is this true? - Page 2 - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#31 of 42 Old 01-08-2009, 03:00 AM
 
neetling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: safe in God's arms
Posts: 3,394
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
subbing
neetling is offline  
#32 of 42 Old 01-08-2009, 04:07 AM
 
AlwaysByMySide's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 1,802
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belleweather View Post
I got my information from reading the text of the actual law. As an information getting tool, I strongly suggest it -- going to the primary source is always better than getting someone else's opinion about what the primary source says.
Wow, thanks for assuming that I haven't read the law. I NEVER KNEW that reading the primary source is a good information getting tool; thank you for filling me in on that tidbit. I don't know how I've managed all these years...

How is it, exactly, that you are reading the law entirely different from pretty much everyone else? Why exactly would there be hearings about it if it were only on imports, as you stated? Why wouldn't our lawmakers just pat us on the head and say, "Silly you, if you read the law, it's only for imports." Oh, that's right, it's because NONE of us have read the law!!

And would you suggest that, while we wait for them to determine how they are going to enforce the law, that we should sit around and do nothing, while some of our livelihoods are on the line? Let's just sit and shut up, not be proactive, and potentially allow our government to singlehandedly snuff out thousands of American owned small businesses! God forbid we take an active role in pushing for amendments and exemptions to save the businesses we work our butts off for!

The CPSIA snuck up on a lot of us, and many were unaware of it at all. Those of us with businesses on the line, especially people like me, where my business is the ONLY income my children and I see, are concerned. Based on my READING OF THE LAW, and looking at various other information that the CPSC has released in regards to this law, including reading the CPSC's summaries of the individual parts of the law, and their FAQ's posted on their website, calling the CPSC more than once, and even speaking with my representative's office, every American manufacturer of any item for children is subject to this law just as much as the importers are.

Maybe you should call the CPSC and tell them that they are not correctly interpreting the law as written. That would save all of us SO much trouble.

And for those people who don't want to muddle through the law, here are the summaries PROVIDED BY THE CPSC (those would be the people who enforce this law), in layman's terms. Which were apparently misinterpreted by the CPSC themselves.

"The new legislation imposes an additional third-party testing requirement for all consumer products primarily intended for children twelve years of age or younger. Every manufacturer (including an importer) or private labeler of a children’s product must have its product tested by an accredited independent testing lab and, based on the testing, must issue a certificate that the product meets all applicable CPSC requirements. "

"Products without the required certificate cannot be imported or distributed in commerce in the United States. The certificate must accompany the product or product shipment and must be available to CPSC and Customs and Border Protection upon request. Failure to furnish the certificate or furnishing a false certificate can subject the manufacturer or private labeler to civil and criminal penalties. "

(Emphasis mine.) Available here - http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/summaries/102brief.html

I would ASSume that this is where thrift stores fall, as products cannot be "distributed in commerce" without the required certificate.

"Is the importer or U.S. manufacturer required to supply the certificate to its distributors and retailers?

Yes. The importer or U.S. manufacturer is required to "furnish" the certificate to its distributors and retailers. The Commission's rule states that this requirement is satisfied if the importer or U.S. manufacturer provides its distributors and retailers a reasonable means to access the certificate."

Hmmm...strange that they would use the words "U.S. manufacturer" if all U.S. manufacturers were exempt from this law!

Available here - http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/faq/102faq.html

Here's an excerpt from the FAQ's about the tracking labels. Again, strange that they would say "domestically made products", since Belleweather has determined that this law only applies to imports.

"Are tracking labels required on domestically made products or are they only required for imported products?

Tracking labels are required for all children’s products manufactured one year after enactment of the CPSIA (August 14, 2009) regardless of whether they are domestic or imported products."

You can watch videos of the CPSC's meetings here, where the law is discussed at length - http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/testing.html

I think I'll go with the CPSC's interpretation of the law, since they would be the ones, along with the Attorney General's office, slapping me with a fine and possible jail time if I am not in compliance.

Single WAHM to 5yo DD, 2yo DS, and forever 7 week old angel DD.
AlwaysByMySide is offline  
#33 of 42 Old 01-08-2009, 04:47 AM
 
grniys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,798
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
AlwaysByMySide, thank you for posting that. That is a wonderful post and very informative and accurate.

SAHM to Ninja Boy (6) surf.gif and Monkey Man (4) carrot.gif.

grniys is offline  
#34 of 42 Old 01-08-2009, 11:45 AM
 
organicmommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,762
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Be sure you sign the petition as well about this ladies.
http://www.rallycongress.com/make-se...s-legal-/1471/
It will also give you a chance to email all your congress people after you sign as long as you put in your zip code. I did it and I think that getting it to the attention of as many people as possible will do us the best.
I also sent an email to Rachel Maddow of The Rachel Maddow Show to see if she can get some air time about it for us. Not only the resale shops but also all the wahm shops and such that are going to be affected by the law.
Hugs
Jessica
organicmommy is offline  
#35 of 42 Old 01-08-2009, 12:07 PM
 
slsurface's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: under a pile of shells
Posts: 2,624
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by EyesOfTheWorld View Post
Because that's just what we need if the economy is going downhill!

I buy 99% of my kids clothes used, and the other 1% on clearance. I can't imagine what I'd do if this happened. I really hope the Belleweather interpretation is correct - that's also what makes the most sense.
Yeah, same here! When I first read about this, my reactions was "NO F-ING WAY!". I simply cannot afford to buy new clothes. All of DS's clothes are used (other than the few things he receives as gifts). I would be seriously hurting if they took this away from me!

organicmommy, thanks for the link!
slsurface is offline  
#36 of 42 Old 01-08-2009, 12:28 PM
 
organicmommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,762
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hopefully the more people that see it and sign it and send letters to congress will help to stop this from being a problem.
organicmommy is offline  
#37 of 42 Old 01-08-2009, 12:31 PM
 
slsurface's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: under a pile of shells
Posts: 2,624
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by organicmommy View Post
Hopefully the more people that see it and sign it and send letters to congress will help to stop this from being a problem.
I just sent an email about this to all my friends and urged them to sign the petition. We can only hope that our voices will be heard!
slsurface is offline  
#38 of 42 Old 01-09-2009, 10:40 AM
 
goldfinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: At home
Posts: 843
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Lead testing law won't apply to thrift stores
After a barrage of complaints, federal regulators shifted gears Thursday and said they would no longer require that used children's clothing, toys and other items sold at secondhand stores be tested for lead.

Thrift and consignment store operators had protested that they couldn't afford to pay for the testing, and that doing so would require them to stop selling some goods or even go out of business.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...,7588285.story

Decluttering SAHM of three. Going for 2011 items in 2011.
goldfinch is offline  
#39 of 42 Old 01-09-2009, 11:18 AM
 
slsurface's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: under a pile of shells
Posts: 2,624
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My sister, the activist. Here is her blog post on the subject:

http://fireinthewind.squarespace.com...-children.html
slsurface is offline  
#40 of 42 Old 01-09-2009, 11:53 AM
 
mamayarn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 379
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am SO happy to read that this morning. It's only the beginning of refining this law, I hope. ::::::
mamayarn is offline  
#41 of 42 Old 01-09-2009, 12:54 PM
 
organicmommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,762
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am glad to see that they are looking at the law more closely and making changes, now there is still a lot to be taken care of....like library books...come on
organicmommy is offline  
#42 of 42 Old 01-09-2009, 09:20 PM
 
Zamber's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,155
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by organicmommy View Post
I am glad to see that they are looking at the law more closely and making changes, now there is still a lot to be taken care of....like library books...come on
:

Also, what about WAHMs?
Zamber is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off