Can somebody educate me about Waldorf? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 86 Old 10-31-2002, 12:51 AM - Thread Starter
 
LoveBeads's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have been considering sending my DD to their school next fall but read some very disturbing things about it on the internet. Does anyone have any experiences good/bad that they can share?

Thanks,
LoveBeads
LoveBeads is offline  
#2 of 86 Old 10-31-2002, 01:57 AM - Thread Starter
 
LoveBeads's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Whoops, never mind. I just found a whole bunch of info in the archives. Sorry to have wasted your time!

LoveBeads
LoveBeads is offline  
#3 of 86 Old 10-31-2002, 02:13 PM
Banned
 
sha_lyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 895
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What disturbing things have you read about waldorf? I do not plan on sending my DD to a Waldof school, but I plan on basing our homeschooling on the Waldorf method.
sha_lyn is offline  
#4 of 86 Old 10-31-2002, 05:58 PM
 
cumulus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Herland
Posts: 512
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hi:

I'm not sure what Lovebeads is referring too but there are sites on the Internet that suggest that Rudolph Steiner, the creator of Waldorf schools, had Nazi sentiments (he died in 193? I think). I learned about this while one of my children was in a Waldorf school and checked into it concluding it was untrue back then when Steiner was alive and completely irrelevent in the present.
cumulus is offline  
#5 of 86 Old 10-31-2002, 07:09 PM - Thread Starter
 
LoveBeads's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hi! Sorry, should have made myself a little clearer so that it didn't sound like I found things that are "scary". I never heard that Nazi rumor and am very relieved that it is unfounded.

I guess what I found to be "disturbing" is that their is some criticism that the school is based on a type of philosophy ("antro something or other") that the administrators don't necessarily tell you about when you inquire about the school. Not judging this philosophy, just didn't know it was part of the philosophy of the school and felt a little misled when I questioned the admins and they told me what it was and how it fits in to the curriculum. That felt less than honest to me, almost like they were trying to hide something, and now I feel like I can't really give it a fair chance since I am so upset that I was misled. I would have been much more open to learning about it if I had been told up front about it instead of having to read about it on the internet.

But there is a lot of info in the archives on this subject so I don't want to beat a dead horse.

LoveBeads
Maddy Moo - 2.5
LoveBeads is offline  
#6 of 86 Old 11-03-2002, 11:11 PM
 
lovelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I had been researching Waldorf also, and I think the website she is talking about might have been www.waldorfcritics.com.
A very interesting site.
lovelee is offline  
#7 of 86 Old 11-04-2002, 11:38 AM
 
Diana W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Waldorf is also not as attachment parenting-friendly as it may appear. See the latest issue of Lilipoh, an anthroposophical health magazine, urging early weaning. Steiner felt the baby needed to become independent of the mother's forces after about 6 months. Some Waldorf teachers disagree, but many of Steiner's parenting recommendations were very 19th century and some Waldorf teachers still adhere to Steiner very slavishly.

http://lilipoh.com

Diana
Diana W is offline  
#8 of 86 Old 11-04-2002, 01:12 PM
 
Ragana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,928
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
We went to a Parent-Child program at the Waldorf school here and liked a lot of aspects of it. However, it was quite expensive for essentially supervised play time (and the regular school is way out of our league). We were given a parenting book, and we believed that the parents would read and discuss it, that we might have a sort of parents' discussion group with the teachers offering additional information about Waldorf. That never ended up happening. I don't know if they were waiting for us to take the initiative? The teachers led a few songs and told one story during the play time, which was nice. I guess I expected a bit more for the parents.

We investigated sending our daughter to the school as well. I am not entirely comfortable with the esoteric aspects of Steiner's philosophy, like child development stages being equated with when their teeth come in and the children being described in terms of the four humours (this is what the newsletter from the school explained, anyway). I am all for waiting until age 7 to teach reading for those children who need the time, but what about kids like my sister and me who started reading at 4? Do they just sit around for 3 years? I was told that children who read early aren't encouraged to bring books to school. At 3, my daughter loves books, and I guess I can't see her in an atmosphere where that is not encouraged for that long.

I also had the ovewhelming impression of "sameness" in the two schools I saw - I can't quite put my finger on why this bothered me, but I assumed that if two schools were interpreting the same philosophy, there would be unique aspects to each, not two essentially identical schools. I guess this is what someone was getting at when they mentioned the slavish adherence to Steiner's philosophy.

The concerns I have heard from other people were about teaching religion (I guess some Christian holidays are observed? I personally didn't see this as much of a problem) and the way science is taught. I never could get to the bottom of the science issue - if anyone knows what that is about, I'd love some more information. A family friend in another country took her child out of Waldorf because she was bullied, but that happens every day in public schools. Doesn't seem like the philosophy would be permissive about that; maybe it was a fluke.

As I said, there are many aspects of Waldorf that I like - the emphasis on the arts, the calm atmosphere, etc. , but one I don't is the expense. This school is very expensive because they have no other source of support. The toys they encourage are, too - a lady tried to sell us a $70 felt ball at the holiday fair we went to.

I have many misgivings about the public schools around here, so this is really a dilemma. I would love to hear more from others about the pros and cons of Waldorf.

Mom "D" to DD1 "Z" (14) and DD2 "I" (11) DH "M"

Ragana is online now  
#9 of 86 Old 11-04-2002, 02:15 PM
 
Diana W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
try this for a compilation of a few of Steiner's racist pasages:

http://topica.com/lists/waldorf-crit...=d&start=16925
Diana W is offline  
#10 of 86 Old 11-04-2002, 02:32 PM
 
Diana W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ragana said:

>I am all for waiting until age 7 to teach reading for those >children who need the time, but what about kids like my sister >and me who started reading at 4? Do they just sit around for 3 >years? I was told that children who read early aren't >encouraged to bring books to school.

No, in fact the teacher will probably confiscate them if she brings books to school. Steiner believed children should not even be exposed to print or learn the alphabet until the change of teeth. And this is a rigid timetable, it is not about following an individual child's pace or not "pressuring" children (which I agree with). It is an actual belief that the print will harm them. Steiner believed that the child who is "intellectually" stimulated - and by this he means, yes, simply learning the alphabet - will suffer ill health in later life. Abstract thoughts are said to cause damage to internal organs in children under age 7.


>At 3, my daughter loves books, and I guess I can't see her in an >atmosphere where that is not encouraged for that long.

There are no books in a Waldorf kindergarten (and the k'garten often includes 6 year olds; parents are encouraged to hold them back as long as possible in the name of "preserving their childhood." I think this is fine if the 6 year old is just not interested yet, but many of them are, and you're right, it is rough on some of them.


>The concerns I have heard from other people were about >teaching religion (I guess some Christian holidays are >observed? I personally didn't see this as much of a problem)

You'd need to read some anthroposophy first - it is an esoteric form of Christianity, and if you're comfortable with it, you wouldn't mind your child celebrating their festivals, probably. Some of them are very lovely. The problem comes in that parents are told *not* to worry, not to learn more, that anthroposophy is not in the school, and in fact anthroposophy is in virtually every detail of classroom practices and rituals. The school day is very ritualistic; the simplest activity must be performed in a ritualistic way, and many of the teachers are very rigid about their rituals, and freak out if someone isn't doing it the anthroposophically "correct" way. So the least they could do is make sure you know what anthroposophy is first.

>A family friend in another country took her child out of Waldorf >because she was bullied, but that happens every day in public >schools. Doesn't seem like the philosophy would be permissive >about that; maybe it was a fluke.


Yes, bullying happens lots of places. In Waldorf the twist is the karma angle - some of the teachers hesitate to intervene in bullying or difficult interpersonal things going on with the kids because karma is central to anthroposophy. The entire class, with the teacher, is believed to be a karmic group which has been together through many previous incarnations, with "tasks" to perform together as a group. Interpersonal conflicts between two kids, or with the teacher, may be seen as coming from a past life, and to intervene might mean interfering with karma.

>As I said, there are many aspects of Waldorf that I like - the >emphasis on the arts, the calm atmosphere, etc. ,

Well, sorry to burst one more bubble, but most of the Waldorf classrooms I have seen were far from "calm." Out of control, chaotic and unsafe were more the norm. It isn't every class, of course; but I have observed in a number of Waldorf schools and chaotic classrooms seem to often follow from applying rigid dogma to children.

>I have many misgivings about the public schools around here, >so this is really a dilemma. I would love to hear more from >others about the pros and cons of Waldorf.

I don't blame you for having misgivings about the public system - we got the heck out of public schools after a couple of years too. The thing to understand about Waldorf is that it is a package deal; the anthroposophy is an unpleasant surprise to many parents. They do some great things in Waldorf schools, and there are talented teachers. However there's a lot of skeletons in their closet. Ask to observe the classrooms very closely - ask to see an entire morning's lesson, for instance - and don't take no for an answer.
Diana

__________________
Diana W is offline  
#11 of 86 Old 11-04-2002, 06:24 PM
 
Ragana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,928
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Thanks, Diana, those quotes are a real eye-opener!

Mom "D" to DD1 "Z" (14) and DD2 "I" (11) DH "M"

Ragana is online now  
#12 of 86 Old 11-04-2002, 09:30 PM
Banned
 
Moon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: living in shimmering disequilibrium
Posts: 1,335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Any philosophy taken to dogmatic extreme can be detrimental.

My experience in a "waldorf-inspired" homeschooling cooperative has been extremely positive.
Moon is offline  
#13 of 86 Old 11-05-2002, 09:43 AM
 
cumulus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Herland
Posts: 512
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hi:

In Waldorf grade school classes the teachers move each year with the children. That is, if a child started with a certain teacher for 1st grade, they'd have that same teacher each year until middle school. "The teacher is everything." said a famous Waldorf teacher and I think that's true. The teachers try to model eveything - including perfect penmanship. My reading of Among Schoolchildren by Tracy Kidder, a book about an author's experience of observing a 5th grade public school class for an entire year, lead me to feel that school philosophy is one thing but it's the teacher who's the main thing. Mrs Zajak, the teacher, is told to do all kinds of things by the principal, the district, you name it, but every morning the class door shuts and she's in the room with the children and it is who she is and who the class is that mostly affect what happens in there. Peers, many say, have strong effects on the child. I'd suggest meeting with the teacher and the class and observing them for a while.
cumulus is offline  
#14 of 86 Old 11-11-2002, 12:08 AM
 
TraceyMc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Right on the Mason Dixon
Posts: 115
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hello
My daughter is in a Waldorf kindergarten and it is not chaotic or unsafe. I have spent quite a bit of time in the classroom and in others, substituting also. The children have a free playtime, but there are rules that must be observed during that time, about safety and respect to others.
Our school does not hide Anthroposophy, in fact they offer a class to teach more about it. Besides that, there are many parents getting together to read more about all aspects of Waldorf education.
My daughter's teacher put together a reading list of favorite books from information gathered from all the parents. True there are no books in the classroom, but they hear a story everyday and use their imaginations to see the pictures, instead of the teacher showing a picture to them.
My daugher loves it and thrives there.
It's not for everyone, nothing is, but I would definitely check out the school for yourself before making a decision.

Tracey
TraceyMc is offline  
#15 of 86 Old 11-11-2002, 05:20 AM
 
I Believe in Fairies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 436
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by Diana W
Steiner felt the baby needed to become independent of the mother's forces after about 6 months.
Diana
I actually read somewhere that Steiner said that a child should be weaned at seven months. However, weaning at that time meant to introduce solids. It did not mean to refuse breastmilk.

Every school is different. I have heard that "The Incarnating Child" is very anti-AP. I know in the parent-toddler class we took everyone was still nursing : D

There are good things and bad things about Waldorf. When I go to a school I look at the kids first and think about if I want them to be around Annabelle or if I want her to act like them. Most of the time I don't and that ends that school.

I hope this helps!
(off to edit my sig now)
I Believe in Fairies is offline  
#16 of 86 Old 11-11-2002, 05:39 AM
 
I Believe in Fairies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 436
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
One thing I find interesting about the alleged racist comments is that they are quoted from lectures that *no one* else has copies of. When asked to produce even a Xerox of the alleged comments the "critics" have refused.

I take the Waldorf Critics site with a grain of salt. Their tone is hysterical, their "proof" is shaky at best and too much of their information is based on anon testimony.

I have read it all, though and they do have the one good point that Anthro. can be very hidden at certain schools.
I Believe in Fairies is offline  
#17 of 86 Old 11-11-2002, 09:13 AM
 
Diana W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Elizabeth wrote:

>One thing I find interesting about the alleged racist comments is >that they are quoted from lectures that *no one* else has >copies of. When asked to produce even a Xerox of the alleged >comments the "critics" have refused.

That is an outrageous, completely absurd charge. Did you ask someone to send you a xerox of a Steiner text, and they didn't? Otherwise what in the world are you talking about?

I am a busy mother like the rest of you, but I will come back as I have time during the next couple of days and provide you with the full citations for each of the quotes that were cited above (in the link I posted from the critics list). You'd need to find the books in a bookstore or library, I guess, to verify that the information is accurate, and granted that is not always easy because Steiner is an obscure, occult writer studied by only a few people interested in esoterica (not a serious philosopher as Waldorf proponents would have you believe). It may not be a simple matter for someone who is interested to track down all this material - it is not likely at your Barnes and Noble. However, a lot of it is also on the web now, and I'll find what links I can for you.

To suggest we are lying - actually making up Steiner quotes?! - suggests, well I don't know what, it is so offensive I can only give you the benefit of the doubt that you simply want to keep your head in the sand where Rudolf Steiner is concerned so as to keep thinking Waldorf is all angels and light.

However, a quick comment - it does become increasingly difficult to find the offensive passages, because they are being EDITED OUT of the latest editions and new translations. In a set of lectures originally entitled Health and Illness, lectures Steiner gave in 1923, Steiner suggests that intelligence is linked to blond hair, and rues the fact that blond hair is supposedly becoming rarer, and "dark people" who have stronger forces will last longer. However, a new translation of this was published in 2000, with these passages *completely left out*. Just not there anymore, no note explaining that any text is missing. These quotes have caused too much trouble for anthroposophy, so they are re-writing Steiner.

Again it is 7 a.m. and I will not get back to this board till late tonight if at all, but I will as I have time give you the correct bibliographic information for the material I referenced earlier in writing to Ragana. The charge that the material is made up is false. There are a lot of people who have put a lot of good time and energy into activism to right these wrongs. Steiner, like many of his day, was a racist, and to defend this stuff today, and prop up this right wing ideology, even unknowingly because you refuse to research for yourself, is simply wrong.
Diana
Diana W is offline  
#18 of 86 Old 11-11-2002, 09:47 AM
 
Diana W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Here is a start -

http://www.waldorfcritics.org/active...m_general.html

There is a link there to a references page - the citations are not on the same page, but you can find them if you want by clicking "References." I admit this is not well organized. I'm going to type it up properly later. However, for quick reference, the abbreviations that refer to Steiner's works are as follows:

CM = Cosmic Memory
KHW = Knowledge of Higher Worlds
GSJ = Gospel of St. John
DIN = Destinies of Individuals and of Nations
CRLA = Christ in Relation to Lucifer and Ahriman
EEM = Evolution of the Earth and Man
CT = Challenge of the Times
SSFSF = Spiritual Science as a Foundation for Social Forms
T = Theosophy
KU - Karma of Untruthfulness
UH = Universal Human
CML = Course of My Life

As I said, you are not likely to find any of these at your local bookstore except possibly KHW and Theosophy, which are two of Steiner's major works. If there is a serious challenge that the quotes cannot be found, I will indeed track down paper copies and mail xeroxes, if desired, to anyone who doubts; I take very seriously this slanderous charge that critics of Waldorf have fabricated anything.
Diana
Diana W is offline  
#19 of 86 Old 11-11-2002, 12:52 PM
 
GranolaMommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 98
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It is difficult to find Waldorf proponants who buy into every word Steiner had to say. They are out there, sure, but the majority of the Waldorf enthusiasts, even teachers, take his message and distill it for all the positive things he did say.
GranolaMommy is offline  
#20 of 86 Old 11-11-2002, 01:58 PM
 
I Believe in Fairies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 436
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by Diana W
To suggest we are lying[/B]
Oh, so you're a member of the Waldorf Critics organization. Well, at least I know where you are coming from now.

Quote:
Originally posted by Diana W
even unknowingly because you refuse to research for yourself, is simply wrong.[/B]
Well, if I hadn't just edited down my sig file you would know that I am conducting a Steiner Book Study right now. I'm reading "Theosophy" right now. It's boring as heck, and not my cup of tea but I am reading it.

From the actions of *many* members of the Waldorf Critics group I do not have a high regard for the organization as a whole. What first brought me to the Mothering.Com forums is that a post was taken off a mailing list and posted to the critics list WITHOUT THE AUTHORS PERMISSION. After her post was laughed at it was posted HERE, again without the author's knowing about it or her permission. She found out because a friend of hers is here and saw it and emailed her about the issue.

Events like this have happened on several mailing lists. I have seen members of the Waldorf Critics join groups, and boards, just to cause strife. One member will pretend to be a newbie and other members of WC will respond. That everyone joins within hours of each other is very telling.

I found this page http://hem.passagen.se/thebee/comments/plans1.html
to be very informative.
I Believe in Fairies is offline  
#21 of 86 Old 11-11-2002, 06:43 PM
 
Ragana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,928
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by GranolaMommy
Just a note about the editing out.

Isn't it a good thing that pro-Waldorf and Anthroposophy people recognize and filter out those negative statements? Waldorf isn't a religion with Steiner set up as a god. He is the founder and informs a great deal of it, yes, but proponants are willing to filter out the parts that they do not find agreeable and/or find offensive or absurd.

Isn't it better to confront than edit out? What I mean is that maybe these views of his should be acknowledged and then taken apart critically rather than just having them deleted without comment (if that is indeed what happened).

Mom "D" to DD1 "Z" (14) and DD2 "I" (11) DH "M"

Ragana is online now  
#22 of 86 Old 11-11-2002, 06:48 PM
 
TraceyMc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Right on the Mason Dixon
Posts: 115
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Granola Mommy-so well put! I couldn't agree more.

Elizabeth-thanks for the link, I have been looking for something like that, the inside story of PLANS.

Tracey
TraceyMc is offline  
#23 of 86 Old 11-11-2002, 07:31 PM
 
GranolaMommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 98
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by Ragana


Isn't it better to confront than edit out? What I mean is that maybe these views of his should be acknowledged and then taken apart critically rather than just having them deleted without comment (if that is indeed what happened).
It may be good to confront and dissect critically, but there is no forum in which to do that so that all readers of the books are given the same opportunity to be privy to the information. In lieu of such an opportunity, I think it is important that TPTB who are in charge of editing the books that are published recognize and acknowledge (by their removal) quotes that no longer reflect the opinions of the Waldorf community.
GranolaMommy is offline  
#24 of 86 Old 11-11-2002, 08:12 PM
 
Britishmum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 4,345
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I find it interesting once again that if someone enters the discussin and turns out to be involved in Waldorf Critics, they get pounced upon.

I've said this before., Any system should be open to scrutiny. If it has nothing to hide or worthy of such criticism, it will survive.

"It is difficult to find Waldorf proponants who buy into every word Steiner had to say. They are out there, sure, but the majority of the Waldorf enthusiasts, even teachers, take his message and distill it for all the positive things he did say."

If even one teacher does buy into every word that Steiner has to say, isn't that scandalous? What would we all think if a public school teacher was found to hold these racist beliefs? Wouldnt he or she be fired without a second thought?

I, for one, think that there is nothing wrong with critics joining the boards here and discussing Waldorf. I want to know both sides, so that I can make my own decisions.

Why be defensive? (I've asked this before, but it seems to be a pattern that repeats itself)
Britishmum is offline  
#25 of 86 Old 11-11-2002, 11:19 PM
 
Diana W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
granolamom wrote - about the removal of offensive statements from recent translations of Steiner:

>Isn't it a good thing that pro-Waldorf and Anthroposophy >people recognize and filter out those negative statements?



You can't be serious. I fear you are. To *delete* the offensive material in a new translation, without comment, is hardly the same thing as addressing the issue. It's hiding, secrecy. It's meant to silence the criticism, pretend it never happened. It's unethical. It's also pathetic as scholarship, and this is the foundation of an educational movement?


Elizabeth says:
>Oh, so you're a member of the Waldorf Critics organization. >Well, at least I know where you are coming from now.


Okay. You know where I'm coming from. I had a child in Waldorf for three years and worked for 2 years as a Waldorf teaching assistant, and planned to become a Waldorf teacher. I was a very involved Waldorf parent. I became disillusioned after I saw the abuses and dysfunction in this so-called "spiritual" education.

>Well, if I hadn't just edited down my sig file you would know >that I am conducting a Steiner Book Study right now. I'm >reading "Theosophy" right now. It's boring as heck, and not my >cup of tea but I am reading it.

I don't know what your reading of Theosophy has to do with this. Talk about ethics - while you imply slimy things about Waldorf critics, you have made a false accusation. I am still seeing red over the charge that critics of Waldorf have simply *made up* Steiner quotes.. Amazing! An amazing charge. I suggest you read a bit past Theosophy if you honestly are able to kid yourself that those Steiner quotes are fabricated! Can I ask you if you really believe someone made these quotes up? If that's what you believe, why do you think someone would make up quotes from the founder of Waldorf education?

Do you not think we are real people too? We were happy Waldorf parents, we were moms you met and did committees with and exchanged play dates with, baked and knitted and gardened and organized open houses, etc. . . .

>From the actions of *many* members of the Waldorf Critics >group I do not have a high regard for the >organization as a >whole. What first brought me to the Mothering.Com forums is >that a post was taken off >a mailing list and posted to the >critics list WITHOUT THE AUTHORS PERMISSION.

This is a public forum. There is much confusion about that on the Internet, I realize. You need to realize you are presently posting in a public place. Anyone in the world who sits down at a computer with an Internet connection can read what we are presesntly saying. I agree with you, however, that it isn't always the right thing, to quote people who don't understand that they can be quoted so easily, when they don't understand this and don't realize their words may be repeated elsewhere.

Still, it seems we are talking about ethics, and I have seen nothing from the critics to rival the false accusation you made in saying that material on the Waldorf critics site is fabricated. That is a serious charge which you seem to have made quite lightly! I could not believe my eyes that you were saying this so blithely and without any idea what you are talking about.

>After her post was laughed at it was posted HERE, again >without the author's knowing about it or her >permission. She >found out because a friend of hers is here and saw it and >emailed her about the issue.

I think I know what you're talking about, I don't think anyone laughed at her. I recall there being concern about the children involved. She had some kind of serious situation with some children in her care, and she was trying hard to follow the Waldorf party line that you never speak to a child directly, even if a child is being hurt. She was obviously well intentioned. But we could be talking about two different things. The people I have met through critics do not take posts and pass them around to laugh at them. We are parents like you, probably with a lot in common in parenting, actually, and we know that what we saw in Waldorf was sometimes very damaging to children. We are trying to help people "get it" that Waldorf isn't AP, isn't respectful of children, isn't about love and light - that is *surface* and there is *deeper stuff* that you *need to get* if you sign on long term. That is where this got started for most of us, and believe me it was a long road.


>Events like this have happened on several mailing lists. I have >seen members of the Waldorf Critics join >groups, and boards, >just to cause strife.

We don't talk about Waldorf to "cause strife"; we talk about Waldorf because we spent years and years there, and want to save others the trouble. There is a private mailing list where we try to support people whose kids require therapy, tutoring, and years of confidence re-building post-Waldorf. We hate to think we are going to see some of the younger mothers here, who join a mom-tot group and think it is so beautiful, in a few years, with more damaged kids. We pick up the pieces afterwards. Wake up! It's a front for a cult. We were just where you are a few years ago, thinking it was all about bread baking and celebrating the seasons or something.

>One member will pretend to be a newbie and other members of >WC will respond.

This, like your charge that we are making up quotes, is beyond absurd. Who is pretending to be a "newbie"? What would it even mean to pretend to be a newbie? I am not misrepresenting myself in any way. I check these boards periodically, and a couple of other places where I know that people who might be drawn to Waldorf (generally, attachment parenting people, as I am, to a large extent), and from time to time I comment on Waldorf when the topic comes up. Is there something you find unethical about that? I don't comment on much else because there are only so many hours in a day, I have children and work and a life also. We realize that popping up different places always talking about Waldorf makes us look like we are kind of nuts. (It's called shooting the messenger.) But there isn't any "pretending" involved. We're who we say - former Waldorf parents, determined to tell our experiences in Waldorf.

>That everyone joins within hours of each other is very telling.

Telling of what? That we talk to each other off-line? (yes) If you are implying something worse, I'm not sure what. (Though for the record, I don't think there's anyone else of "us" here right now.) There were a lot of wonderful families at the Waldorf school. Post-Waldorf, I remain friends with many of them and have connected with a lot of other wonderful families who had similar experiences at Waldorf schools all over the world, and continue to support each other in the recovery process. And that's what post-Waldorf is, for many of us and our children - a recovery process, and for a few, later, activism. We do support each other and have become friends, many have met in person, and we work on this together. There is no secret there. You will find the "secret society" mentality alive and well in Waldorf, however. enough for now.
Diana
Diana W is offline  
#26 of 86 Old 11-11-2002, 11:37 PM
 
Diana W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Granolamommy:

>It may be good to confront and dissect critically, but there is no >forum in which to do that so that all readers of the books are >given the same opportunity to be privy to the information.
>In lieu of such an opportunity, I think it is important that TPTB >who are in charge of editing the books that are published >recognize and acknowledge (by their removal) quotes that no >longer reflect the opinions of the Waldorf community.

This just astounds me, I am mouth agape trying to figure out how educated people could make such statements. Hello? You can't take go back and DELETE the parts you don't like of your favorite authors.

Does it change the facts, does it mean he never said it if it is taken out of the books? Do you want history taught to your own children this way? Is this just ignorance? I suspect a lot of people just really want Steiner to have been a nice guy so that he could have founded a really great educational system, unfortunately wishing it doesn't make it so, and rewriting his words just compounds the problem. Integrity?
(Does make it easier to pretend the critics of Waldorf are just on some kind of weird crusade, though. What racist quotes?)
Diana W is offline  
#27 of 86 Old 11-11-2002, 11:56 PM
Banned
 
sha_lyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 895
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I agree with Granolamommy ...Why can't the philosphy grow as we as a society grow? Stop dwelling on the fact that he had opinions that were shaped by society at the time, most of us realize that we have has grow since them. No, you had rather dwell on an outdated opinion and bash someone who isn't alive and can defend themself and their viewpoint.
sha_lyn is offline  
#28 of 86 Old 11-12-2002, 12:01 AM
 
Jazmommie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Newburgh,Indiana
Posts: 1,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
LILIPOH--I ordered a issue -the one on childrens illnesses by Dr Incao.

I do not agree with everything that Waldorf or Steiner has said/believes but do get a lot out of the anthroposophical Dr & nurse websites & beliefs.
He was way ahead of his time in my opinion & very other world minded(reminds me of Mary Baker Eddy's life)-when you believe in something & not every one else does ,does that make it wrong?Not for them!

Thanks for the good info on this thread.

::
momma to 4
Jazmommie is offline  
#29 of 86 Old 11-12-2002, 12:48 AM
 
Diana W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Shalyn wrote:

>I agree with Granolamommy ...Why can't the philosphy grow as >we as a society grow?

That would be nice, but philosophies don't "grow" when people pretend that the philosopher didn't say what he said. Anthroposophy is not growing. People who disagree with Steiner just don't last long in Waldorf.


>Stop dwelling on the fact that he had opinions that were >shaped by society at the time,

Actually, Steiner claimed to be clairvoyant, and his followers insist that his opinions were derived from the "Akashic record." They are supposed to be immortal truths, revealed knowledge. If his followers admit he had opinions "shaped by his time," they might have to throw out a lot of other outdated stuff to, like the nonsense about not making eye contact with children, and never answering children's questions.


>No, you had rather dwell on an outdated opinion

That is my point, that it is an outdated opinion. It's junk, toss it out. That's different from pretending he never said it.

>and bash someone who isn't alive and can defend themself and >their viewpoint.

There are some very scary and ignorant views being expressed here about history and debate. Do you really believe we shouldn't criticize someone who isn't alive?
Diana W is offline  
#30 of 86 Old 11-12-2002, 12:49 AM
 
momofgurlz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mid-Atlantic region
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hello, everyone!

My name is Lisa, and I posted on these boards a few months ago, quite extensively, regarding Waldorf education and some of the objections/concerns that I have with it. (For the record, I was a Waldorf parent for a number of years and have firsthand experience with this matter, in addition to knowledge gleaned from almost four years of intense study of Steiner, Anthroposophy and Waldorf in an effort to figure out just what happened at our school!)

I don't have time right now (unfortunately! <g>) to respond to a number of messages that have been posted recently, but the following just begged immediate response:

Someone said:

<<Isn't it a good thing that pro-Waldorf and Anthroposophy people recognize and filter out those negative statements? Waldorf isn't a religion with Steiner set up as a god. >>

Lisa again: Editing racist and racially offensive statements from Steiner's lecture (collected in books) certainly *would* be a "good thing" for pro-Waldorf people and Anthroposophists to do IF (and therein lies the problem) they simultaneously acknowledged the sentiments and philosophy and beliefs behind those statements and DISOWNED them. Sadly, that is not the case. Editing these statements out is, instead, just a way to hide them.

Racist ideology -- just one part of which is the belief that the various races of humankind have different levels of spiritual evolution -- is deeply embedded in Anthroposophy; indeed, the history of the world and creation according to Anthroposophy/Steiner is based upon racist doctrine. (Example: Aryan humankind -- the most highly evolved race, a la Steiner -- originated on Atlantis, which was destroyed by a flood. This is accepted as FACT, folks. )

I have had the experience of asking Steiner followers (and that includes both Waldorf teachers and anthroposophers) about a variety of their guru's teachings (and make no mistake: to a many a dedicated Waldorf teacher, Steiner *is* a guru, whose word is practically indisputable!), and the response is, to me, frightening. I was told that "some of Steiner is difficult." Others who have stumbled upon the racist elements of Waldorf's founding doctrine have been given similar answers when asked: we are told we just don't understand, that we must study Steiner more, that we must learn to meditate a certain way to "get" it, that it really is not racist at all, can't we see?

If Waldorf teachers and anthroposophers would only say "You know, Steiner was a man of his time, and therefore, some of the things he believed and taught are outdated and yes, racist ways of thinking. We merely sift the good and useful from the old and potentially harmful," I would not be writing this now. Unfortunately, that is not what happens. Instead, the statements are hidden. Waldorf schools are master of hiding things; I would daresay that it is one of the things they do best.

Sorry to be so blunt.

Lisa
momofgurlz is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off