Do you trust skin testing or RAST testing more for food allergies? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-13-2010, 11:52 AM - Thread Starter
 
APToddlerMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)

So the title is the question. I test positive for some skin tests and then negative with RAST and vice versa.  I am having some pretty big health issues right now and it is pointing towards being diagnosed with a pretty serious autoimmune disorder.  I have read a bit about leaky gut, candida, etc, and I'm looking at trying to do a yeast free diet and also take out all the foods I've tested positive for.  This is SEVERELY going to limit what I eat though, since I test positive for nearly every single fruit and vegetable and wheat.  I seem to do just fine when the veggies/fruits are cooked though, so I've been told I could just have oral allergy syndrome.

 

So, if I am testing positive to them, but do fine when cooked, do you think that I should still cut them out?  Is it posible that the tests are just positive for the foods in the raw form?  I understand some sort of pollen protein or something is killed by heat.  Any advice is appreciated!

APToddlerMama is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-13-2010, 12:06 PM
 
scsigrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 2 steps from CraZyville
Posts: 1,786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)

Both the tests are limited in exact results.  The only 100% sure way to know if you are allergic is an actual food trial.  Dr's seem to say skin tests are more "accurate" and RAST gives you an idea of "how" allergic you are though you can have high levels but a very minimal reaction.  Most Drs. like to have both sets of results and see what they both say.

 

Clear as mud, huh? lol

 

Good luck!

scsigrl is offline  
Old 12-24-2010, 09:31 AM
 
Brees_Mama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,108
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I'd been wondering this too. Nice to have an answer :)


 

 

Brees_Mama is offline  
Old 12-26-2010, 08:59 PM - Thread Starter
 
APToddlerMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)

Thanks for the reply! 

APToddlerMama is offline  
Old 12-28-2010, 03:00 PM
 
sbgrace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Also, for either test, food positives are incorrect 50% of the time. False negatives are much less likely. Therefore I think oral allergy seems possible particularly if fresh fruits/veggies were used for the test--this is if you see reaction eating raw? If you can eat them without reaction and had a negative RAST I would assume no allergy/false positive basically. The "gold standard" is food challenge.

Rachelle, mommy to 8 year old boys! 

My Blog-free homeschooling finds and my lesson plans and link to the new User Agreement

sbgrace is offline  
Old 12-28-2010, 03:32 PM
 
carly0805's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

when you say food positives are incorrect 50% of the time do you mean the foods that came back as them NOT being allergic to??

carly0805 is offline  
Old 12-28-2010, 03:41 PM
 
scsigrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 2 steps from CraZyville
Posts: 1,786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)

What that means is that if you test -, you are usually safe saying you are not allergic to that food.  If you test +, there is a 50/50 chance that there is no allergy.  By no allergy, I mean the test is + but in a food trial, the person would show no issues.

scsigrl is offline  
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off