AM
 
clavicula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,011
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i picked 3 years.

Liv, SAHM of 3 kiddos 

 

 

 

 

clavicula is offline  
#42 of 45 Old 07-25-2007, 05:16 AM
 
MCatLvrMom2A&X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: With Vin Diesel ;) YUMMMM
Posts: 14,239
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
For me it is a child over 2 that I consider extended.

SAHM
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
lovin'
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
to
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
DD 10/00 &
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
DS 10/04
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
If your son is intact, keep him safe, visit the Intact Care forum
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Circ, a personal choice, Your SONS
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
11/98
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
6/99
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Thyroid cancer survivor. With 5
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
& 2 Boxers
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wishing for
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
MCatLvrMom2A&X is offline  
#43 of 45 Old 07-25-2007, 10:18 AM
 
Clarinet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,415
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
This thread is five years old

I set my minimum number nursing years at 2 since, according to even the mostly mainstream AAP, children up to two need a full fat milk and breastmilk has more than other milk sources. So to me, more than 2 years is extended.
Clarinet is offline  
#44 of 45 Old 07-25-2007, 10:28 AM
 
rmzbm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 15,101
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Most children, around the globe, are nursed 4-7 yrs. - so I'd say "extended" is anything beyond that.

~Marie: Mom to DS(17), DS(16), DD(14), DD(10), DD(8) & someone new on the way.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
rmzbm is offline  
#45 of 45 Old 07-25-2007, 10:35 AM
 
Mom4tot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pemberley
Posts: 15,225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What an old thread! Extended nursing is anyone who was nursinng when this started and is still nursing now



That's me!!

~Joan, Happy mom to 2 beautiful kiddos, one new puppy and 2 lovely felines
Mom4tot is offline  
Reply


User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Online Users: 8,267

22 members and 8,245 guests
Ambrossimo , bostonem03 , DahliaRW , emmy526 , fange , frugalmama1 , hagansau02 , iceface , joandsarah77 , katelove , Katherine73 , Leo Liang , Lydia08 , mckittre , omarinbox1888 , Phanie006 , rubelin , scheelimama , SchoolmarmDE , sciencemum , Socks , zebra15
Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.