New Poll: Americans Think Women Should Start Having Children Earlier than Men - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 9 Old 11-12-2013, 11:16 AM - Thread Starter
Administrator
 
Melanie Mayo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 247
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)

From a new Gallup Poll:

 

Quote:

In light of the importance that child rearing has on gender roles in society and, ultimately, on families, workplaces, and the economy, Gallup recently asked Americans what they think is the ideal age for men and women to start having children. The majority, 58%, say 25 or younger is ideal for women, whereas the majority think men should start having children at 26 or older. 

 

Read more and see the poll results here. 

 

What do you think? Are women ready to have children earlier than men are?

Melanie Mayo is offline  
#2 of 9 Old 11-12-2013, 12:58 PM
 
rhedin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Respectfully, I think that's the wrong question. It's not nearly as important to know if women are ready for childbearing sooner than men than to know why people believe that this is true.
rhedin is offline  
#3 of 9 Old 11-12-2013, 01:09 PM
 
michelleepotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 977
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm very surprised by this. I had plenty of people tell me I was ruining my life by having kids in my early 20s.

Michelle, wife to DH, and momma to DD16, DS15, DS12, DS10, DD9, DD7, DS5, and baby girl born Christmas Eve 2013!
michelleepotter is offline  
#4 of 9 Old 11-15-2013, 04:40 PM
 
Smokering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 8,609
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)

From a biological perspective, it's more important for women to reproduce early than it is for men, but younger reproduction in both sexes has benefits.

 

In terms of egg health, ease of recovering from pregnancy etc, as long as a woman is fully-grown, well-nourished and has laid down good calcium deposits, the sooner the better (again, from a purely biological perspective). Older mothers not only have more trouble conceiving, but are at higher risk of chromosomal abnormalities, GD, miscarriage and stillbirth, multiple pregnancy, placenta previa, pre-eclampsia...

 

Younger fathers are less likely than older fathers to have autistic children, and the sex ratio is slightly skewed for older fathers, indicating a decline in fertility and sperm health; so again, younger is better.

 

Of course, the biological issues are only one factor in a very complicated equation, and I think suggesting a blanket 'right' age is ridiculous. But I do think, healthwise, humans are doing themselves a disservice by encouraging a culture in which waiting until mid-late thirties to even consider having kids in billed as the 'responsible' thing to do.


If decomposition persists please see your necromancer.

Smokering is offline  
#5 of 9 Old 11-17-2013, 05:59 AM
 
mammal_mama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Urban Midwestern USA
Posts: 6,772
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)

I had my first child at 35, and a few years ago, I was shocked to learn that waiting this long (not intentional on my part) did more to increase my risk for certain cancers than all the years of breastfeeding I did after 35 did to reduce my risk.


Susan -- married unschoolin' WAHMomma to two lovely girls (born 2000 and 2005).
mammal_mama is offline  
#6 of 9 Old 11-17-2013, 07:18 AM
 
contactmaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,031
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)

In some countries, having children well into their forties is the norm for women. Also,  most women have no problems conceiving after 35, the true descent in fertility happens after 42. Even then, many women manage to conceive and bear children without problems. It is true that many dont.

 

My point is, we are still in the dark ages when it comes to understanding fertility. It doesnt help  that most statistics reflect those who have fertility issues, rather than the average fertile  man or woman.

 

So who cares? What do the majority of people even know  when scientists and doctors specializing in the field still dont know what they are talking about?

 

Having said that, its nothing new that fertility declines with age.  Knowing exactly when that is for each individual is another question.

dalia likes this.
contactmaya is offline  
#7 of 9 Old 11-17-2013, 10:58 AM
 
Smokering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 8,609
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
 Also,  most women have no problems conceiving after 35, the true descent in fertility happens after 42.

 

Really? I read that fertility starts declining quite dramatically at 27.


If decomposition persists please see your necromancer.

Smokering is offline  
#8 of 9 Old 11-17-2013, 12:31 PM
 
dalia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,982
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by contactmaya View Post

In some countries, having children well into their forties is the norm for women. Also,  most women have no problems conceiving after 35, the true descent in fertility happens after 42. Even then, many women manage to conceive and bear children without problems. It is true that many dont.

My point is, we are still in the dark ages when it comes to understanding fertility. It doesnt help  that most statistics reflect those who have fertility issues, rather than the average fertile  man or woman.

So who cares? What do the majority of people even know  when scientists and doctors specializing in the field still dont know what they are talking about?

Having said that, its nothing new that fertility declines with age.  Knowing exactly when that is for each individual is another question.

Agreed

Wife to one amazing husband superhero.gif, SAHM to DS bouncy.gif 10/09, DS babyboy.gif 10/19,  one furbaby dog2.gif, and lots of chicken3.gif!

 
joy.gif

dalia is offline  
#9 of 9 Old 11-17-2013, 03:10 PM
 
contactmaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,031
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokering View Post
 

 

Really? I read that fertility starts declining quite dramatically at 27.

Its very much a misconception. Even the so called decline after 35 is exaggerated.

contactmaya is offline  
Reply

Tags
News

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off