Morning After Pill Will Soon be Available to Girls of All Ages Without Prescription - Mothering Forums

 
Thread Tools
#1 of 6 Old 04-05-2013, 01:26 PM - Thread Starter
Administrator
 
Melanie Mayo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 235
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)

From CBSNews

 

Quote:
The Food and Drug Administration must make emergency contraceptives available to girls of all ages within 30 days, a federal judge has ruled, saying the agency's decisions regarding the so-called morning-after pill were "arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable."
 
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Edward Korman came as the result of a lawsuit brought by reproductive-rights advocates, who had sought to remove age and other restrictions on the so-called "morning after" pill.
 
The Center for Reproductive Rights and other groups have argued that contraceptives are being held to a different and non-scientific standard than other drugs, and that politics has played a role in decision-making. Social conservatives have said the pill is tantamount to abortion.

 

Read More

 

What do you think of this ruling? 

Melanie Mayo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 of 6 Old 04-05-2013, 01:32 PM
 
pokeyac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 4,613
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)

I think it is a good ruling.  I think this was how it was intended to be distributed in the first place.  It has been restricted for reasons that have almost nothing to do with health and safety.  The reasons have more to do with anti-abortion views, and that's ridiculous because Plan B is not an abortion pill.  It is taken before pregnancy occurs or can be detected.  It can prevent ovulation and thus conception and it can prevent pregnancy.  It could prevent lots of abortions later and increase the number of children who are born who were planned and wanted.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Married to a wonderful woman
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
since 2010. Baby boy C arrived in June 2013!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Check out our
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.
pokeyac is offline  
#3 of 6 Old 04-05-2013, 06:45 PM
 
ananas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,885
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokeyAC View Post

I think it is a good ruling.  I think this was how it was intended to be distributed in the first place.  It has been restricted for reasons that have almost nothing to do with health and safety.  The reasons have more to do with anti-abortion views, and that's ridiculous because Plan B is not an abortion pill.  It is taken before pregnancy occurs or can be detected.  It can prevent ovulation and thus conception and it can prevent pregnancy.  It could prevent lots of abortions later and increase the number of children who are born who were planned and wanted.

I agree, I am all for this.


Single mama to an only born November 2012.
Co-sleeping, vaxing, baby-wearing, sometimes cloth diapering, car seat safety advocate. Still nursing with no end in sight
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ananas is offline  
#4 of 6 Old 04-05-2013, 08:22 PM
 
dinahx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: earth
Posts: 2,062
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
This is one judge, in Eastern NY. They can't control the FDA: if a lone district judge could trump agencies like the USDA & FDA, we would all be celebrating in the streets . . . The way the media is reporting it makes it more likely that the FDA will be like 'okay, sure!' but that isn't normally how it works.

Sebelius is VERY pro Pharma & even more pro Planned Parenthood, so she wants it available anyway, but to be like 'oh this one district judge is tying the FDA's hand is disingenuous.

My only concern was that when Planned Parenthood was giving it out, they would discuss with you your 'Plan A' when you went to get it. Also, this is distributed widely (to quote my student friend 'like candy') on college campuses already. It costs $50 in the store, so I think many have access to it from places (like clinics, PP, & colleges) that are not the drug store.

I am a tiny bit worried about dudes making women take it: there is already a really offensive movie about that concept.
dinahx is offline  
#5 of 6 Old 04-05-2013, 08:28 PM
 
dinahx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: earth
Posts: 2,062
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
The effectiveness of Plan B as EC is not really as high as you'd think, when you look @ the stats. It is less effective than other methods, for sure (Ella, Paragaurd), methods that make no bones about being able to impact a fertilized egg.

So making this Plan A is not ideal. I predict Combined Oral Contraceptives will hit the shelves next, that is already the case in many other countries. I don't favor that because hormones suck (in the environment, in the body), also because condoms are 100% better @ preventing STDs & many women are poor evaluators of their STD risk as evidenced by skyrocketing numbers. Hormonal methods actually increase STD susceptibility independant of behavior . . .
dinahx is offline  
#6 of 6 Old 04-08-2013, 10:27 AM
 
pokeyac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 4,613
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)

I agree that Plan B should not be used as a primary form of birth control.  I believe it is always best to prevent with a reliable method.  And it is certainly important to prevent STD's from spreading.   



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Married to a wonderful woman
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
since 2010. Baby boy C arrived in June 2013!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Check out our
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.
pokeyac is offline  
Reply

Tags
News


User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Online Users: 16,415

50 members and 16,365 guests
a-sorta-fairytale , abigailsmith0330 , agentofchaos , bananabee , barcelona , coconotcoco , Dakotacakes , Dear_Rosemary , DerekonMothering , Dina1 , ELTAZ , happy-mama , Janeen0225 , JElaineB , katelove , kathymuggle , lisak1234 , LLM21 , Lydia08 , mamabear0314 , Michele123 , Mirzam , moominmamma , NaturallyKait , newmamalizzy , oaksie68 , PoppiesPosies , prayingforpeace , rachieface , RollerCoasterMama , rubelin , Saladd , samaxtics , sarrahlnorris , SchoolmarmDE , shanna-cat , shantimama , Shmootzi , Socks , Springshowers , sren , stephalittle , t2009 , Wildcatsarahj , Xerxella , zannster , zebra15 , zoeyzoo
Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.