What happens when you can't agree? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 06:25 AM - Thread Starter
 
PixieAlly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 435
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Just wondering what happens if parents can't agree on something that is not stipulated in the divorce decree. I realize you would eventually go to mediation, but this is about custody during winter break, so I doubt we'd get a mediator in time. The decree only specifics certain days (Christmas day, Easter day, 4th of July, etc.) not the week they get off of school for winter and spring break. The ex is taking the kids for 3 days for vacation as well as she gets them from 8pm on Christmas Eve to the 26th (time is not specified). We are only asking to have them two days (morning of the 26th to the morning of the 28th when they are leaving for vacation) and she refuses. She says we have to follow the regular schedule, but that schedule shows the kids in school during the day and she seems to think that means they stay with her. I don't know what we can do legally if she just refuses to let us have them. If she does that, we only get about 6 waking hours with them during the entire week and she gets them the rest of the time. The decree does specify that the time spent during holidays has to be fair and equitable. If we keep the kids those days can she call the police? In the past I think she has just given the kids to their dad most evenings during the break and kept them during to day, but because she is taking them on vacation, that gives us no time with them. We've sent her a very detailed proposed schedule that charts the waking and asleep hours with each parents during the break (and shows she still gets more time with them) and asked her what changes she would like to see, but also keep in mind the time needs to be fair to each parent. She flat our refuses to do so stating she will pick the kids up every morning at 8am like the decree states (it actually states Dad gets the kids from 7am to 8am and then they are at school all day or with a mutually agreed upon babysitter which would be dad's parents or with a parent). We don't want to cause drama for the kids, but we don't want to keep letting the ex "win" and get more and more time with the kids and dad less. The custody is supposed to be 50/50.

PixieAlly is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 06:10 PM
 
csekywithlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

She could call the cops. But there is really nothing the police could do if you kept the kids with you guys. If it isn't stipulated in the agreement, then she has no grounds to take them away. I would call my lawyer though and ask for advice. This is ridiculous. If she really wants to fit about the smallest detail, tell her it's a go. She bullies you guys too much. And the time is not really 50/50 that will be blatantly apparent to a judge. But I have your BF call the original lawyer used in the custody agreement or a mediator tomorrow morning. It's the holidays, I'm sure they get quite a bit of calls that deal with custody around this time of year. They will know what you can and cannot legally do. And consults are free!


Artist wife to dh_malesling.GIF. Mom to DSS superhero.gif (3 yrs) and DD (04/12).  brokenheart.gif (2/28/10). winner.jpgcd.gif

csekywithlove is offline  
#3 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 06:29 PM - Thread Starter
 
PixieAlly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 435
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Well, we mentioned hiring a mediator and she has backed down slightly. I have begged my BF to call the lawyer he used for the divorce but he thinks the lawyer won't even talk to him without a $3000 retainer. Do you think if we called the lawyer (or even a mediator) about the Christmas break thing they'd talk to him about it, or would they want the retainer first?

 

As for backing down...she has said we can have the kids the days we want for Christmas break, BUT she would like to extend the right of first refusal to anytime the kids can't be with dad (or mom), not just for overnights as it is now. So if my BF can't take off the whole day of work on the 27th, he has to give the kids to her (that is what she wants) instead of leaving them with me. And this will extend to other times too, like if he doesn't take one kid to karate, he has to let her take that kid instead of just leaving them home with me for the hour of karate, etc...she is trying to force him to agree to something that will mean I can never be alone with the kids without her permission. He is going to tell her know, but we know it will make her very angry because she feels she is being "fair" and "flexible" and he is not. I think talking to a lawyer at this point is a great idea, but a $3000 retainer right now for us is nearly impossible :(

 

It's so sad. These kids are so turned around with the regular schedule that they never know whose house they are sleeping at. Tonight, the 6yo could not remember where he slept last night because they get bounced around so much :( It's only for a week, but we really wanted to created 2 whole days where we could spend that time with just the kids, in one house. They almost never experience that at dad's the way she has the schedule. :(
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by csekywithlove View Post

She could call the cops. But there is really nothing the police could do if you kept the kids with you guys. If it isn't stipulated in the agreement, then she has no grounds to take them away. I would call my lawyer though and ask for advice. This is ridiculous. If she really wants to fit about the smallest detail, tell her it's a go. She bullies you guys too much. And the time is not really 50/50 that will be blatantly apparent to a judge. But I have your BF call the original lawyer used in the custody agreement or a mediator tomorrow morning. It's the holidays, I'm sure they get quite a bit of calls that deal with custody around this time of year. They will know what you can and cannot legally do. And consults are free!



 

PixieAlly is offline  
#4 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 06:48 PM
 
csekywithlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

You really shouldn't have to pay a retainer, the only way that would happen is if your BF decided that a motion for change of the custody agreement would need to happen. As far as the ROFR, it would have to infringe on her schedule at some point. Does she really want your BF questioning everyone who watches the children but him? Also, does she not have a BF or DH? I would call the lawyer for sure and see where that gets you. And the only way she will know that he called is if he tells her, so I would do it!

 


Artist wife to dh_malesling.GIF. Mom to DSS superhero.gif (3 yrs) and DD (04/12).  brokenheart.gif (2/28/10). winner.jpgcd.gif

csekywithlove is offline  
#5 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 06:52 PM - Thread Starter
 
PixieAlly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 435
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Okay, I will have him call tomorrow. She rarely has babysitters from what we know...maybe 3 times in the last six months? It's rare and she leaves them home alone sometimes if it's just for an hour or two. Even if she does hire a sitter, she wouldn't tell us and the kids seem scared to say anything about what goes on at mom's house. She also gets upset if she feels we are "grilling" the kids for info, so we're afraid to ask too much plus we don't want to put the kids in the middle. She doesn't have a BF or a DH as far as we know, but the kids tell us about some guys who "sleeps over" occasionally. She never lets my BF know about anyone who is spending time with the kids (but I did make him tell her about me as soon as we knew it was serious and I'd be moving in. She didn't seem to care at that time)

Quote:
Originally Posted by csekywithlove View Post

You really shouldn't have to pay a retainer, the only way that would happen is if your BF decided that a motion for change of the custody agreement would need to happen. As far as the ROFR, it would have to infringe on her schedule at some point. Does she really want your BF questioning everyone who watches the children but him? Also, does she not have a BF or DH? I would call the lawyer for sure and see where that gets you. And the only way she will know that he called is if he tells her, so I would do it!

 



 

PixieAlly is offline  
#6 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 06:56 PM
 
jess in hawaii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: guess
Posts: 749
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

She is their mother, you are the girlfriend, she should have priority over you. Get used to it.

Kids do get turned around with 50/50 custody. It's terrible for the children, completely unfair to them, but they don't really have rights anyway.


rainbow1284.gifJess, mama to five boys joy.gif

 

 

jess in hawaii is offline  
#7 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 07:07 PM
 
csekywithlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

See it's a double standard. "Who's watching the kids when you're at work?" Then in the same conversation, "It's none of your business who is in my house." I have had these conversations with DSS's BM a million times. DH and I just tell her "Ok, fine. You can argue with yourself but you aren't going to argue with us. Contact us in 24 hours when you have calmed down." The last time she threatened visitation we told her about the child psychologist DSS had to see after she had him the last time and that he was willing to testify if need be. She backed down immediately.

 

It's not about being argumentative but she needs to realize that HE is their parent TOO. Sounds to me like there is some serious resentment, anger, jealously issues going on. Which is to an extent normal. But she is getting crazy with it. To not allow her children 2 days with their father when they are on break is cruel.


Artist wife to dh_malesling.GIF. Mom to DSS superhero.gif (3 yrs) and DD (04/12).  brokenheart.gif (2/28/10). winner.jpgcd.gif

csekywithlove is offline  
#8 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 07:22 PM - Thread Starter
 
PixieAlly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 435
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Nice, so kids get treated like  crap and unfairly because they don't have rights and that's okay? She has the kids when she's supposed to and for the time legally stipulated in the divorce decree. My BF doesn't want to take any of that way, he just wants HIS kids in HIS home when they should be and for the correct amount of time. 50/50 does not mean she gets them in her home 80% of the time because he's at work. The divorce decree specifies creating environments for the kids that is less stressful...bouncing them around to different houses each night so they don't even remember where they slept the night before is not a "less stressful" environment.
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by jess in hawaii View Post

She is their mother, you are the girlfriend, she should have priority over you. Get used to it.

Kids do get turned around with 50/50 custody. It's terrible for the children, completely unfair to them, but they don't really have rights anyway.



 

PixieAlly is offline  
#9 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 07:28 PM
 
jess in hawaii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: guess
Posts: 749
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I hear what you're saying, but having lived the other side, I know what it's like to have an ex whose new partner thinks she has some right and privilege just because she hooked up with a dad. If the mother (please refrain from using BM, it's really insulting) feels it necessary to insist on keeping the only schedule they have in a court order, chances are there is a very good reason. She is not demanding more, she is saying "this is all we have to go on, this is what we have to do right now". I totally get that. I have had to hold my ex to the letter of our orders because he abuses and exploits any loophole he can. I have a feeling this mother is just protecting her side of the agreement, which is what she should do. If she doesn't have anyone else in her life, her life completely revolves around her children, unlike her ex, who has put his energy into another relationship. It is reasonable to be concerned about who your children are with. My ex exposed my kids to all kinds of inappropriateness. It sounds like there is a lot of judgement about the mother acting the way most mothers act in a similar situation. She probably feels defensive and guarded with good reason.


rainbow1284.gifJess, mama to five boys joy.gif

 

 

jess in hawaii is offline  
#10 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 07:30 PM
 
jess in hawaii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: guess
Posts: 749
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

50/50 means with him, not his girlfriend. If he isn't available for that, why should the mother lose out?

 

ETA p.s. I was being facetious about the kids. Unfortunately, the courts are currently more concerned with "dads' rights" than what is in the best interest of the children.


rainbow1284.gifJess, mama to five boys joy.gif

 

 

jess in hawaii is offline  
#11 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 07:40 PM
 
csekywithlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by jess in hawaii View Post

I hear what you're saying, but having lived the other side, I know what it's like to have an ex whose new partner thinks she has some right and privilege just because she hooked up with a dad. If the mother (please refrain from using BM, it's really insulting) feels it necessary to insist on keeping the only schedule they have in a court order, chances are there is a very good reason. She is not demanding more, she is saying "this is all we have to go on, this is what we have to do right now". I totally get that. I have had to hold my ex to the letter of our orders because he abuses and exploits any loophole he can. I have a feeling this mother is just protecting her side of the agreement, which is what she should do. If she doesn't have anyone else in her life, her life completely revolves around her children, unlike her ex, who has put his energy into another relationship. It is reasonable to be concerned about who your children are with. My ex exposed my kids to all kinds of inappropriateness. It sounds like there is a lot of judgement about the mother acting the way most mothers act in a similar situation. She probably feels defensive and guarded with good reason.



I use BM because in my case DH and DSS's mother were never married and she has never had anymore than joint custody of him. She also didn't pay her child support ($60/month) until the judge put a contempt order on the books and she never calls on birthdays, holidays, anything to check on DSS. He literally doesn't know who she is and hasn't seen her in over a year. She is in my opinion an egg donor. I am not trying to offend you in anyway, Jess. I simply never want DSS to think that just because his birth mom chose to ignore him that he didn't have a mother. 

 

And I do get what you are saying about their mother protecting her side of the agreement but from what Pixiealley is saying it's not so much about keeping to the custody agreement and allowing a fair time for both parents to parent their kids. 

 

My DH was in a situation where he loved his son and knew that he had to fight for him. He did with me alongside him. We were expected to get residential custody and did, while the judge told her if she said one more word, she would get 30 days for contempt. I respect that you have been on the other side of this argument and I agree that the mom is doing what a 'mom' should do. But I think if he is a good father, don't punish the kids because he has a girlfriend who obviously is willing to co-parent and be good to your children. If Pixie didn't want to be involved in the kids lives and thought they were just BF's responsibility, that would be horrible IMO. At least she is trying to be a positive influence.


Artist wife to dh_malesling.GIF. Mom to DSS superhero.gif (3 yrs) and DD (04/12).  brokenheart.gif (2/28/10). winner.jpgcd.gif

csekywithlove is offline  
#12 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 07:50 PM
 
jess in hawaii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: guess
Posts: 749
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Ha! you dss's mother sounds like my boys' father! We all have different and similar situations. And we can't know both sides just from one person's post. One would hope that the children's needs can be lovingly attended by all the adults involved, but sadly this doesn't often happen. Everyone wants to think they are doing the right thing, but I find it rare that each parent puts away their ego and does what is best for the kids.


rainbow1284.gifJess, mama to five boys joy.gif

 

 

jess in hawaii is offline  
#13 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 08:01 PM
 
aricha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I really think you will need a lawyer to look at the custody agreement. If he already has a lawyer from before, he should be able to pay just for the time he uses his/her services to consult about the schedule and discuss his legal options. A retainer is an estimated up-front payment (or substantial partial payment) for work that the lawyer knows they are going to need to do. They aren't going to charge a $3000 retainer if there isn't work for them beyond a consultation about interpreting a custody agreement. 

 

He and his ex CAN go to mediation and come to am agreement to supplement their current agreement. Depending on the situation and the state, it might be enough to just have a written agreement or it might need to be officially filed with the court. We worked with mediators who had the knowledge and resources to file something legal with the court without needing to actually go to court. In our situation both parents have agreed to changes or clarifications in writing and that has been enough for both of them to abide by them. BUT we also worked hard with our lawyer to spell out EVERYTHING in detail because of the co-parent we were dealing with, AND we operated under a temporary agreement for the first year in order to iron out any difficulties before filing a final agreement with the court. So there is not much left in there that could be open to interpretation. The custody agreement should be the document that provides the bottom-line clarity for disagreements, and should be something you can default to if you don't agree. It doesn't sound like that is the case for your boyfriend and his ex, so it certainly wouldn't be the worst idea to renegotiate the agreement and provide clarity so everyone knows what to expect and it can better meet the needs of the kids and the parents.   

 

As for a change to the ROFR, if it is written in the custody agreement that it only applies to overnights, that's potentially a very reasonable place for your boyfriend to start standing up for his rights. If he isn't obligated to abide by ROFR at any other time, he can simply not do that. She can tell him that's what she wants him to do, but if she's asking for a change to their agreement it is up to him to agree to it. She doesn't just get to decide that she wants something different... if it's in the agreement, it's in the agreement until they agree to something else (or a judge says otherwise). 

 

I feel like I should say that I don't know what the agreement says, so I'm not giving advice on what to do. I'm speaking just from my own experience dealing with a mom who felt, for a long time, that she could just decide what everyone else was going to do and didn't consider dad an equal parent or legitimate decision-maker. IT was really hard to make that change-- you can't control what someone else does, you can only control what you do... When my husband had had enough and decided he was ready for something to change, the first step was to change his own behavior. To do that, he needed to truly believe that he was an equal parent, with equal rights and responsibilities to his child.


Parenting four little monkeys (11, 8, 6, and 4) with the love of my life. Making it up as I go.
aricha is offline  
#14 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 08:33 PM - Thread Starter
 
PixieAlly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 435
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by jess in hawaii View Post

I hear what you're saying, but having lived the other side, I know what it's like to have an ex whose new partner thinks she has some right and privilege just because she hooked up with a dad. If the mother (please refrain from using BM, it's really insulting) feels it necessary to insist on keeping the only schedule they have in a court order, chances are there is a very good reason. She is not demanding more, she is saying "this is all we have to go on, this is what we have to do right now". I totally get that. I have had to hold my ex to the letter of our orders because he abuses and exploits any loophole he can. I have a feeling this mother is just protecting her side of the agreement, which is what she should do. If she doesn't have anyone else in her life, her life completely revolves around her children, unlike her ex, who has put his energy into another relationship. It is reasonable to be concerned about who your children are with. My ex exposed my kids to all kinds of inappropriateness. It sounds like there is a lot of judgement about the mother acting the way most mothers act in a similar situation. She probably feels defensive and guarded with good reason.


I don't think I've ever referred to her as the BM, so I am not sure why you're addressing me about it. I usually just say she's the ex or my BF's ex or their mom. She is saying that the time the kids are usually in school is HER time. It does not state that anywhere in the divorce decree and logic would tell you that if you have 50/50 custody, then at least half that time should go to the dad. We are not asking for anything more than what he is entitled to legally. She is the one who abuses loopholes, not us. Her side of the agreement is not "Mom gets the kids when they are supposed to be in school during breaks" and my BF is trying to protect HIS right to see his kids 50% of the time and to attempt to protect them for stressful situations. She does have someone in her life, a sleepover buddy according to the kids, who we are not allowed to know anything about, but somehow she has a right to know about me, when I'll be there, when I'm watching the kids, etc..? If he asks about who the kids are spending time with he is told it is none of his business or she just completely ignores the question.

 

PixieAlly is offline  
#15 of 56 Old 12-13-2011, 08:35 PM - Thread Starter
 
PixieAlly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 435
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Not in this county. She was favored and get the exact schedule she wanted. He tried to propose something that would still give them 50/50 but wouldn't bounce the kids around and the judge said no. Hawaii is a lot different than podunk-town, Wisconsin.
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by jess in hawaii View Post

50/50 means with him, not his girlfriend. If he isn't available for that, why should the mother lose out?

 

ETA p.s. I was being facetious about the kids. Unfortunately, the courts are currently more concerned with "dads' rights" than what is in the best interest of the children.



 

PixieAlly is offline  
#16 of 56 Old 12-14-2011, 06:20 AM
 
aricha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

If the agreement doesn't specify anything on vacations besides that it should be divided equitably, and you guys don't like her schedule, then your boyfriend is going to have to steel himself to stand up to her about it. One way to do that is to propose your own schedule... we never actually get what my husband actually asks for because his ex needs to be the one to control the situation, but usually she just comes back with some modified version of the same plan or they go back and forth arguing about it for a while before she goes back to what he originally asked for but in a way that makes it sound like it was her idea. The other way is to give her the parameters and ask her to come up with a reasonable schedule... So maybe he says "the agreement says the time they are on vacation will be shared equitably. That means that the time they would normally be in school needs to be divided equally. I don't care how it is divided, but the time they would normally be in school needs to be divided between us. Let me know which days and times you would like them with you." My husband usually adds something (so it is in writing) about what he would like to see (I would prefer to minimize the number of times they go back and forth because I know that is hard for them), but sometimes that just serves to make her do the opposite.

 

Maybe look at their entire break, take out the five days of official vacation for her (and the official vacation for you if that's what you are using in January) and then look at the remaining days they would have been in school and divide those between the two houses. I know the ideal would be to have those two days together the way you have planned, but in the long run it may be more important for your husband to stand up for overall equity at the expense of having your time broken up a bit. If he argues with her about it and then ends up just giving in, she has discovered that she's just going to have to hold out longer now but that eventually she will get what she wants. And it sounds like she is looking for the weak spots and thinks she has found it with saying that the kids must be with a parent the whole time. If your husband comes up with a consistent response, "Right of First Refusal doesn't apply during the day. What I do with my parenting time is my business" it might be easier to keep from getting involved in an argument about it and keep the two issues separate (ie not negotiate one thing for the other). Essentially she is saying "If you want time at Christmas, you need to agree to a change in the custody agreement." Personally, I wouldn't sacrifice something like that for the short-term trade-off of this week's Christmas schedule... it's two days at Christmas in exchange for 10-12+ years of a pretty ridiculous interpretation of ROFR. In my book, it's just not worth it.


Parenting four little monkeys (11, 8, 6, and 4) with the love of my life. Making it up as I go.
aricha is offline  
#17 of 56 Old 12-14-2011, 07:07 AM - Thread Starter
 
PixieAlly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 435
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Ugh, this whole situation is completely out of control at this point. Seriously, all this started out is is asking for 4 days out of 10 during winter break (2 of those days are stipulated as his in the divorce decree due to the Christmas holiday). He proposed a schedule expecting her to send back a modified one and asked her to just make sure it is equitable. She so far has refused to do so and in the latest email from her, she has completely changed what she originally proposed! I suggested he just resubmit his proposal, with modifications of things she's asked for, and tell her that is what he is willing to agree to and if she won't, they will have to take it to mediation. Her last email was all about how sad she was to be away from the kids and how he is just doing all this to be vindictive and keep the kids away from her. How is wanting the kids 40% of the time in a 50/50 custody situation trying to keep the kids away from her?!?! He doesn't want to take the kids away from her at all. He knows it is important they have a relationship with their mom. He just wants his fair time with them. He loves them and misses them too and can't understand why her love and desire to be with the kids is more important than his.

 

He did send her a detailed breakdown of the time, excluding her vacation as her time with the kids, and she still came out having the kids more with his plan. She refuses to even acknowledge that. And we are definitely not changing the ROFR stuff. He flat out told her that, which is why she came back with a completely different proposal. This is supposed to just be about Christmas break, but she has made it about all breaks, sick days, snow days, doctor appointments, etc...I think he needs to just go back to the beginning and ask her to resolve only the Christmas break issue first and we'll go back to the other stuff after that. She told him a fair way to deal with breaks, snow days, snow delays, sick days, etc...would be wherever the kids are sleeping that night is where they will stay during the day. We thought, okay, fine, that sounds fair because it would just work out equitably in the long run, although most teacher conference days and half days tend to be on her days at the end of the week. We decided that didn't matter and let her know that her idea was acceptable (minus the ROFR stuff). Her latest email now states that she gets the kids for all snow DAYS and we get the kids for all snow DELAYS. Her reasoning is she will miss snow days with the kids too much. Well, that's understandable, but she would still get snow days with the kids if it lands on her day and why is her desire to have snow days with the kids more important then my BF's desire to spend snow days with the kid? On top of that, in the past, she has never once come and gotten the kids for a snow delay, even though he has asked her. He always had to take off of work. She also refused to take them for about 50% of the snow days that occurred over the past two years or she would tell him she  was busy and couldn't get the kids until later in the day, which was pointless since he'd have to take most of the day off of work anyway. But if she wants snow days now, that is fine with him. He just wants them divided equally.

 

I think he will be going into "broken record" mode now with basically, this is what I propose, if it is not acceptable or you can't provide another plan that is equitable, or we will need to go to mediation. I think we'll add "Right of First Refusal doesn't apply during the day. What I do with my parenting time is my business." :) Thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aricha View Post

If the agreement doesn't specify anything on vacations besides that it should be divided equitably, and you guys don't like her schedule, then your boyfriend is going to have to steel himself to stand up to her about it. One way to do that is to propose your own schedule... we never actually get what my husband actually asks for because his ex needs to be the one to control the situation, but usually she just comes back with some modified version of the same plan or they go back and forth arguing about it for a while before she goes back to what he originally asked for but in a way that makes it sound like it was her idea. The other way is to give her the parameters and ask her to come up with a reasonable schedule... So maybe he says "the agreement says the time they are on vacation will be shared equitably. That means that the time they would normally be in school needs to be divided equally. I don't care how it is divided, but the time they would normally be in school needs to be divided between us. Let me know which days and times you would like them with you." My husband usually adds something (so it is in writing) about what he would like to see (I would prefer to minimize the number of times they go back and forth because I know that is hard for them), but sometimes that just serves to make her do the opposite.

 

Maybe look at their entire break, take out the five days of official vacation for her (and the official vacation for you if that's what you are using in January) and then look at the remaining days they would have been in school and divide those between the two houses. I know the ideal would be to have those two days together the way you have planned, but in the long run it may be more important for your husband to stand up for overall equity at the expense of having your time broken up a bit. If he argues with her about it and then ends up just giving in, she has discovered that she's just going to have to hold out longer now but that eventually she will get what she wants. And it sounds like she is looking for the weak spots and thinks she has found it with saying that the kids must be with a parent the whole time. If your husband comes up with a consistent response, "Right of First Refusal doesn't apply during the day. What I do with my parenting time is my business" it might be easier to keep from getting involved in an argument about it and keep the two issues separate (ie not negotiate one thing for the other). Essentially she is saying "If you want time at Christmas, you need to agree to a change in the custody agreement." Personally, I wouldn't sacrifice something like that for the short-term trade-off of this week's Christmas schedule... it's two days at Christmas in exchange for 10-12+ years of a pretty ridiculous interpretation of ROFR. In my book, it's just not worth it.



 

PixieAlly is offline  
#18 of 56 Old 12-14-2011, 07:27 AM
 
Imakcerka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,026
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)

Sounds like a power struggle.  They never end.  My parents did the exact same thing.  Mom wanted this dad wanted that and just continued on for years.   YEARS!

Imakcerka is offline  
#19 of 56 Old 12-14-2011, 08:57 AM - Thread Starter
 
PixieAlly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 435
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

We're both so worn out by this :( I hate playing games but it seems like that is the only way she'll compromise. I think we've decided to give her snow days and he will promise to make every effort to take time off during sick days and holidays to be with the kids, but he is still telling her he will not adjust the ROFR to include non-overnights. We also realize she picked us having the kids on snow delay days because if the kids are at her house, it will be nearly impossible for us to pick them up before school starts due to her road  being one of the last ones to be plowed :/  I think he is going to say she needs to pick them up on full snow days to equal things out. He's also going to let her know that he will have time off during the break to be with the kids so they will not be with me the whole time. She is so manipulative though. The way she worded the last email makes me almost feel sorry for her, and in a way I do, but then you look more closely and you see the cracks in her story (like saying she is sad about snow days when for the past two years so has shown very little interest in having the kids on snow days and usually made my BF take time off of work). We've been talking about expressing to her that he wants the kids to spend equal time with both parents, which is true, because that is what is best and healthiest for them, but he wants his time to be equal. And also telling her how the kids complain about being bounced around between houses so much and he is just trying to create some continuity in their lives while keeping time with parents as equal as possible. We'll see what happens or if he even sends that email. I see him getting to the giving up point :(

PixieAlly is offline  
#20 of 56 Old 12-14-2011, 10:56 AM
 
csekywithlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I'm sure that you are both worn out buy it. Situations like these are mentally and emotionally exhausting. Just make sure that he stays on track. Sounds like he is making some great strides as far as staying on point. I doubt she will stick to her end of the bargain about snow days from what you've said. You talk an awful lot about him taking off of work or leaving early during the day. Does he take off that much because she changes plans? That can't be good for his job unless he has an awesome boss and job security. ROFR is the most annoying thing. That is the biggest double standard here because I bet you BF is never allowed to ask who she has watching their children. Ugh. I'm sorry mama.hug.gif  I really hope that he can get this panned out before next week so you all can enjoy the holidays.


Artist wife to dh_malesling.GIF. Mom to DSS superhero.gif (3 yrs) and DD (04/12).  brokenheart.gif (2/28/10). winner.jpgcd.gif

csekywithlove is offline  
#21 of 56 Old 12-14-2011, 11:10 AM - Thread Starter
 
PixieAlly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 435
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Yeah, she is lucky that he has a great boss who allows him to have flexible hours (so he can skip lunch to make up for time or come in early, etc...). And yes, he has had to take a lot of vacation days and hours in the past because of her and her schedule changes or refusing to do things when she has the kids. I honestly don't care if she keeps her end of the bargain up since I am fine with keeping the kids home with me. We decided she can have first pick of snow days because there are rarely more than 1 or 2 per year anyway. Our main goal is to stop the constant bouncing around from house to house which is why we requested when a kid is sick, they just stay put until evening transfer time no matter where they are and that on early release snow days, the kids go to whichever house they are spending the night out. We still have a long way to go. She still has not defined a vacation day (she seems to think any day we are gone with the kids is a vacation day even if it's a day we normally have them, but for herself, she only counts the days the kids would be with us normally as a vacation day and insists that visit family out of state does not count as a vacation). We also need to sort out how to deal with the schedule change she is requesting in January where she wants the kids to bounce around to 4 different places (school, her house, our house and karate) all within a span of 50 minutes instead of just letting us pick the kids up from school since we have them every Monday night anyway. We also need to contact the teachers and talk about homework issues and see if we can get the ex to do at least 20 minutes of homework with the kids when she has them on days when the 8yo gets an hour's worth of homework because we just don't have the time to do it all with dinner, karate, bath time, etc..and she gets punished at school by being kept in a recess if she doesn't do it all. I don't know how we're going to get through all this, but I will just be happy if we can get through Christmas with the four measly days we want, days my BF is entitled to as their father.
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by csekywithlove View Post

I'm sure that you are both worn out buy it. Situations like these are mentally and emotionally exhausting. Just make sure that he stays on track. Sounds like he is making some great strides as far as staying on point. I doubt she will stick to her end of the bargain about snow days from what you've said. You talk an awful lot about him taking off of work or leaving early during the day. Does he take off that much because she changes plans? That can't be good for his job unless he has an awesome boss and job security. ROFR is the most annoying thing. That is the biggest double standard here because I bet you BF is never allowed to ask who she has watching their children. Ugh. I'm sorry mama.hug.gif  I really hope that he can get this panned out before next week so you all can enjoy the holidays.



 

PixieAlly is offline  
#22 of 56 Old 12-14-2011, 02:49 PM
 
greenemami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,783
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)

"We're both so worn out by this :( I hate playing games but it seems like that is the only way she'll compromise. I think we've decided to give her snow days and he will promise to make every effort to take time off during sick days and holidays to be with the kids, but he is still telling her he will not adjust the ROFR to include non-overnights. We also realize she picked us having the kids on snow delay days because if the kids are at her house, it will be nearly impossible for us to pick them up before school starts due to her road  being one of the last ones to be plowed :/  I think he is going to say she needs to pick them up on full snow days to equal things out. He's also going to let her know that he will have time off during the break to be with the kids so they will not be with me the whole time. She is so manipulative though. The way she worded the last email makes me almost feel sorry for her, and in a way I do, but then you look more closely and you see the cracks in her story (like saying she is sad about snow days when for the past two years so has shown very little interest in having the kids on snow days and usually made my BF take time off of work). We've been talking about expressing to her that he wants the kids to spend equal time with both parents, which is true, because that is what is best and healthiest for them, but he wants his time to be equal. And also telling her how the kids complain about being bounced around between houses so much and he is just trying to create some continuity in their lives while keeping time with parents as equal as possible. We'll see what happens or if he even sends that email. I see him getting to the giving up point :("

 

 

This sounds really complicated-actually, I'm not even sure how it would work!

 

I would encourage you to stand up on this one and just say that whoever has them the prevoius night (i.e. where they would be leaving for school from) would just be responsible for either getting them to school or to when school would normally end. Our agreement (the newest one at least, because we have dealt with this issue!) states that "xyz has the child from 3 pm Wednesday until 3 pm Thursday OR is responsible for taking child to school on Thursday morning." (rough terms, not what it actually says!) We had a big argument with dsd's mom at one point too about days off-she insisted we drop her off at the time we would to start school, we said we should get to keep her until the time mom would normally pick her up from school. Originally, we compromised at around noon, but now it has changed to 3 or 4 pm as the default.


Single mama namaste.gif to dd dust.gifand ds fencing.gif, loving my dsd always reading.gif .
greenemami is offline  
#23 of 56 Old 12-14-2011, 02:55 PM
 
greenemami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,783
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)

Also, I'm curious-if you don't mind sharing, what is your schedule? I'm confused as to why you wouldn't ordinally end up with 2 days in a row?

 

Claiming that time the kids would be in school is her time just doesn't make sense, there's no way she would win that one in court. If it states split vacation equably, then insist on close to equal time or you risk being walked all over in the future.

 

Her ideas on vacation time kind of made me laugh (sorry!) It seems like such a clear cut issue and yet gets so complicated, right?! Vacation time here at least is pretty simply defined as taking time that would normally be spent with the other parent. i.e. if mom went away for 10 days, but only 3 were dad's originally, that counts for 3 vacation days, not 10! And yes, family visits count, lol! I would imagine that if she were more reaonsble, it would be so simple o say a few extra vacation days don't matter instead of feeling like you have to stand your ground-it is a shame she is making things harder for everyone, including herself. :(


Single mama namaste.gif to dd dust.gifand ds fencing.gif, loving my dsd always reading.gif .
greenemami is offline  
#24 of 56 Old 12-14-2011, 04:33 PM - Thread Starter
 
PixieAlly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 435
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Okay, I'll try to explain it! :) But we never get two solid days in a row (she gets 2-3 per week however).  Also, the original schedule was written when the youngest only had half days of school, so it indicates that she or a baby sitter gets the kids in the afternoon during the week, but that was only  because the youngest had to go somewhere. Now he is in school full time so it doesn't apply, however I am assuming if she sent a cop to the house because we kept them during the day on a day school was out, we'd be out of luck :(

 

So my BF gets the kids at 445pm on M, Tu, and every other Wed. Then we get them at 1pm on Saturday until 2pm on Sunday. However, she picks them up from school every day and has them from 3:20 to 4:45pm. So she gets to see them every day, and he does not, yet she has the nerve to tell him that it almost kills her when he takes them on vacation because she can't see them for so long. She has no empathy for him and the fact that he has to go days without seeing them EVERY WEEK. Also, when they are on vacation, she has a right to call every day, but rarely does. Also, as you can see, we never get them for a full day either. She has Saturday and Sunday broken up so we have to rush back on a Sunday to get the kids back by 2pm if we decide to do something together that day (and she is late picking them up 50% of the time on Sunday which is extra frustrating when we rush home for her). We have asked her to switch it so we pick them up on Saturday at 5 or 6pm and she can pick them up Sunday at 6 or 7pm, but she said no, she doesn't like that schedule, especially in the winter time. So again, the kids get bounced around all weekend and we can never do anything more than an hour away (we are very outdoorsy and like to hike in the spring, summer and fall at different parks around the state or go biking). We don't want to take weekends away from her, we just want a whole day for each parent. So we have to use vacation days or try and negotiate a switch (like, hey can I have the kids 2 extra hours on Sunday and you can keep them two extra hours on Saturday).

 

And just in case anyone wonders why he didn't fight for a different schedule, he did. He submitted a more "normal" 50/50 schedule where each parent is responsible for the kids for 3-4 days a week in a row, splitting up the weekend. She said no and the judge sided with her. The next county over has a great court system where the kids have their own bill of rights, but not here in podunk-ville! :/ We can't even ask for a different judge when/if we do go back to court because there is only one judge in the county and changing venue is frowned upon.
 

The stupidest part of this whole thing is if she would just act like a normal human being, we would not care about keeping track of hours and vacations so closely and I'd probably call her a lot of the time to see if she'd want to take the kids while my BF is at work. But that woman will just take and take and take and feel she is entitled to it all and when we ask for something she basically says no, we don't deserve it. It is ridiculous some of the things my BF did right after the separation to try and keep her happy in hopes that she would turn around and be nice to him...the first vacation away from mom he drive the kids 20 minutes every day on his vacation to a spot where the phone would work so she could talk to them. She had a surgery (elective, not because she was sick) and he took care of her for two weeks and let her come back and live with him during that time so he could care for her and the kids....you know what she did? She stole stuff out of the house that she said was hers (like gifts from his parents of kitchen items, photos, all the pictures off the walls, etc..) while he was at work. She also insisted he give her the dryer (he kept the washer) even though her apartment didn't need one just in case some day she would need it. It's still sitting in her garage. She took all the king sized bed sheets "just in case she has a king size bed someday" even though at the time she had a queen size bed.  Stupid crap like that. She has their birth certificates and social security cards and refuses to get him copies (she stole those too without talking to him about it first). When he finally wised up and changed the locks, she got super mad at him (this was after she had moved out and was dating the man she cheated on my BF with) because I guess she tried to get into the house when she knew he was away. Can you imagine getting mad at someone for them trying to keep you out of their home because you stole from them? Her thinking is insane.

Quote:
Originally Posted by greenemami View Post

Also, I'm curious-if you don't mind sharing, what is your schedule? I'm confused as to why you wouldn't ordinally end up with 2 days in a row?

 

Claiming that time the kids would be in school is her time just doesn't make sense, there's no way she would win that one in court. If it states split vacation equably, then insist on close to equal time or you risk being walked all over in the future.

 

Her ideas on vacation time kind of made me laugh (sorry!) It seems like such a clear cut issue and yet gets so complicated, right?! Vacation time here at least is pretty simply defined as taking time that would normally be spent with the other parent. i.e. if mom went away for 10 days, but only 3 were dad's originally, that counts for 3 vacation days, not 10! And yes, family visits count, lol! I would imagine that if she were more reaonsble, it would be so simple o say a few extra vacation days don't matter instead of feeling like you have to stand your ground-it is a shame she is making things harder for everyone, including herself. :(



 

PixieAlly is offline  
#25 of 56 Old 12-14-2011, 06:31 PM
 
jess in hawaii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: guess
Posts: 749
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by PixieAlly View Post
 Can you imagine getting mad at someone for them trying to keep you out of their home because you stole from them? Her thinking is insane.

 



Ah, now i do understand your position. I am going through this exact same thing with my stbx.


rainbow1284.gifJess, mama to five boys joy.gif

 

 

jess in hawaii is offline  
#26 of 56 Old 12-15-2011, 08:53 AM
 
greenemami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,783
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)

Okay, that is making more sense to me now, thanks :) So you are saying that even though your bf technically has M and T every week, he picks them up at 4:45 on Monday, drops them off at school on Tuesday, they go to mom's house after school, and then he picks them up at 4:45 again on Tuesday?And now mom is saying that since he will be working while they are in school, they should just go to her house for the day?

 

On the one hand, I understand where mom is coming from (as a mother myself) in that she wants to see her kids if they are not with dad and honestly, I would probably just let them go to mom's for the full days. BUT-I understand too that if you just let this one go, she will probably continue to think she can control all situations, so it is a tough call to make.

 

The after school schedule sounds kind of crazy with all that bouncing around, I know my kids would hate that. Is it possible to change your bf's hours so he is free to pick them up after school (since I know you said she wasn't okay with you doing it). Again, as a mom I can understand why she wants to the kids with her instead of anyone else, but in this case it just doesn't make sense for the kids and is probably really confusing.


Single mama namaste.gif to dd dust.gifand ds fencing.gif, loving my dsd always reading.gif .
greenemami is offline  
#27 of 56 Old 12-15-2011, 09:05 AM - Thread Starter
 
PixieAlly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 435
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I understand where she is coming from as well and if she wasn't taking them for the rest of the week, we wouldn't care so much about the two days. But we won't see them from 8pm on the 24th until (if she gets her way) 4:45 on the 26th and then they will be gone again from 8am on the 28th until 9pm on the 31st. We don't have any objection to the vacation time she's taking them, we just don't see how it's fair that he can't have them for the two days they are with us normally in the evening anyway. He doesn't have to work on the 26th so he will be home.

 

He can't change his hours on a permanent basis like that unfortunately and she would never allow him to pick the kids up anyway on a permanent basis (the Monday thing is just because her work schedule is changing for a semester). I don't want to take time away from her and the kids, we just want to provide some stability, especially due to their complaints. Unfortunately, the kids probably never complain to mom and even if they did, she'd never admit it to us. Sometimes when we say they'll have to ask mom about something, they look at us funny and say "never mind". She is much more strict with them and it seems they feel less comfortable talking to her (some examples, in the past (not sure if she still does it now  because we don't want to ask the kids and put them in the middle) she punished the kids by pinching them. The 8yo has told me that her mom won't let her hug her when she's mad. That came up because I was mad at her for picking on the other kids, but still allowed her to come over and hug me - and I hugged her  back - because she seemed to need it. Other little things too that they're not allowed to do or say at moms that just seems weird...they're not allowed to call her Mommy, only Mom. If they do, she gets mad and so they won't call my BF daddy which he misses. Sometimes when the 6yo does by accident, the 8yo yells at him to stop. Weird crap like that.).
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by greenemami View Post

Okay, that is making more sense to me now, thanks :) So you are saying that even though your bf technically has M and T every week, he picks them up at 4:45 on Monday, drops them off at school on Tuesday, they go to mom's house after school, and then he picks them up at 4:45 again on Tuesday?And now mom is saying that since he will be working while they are in school, they should just go to her house for the day?

 

On the one hand, I understand where mom is coming from (as a mother myself) in that she wants to see her kids if they are not with dad and honestly, I would probably just let them go to mom's for the full days. BUT-I understand too that if you just let this one go, she will probably continue to think she can control all situations, so it is a tough call to make.

 

The after school schedule sounds kind of crazy with all that bouncing around, I know my kids would hate that. Is it possible to change your bf's hours so he is free to pick them up after school (since I know you said she wasn't okay with you doing it). Again, as a mom I can understand why she wants to the kids with her instead of anyone else, but in this case it just doesn't make sense for the kids and is probably really confusing.



 

PixieAlly is offline  
#28 of 56 Old 12-15-2011, 09:27 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cover letter he!!
Posts: 6,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I think your DH should scrap the thing and go back to court/mediation to draft a new agreement that addresses the kids school schedule. So, days/times that kids have school, who gets which half of X-mas break, who gets presidents day recess, who gets spring/easter recess, who gets MLK day, who gets Columbus day, who gets labor day, memorial day, etc. My custody/visitation order is SO detailed, that it is our guide as to what to do when we can't agree.  ie, when we cannot agree, we look to the order and it tells us what to do.

 

Seriously, your DH needs a better order that has more detail - it protects BOTH parties.

Super~Single~Mama is offline  
#29 of 56 Old 12-15-2011, 09:40 AM - Thread Starter
 
PixieAlly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 435
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I agree and we've pretty much decided that's what we're going to do. We just want to get through the holidays at this point since it's unlikely he'd get into mediation before that. We mentioned mediation to the ex and she wants to avoid it, but it's not helping that she hasn't even written back to our last proposal :( 
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super~Single~Mama View Post

I think your DH should scrap the thing and go back to court/mediation to draft a new agreement that addresses the kids school schedule. So, days/times that kids have school, who gets which half of X-mas break, who gets presidents day recess, who gets spring/easter recess, who gets MLK day, who gets Columbus day, who gets labor day, memorial day, etc. My custody/visitation order is SO detailed, that it is our guide as to what to do when we can't agree.  ie, when we cannot agree, we look to the order and it tells us what to do.

 

Seriously, your DH needs a better order that has more detail - it protects BOTH parties.



 

PixieAlly is offline  
#30 of 56 Old 12-15-2011, 11:50 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cover letter he!!
Posts: 6,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by PixieAlly View Post

I agree and we've pretty much decided that's what we're going to do. We just want to get through the holidays at this point since it's unlikely he'd get into mediation before that. We mentioned mediation to the ex and she wants to avoid it, but it's not helping that she hasn't even written back to our last proposal :( 
 


So document document document, and then suffer through this year. After the new year, go into court to ask for a new visitation schedule and use this as an example of her being completely uncooperative.

 

Super~Single~Mama is offline  
Reply

Tags
Blended Family Advice

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off