Sweeping membranes - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
Thread Tools
#1 of 8 Old 05-08-2006, 02:21 PM - Thread Starter
SugarAndSun's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,095
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Has anyone had this done or know the pros and cons? My mw would like to do this tomorrow if I'm not yet in labor.

Thanks for any info.
SugarAndSun is offline  
#2 of 8 Old 05-08-2006, 02:33 PM
ellymay's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I know what it is...it is where the doc runs a finger on the inside of the cervix to loosen the bag of waters away from the cervix....I have never
had it done. I was supposed to have it done today but I decided not to.
ellymay is offline  
#3 of 8 Old 05-08-2006, 02:36 PM
boingo82's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: A new-to-us house!!
Posts: 10,125
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It is uncomfortable to painful. It can supposedly get labor going if you're "ready". But it can also mean crampier labor from the get-go. I had it done 3x with my first, would not do it again.
boingo82 is offline  
#4 of 8 Old 05-08-2006, 03:41 PM
Sydnee's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,464
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I had it done with Emma and Alayna, and would do it again. It did not hurt that bad for me, and it put me into labor within half an hour.

Busy Mama to three beautiful girls and loving wife to my hubby
Sydnee is offline  
#5 of 8 Old 05-08-2006, 05:17 PM
tomtemama's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in the house of crazy girls.
Posts: 480
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I had my membranes swept in my first pregnancy about every two days from halfway through my 41st week. I went 12 days post dates before I was induced medically for a fever so I had them swept about 5 times.

I think that it is supposed to increase the amount of prostaglandins that are in your cervix but I also think that only helps with effacement so if you are already thin I don't see the point. It can also increase your chances of ruptured membranes and if your baby wasn't ready to be out yet it may be forced out.

Mama to 3 lovely home learning, nature loving girls read.gif(10), fairy.gif(7), fly-by-nursing1.gif (3).

tomtemama is offline  
#6 of 8 Old 05-08-2006, 05:54 PM
djinneyah's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: gestating...
Posts: 900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
it does also increase your chance of infection....separating the membranes from the cervix creates a space for the bacteria that has now been pushed up closer to your cervix by the MW's hand to come in and colonize between the membranes and the cervix/wall of the uterus, which can cause infection/fever in the mother.

so...it may get labor started, it may not..it may be uncomfortable/painful, it may not...either way, it ups your infection risk.

successful #2 Jan. 25th - welcome Maisie Elise!
djinneyah is offline  
#7 of 8 Old 05-08-2006, 10:16 PM
flowmom's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,342
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would never allow sweeping of membranes. First of all, research indicates that sweeping membranes once at 38-40 weeks' gestation does not significantly increase the proportion of women who begin spontaneous labor within 7 days so there's no point in doing it anyway during that stage. Second, this puts you at a higher risk of infection, even if your MW is careful about hygiene. Third, this puts you at risk for having your membranes ruptured, which is not a good idea if you are not ready to go into labour. Henci Goer discusses the risks in detail in her book The Thinking Woman's Guide to a Better Birth.

What is the rush?? Are you over 42 weeks? If not, I really don't see any advantages to this procedure.

sharing life with | 9.5 yo ds | 7 yo dd | love of my life new husband

flowmom is offline  
#8 of 8 Old 05-08-2006, 11:39 PM
KerriAZ's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 990
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I had it done with both pregnancies... With my first, it was just midly uncomfy to have it done and I went into active labor an hour later. This time, it was painful, but compared to the back/pelvic pain I had been having, no biggie, really! LOL (And it only hurts for a few seconds, really! At least for me!) I started having strong contrax an hour later, just like with DD, but then it stopped. So it didn't really do much this time around... I had them stripped on Tuesday and had DS on Saturday night... So it might have helped *some* but I thnk it worked better with DD...


Wife to Kevin (8-1-98)
: Proud Momma to Katelyn (4-02), Calvin (4-06), and Ashley (7-08) :
KerriAZ is offline  

Quick Reply
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off