Trust birth? - Page 5 - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#121 of 123 Old 06-19-2011, 11:01 PM
 
princesstutu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the bay area, baby!
Posts: 1,678
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I thought I'd try to research birth statistics for the first time in 8 years and...wow.  A whole bunch of nothing on the internet!  I find that odd, but this site was an interesting numbers game, anyway. 

 

Of course, I did find a study where the conclusion was that while homebirths result in fewer unnecessary interceptions for the mother and lower c-section rates, the infant mortality rates post-partum were higher.  Finding that odd, I kept looking around and noticed: 1- the study was at least endorsed and being spread around by The League of OBGYNers (or whatever legal name they go by), if not constructed by them and 2- the mortality rates were given for infants up to 28 days post-partum, which means the babies could have died from SIDS for all we know and the deaths may have nothing at all to do with homebirth (or at least not in any significantly statistical way that was worth mentioning for a discussion about the safety of HB vs. hospital birth).

 

I find it disturbing that in the whole, wide internet, I couldn't find much info on hospital vs. homebirth stats. Disturbing in the conspiracy theorist sorta way. 

 

Anyway...happy birthing and journeying!  I really like what cottonwood had to say up there. 

 

May the woo be with you all!  (All we need is woo!)


Yes, yes.  I'm fabulous. loveeyes.gif  Moving on...

princesstutu is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#122 of 123 Old 06-21-2011, 05:45 PM
 
rhiandmoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 1,524
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

What are you looking for? A lot of studies have been done over the last 10 years so you should be able to google up tons of stuff about homebirth compared to hospital birth. UC is such a small subset of homebirth that there aren't big studies on it.

 

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02175.x/full

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01580.x/full

http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378%2810%2900671-X/abstract

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01669.x/full

http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/abstract/cmaj.081869v1/

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00206.x/full

http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/192_02_180110/ken10465_fm.pdf

http://internationalmidwives.org/Portals/5/Home%20Birth%20Statsitics%20-%20Canada%20-%20BIRTH%20September%202009.pdf

 

 

 

rhiandmoi is offline  
#123 of 123 Old 06-19-2013, 02:01 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)

A truly inspiring thread! For those of us wishing for the return of the good old days!!!

yollie is offline  
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off