Why are kids so mean sometimes? - Page 2 - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#31 of 51 Old 12-12-2010, 12:35 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cover letter he!!
Posts: 6,548
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by velochic View Post



Quote:
Originally Posted by Super~Single~Mama View Post

I agree that bullying can be a learned behavior, but it certainly isn't always.  Kids also learn it from each other. 

 

It's sad that you live somewhere that parents bullying their children is the norm, but I would wager a guess that not all those children are bully's.

 


The part I bolded:  It's still a learned behavior even if they learn it from each other.  It doesn't really matter who they learn it from.  It has to come from somewhere.  You have one kid who has a stable, loving home life and another who is bullied at home... the one who is bullied at home teaches the other how to bully.  I just disagree that kids are natural bullies. 



It can be a learned behavior, and if children are learning it from their peers it still needs to be addressed.  I guess what I hear the OP trying to say is that only kids who are brought up in authoritarian households are bully's - but thats not true.  And as parents who practice GD we need to be aware of what outside influences are teaching our children - homeschooled, public school, private school, whatever - b/c they can learn it other places.  I think that the way we treat our children is most influential, but that may not be true for all children and personalities.  I think if I acted like my ds could never ever ever become a bully b/c I'm such an awesome parent I would be doing him, and his peers, a huge disservice.

 

And, really, if we just allowed our children to hit/kick/pull hair/etc when they're toddlers, and don't teach them not to do it, they would probably grow up to be bully's.  Considering most children do those things to some extent  as a toddler, most children probably are "natural bullies" and we teach them alternate ways of behaving.  Now I'll get to hear from everyone who's children never ever once even tried to do any of those things b/c they were born perfect eyesroll.gif

Super~Single~Mama is offline  
#32 of 51 Old 12-12-2010, 01:11 PM
 
Smokering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 8,607
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)

 

Quote:

We homeschool also. ButI have learned that bullies are everywhere, not just at school. They are at the YMCA, the mall, the dance centre. It is easier to deal with bullies when they arent faced with it every single recess. But unfortunelay our homeschooled kids are not safe from bullies either.

I realise that, but my comment was tied into my theory about bullying being worse in demographically-similar groups. At the YMCA, the mall or the dance centre, kids are more likely to come across kids of a variety of ages. It doesn't prevent bullying entirely, but it removes one of the triggers, ie. lots of kids of the same age, in the same social group, in which they've had time to develop a pecking order and hash out a strict this-is-cool-this-is-not regime.


If decomposition persists please see your necromancer.

Smokering is offline  
#33 of 51 Old 12-12-2010, 02:05 PM
 
CatsCradle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,006
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by pink_emerald77 View Post

I can't say that I know how kids acted 50 years ago, but I can tell you, I believe kids are getting meaner and meaner by the day. And the things that they talk about, these 11/12 year olds, are things I never thought about til I was in high school. Our generation is growing up too fast, imo. And the innocence and simplicity of childhood is no longer considered sacred.


Respectfully, but tell that to the Jewish people who survived the pogroms and World War II, and to the kids in sub-Sahara Africa that have survived various injustices in which "kids" were catalysts.  Kids have killed; kids have been informers; kids have shunned people on the basis of their race, religion and creed.  Kids take their cues from their surroundings and go with it.  Kids have been actively involved in "mean" things for thousands of years.  Life isn't so simple as talking about or thinking in romantic terms about the "old days" and the innocence thereof.  Kids have been involved in violence in every aspect of known history.  Why?  Because it was okay to treat people shamefully (in our terms of shamefulness).  There were mean kids when I was growing up (and I'm on the older end of the spectrum here) and there are mean kids now.  Kids aren't meaner now then they were then.  There has always been a pecking order and sometimes that order is modeled in the form of violence.    What has changed is our tolerance of such behavior.  What was acceptable or over-looked then is not now.  I think that is a good thing.   I think it is good that we recognize the mean  in people and shame them accordingly.  I think a lot of this begins at home, not in school or social groups.  Modern schooling as we know it hasn't always existed, and there have been horrid times in history in which children were active participants.  It is the societal acceptance of meaness that is disturbing, not peer pressure, which is just an off-branch of the greater problem, in my opinion.


"Lawyers, I suppose, were children once." Charles Lamb.
CatsCradle is offline  
#34 of 51 Old 12-12-2010, 04:35 PM - Thread Starter
 
MarineWife's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: on the edge
Posts: 11,521
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Actually, I never said that all kids who are bullies must have come from homes where they are bullied. If you read my last post, you will see that I think it probably comes from a variety of sources. My point is that I do think it is a learned behavior and not something that they are born with, not original sin, as it were. I also never argued that older people don't have a natural aggressiveness, either. That is not what I'm talking about here. To me there is a difference between the person who expresses their natural, defensive aggression and a person who does something deliberately mean just for the sake of being mean.

 


knit.gifSAHM to 3 boys and 1 man; 22 jammin.gif, 9REPlaySkateboard04HL.gif, 5 FIREdevil.gifand now 1 year oldtoddler.gif!

MarineWife is offline  
#35 of 51 Old 12-12-2010, 07:49 PM
 
bluedaisy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 603
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Having lived in other cultures, there is a certain "meanness" that I observe in American kids that I feel is different that the typical human aggression/power plays, etc.

 

I am sure the issue is multi-faceted but I think a huge contributor is media.  In sitcoms, characters get laughs by making fun of others.  Family members cut each other down and use sarcasm constantly.  Celebrities are constantly criticized for wearing the wrong thing, gaining too much weight, having the wrong hairstyle.  The worst contestants are American Idol are shown just so that people can make fun of them.  Certain characteristics (being overweight, being a "nerd" or "uncool" etc) are overemphasized and jokes are constantly made about such characteristics that make people different.

 

Children imitate what they see.  most kids spend many more hours in front of a screen than they do with their parents.  I have been shocked at hearing how mean characters are on some popular tv shows for kids.

 

When I was living in another culture, I tripped while walking.  Several of my friends immidiately rushed to my side with genuine concern to see if I was ok (it was a little stumble and it was obvious I wasn't really hurt).  Nobody laughed or even smiled.  Here, if a kid trips while they are walking, everyone bursts out laughing and will probably make fun of the kid for weeks.  We have been conditioned to think that others mistakes or misfortunes are funny.  this is not typical human nature but it goes beyond that and I think the media is a huge factor in creating this culture of meanness.


Loving wife to DH and buddamomimg1.pngmama to DD (11/08) and DS (2/12)

bluedaisy is offline  
#36 of 51 Old 12-12-2010, 10:08 PM
 
meemee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Norther California
Posts: 12,751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)

well i think various factors are at play.

 

1. our kids are constantly being asked to fit in a certain box. adn there is something wrong with them if they dont fit in. so i think social conditioning is coming from that. so in their world everyone has to fit in a box.

 

2. break down of the community feeling - breakdown of the family. extreme stress on the families - whether rich or poor. we are getting socially conditioned to react. not think. 

 

i think children are like the canary in the coalmine. they are truly pointing out how degraded our society is getting. in this 'all about me', 'me me me' culture - its about every man for himself and as others have pointed out that sense of power. we should have power over others. 


 treehugger.gif Co-parent, joy.gifcold.gifbrand new homeschooling middle schoolerjoy.gif, and an attackcat.gif 
meemee is offline  
#37 of 51 Old 12-13-2010, 08:02 AM
 
beenmum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 273
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

 

 I have to say that my view on this is a bit different. I dont think that putting the same age kids together creates a more ripe atmosphere for bullying and putting in various aged kids creates a lessened atmosphere for bullying.

 

For example, my daughter is in 4 dance classes a week ( 1 pre pro tap, 1 pre pro ballet, 1 req jazz and 1 req ballet). In 3 of them she, at 6, is the youngest by up to 3 years. In her pro ballet class she is the youngest by only a year.

 

In the req class where there are kids from 7 to 9, my daughter is bullied more often b/c she is younger and therefore weaker. She is isolated b/c of her age and her lack of "standing" in the age grouping, while also being picked on b/c she is seen as the teachers pet..the youngest who is good enough to play with the older girls. I have had to step in more then once.

 

In her pro class, she is younger by only a year. There has not been once where I have had to step in and intervine. They see her as a peer and not as a threat.

 

I think when you put kids of varying ages in, you are creating an automatic peeking order. The older kids are at the top of the heirachy, and the youngest is at the bottom. The younger ones with the stronger personality will automatically take up head over the older ones who are quiter and not as dominant.

 

 

 

 

 

 

beenmum is offline  
#38 of 51 Old 12-13-2010, 08:35 AM - Thread Starter
 
MarineWife's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: on the edge
Posts: 11,521
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

bluedaisy ~ I think you make some really good points. I'm reluctant to blame the media because my experience has been that it's only as influential as you let it be. I think the problem with the  media comes when parents don't discuss the behaviors of the characters with their kids or even laugh along with everyone else. I don't restrict my children's TV watching much. I don't let them watch very scary, gruesome, violent or sexual adult shows and movies but they can watch pretty much whatever kid's shows they want. We watch them together, though, and we discuss what happens on the shows. We talk about who the person being picked on or made fun of must feel and if we would want to feel that way. That sort of thing. I think because of that my kids understand that a lot of the behavior is mean instead of funny.

 

Your experience in another culture is very interesting.

 

beenmum ~ I wonder how much of the teasing from the older kids comes from what they've learned from other exclusive environments. I don't know if most of the teasing and bullying that goes on in school, for example, comes from same aged peers or older kids. What I see from the kids in my neighborhood is that the slightly older and/or bigger kids pick on the younger and/or smaller ones. I have read that is a trickle down effect. Adults treat teens with disrespect. Teens treat tweens with disrespect. Tweens treat younger children with disrespect. I can't remember where I read about this now but it was comparing western society and culture to other cultures where teens are treated with much more respect and caring. Those teens then treat the younger children in the same way.


knit.gifSAHM to 3 boys and 1 man; 22 jammin.gif, 9REPlaySkateboard04HL.gif, 5 FIREdevil.gifand now 1 year oldtoddler.gif!

MarineWife is offline  
#39 of 51 Old 12-13-2010, 09:58 AM
 
LROM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 908
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)



 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super~Single~Mama View Post

While I think that bullying can be learned, it isn't always.  For example, my ds is in a very small daycare center, there are 4children under the age of 2.  My ds is the oldest and is 23mo, 2 of them are a week apart in age and are 18mo, and the youngest is 15mo.

 

One of the 18mo's went through a period of hitting, biting, and kicking the other children - none of the others have ever exhibited this behavior at daycare. He would do it out of the blue sometimes (when the teachers thought he was giving hugs, kisses whatever), other times when he was angry, other times when he was frustrated.

 

I don't think anyone on here would label him a bully - he's too young right? But where did he get that behavior? Not at home, I'm good friends with his mom, and she has never done CIO, she's very gentle in her discipline (far more gentle than I am), and she does address the behavior (unlike some who use GD who just don't do anything). She's a great mom!

 

I don't thin the behavior itself is "learned" - but I do think it needs to "unlearned" with the guidance of adults. I think when parents notice, or are told, about their child displaying bullying behaviors they need to act on it. But saying, "Oh, we are a GD household so my son doesn't know how to bully" certainly isn't doing anyone any favors. I'm sure its true that some children will not engage in bullying, but as parents we need to have our eyes wide open and watch for it so that we can address it if it comes up.

 

I also disagree that young children don't display empathy - just the other day my 23mo gave me a hug and kiss when I was crying (I stubbed my toe and it hurt so bad!), and he and his friends at daycare hug each other when one of them is crying.


Just on the bolded part, your post assumes that a parent who doesn't CIO, is gentle in discipline, and addresses behavior is still not capable of parenting in a way that makes a child act out.  I agree that on the surface those factors should give a child a better chance of not exhibiting those behaviors, but you simply never know what else is happening in a home.  Everything from subtle negative influences to blatant meanness is possible when no one is around.  I'm NOT saying your particular friend is like that or her home is like that... just saying you really can't be sure that because a parent does those 3 things, there aren't other factors/dynamics in play that could make a child act out.

 

I also agree that whether a child turns into a bully/consciously mean or not is a sum of 3 factors that are all very influential: how they're parented (or not); how their peers act; and the temperment they're born with.  I think parenting and termperment are most influential though, because that determines the base behavior on which they'll process and respond to peer behavior.

LROM is offline  
#40 of 51 Old 12-13-2010, 10:07 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cover letter he!!
Posts: 6,548
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by LROM View Post



 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super~Single~Mama View Post

While I think that bullying can be learned, it isn't always.  For example, my ds is in a very small daycare center, there are 4children under the age of 2.  My ds is the oldest and is 23mo, 2 of them are a week apart in age and are 18mo, and the youngest is 15mo.

 

One of the 18mo's went through a period of hitting, biting, and kicking the other children - none of the others have ever exhibited this behavior at daycare. He would do it out of the blue sometimes (when the teachers thought he was giving hugs, kisses whatever), other times when he was angry, other times when he was frustrated.

 

I don't think anyone on here would label him a bully - he's too young right? But where did he get that behavior? Not at home, I'm good friends with his mom, and she has never done CIO, she's very gentle in her discipline (far more gentle than I am), and she does address the behavior (unlike some who use GD who just don't do anything). She's a great mom!

 

I don't thin the behavior itself is "learned" - but I do think it needs to "unlearned" with the guidance of adults. I think when parents notice, or are told, about their child displaying bullying behaviors they need to act on it. But saying, "Oh, we are a GD household so my son doesn't know how to bully" certainly isn't doing anyone any favors. I'm sure its true that some children will not engage in bullying, but as parents we need to have our eyes wide open and watch for it so that we can address it if it comes up.

 

I also disagree that young children don't display empathy - just the other day my 23mo gave me a hug and kiss when I was crying (I stubbed my toe and it hurt so bad!), and he and his friends at daycare hug each other when one of them is crying.


Just on the bolded part, your post assumes that a parent who doesn't CIO, is gentle in discipline, and addresses behavior is still not capable of parenting in a way that makes a child act out.  I agree that on the surface those factors should give a child a better chance of not exhibiting those behaviors, but you simply never know what else is happening in a home.  Everything from subtle negative influences to blatant meanness is possible when no one is around.  I'm NOT saying your particular friend is like that or her home is like that... just saying you really can't be sure that because a parent does those 3 things, there aren't other factors/dynamics in play that could make a child act out.

 

I also agree that whether a child turns into a bully/consciously mean or not is a sum of 3 factors that are all very influential: how they're parented (or not); how their peers act; and the temperment they're born with.  I think parenting and termperment are most influential though, because that determines the base behavior on which they'll process and respond to peer behavior.


Thats not what I was saying at all - I was pointing out that children go through aggressive stages, and it has nothing to do with our parenting.  A child who has never been left to CIO, whose parents practice GD, etc can still be aggressive - most 18mo - 2yo children go through a stage similar to the one my friends child is going through right now.  My ds did too.  It's NOT b/c of the way they were each parented, and just go check out the GD forum here on MDC - there are posts about hitting/kicking/aggression going up almost daily.  If we did not address those things, our children would grow up to bully other children.

 

I don't think that practicing AP gives our children a better chance at not exhibiting those behaviors, I think it gives us parents a better chance at being able to effectively ADDRESS those behaviors - which I think is an important distinction.  I don't AP b/c I think it will make my child "better" than the next child, I do it b/c I want to be in tune with my ds so that when something is wrong I know about it, and then can address it. 

Super~Single~Mama is offline  
#41 of 51 Old 12-13-2010, 11:12 AM
 
GuildJenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,776
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I don't really believe in original sin...but I also don't believe that kids fully understand the consequences of their anti-social actions and that this ignorance is ingrained. Even though I agree that young kids can show empathy and so on, I'm not sure that it's part of their brain and moral development to really be able to step into other people's shoes for a long time.

 

I see aggressive behaviour or power-play behaviour a bit like I see a baby dropping food off a tray.  It's experimenting with the forces around us - in the baby's case, gravity. In the kids' case, social capital (withholding, and giving), tribal pecking order, etc.  I think some kids may experiment once (or not at all), others are going to experiment over and over. 

 

What shapes them is how those around them respond to that experimentation.  Fighting on a school bus where the bus driver can't notice makes it clear that there will be no consequences. So, over time, it escalates and even becomes part of the 'riding the bus' culture. I don't think we can blame any one environment...and actually I've worked with kids who were very kind in one environment, and not in another.  Bullying could be reinforced at home, in the media, at school, on sports teams, etc. Or at least not negated.

 

In my experience not all the kids who are bullies grow up to be bullies. Some do, but a lot meet up with some kind of insight or pressure. There are definitely adult bullies, but some of them weren't bullies as kids.

 

When I was in school in the 70s, I have to say that bullying was basically acceptable. Not only did teachers participate in it, I bullied on a couple of occasions where we were hauled in and in 2/3 cases that I remember, the attitude of the teacher was more along the lines of "don't do that, even though so-and-so is a total screw up" than "what's wrong with you."  However I was mostly on the receiving end of the bullying and a few things that happened to me that didn't result in very significant consequences would probably produce a suspension or expulsion these days. There's tons of bullying in literature going back.  So I don't buy that it's getting worse. We may be noticing it more.

 

I do think some of the new anti-bullying stuff is making some progress, especially programmes that focus on the role of the bystander. It will be the bystanders (the majority, whether child or adult) who end up setting the tone.


~ Mum to Emily, March 12-16 2004, Noah, born Aug 2005, Liam, born January 2011, and wife to Carl since 1994. ~
GuildJenn is offline  
#42 of 51 Old 12-13-2010, 11:49 AM
 
Smokering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 8,607
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)

 

Quote:

I think when you put kids of varying ages in, you are creating an automatic peeking order. The older kids are at the top of the heirachy, and the youngest is at the bottom. The younger ones with the stronger personality will automatically take up head over the older ones who are quiter and not as dominant.

See, I haven't witnessed this. IME it's more that the older kids ignore the younger kids a bit - more like they consider them beneath their notice (both in terms of friendship and bullying). This is mostly from homeschool events - not sure if that changes the dynamic any. As a generalisation, a lot of homeschooled families are big, so maybe the bigger kids are used to having bevies of smaller kids tagging along, and kind of tune them out? :p


If decomposition persists please see your necromancer.

Smokering is offline  
#43 of 51 Old 12-13-2010, 12:33 PM
 
hhurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 811
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by bluebackpacks View Post

VisionaryMom is right.  Also, childhood as we know it has only been around for a 150 years.  Prior to this, children were considered little adults.  The idea of protecting 'childhood innocence' is a very new one.  I believe that we often tend to romanticize childhood... not that this is wrong.  It's just helpful to realize that this is a newer philosophy.  Otherwise, we become susceptible to chasing an old world kinder dream.  



ITA with this. It seems to me that children are kinder than they were in the past, generally speaking of course. Adults are more aware of instances of unkindness, perhaps. There's no such thing as the good old days...

hhurd is offline  
#44 of 51 Old 12-13-2010, 03:45 PM
 
LROM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 908
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)



 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super~Single~Mama View Post



Quote:
Originally Posted by LROM View Post



 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super~Single~Mama View Post

While I think that bullying can be learned, it isn't always.  For example, my ds is in a very small daycare center, there are 4children under the age of 2.  My ds is the oldest and is 23mo, 2 of them are a week apart in age and are 18mo, and the youngest is 15mo.

 

One of the 18mo's went through a period of hitting, biting, and kicking the other children - none of the others have ever exhibited this behavior at daycare. He would do it out of the blue sometimes (when the teachers thought he was giving hugs, kisses whatever), other times when he was angry, other times when he was frustrated.

 

I don't think anyone on here would label him a bully - he's too young right? But where did he get that behavior? Not at home, I'm good friends with his mom, and she has never done CIO, she's very gentle in her discipline (far more gentle than I am), and she does address the behavior (unlike some who use GD who just don't do anything). She's a great mom!

 

I don't thin the behavior itself is "learned" - but I do think it needs to "unlearned" with the guidance of adults. I think when parents notice, or are told, about their child displaying bullying behaviors they need to act on it. But saying, "Oh, we are a GD household so my son doesn't know how to bully" certainly isn't doing anyone any favors. I'm sure its true that some children will not engage in bullying, but as parents we need to have our eyes wide open and watch for it so that we can address it if it comes up.

 

I also disagree that young children don't display empathy - just the other day my 23mo gave me a hug and kiss when I was crying (I stubbed my toe and it hurt so bad!), and he and his friends at daycare hug each other when one of them is crying.


Just on the bolded part, your post assumes that a parent who doesn't CIO, is gentle in discipline, and addresses behavior is still not capable of parenting in a way that makes a child act out.  I agree that on the surface those factors should give a child a better chance of not exhibiting those behaviors, but you simply never know what else is happening in a home.  Everything from subtle negative influences to blatant meanness is possible when no one is around.  I'm NOT saying your particular friend is like that or her home is like that... just saying you really can't be sure that because a parent does those 3 things, there aren't other factors/dynamics in play that could make a child act out.

 

I also agree that whether a child turns into a bully/consciously mean or not is a sum of 3 factors that are all very influential: how they're parented (or not); how their peers act; and the temperment they're born with.  I think parenting and termperment are most influential though, because that determines the base behavior on which they'll process and respond to peer behavior.


Thats not what I was saying at all - I was pointing out that children go through aggressive stages, and it has nothing to do with our parenting.  A child who has never been left to CIO, whose parents practice GD, etc can still be aggressive - most 18mo - 2yo children go through a stage similar to the one my friends child is going through right now.  My ds did too.  It's NOT b/c of the way they were each parented, and just go check out the GD forum here on MDC - there are posts about hitting/kicking/aggression going up almost daily.  If we did not address those things, our children would grow up to bully other children.

 

I don't think that practicing AP gives our children a better chance at not exhibiting those behaviors, I think it gives us parents a better chance at being able to effectively ADDRESS those behaviors - which I think is an important distinction.  I don't AP b/c I think it will make my child "better" than the next child, I do it b/c I want to be in tune with my ds so that when something is wrong I know about it, and then can address it. 


Thanks, I understand the point you were trying to make now.

 

And very interesting the posts about "There is no such thing as the good ole days" re: a time when children were kind and allowed to be children (or rather, that concept is still fairly new and does not go back as far as we think it did.  It does feel like things have gotten more intense and kids have gotten much meaner, but maybe it is the combo of public exposure to it all... both the increased exposure makes it seem like there's more of it, but also kids learn from it.  How many post-bullying teen suicides have their been in the last year?  So did just as many kids commit suicide because of bullying in the 10-20 years prior but we hear more about it today... or has it actually gotten worse?  Not sure what I think, but it's very interesting to consider...
 

LROM is offline  
#45 of 51 Old 12-13-2010, 05:45 PM - Thread Starter
 
MarineWife's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: on the edge
Posts: 11,521
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Well, suicide used to be a huge scandal. People did not talk about it. It was shameful. At least that's the impression I get from things I've heard and read about how things were 50 years ago or whatever. So I think it may be very possible that, like many other things, we are just more open about and aware of it today. .

 

Unfortunately, I don't see much kindness from the children we see. I see a lot of teasing and meanness and even fighting. A few weeks ago I had to break up a fight between 2 6 or 7 year old girls. As if it weren't bad enough that these children were fighting, there was a group of boys standing around them chanting, "cat fight." Where in the world did these young children hear and understand that term? Also disturbing was the fact that I was the only adult around who intervened. I had to run two houses down to reach the girls and break them up. The adults in the house of the yard where the fight occurred didn't even open their door. The mother even told me she looked out her window and saw it but didn't think it was a big deal. And we live in what's considered a good neighborhood.

 

I'm so tired of it all. I don't want my children going outside or playing with the neighbor kids at all anymore.


knit.gifSAHM to 3 boys and 1 man; 22 jammin.gif, 9REPlaySkateboard04HL.gif, 5 FIREdevil.gifand now 1 year oldtoddler.gif!

MarineWife is offline  
#46 of 51 Old 12-13-2010, 07:44 PM
 
Smokering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 8,607
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)

Interestingly, fighting - among boys, at least - was pretty much accepted by adults several decades ago. Even encouraged - pugilism was considered a necessary manly art, and not fighting was seen (probably not by all adults, but a lot) as a sign of cowardice rather than moral strength. So a teacher at a British public school might have refereed a fight to make sure the boys fought fair, but wouldn't actually try to prevent it.


If decomposition persists please see your necromancer.

Smokering is offline  
#47 of 51 Old 12-14-2010, 05:21 AM - Thread Starter
 
MarineWife's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: on the edge
Posts: 11,521
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Yes, I know fighting used to be considered a sort of rite of passage for males. It still is a lot. I think you can see that with the popularity of boxing and now MMA fighting. IDK. Maybe I expose myself to much different info than most people but everything I hear now on the news or read in news or scientific reports is about how fighting among children is not a good thing. It's all about cooperation and team players these days. I thought our society had evolved a bit beyond the gladiator days. Guess I'm wrong.


knit.gifSAHM to 3 boys and 1 man; 22 jammin.gif, 9REPlaySkateboard04HL.gif, 5 FIREdevil.gifand now 1 year oldtoddler.gif!

MarineWife is offline  
#48 of 51 Old 12-14-2010, 10:37 AM
 
Storm Bride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 27,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


This is true, ime, as well. I was bullied fairly badly in high school, and several of the guys involved apologized at the 10 year reunion. They were very obviously sincere, and it had obviously been bothering them for quite a while.

 

I don't know most of them very well, and don't know most of their families at all, but I do know one of the families a little bit, and they're very nice people and I think they were very loving parents. (The dad just died a few weeks ago.) They divorced just after their youngest graduated, so I'm sure there was some tension at home...but there was all kinds of tension at my house, too, and none of us were bullies. I think this whole thing depends on many, many factors, but I do think it's natural, and it's not really about parenting. I agree with those who say it's a form of experimentation with control, social dynamics, etc. I don't assume that a child who is mean to another chlid has mean/shaming/whatever parents, any more than I assume that a five year old who throws things (ds2, for instance) has seen that behaviour modelled at home. Different kids learn and process life differently...and for some of them, meanness is at least a temporary part of the process. (Two of those bullies I mentioned are really, really nice people as adults - their behaviour when they were younger was very temporary.)

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by GuildJenn View Post

 

In my experience not all the kids who are bullies grow up to be bullies. Some do, but a lot meet up with some kind of insight or pressure.


Lisa, lucky mama of Kelly (3/93) ribboncesarean.gif, Emma (5/03) ribboncesarean.gif, Evan (7/05) ribboncesarean.gif, & Jenna (6/09) ribboncesarean.gif
Loving my amazing dh, James & forever missing ribbonpb.gif Aaron Ambrose ribboncesarean.gif (11/07) ribbonpb.gif

Storm Bride is offline  
#49 of 51 Old 12-14-2010, 11:36 AM
 
Owen'nZoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,322
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedaisy View Post

 

When I was living in another culture, I tripped while walking.  Several of my friends immidiately rushed to my side with genuine concern to see if I was ok (it was a little stumble and it was obvious I wasn't really hurt).  Nobody laughed or even smiled.  Here, if a kid trips while they are walking, everyone bursts out laughing and will probably make fun of the kid for weeks.  We have been conditioned to think that others mistakes or misfortunes are funny.  this is not typical human nature but it goes beyond that and I think the media is a huge factor in creating this culture of meanness.


It all depends on the country you are using as a reference point. We've spent time in my husband's home country (Jordan), and my children have been shocked by how physically agressive the children we've interacted with are there. We started avoiding events where there would be children in our last week of the most recent visit - we were tired of watching our kids get hurt and having everyone (except us) treat it as 'oh, kids will be kids'. Our boys wanted absolutely nothing to do with other children after the first few experiences. We had a thread recently in the multi-cultural forum, and it was interesting to see how many American ex-pat children have similar experiences in widely divergent cultures. Our kids, at least the ones who have grown up in your average American suburb, do not expect to have to put up with physical violence - and when it happens, they expect someone to get in trouble. That isn't always the expectation in other places.

 

Intercultural issues aside, I guess I fall into the 'kids are no meaner now than they were in the past, and maybe even less mean' camp. I certainly see meanness among my son's friends, but I also see a lot of kindness, caring and generosity. For little ones who are still working out how to behave properly with others, I think they do pretty well.

hhurd likes this.
Owen'nZoe is offline  
#50 of 51 Old 12-14-2010, 11:47 AM
 
journeymom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Having a Gilly Water with McGonagall
Posts: 9,804
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)

I haven't read the rest of the responses yet.  Just want to share that I think that the school bus experience is basically a distillation, an amplification of the very worst parts of the school experience. I rode the bus during middle school. It was Hell on wheels. 


Someone moved my effing cheese.
journeymom is offline  
#51 of 51 Old 02-19-2013, 05:13 PM
 
caviti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Wow, what an interesting discussion!  I have been reading a good book on the topic http://www.abebooks.com/9781402219443/Why-Good-Kids-Act-Cruel-140221944X/plp since my 10yo son has been starting to experience it (like I did, many moons ago), and my 7yo daughter (at both ends).  It's a great book for practical strategies to assist both the "victim" (in asserting themselves and understanding their options) and the perpetrators (in parents guiding more prosocial behaviour).  At essence motivated by  the need to conform  and assert social social status by differentiating from the "other"  (identifying with might highlight one's own otherness) and attacking with preemptive strategies.  Fascinated by the social psychological side, but distressed by its actual manifestations.  I guess it's part of human condition, and one can only hope to protect/educate our children with useful strategies. From my observation or P&C behaviour, it feeds directly on from learned behaviours from parents about asserting social status.

caviti is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off