Saved $16 but feeling a little guilty - Page 5 - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#121 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 11:21 AM
 
thriftyqueen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Peace Garden State
Posts: 1,155
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
In a perfect world, we would all buy locally made household items, locally grown food, handmade clothing, or we would make and grow everything ourselves. This is obviously not a reality and it is not a perfect world. We can all strive to do our part to support local business and leave a smaller footprint on this earth by purchasing less and "needing" less. Borrowing things from people that we only need every now and then. Sharing our talents with others and bartering for products and services. These are ways of staying away from purchasing from big corportations.

In a perfect world, none of us would shop at big corporations (Wal-Mart, Target, CVS, Office Max, Staples, K-Mart, Sears, Old Navy, Etc.). We would go back to 1920's western US where there are actually mom and pop owned shops to purchase things. This would be great. This is not the way the world is anymore unfortunately. Nearly every large corporation or discount store has ghosts in the closet when it comes to how they treat their employees, health insurance, business practices, child labor laws, etc. If we are going to boycott Wal-Mart, we better start boycotting the rest of them, too. Wal-Mart has been exposed. The rest of the have not necessary let their ghosts out of the closet.

It all goes back to making a personal decision of what is best for your family. If you live in a remote area with very few choices and need to save the money so your kids can eat, shop at Wal-Mart. Kids health is more important than worrying about not shopping someplace. Now if one can afford to shop elsewhere, by all means, stay away from places you don't agree with. If you can take the time to shop around, shop around and save that way. Not all people have this option or time to do so.

Instead of all of us stabbing each other in the back for decisions we make based on the part of the country we live, the finances we have, and the choices we have, why don't we just embrace each other personal decisions and forget about our own opinions. Spend some time walking in someone else's shoes and you may have a different viewpoint in life.

Hope, check out my life at http://thethriftyqueenspeaks.com
 

thriftyqueen is offline  
#122 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 11:40 AM
 
candykane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thank you Thirfty Queen. You said that perfectly. We will ALL have to answer for our choices eventually and we need not judge each other.
candykane is offline  
#123 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 12:02 PM
Banned
 
Rainbowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nature View Post
Have you actually read the whole thread? Because there most certainly is an air of superiority among some posters who choose not to shop at Walmart.
Yes, I have read the whole thread. No, I did not get a sense of superiority about boycotting WalMart, at all. I think some people here are very passionate about their personal ethics and shopping decisions, but I didn't get a sense of superiority about it. And that includes the lady who talked about her kids not wanting stuff from WalMart. I say, good for her, that is great. I didn't feel like she was bashing me for occasionally shopping there.

I do shop at WalMart on the rare occasion that I can't find an item elsewhere (I stated this in my first post in this thread). Generally I avoid them like the plague, along with Target and the others. I don't judge people who shop there; I just think we should all do our part to boycott them if we can.

I do feel WalMart is worse than other big box stores. There's a reason they have so much more bad publicity. It's because they ARE bad, and they are HUGE, and they create more damage to local economies.

Speaking of which, if we want to help poor mamas who might be working at WalMart, or need to shop there, I think our money is better spent donating to food banks, volunteering at shelters etc., or sharing our bounty with less fortunate neighbors. Because shopping at WalMart isn't going to help anyone in the long run, it's going to continue to weaken the local economy and make WalMart richer.

If someone absolutely has to shop there, like the lady who had to buy milk at WalMart in Hawaii b/c it was $8 elsewhere, well, what else can you do? I agree that $8 is not affordable for most of us. In that case I think it's definitely up to the rest of us to boycott them as much as possible so that maybe SOMEDAY that lady can buy a gallon of milk at Safeway or some other store for a reasonable sum.
Rainbowbird is offline  
#124 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 12:06 PM
Banned
 
Rainbowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathansmom View Post
Which Walmart store had the lowest prices? The one in the rich area. The highest prices were in the poor area. Was it just a few cents? No there was a $3 difference on the same size and type of Tide. Milk prices had a difference of a $1. The news purchased 16 items at all three stores and the rich area store total was $41 something. The middle class store was $48 something and the poor area store was $59. Why the price difference? They asked a socialogist why there was a price difference and he said it was because the poorer people don't price shop, travel to shop, and just shop at what is close to them which after Walmart runs out other business its just them to shop at. After the story ran I hit three stores near me which would fall in the same three classes and my results were the same as the news station.
That is SO evil. Which is why I am saying, those of us who are in a position to do something about that place--BOYCOTT! They should be put out of business!
Rainbowbird is offline  
#125 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 12:10 PM
Banned
 
Rainbowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigeyes View Post
Not to mention all those other non-Wal-mart companies that pay so little that families still qualify for medi-Cal or whatever it is called in your state.


Wal-Mart is not to blame for the health care crisis, our government is.
Those other non-Wal-Mart companies could probably afford to do more for their employees if they weren't being squeezed to death by WalMart! I really think that most people do not realize just how big a negative impact WalMart makes on the economy!

I do agree that our health-care crisis is complex and should be entirely restructured.

But WalMart could indeed improve society a great deal if they weren't so frickin' greedy.
Rainbowbird is offline  
#126 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 02:02 PM
 
sabrinat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I absolutely love these types of threads. They remind me to be less judgemental of others choices and to respect that my experience and journey in life isn't everyone elses and vice versa. To each his own.
I shop at Walmart, I make no excuses or apologizes about it. Ours is clean, well stocked, I find many items that I can't find at other stores for the same price. While I care about the world at large and humanity, my first obligation is to my own family...yep, I said it, I care about them more. If shopping at Walmart means that I can be a SAHM and still afford all needs and some of our wants I say Amen, thank goodness for Walmart!
For me it's not an issue of being bought or lack or morality, it's about economics, plain and simple. I love going to the farmer's market, aldi's, dollartree and lots of other places, but I will probably always spend a precentage of our food budget at Walmart.
I find it so ironic that many of us found MDC and mothering as a safe haven away from the criticisms of mainstream parenting, yet we're quick to criticism anyone who we deem not carrying the banner quite as high as ourselves. Go figure!

Sabrina , mom to 4 fab kids!

sabrinat is offline  
#127 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 02:56 PM
Banned
 
Rainbowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sabrinat View Post
I find it so ironic that many of us found MDC and mothering as a safe haven away from the criticisms of mainstream parenting, yet we're quick to criticism anyone who we deem not carrying the banner quite as high as ourselves. Go figure!
But nobody was criticising anyone, with the exception of the WalMart shopper who claimed that another pp was "elitist" or had a "superior attitude" or something to that effect because the pp wrote about her ethics on the subject with regards to her children. And another WalMart shopper used the word "snobbish".

The only bashing that has occured, IMO, is from the WalMart shoppers (I won't call them "supporters" since I know some of them really don't care for WalMart and feel forced to shop there).

I didn't find any of the boycott mamas to be snobbish or suffering from a superiority complex. They simply stated their own practices and beliefs on the topic.
Rainbowbird is offline  
#128 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 03:05 PM
Banned
 
Rainbowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigeyes View Post
And until I see compelling evidence that Safeway's (or KMart's or Walgreens') made in China junk is somehow superior to Wal-mart's made in China junk, I think the only people who can really say they are boycotting are those who only buy locally made goods.
It's not just the made in China junk that is the issue. It's the way WalMart operates here, putting other local businesses out of business, then driving their own prices up to make a greater profit when shoppers have nowhere else to go; the way they treat their employees. WalMart is too large, too greedy, and too powerful. They should be stopped. They have to be in violation of something! I wish they would make a big huge error that results in their downfall.
Rainbowbird is offline  
#129 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 03:06 PM
 
Leta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ishpeming, MI
Posts: 3,597
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainbowbird View Post
Those other non-Wal-Mart companies could probably afford to do more for their employees if they weren't being squeezed to death by WalMart! I really think that most people do not realize just how big a negative impact WalMart makes on the economy!

I do agree that our health-care crisis is complex and should be entirely restructured.

But WalMart could indeed improve society a great deal if they weren't so frickin' greedy.
Bolding mine. As to the first bolded part: This is a nice thought, but it is completely and totally false. I did my thesis on the modern American healthcare crisis. Does WM negatively impact local economies? In many, many cases, YES. But the problem with healthcare is that it cannot be regulated by conventional market driven means. THE HEALTHCARE CRISIS IS IN NO WAY THE FAULT OF ANY MANUFACTURER OR RETAILER.

As far as the second bolded part goes, yes, absolutely. But you could subsitute "Wal-Mart" in this sentance with almost any other money making enterprise.

Trying to turn hearts and minds toward universal healthcare, one post at a time.
Leta is offline  
#130 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 03:07 PM
 
AngelBee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Brighton, MN
Posts: 20,388
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
:

Mama to 9 so far:Mother of Joey (20), Dominick (13), Abigail (11), Angelo (8), Mylee (6), Delainey (3), Colton (2) and Baby 8 and Baby 9 coming sometime in July 2013.   If evolution were true, mothers would have three arms!

AngelBee is offline  
#131 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 03:08 PM
 
Nature's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In Aspieville
Posts: 6,492
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Having the attitude of "if you really wanted to.." or "if you were compassionate of other humans..." or "if you had higher morals..." "then you too would boycott walmart" isn't having a superiority complex?

treehugger.gifAutistic pagan mama with five kiddos on the spectrum, learning through living life. autismribbon.gif  computergeek2.gif

Nature is offline  
#132 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 03:16 PM
 
Carolinamidwife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 7,743
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Well, Rainbowbird, I am not a wal-mart shopper so before you go chalking up my disagreeing with you to my secret shame over bargain shopping I was wondering if you had any back up documentation for these statements (other than propaganda):

Quote:
and they create more damage to local economies.
Quote:
It's the way WalMart operates here, putting other local businesses out of business,

Like I said, I am not a Wal-mart shopper but before I decide for someone whether or not the job they might be getting at Wal-mart is affecting my local economy I like to have all of the facts.

Amy: Certified Professional Midwife and mom to Max (11) and Stella (6).
Carolinamidwife is offline  
#133 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 03:20 PM
 
swimswamswum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chasing my babe.
Posts: 4,284
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leta View Post
Bolding mine. As to the first bolded part: This is a nice thought, but it is completely and totally false. I did my thesis on the modern American healthcare crisis. Does WM negatively impact local economies? In many, many cases, YES. But the problem with healthcare is that it cannot be regulated by conventional market driven means. THE HEALTHCARE CRISIS IS IN NO WAY THE FAULT OF ANY MANUFACTURER OR RETAILER.

As far as the second bolded part goes, yes, absolutely. But you could subsitute "Wal-Mart" in this sentance with almost any other money making enterprise.
I disagree and agree with Rainbowbird. While the healthcare crisis is certainly complex, it absolutely is related to current manufacturing and trade policies in the United States. When places like Walmart choose to provide their shareholders and owners with greater profit at the expense of their employees and the people manufacturing the goods they sell, they are absolutely contributing to the high rate of uninsured people in this country. When they choose to low ball decent manufacturers like Rubbermade and force them to rely on exploitative labor in poor countries, they absolutely contribute to high rates of uninsured and unemployed people in the US. States are left with the burden of providing healthcare for people who once had decent, well paying manufacturing jobs, they aren't able (or willing) to provide clinicians with competitive reimbursement rates, and costs go up for everyone.

I do not disagree with you that a problem in healthcare is that it cannot and should not be regulated by conventional market means. Capitalism and health care absolutely should not mix. I am a strong proponent of universal healthcare and healthcare reform. This does not mean that I believe that the policies and decisions of major, profit driven corporations like Walmart do not also contribute to the crisis. I think it's a "both and" problem, rather than "either or".

We also have to remember that health is not just defined as access to care. It's about having access to all of the things that we need to stay healthy- avoiding stress, eating well, having clean environments, etc. These things are absolutely related to making a living wage and having a job where you're treated with dignity. Walmart's track record shows that they are not interested in treating all people with dignity and that they have no interest in providing their employees or those manufacturing for them with a living wage and the right to organize.
swimswamswum is offline  
#134 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 03:28 PM
 
my6beans's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I shop at Wal-Mart. We are a famly of 8 and on a somewhat fixed income. I find if I shop at Wal-Mart I am getting almost 2x's as much as if I shop at Hannaford or Target. When it comes to toilet paper, I am NOT willing to scrimp. It doesn't make a difference if you buy tp at Wal-Mart or any other store as it all comes from the same place. Yes I feel bad for those people, but when it comes to having a few extra dollars in my pocket I will still shop at Wal-Mart.
my6beans is offline  
#135 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 03:42 PM
 
jennlyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 493
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
As far as Wal-Mart charging different prices in different areas, I have found this to be true. I have two superstores in my area within a five mile area. I went to the one that is more out-of-town and got a couple of food items that I normally buy. Two of them were priced fifty cents higher than at their other store. I mentioned it to the cashier, who acknowledged that different stores have different prices, but she did charge me the lower prices on the items. I do not live in a rural area, however, we do not have any low-cost grocery stores here. The one we had ( where I often shopped) got bought out by a larger grocery chain that didn't want to bother with a low-end retail establishment. If I go to a grocery store, I purchase the loss leaders. Many items are priced anywhere from .25 to 1.00 more than the same item at Wal-Mart. When I had more cash , I shopped more at the higher -end grocery store. They did not treat their employees particularly well either. A woman who worked there many years was told that the store "couldn't afford" to give the employees a raise that year, but I don't recall any news that store profits were down in any way. Another told me of how they would cut back employee hours to next to nothing so employees would have to quit in order to find other work. I recently read a NY Times article about buying green. The author stated that it gets a bit ridiculous when people are buying fruit at Whole Foods in the winter that was flown in on a 747 from Chile. The gist of it was that people need to consume less, period. I do not have any produce stands locally. The one nearby closed down. I have visited rural areas where there are very, very few choices as far as shopping goes. I have choices, but I don't think supporting my local grocery that doesn't treat employees well is such a great choice either. No, there are not unions there either. I worked at a grocery store many years ago and it was union. Minimum wage was 3.10. After a couple of years I was making 6.50, with benefits. If I went and got a job at a grocery store here, I would probably be making about the same wage I made 25 years ago. While I applaud the efforts many of you have made to make people aware, please be tolerant of those who aren't as far ahead on the journey to awareness or need to make different choices for their families.
jennlyn is offline  
#136 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 03:46 PM
 
wonderwahine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: wi fi didnt do it!
Posts: 17,724
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainbowbird View Post
Speaking of which, if we want to help poor mamas who might be working at WalMart, or need to shop there, I think our money is better spent donating to food banks, volunteering at shelters etc., or sharing our bounty with less fortunate neighbors. Because shopping at WalMart isn't going to help anyone in the long run, it's going to continue to weaken the local economy and make WalMart richer.
thats a big assumption, I know even on our tight budget we still donate food and clothing. Just because we shop at walmart doesn't mean we arn't.

not to mention, the thousands of dollars in food that WALMART donate to the food banks ad homeless shelters in our area. I think if walmart had to cut costs suddenly because of lack of sales, that would be one of the areas that suffered first, so how would boycotting help?
wonderwahine is offline  
#137 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 03:49 PM
 
wonderwahine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: wi fi didnt do it!
Posts: 17,724
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainbowbird View Post
Those other non-Wal-Mart companies could probably afford to do more for their employees if they weren't being squeezed to death by WalMart! I really think that most people do not realize just how big a negative impact WalMart makes on the economy!

I do agree that our health-care crisis is complex and should be entirely restructured.

But WalMart could indeed improve society a great deal if they weren't so frickin' greedy.
how on earth is a casino being squeezed to death by walmart, or an insurance company that laid dh off 3yrs ago, in 4 yrs of working there, selling insurance, he was never offered any or even a discount.
wonderwahine is offline  
#138 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 03:50 PM
 
nannymom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 2,675
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainbowbird View Post
But nobody was criticising anyone, with the exception of the WalMart shopper who claimed that another pp was "elitist" or had a "superior attitude" or something to that effect because the pp wrote about her ethics on the subject with regards to her children. And another WalMart shopper used the word "snobbish".

The only bashing that has occured, IMO, is from the WalMart shoppers (I won't call them "supporters" since I know some of them really don't care for WalMart and feel forced to shop there).

I didn't find any of the boycott mamas to be snobbish or suffering from a superiority complex. They simply stated their own practices and beliefs on the topic.
I think you are refering to me and I didn't call anyone an elitist or say anyone had a superior additude what I said was that an anti Walmart position can be/often is elitist. If you are going to call a me out at least take the time to read my point.

Mom to Iris and Henry
nannymom is offline  
#139 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 03:52 PM
 
thriftyqueen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Peace Garden State
Posts: 1,155
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I honestly don't think Wal-Mart is to blame for health care issues in the US. Most companies cannot pay for their employees health insurance. My DS works for a wonderful business in our community. It is a professional business. They offer him some health benefits, but nothing for the rest of the family (my DS and I are on our own and have terrible insurance). They would love to fund our insurance, but with premiums going up every year (not because of Wal-mart) they can't do it. It would cost them $600 a month to pay our insurance. That is a lot.

I would say it is more the health insurance companies that are causing some of this. And the hospitals and clinics that charge an arm and a leg. And people not taking care of their bodies, thus causing more sickness.

Hope, check out my life at http://thethriftyqueenspeaks.com
 

thriftyqueen is offline  
#140 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 04:01 PM
 
Leta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ishpeming, MI
Posts: 3,597
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimswamswum View Post
I disagree and agree with Rainbowbird. While the healthcare crisis is certainly complex, it absolutely is related to current manufacturing and trade policies in the United States. When places like Walmart choose to provide their shareholders and owners with greater profit at the expense of their employees and the people manufacturing the goods they sell, they are absolutely contributing to the high rate of uninsured people in this country. When they choose to low ball decent manufacturers like Rubbermade and force them to rely on exploitative labor in poor countries, they absolutely contribute to high rates of uninsured and unemployed people in the US. States are left with the burden of providing healthcare for people who once had decent, well paying manufacturing jobs, they aren't able (or willing) to provide clinicians with competitive reimbursement rates, and costs go up for everyone.

I do not disagree with you that a problem in healthcare is that it cannot and should not be regulated by conventional market means. Capitalism and health care absolutely should not mix. I am a strong proponent of universal healthcare and healthcare reform. This does not mean that I believe that the policies and decisions of major, profit driven corporations like Walmart do not also contribute to the crisis. I think it's a "both and" problem, rather than "either or".

We also have to remember that health is not just defined as access to care. It's about having access to all of the things that we need to stay healthy- avoiding stress, eating well, having clean environments, etc. These things are absolutely related to making a living wage and having a job where you're treated with dignity. Walmart's track record shows that they are not interested in treating all people with dignity and that they have no interest in providing their employees or those manufacturing for them with a living wage and the right to organize.

Sorry, but no. It's a "both and" problem, sure- but it's a *very* simple solution. What it boils down to is this: the problem is so complicated because we tie healthcare to employment, which is diabolically stupid. The solution is easy: expand Medicare to cover everyone, not just those over 65.This is a job for government, and government alone. It is only thru the negligence of our government that employers have any role to play whatsoever.

I spent 6 months of my life living, breathing, and eating this issue. If you want to get into why we have a healthcare crisis, I'd be happy to have that conversation, tho' I certainly do not think that this is the appropriate thread for it.

ETA: I am in Public Health. The whole point of my feild is educating people on how to take care of themselves. So yes, earining a living wage is a strong indicator of leading a healthy lifestyle. That criticism of Wal-Mart (and many other corporations) is very well founded.

Trying to turn hearts and minds toward universal healthcare, one post at a time.
Leta is offline  
#141 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 04:02 PM
 
bigeyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: hawaii
Posts: 7,734
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
QUOTE]

It is so not about this, and if you still think it is, well, you really don't get the gist of this thread at all.

If you have to buy milk at WalMart b/c there is not other alternative, that is really sad. That's what you have to do. But don't be so defensive and say the rest of us are snobs are trying to feel superior or some such nonsense. That is coming from your own issues inside, whatever they may be.[/QUOTE]

I think some of you don't get the other side either. There was a time when I couldn't afford to do anything else, and yes, that was sad.

Now, I can't see any reason to pay twice as much for something I can get there. I'm not talking about 30 cents, I'm talking about literally double the price. And there are some people in this thread who are coming off as feeling morally superior for not shopping at walmart.

I still maintain that until you can prove to me that all the other stores are getting their products from fair trade manufacturers, it is unfair to demonize Walmart without dissecting the business practices of every other retailer in the same discussion.

Just because I disagree with you does not mean I have issues.
Maybe you have issues with big business?

It's possible it's just the written word coming off differently than the spoken word, but it sure looks like quite a few people in this thread look down on us for shopping at walmart unless we say we're so destitute we have no choice.

So is that moral superiority? Pity? Either way, it isn't very nice.

for intuitive readings click here :
bigeyes is offline  
#142 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 04:05 PM
 
wonderwahine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: wi fi didnt do it!
Posts: 17,724
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I agree, and also investigate your beloved "local" stores, because they might be shopping for their suppliesat walmart or sams club also.
wonderwahine is offline  
#143 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 04:23 PM
 
swimswamswum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chasing my babe.
Posts: 4,284
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leta View Post
Sorry, but no. It's a "both and" problem, sure- but it's a *very* simple solution. What it boils down to is this: the problem is so complicated because we tie healthcare to employment, which is diabolically stupid. The solution is easy: expand Medicare to cover everyone, not just those over 65.This is a job for government, and government alone. It is only thru the negligence of our government that employers have any role to play whatsoever.

I spent 6 months of my life living, breathing, and eating this issue. If you want to get into why we have a healthcare crisis, I'd be happy to have that conversation, tho' I certainly do not think that this is the appropriate thread for it.

ETA: I am in Public Health. The whole point of my feild is educating people on how to take care of themselves. So yes, earining a living wage is a strong indicator of leading a healthy lifestyle. That criticism of Wal-Mart (and many other corporations) is very well founded.
Again, I don't disagree that employment and healthcare should not be tied to one another. I will reiterate that I fully support universal healthcare.

I am really not interested in having a pissing contest about our credentials because I don't think it should matter.

I also would like to point out that I find your tone dismissive and condescending. "Sorry, but no" really turned me off to the rest of your post.
swimswamswum is offline  
#144 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 05:04 PM
Banned
 
Rainbowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wonderwahine View Post
thats a big assumption, I know even on our tight budget we still donate food and clothing. Just because we shop at walmart doesn't mean we arn't.

not to mention, the thousands of dollars in food that WALMART donate to the food banks ad homeless shelters in our area. I think if walmart had to cut costs suddenly because of lack of sales, that would be one of the areas that suffered first, so how would boycotting help?
In no way did I say or imply that anyone who shops at WalMart doesn't donate to needy people.

My point is that if you want to help needy people, that is a far better way to do it than justifying shopping at Walmart because it is going to help someone in need. Do you see the distinction?
Rainbowbird is offline  
#145 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 05:08 PM
 
bigeyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: hawaii
Posts: 7,734
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainbowbird View Post
In no way did I say or imply that anyone who shops at WalMart doesn't donate to needy people.

My point is that if you want to help needy people, that is a far better way to do it than justifying shopping at Walmart because it is going to help someone in need. Do you see the distinction?
NO. What I see is you being judgmental about someone else's choices.
I also saw you imply I was too dumb to know what we were talking about. I know, you're going to say you didn't, but you did. When You say someone doesn't understand the thread, you are implying that they are too dumb to get it.


People disagree.

for intuitive readings click here :
bigeyes is offline  
#146 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 05:13 PM
Banned
 
Rainbowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigeyes View Post
NO. What I see is you being judgmental about someone else's choices.
I also saw you imply I was too dumb to know what we were talking about. I know, you're going to say you didn't, but you did. When You say someone doesn't understand the thread, you are implying that they are too dumb to get it.


People disagree.
I'm not being judgemental and I don't know how you get that from what I wrote. I didn't say you didn't understand. I am honestly asking you, do you see the distinction in what I am saying? There was no sarcasm there.
Rainbowbird is offline  
#147 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 05:16 PM
 
Leta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ishpeming, MI
Posts: 3,597
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimswamswum View Post

I am really not interested in having a pissing contest about our credentials because I don't think it should matter.

I also would like to point out that I find your tone dismissive and condescending. "Sorry, but no" really turned me off to the rest of your post.
I don't want to get into a pissing contest about credientials, either- that wasn't my point. It's just that here and IRL, I've had people say, "How do you know?", so I was just trying to be preemptive (sp?). Also, I don't think credentials per se matter, but I DO think it matters that we have our ducks in a row, so to speak. The U.S. healthcare system is one of the eight topics where I actually know what the hell I'm talking about.

I wasn't trying to be condescending, either. I'm sorry, sss, that it came across that way. I was trying to be succinct.
You are absolutely correct in that the problem is complicated. But, once again, on MDC and IRL, I have found that any conversation about the U.S. healthcare system is always skewed toward parsing the problem, which I think is silly when the solution is so simple. This is a hobbyhorse of mine, trying to reframe and refocus the debate.

I don't want to come across as a WM apologist. I'm not. As I said earlier in the thread, I am anti-corporatism. I just call BS on the whole, "WM is evil because their health insurance sucks". There are many, many, many valid and severe complaints about WM, I just don't think this one is.

Trying to turn hearts and minds toward universal healthcare, one post at a time.
Leta is offline  
#148 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 05:16 PM
Banned
 
Rainbowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leta View Post
Bolding mine. As to the first bolded part: This is a nice thought, but it is completely and totally false. I did my thesis on the modern American healthcare crisis. Does WM negatively impact local economies? In many, many cases, YES. But the problem with healthcare is that it cannot be regulated by conventional market driven means. THE HEALTHCARE CRISIS IS IN NO WAY THE FAULT OF ANY MANUFACTURER OR RETAILER.

As far as the second bolded part goes, yes, absolutely. But you could subsitute "Wal-Mart" in this sentance with almost any other money making enterprise.
It is not false. Smaller companies would be doing better without giants like WalMart putting them on the edge. They would likely be able to pay their employees better and have better benefits if the local economies were not so endangered.

And I didn't say the healthcare crisis was the fault of any retailer. I'm saying thing would be in a lot better shape if big business, WalMart especially, operated different. You're putting words in my mouth.
Rainbowbird is offline  
#149 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 05:16 PM
 
nantahala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WNC
Posts: 101
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leta View Post
Sorry, but no. It's a "both and" problem, sure- but it's a *very* simple solution. What it boils down to is this: the problem is so complicated because we tie healthcare to employment, which is diabolically stupid. The solution is easy: expand Medicare to cover everyone, not just those over 65.This is a job for government, and government alone. It is only thru the negligence of our government that employers have any role to play whatsoever.
Cosigned, another health care professional
nantahala is offline  
#150 of 411 Old 07-29-2007, 05:17 PM
Banned
 
Rainbowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nature View Post
Having the attitude of "if you really wanted to.." or "if you were compassionate of other humans..." or "if you had higher morals..." "then you too would boycott walmart" isn't having a superiority complex?
I believe you are inferring that some pps said the things you put in quotes, when in fact, they did not. So you are inferring that some pps have a superiority complex, which is a rather dangerous and rude assumption to make.
Rainbowbird is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off