Only Children - Mothering Forums

Thread Tools
#1 of 6 Old 06-17-2013, 08:36 PM - Thread Starter
VKHarberRYT's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Posts: 44
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I recently read two interesting takes on having only one child, which is a subject that always catches my attention as it is weighing heavy on my mind in terms of my own family planning. 


The first was from The New York Times -  Only Children. Lonely and Selfish? There was a lot of interesting research in the article. 



The differences between only children and those raised with siblings tend to be positive ones. Ms. Falbo and Ms. Polit examined hundreds of studies in the 1980s and found that only children had demonstrably higher intelligence and achievement; only children have also been found to have more self-esteem. These findings, which have been confirmed repeatedly in recent years, hold true regardless of whether parents of only children stayed together and regardless of economic class.

Researchers like the sociologist Judith Blake believe these qualities result from the fact that parents who have just one child are able to devote more resources — time, money and attention — to them than parents who have to divide resources among more children.


And the other article was on Huffington Post - Only Child Myths.



The three biggest myths, she says, turn into one word -- lonelyselfishmaladjusted -- when people talk about us, despite the hundreds of studies that show only children are no different than people with siblings. It is a knowledge gap with consequences. The stereotypes “are really infringing on the lives of parents and especially mothers,” Sandler says. “They have their first kid for them and a second for the other kid. If the reason they’re doing that is that only children are somehow screwed up, then the reasoning is flawed.”


Lots to think about! Any only children out there want to weigh in?

Melanie Mayo likes this.
VKHarberRYT is offline  
Sponsored Links
#2 of 6 Old 06-28-2013, 03:10 PM
Melirose's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

My best friend is an only child. She is very sweet and we have known each other since the 2nd grade. I never thought she was selfish or maladjusted. However, I will say she was not the smartest girl (still isn't). I have found that to be true of most of the only children I know. I think that something the only children I know missed out on was a lot of intelligent interaction between siblings. My siblings and I would play school all the time, read books to each other, and do science experiments we would make up together. I think that only children can really miss out on those experiences that help you grow (I graduated from a trade school, my sister is a Stanford graduate and has her masters, my brother is a college graduate). I think that if you are willing to commit the time to make sure your child doesn't miss out on these experiences they should be just fine. I just think it takes a lot more effort on the parents part when the child doesn't have siblings. There is a definite gap that needs to be filled.

Melirose is offline  
#3 of 6 Old 07-05-2013, 12:02 AM
Cyllya's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 538
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I was an only child until my parents started taking in displaced cousins out of a sense of familial guilt. Two of them ended up being adopted by my mom when I was a teenager. We weren't close, so I didn't really get any sibling benefits. I had some sibling downsides from the division of resources, but it was mitigated by me being a relatively low-resource kid inherently and by my mom granting me more than my fair share of the resources. I tend to still think of myself as an only child. I've finally trained myself to refer to my adopted siblings as siblings, but they still call me their cousin.


While I'm fairly maladjusted, I'm never lonely (certainly not as a kid) and I don't think I'm particularly selfish either. I also did well in school and got a bachelor's degree with hardly any academic effort, if you're worried about book-smarts. (I did solitary "smart" activities as a kid, like reading articles, reading novels, trying to write novels, researching how to write novels and draw, tried to teach myself Japanese off the internet and made decent progress considering, etc.)

Cyllya is offline  
#4 of 6 Old 07-05-2013, 07:19 PM
prescottchels's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Swimming in essential oils
Posts: 1,620
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)

I was an only and I hated it, until high school when I realized how messed up my family was, and that it was probably better that none of my parents had any more children. As a youngin though I was always lonely & bored, but then I had a narcissistic mom who rarely spent quality time with me. That's not to say I wasn't creative or actively seeking out ways to have fun or otherwise occupy my time, though. I definitely would not say that being an only had any impact on my intelligence level. I did well in school and read books constantly. As for being selfish...I think that's a misnomer for me as well. If anything I tried to be as invisible & low needs as possible growing up...

The other thing that parents of only's don't consider is the topic of caring for elderly parents. As an only I'm the sole proprietor in that endeavor and I don't look forward to it.

Personally I hope to have at least 2 children if not more...

Jill of all trades!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Essential Oil Guru, Nanny Extraordinaire & Aunty to all
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
, Organizer of all things, Gluten Free Baker & Nutrition Coach
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
, & Favorite Substitute Teacher-EVER!
Becoming a mama hasn't been in the stars so far for this life-maybe the next one
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
prescottchels is offline  
#5 of 6 Old 07-05-2013, 11:20 PM
k x s's Avatar
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I have mixed feelings about only children. I was an only until I was 7 1/2..
I don't buy into only children are selfish or maladjusted stuff (
that sounds like a combination of temperament and parenting and I don't think parents who choose to have one child are inherently somehow selfish or maladjusted themselves) however lonely? Makes me pause for thought.
In my brief experience... I didn't realize the connotations of being an only 
when we lived in a neighborhood with lots of other kids to play with. When my sister came along however... We moved to a neighborhood with no other kids and I became acutely aware of how lonely it was not to have anyone to play with (even though I had a sibling she was much too young to play with)

I think as a result of that experience I am more aware then is perhaps necessary (lol fixated) on what sort of family I want to have and the potential impacts of the different choices.
However having thought about it. Siblings don't guard against loneliness and come with their own set of problems. Having more then one child needs to be balanced against the idea that subsequent children (
siblings) are not the same thing as friends. I think most people when they think about having another child give a point in favor of another because their first born will have a companion and supposedly that wards off against loneliness. I think they should actually take a point off because having another child could be diverting attention and resources away from the first born potentially harming them.


Maybe its a wash?

The Sandler book looks interesting.

k x s is offline  
#6 of 6 Old 07-08-2013, 11:31 PM
shielar's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

lots of interesting info on Sandler's book.  I hope I got my hands on it when starting a family.  I have 4 of my own and gosh I have barely not enough time for myself...


I love this words from Sandler's: To have a happy kid, she [Sandler’s mother] figured she needed to be a happy mother, and to be a happy mother, she needed to be a happy person. To do that, she had to preserve her authentic self, which she could not imagine doing with a second child.”


shielar is offline  


User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Online Users: 13,295

44 members and 13,251 guests
a-sorta-fairytale , agentofchaos , bananabee , Childrenareawesome , Dear_Rosemary , Deborah , Dovenoir , easydoesit , emmy526 , gizzypeach , hakunangovi , happy-mama , hillymum , justlizzy , jwood723 , Katc8910 , Katherine73 , kathymuggle , Kelleybug , Leelee3 , LibraSun , LiLStar , Lucee , manyhatsmom , mckittre , mekinmommy , Michele123 , Mirzam , moominmamma , Nairo Sonsona , NaturallyKait , pokeyac , redsally , samaxtics , shantimama , Shmootzi , Springshowers , verticalscope , whosurmomma , xthoney , zebra15 , zoeyzoo
Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.