Getting Insurance to Pay for Midwives - Mothering Forums

Thread Tools
#1 of 3 Old 07-04-2013, 11:24 PM - Thread Starter
VKHarberRYT's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Posts: 44
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

There is a post on related to the popular article “American Way of Birth, Costliest in the World.”


The post details the issues with getting insurance to cover midwifery care, despite the fact midwives can provide services for much less than doctors and everyone seems to be searching for a way to reduce the costs of medical care. 



One of the reasons midwife care saves money is that midwives generally order fewer tests and their patients are less likely to end up having Caesarean deliveries, studies have shown.


The good news is, it should soon become easier to get Midwifery care covered by insurance. 




The Affordable Care Act added birth centers and midwife care as mandatory Medicaid services, for example. Many health experts are recommending an expanded use of birthing centers as a cost-saving measure as well as in response to women’s demand.



You can read the full post here.

VKHarberRYT is offline  
Sponsored Links
#2 of 3 Old 07-26-2013, 12:58 PM
cynthia mosher's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: The Motherland
Posts: 38,824
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)

This is excellent news! Any idea when the new policy will take effect?

cynthia mosher is offline  
#3 of 3 Old 07-29-2013, 09:25 AM
JenVose's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 184
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

This is great news for those who qualify for Medicaid and other services, but unfortunately, it doesn’t offer the same benefit to those who have private insurance. I suppose if you were on an employer-subsidized large-group plan, then insurance coverage for midwifery care might serve to make it more accessible. However, with my first pregnancy (which was planned for and several options considered prior to our TTC), I found that there are several problems with the insurance scenario for pregnant women. If one is to purchase private insurance, individually, then one must actually purchase a maternity policy in order to have coverage, not just a regular insurance policy. With monthly premiums around $500, the costs of such a policy would have been far greater than the costs of paying for a birthing-center birth out-of-pocket (and would have been closely approaching the total costs for pre-natal care and a simple hospital birth), therefore we decided to take our risks ourselves with the plan to birth naturally and were prepared to cover some additional costs if we did end up needing a hospital transfer. With that in mind, in order for this to be a feasible option for women who actually have to pay for their insurance, major changes are still needed to the entire insurance system. Otherwise, having insurance companies now recognize and pay for midwife services seems fickle in the light that these women would basically have to pay two to three times the cost of these services, and therefore would simply be funding the costs of much higher risk pregnancies where the insurance company might previously have been out of more than an individual’s premium. As it stands, it benefits no-one other than the insurer.

JenVose is offline  


User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Online Users: 12,179

19 members and 12,160 guests
andreamiller17 , bananabee , bayremoter14 , IsaFrench , jamesmorrow , Janeen0225 , junesmith , Katherine73 , Lucee , manyhatsmom , Micheal Jones , moominmamma , MountainMamaGC , Organic Tampons , sarrahlnorris , singhnish2802 , Springshowers
Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.