Upper & Upper Middle-Class Parents - Essential Knowledge? - Page 11 - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#301 of 345 Old 03-09-2012, 08:43 PM
 
Coral123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 88
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

La Limena..I think that is a very good answer.

Coral123 is offline  
#302 of 345 Old 03-10-2012, 04:32 AM
 
Smithie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,529
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)

 

It is a good answer to the OP's question, but the life it sketches out seems really depressing to me. I don't want to live where everybody else lives and do what everybody else does. 

Smithie is offline  
#303 of 345 Old 03-10-2012, 05:37 AM
 
Coral123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 88
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mama Metis View Post

If there is one skill a rich kid needs, it is how to never talk about class openly. Don't even acknowledge that it exists! Only when absolutely pressed, one might use euphemisms like "high net worth."

 

;)


Yep, I'd agree with that.  I'm not sure if that is how the wealthier operate today though.

 

Coral123 is offline  
#304 of 345 Old 03-10-2012, 06:02 AM
 
pigpokey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Decatur, GA
Posts: 3,110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Coral123 View Post


Yep, I'd agree with that.  I'm not sure if that is how the wealthier operate today though.

 



The nouveau riche are so gauche. biglaugh.gif

 

Jen Muise likes this.
pigpokey is offline  
#305 of 345 Old 03-11-2012, 12:28 PM
 
Dona Barry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I wanted to say to everyone who commented on this thread that I am doing research on cultural competence between the classes (which are stratified by income in the US). I came across this thread and was saddened to see that only one of you really understood the significance of being diversely culturally competent and the rest of you in your own little ways flamed that person. There is a book called "Unequal Childhoods" that you should try to read. Its simple message is that unless a child is taught to live in a particular society he will rarely ever achieve success outside of his class. Parents teach what they know. The cycle is perpetuated with little intervention. The intervention that occurs through public schools and church is limited by the parents ability to maneuver and participate in the social structure of the educational system. In other words, parents of working class teach their children that family values are most important and that working yourself to death is the only way to keep family together, parents living in poverty (with no upper level experience) teach their children how to survive in poverty and not how to survive with wealth. For example: a child from a poverty stricken family will know how to get aid from shelters, church rummage sales and other community resources but someone from working class or middle class will not know how to survive there. None of us if we have never experienced extreme wealth and the lifestyle that goes with it will be culturally competent and therefore cannot teach our children to be successfully competent in a wealthy situation. Reversely, a wealthy child, who is not taught to live in poverty will not survive in poverty. Think of Paris Hilton's "Simple Life". She wasn't able to be competent in living that way but her public encounter showed she was very competent in disgracing, demeaning other people and their ways. This is taught. I hope that you get the point that finding ways to teach your children to be culturally competent is important, whether you think its "fitting in" or just teaching success. In order to teach them, you have to learn also. Our educational system isn't set up for this. Most children in poverty will attend only a public education and will not have the opportunity to attend private schools where other cultural competence is expected. I hope that you can see where there are mechanism in our US system that keeps poor people poor, rich people rich, and the rest of us sliding down the slope to poverty.-Dona

Dona Barry is offline  
#306 of 345 Old 03-11-2012, 02:29 PM
 
Jen Muise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

The points you make about moving between classes are good ones, Dona, but the OP's superficial example of wine tasting kind of threw the conversation off I think.  Generally, the differences between the classes is more significantly different than that.  A wealthy or upper middle class child is taught how to relate to people differently, to advocate for themselves with professionals such as doctors, and to expect a certain standard of living among other things.  Good table manners and knowing how to judge your audience etc.  are important lessons for everyone, but things like skiing and horseback riding aren't going to get you ahead.  Having a role model to follow, seeing that education is critically important, understanding the system and how it works are all things that richer kids get regular exposure to that less wealthy kids might have less exposure to.   Thinking it's about the trappings that money brings is a classic error that lower classes make when evaluating the differences between them and higher classes.

Jen Muise is offline  
#307 of 345 Old 03-11-2012, 03:08 PM
 
Dona Barry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Yes, there are different ways to parent based on income. Please check out some good reading called Unequal Childhoods. It addresses that very thing. I don't think anyone here was being mean, just explaining the world as they see it from their particular place on the planet. BTW: gov cheese and commodities IS a handout. Those millionaire grandparents didn't do much to increase your cultural competence either.  

Dona Barry is offline  
#308 of 345 Old 03-11-2012, 06:02 PM
 
Linda on the move's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: basking in the sunshine
Posts: 10,634
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dona Barry View Post

There is a book called "Unequal Childhoods" that you should try to read. Its simple message is that unless a child is taught to live in a particular society he will rarely ever achieve success outside of his class

 

 

Yet this thread is full of experiences from those of us who have been in different classes as different points in out lives. How... interesting ... that you feel we should discount our own experiences in favor of what you read in a book.

 

 I hope that you can see where there are mechanism in our US system that keeps poor people poor, rich people rich, and the rest of us sliding down the slope to poverty.

 

 

 

But that's not what the OP was talking about. She HAS changed class -- at least economically. And she wants to make sure she provides the extra sort of information that usually goes along with that income to her children.

 

The whole question disproves your point. (As well as the number of people I know who are doing better than their parents did).

 

Also,  OPer also wasn't asking about the wealthy. 100K a year for a family of 4 isn't wealthy. Not by a long shot. It's middle class, it's just the more comfortable end of middle class.
 

 


but everything has pros and cons  shrug.gif

Linda on the move is online now  
#309 of 345 Old 03-11-2012, 07:50 PM
 
skreader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 681
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

As long as we're recommending books, I would recommend Pierre Bourdieu's "Distinction". Although its basis is a study of class and culture from ethnography done in France in the 60s, the theory about cultural capital, and how different classes and cultures within a society view what is appropriate for their eating, drinking, listening, viewing, reading, etc. is still useful.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Distinction

http://www.amazon.com/Distinction-Social-Critique-Judgement-Taste/dp/0674212770

 

It is kind of dry, and a bit repetetive but I found it intriguing.

 

So, perhaps the OP is trying to figure out what sort of cultural capital is important and necessary for her kids, since she does not view the cultrural capital that she already has is adequate or the right type?

 

My kids lack cultural capital in terms of knowing US sports teams. It's not something that comes up here very much, but I know that it may be likely if my son lives in the USA when he grows up, that he will need to develop cultural competence in knowing about and having opinions abouy US grid-iron football teams and basketball teams and probably ice hockey and baseball teams as well. If not, I suspect he may sometimes lack small-talk among men in the US of many classes.

 

In my kids' high school, knowledge about rugby teams and who you favor is important cultural data. This would be less important in other milieus where (for example) knowledge and skill in Mahjong or Big-2 (a card game) would be very important, much more so than poker or bridge. In fact, it my kids' high school, knowledge of Rugby and Big-2 can widen a social circle. 

 

 

 

 

skreader is offline  
#310 of 345 Old 03-12-2012, 04:31 AM
 
pigpokey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Decatur, GA
Posts: 3,110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


I disagree with this statement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dona Barry View Post

 I hope that you can see where there are mechanism in our US system that keeps poor people poor, rich people rich, and the rest of us sliding down the slope to poverty.-Dona


 

Poverty in my county in the "US System" -- which is not a particularly great or well run county -- means you have air conditioning, hot and cold running water, basic medical care, one bedroom for every 2 kids, a transport pass that will take you all over the city, a bus that picks up your kids near their door and drives them to school to eat breakfast and lunch that you don't have to pack, and so much food that obesity is a notable problem in your social class.  You have multiple pairs of shoes and access to a washer for your clothes.  You probably use a dryer.  You watch TV and DVDs. 

 

I'll admit that the lifestyle of "poverty" in the US is so completely adequate for a lot of people's needs that there's not a huge incentive to climb out if your personality does not worry about the benefits that being middle class does offer.  It's a tiny part of life's needs that aren't covered by the US version of "poverty."  When everything is good, everything is good.  But when your child gets a complicated illness, or a family member gets arrested and needs a good lawyer, or your adult brother needs to go into addiction treatment ... this is when the extra hustling to stay middle class pays off.

 

Compared to the 70s when I was growing up, most people in my extended family on both sides (in-laws included) are either living much larger than they were then -- or they were already living an upper middle lifestyle.  But a lot of us weren't then, and are now. 

pigpokey is offline  
#311 of 345 Old 03-17-2012, 07:27 PM
 
gcgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

You can make six figures without being exposed to wines. Lol. DH makes six in a blue collar job where a lot of his coworkers still like beer and strip clubs. Thank goodness he's not like that. :)

 

Nothing in particular matters except to experience life wholeheartedly, with an open mind, and learn all you can. That's it. No class-handbook needed.

gcgirl is offline  
#312 of 345 Old 03-17-2012, 07:53 PM
 
gcgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Haha! That's great. I believe it. The other big topic you can ALWAYS count on to make you friends? The OTHER person. Develop a genuine interest in the other person, ask them questions about themselves and let them ramble on about their favorite subject (themselves!). You will never be a fish out of water with THAT trick up your sleeve. ;)

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Linda on the move View Post

 

 

Because of my DH's job, he deals with people who are wealthy and upper middle class. You know wanna know what is really important for him to be able to talk about????  The big mystery subject......

 

 

sports

 

 

 

pickle18 likes this.
gcgirl is offline  
#313 of 345 Old 03-17-2012, 10:25 PM
 
Linda on the move's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: basking in the sunshine
Posts: 10,634
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)

F Scott Fitzgerald wrote, "the rich are are different than you and I."

 

Hemingway wrote, "yes, they have more money."

 

I think these days that could be changed to "yes, they get better seats at the game."

 

 

Today we were at a BBQ where the guest of honor was a self made millionaire. Guess what he wanted to talk about ---

 

he asked my teenagers what the big deal is about Hunger Games, why teens like it. He later told me that he liked their answers and they were sharp. And that I should enjoy every day of the next couple of years, because he feels like he blinked at the teen years were over and his kids were suddenly in their 30s.

 

So I thought I would pass it along, my parenting advice from a millionaire: Enjoy your kids thumb.gif

 

He also really liked the bottle of local wine I brought along. (Or at least he was polite enough to say he did!)


but everything has pros and cons  shrug.gif

Linda on the move is online now  
#314 of 345 Old 03-20-2012, 01:10 PM
 
Storm Bride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 27,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

So...I'm not really here much, anymore (as my health is improving, I'm cutting way back on my computer time), but this thread caught my eye again. And, a few posts (Rona Barry's, especially) rubbed me the wrong way. I'm not sure people mean it this way (I'm not sure they don't, either), but there's an underlying vibe in some of these posts that comes across in a very "success = money" kind of way. I think it's a sickness that infects people - and cultues - very easily, but I don't see success as being about how much money someone has, and it really gets to me that this sentiment is so common.

 

Cultural competence? Sure - we should teach it to our children, to as great an extent as we can. But, if one isn't culturally competent in the things one needs to know to function at a certain "level", then one can't teach one's children to be culturally competent at that level. I teach my kids as many things as I can think of to teach them. In ds1's case, I'm realizing that I missed a few things...but that's largely because of his personality. He's missing some basic life skills (esp. as regards paperwork), partly because he's always been really slippery about learning them.  He's not interested, and his focus has always been elsewhere. However, he's managed cultural competence in areas I never taught him, because those areas do interest him, and they became relevant when he started associating with kids from homes where different competencies were/are valued. I have little need to master the cultural competencies of the upper class, because I have no interest in joining the upper class. If I'm ever forced there (by dh's income, for instance), then I'll learn to manage, but it's not something that I want to do, in any way.

 

I also can't pretend to care about sports - any sports. So, if that becomes a necessity, I'll cultivate silence. I want to be around people who are interested in things that are interesting to me, not spend my time learning to fake it, so as to acquire "cultural competence". If cultural competence requires me to fake it all the time, then it's not a culture I want to be competent in, yk?

 

Anyway - it's all been an interesting conversation, for sure.

Imakcerka likes this.

Lisa, lucky mama of Kelly (3/93) ribboncesarean.gif, Emma (5/03) ribboncesarean.gif, Evan (7/05) ribboncesarean.gif, & Jenna (6/09) ribboncesarean.gif
Loving my amazing dh, James & forever missing ribbonpb.gif Aaron Ambrose ribboncesarean.gif (11/07) ribbonpb.gif

Storm Bride is offline  
#315 of 345 Old 03-20-2012, 10:24 PM
 
Linda on the move's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: basking in the sunshine
Posts: 10,634
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)


 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Storm Bride View Post

 

I also can't pretend to care about sports - any sports. So, if that becomes a necessity, I'll cultivate silence. I want to be around people who are interested in things that are interesting to me, not spend my time learning to fake it, so as to acquire "cultural competence". If cultural competence requires me to fake it all the time, then it's not a culture I want to be competent in, yk?


I think there is a difference between being able to carry on conversations with a wide variety of people and faking things.

 

Some situations are more fun and I feel more comfortable because the other people are what I am interested in. My book club for example.

 

In other situations, I'm around people that I don't have that much in common with on a core level, but I can carry on a conversation about things that other person cares about. I'm not faking anything if I ask someone if they are into the Final 4, if they have a team that is doing well. I'm just making conversation.

 

Conversing with people about things they are interested is a bit like playing a friendly game of badminton -- the goal is to keep the shuttle in the air -- to hit it in such a way they can return it.

 

To insist that everyone I ever speak to only speak to me about things I am interested in, never about things they are interested seems very limiting.  If one starts with the premise that every person is worthy of respect that whatever they are interested in is fine, conversing becomes an art. How to draw out the other person, how to make them comfortable.

Youngfrankenstein likes this.

but everything has pros and cons  shrug.gif

Linda on the move is online now  
#316 of 345 Old 03-21-2012, 11:46 AM
 
Storm Bride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 27,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Linda on the move View Post


 


I think there is a difference between being able to carry on conversations with a wide variety of people and faking things.

 

Some situations are more fun and I feel more comfortable because the other people are what I am interested in. My book club for example.

 

In other situations, I'm around people that I don't have that much in common with on a core level, but I can carry on a conversation about things that other person cares about. I'm not faking anything if I ask someone if they are into the Final 4, if they have a team that is doing well. I'm just making conversation.

 

Conversing with people about things they are interested is a bit like playing a friendly game of badminton -- the goal is to keep the shuttle in the air -- to hit it in such a way they can return it.

 

To insist that everyone I ever speak to only speak to me about things I am interested in, never about things they are interested seems very limiting.  If one starts with the premise that every person is worthy of respect that whatever they are interested in is fine, conversing becomes an art. How to draw out the other person, how to make them comfortable.


I know nothing about sports. I don't want to know anything about sports. I have no idea what the Final 4 is, and I don't care. I, in fact, hate sports with a passion, and there actually is no way for me to talk about them without being a fake. I can manage to draw someone out about things that I'm not terribly interested in (although if they keep talking about it, the conversation is eventually going to bore me to tears), but drawing someone out about sports would be about like volunteering for a root canal on a healthy tooth. If someone is so interested in sports that I can't find anything else to talk to them about, then we have absolutely no common ground, and having a conversation is pointless, anyway. That doesn't mean they're not worthy of respect. It means we have nothing to talk about. I can also assure you that none of the people I've met who believe that I should learn to talk about what other people are interested in (usually sports or some form of the arts) ever think those people should be able to carry on a conversation about my interests, because my interests are "weird", and...not deserving of respect.

 

However, I also structure my life to avoid small talk to as great an extent as humanly possible. It's one of the many reasons I have no interest in moving "up" the class ladder. Being stuck in social situations with people I don't know and have nothing in common with is a nightmare, and I don't want to be in a class where it's considered necessary.

 

DoubleDouble likes this.

Lisa, lucky mama of Kelly (3/93) ribboncesarean.gif, Emma (5/03) ribboncesarean.gif, Evan (7/05) ribboncesarean.gif, & Jenna (6/09) ribboncesarean.gif
Loving my amazing dh, James & forever missing ribbonpb.gif Aaron Ambrose ribboncesarean.gif (11/07) ribbonpb.gif

Storm Bride is offline  
#317 of 345 Old 03-21-2012, 05:22 PM
 
LynnS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pacific NW longing for the Midwest
Posts: 12,565
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm Bride View Post


I know nothing about sports. I don't want to know anything about sports. I have no idea what the Final 4 is, and I don't care. I, in fact, hate sports with a passion, and there actually is no way for me to talk about them without being a fake. I can manage to draw someone out about things that I'm not terribly interested in (although if they keep talking about it, the conversation is eventually going to bore me to tears), but drawing someone out about sports would be about like volunteering for a root canal on a healthy tooth.

 



Ah but you know enough about sports to know that the Final Four is a sporting event!

 

Personally, I think that talking about sports is really useful in the corporate world. There are lots of other areas where it's not so important. Talking sports in an English department at a university? Probably only going to engage about 1/3 of the people around you. It's not "essential" knowledge unless you really want to move up in the corporate world. I have not interest in the corporate world, but I do have a mild interest in sports. I like baseball. Dh loves soccer and so I like that too. Ds will watch any sport on (as dh put it "if there were season tickets to dog sled racing, he'd go!). I'm actually really fond of curling, but never get to see it anymore. When we lived in Buffalo, it was on Canadian TV regularly. But curling isn't going to win me a lot of popularity contests anywhere, even in Canada!


Lynnteapot2.GIF, academicreading.gif,geek.gif wife, WOHM  to T jog.gif(4/01) and M whistling.gif (5/04)
LynnS6 is offline  
#318 of 345 Old 03-21-2012, 07:04 PM
 
CatsCradle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,006
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by LynnS6 View Post


 



Ah but you know enough about sports to know that the Final Four is a sporting event!

 

Personally, I think that talking about sports is really useful in the corporate world. There are lots of other areas where it's not so important. Talking sports in an English department at a university? Probably only going to engage about 1/3 of the people around you. It's not "essential" knowledge unless you really want to move up in the corporate world. I have not interest in the corporate world, but I do have a mild interest in sports. I like baseball. Dh loves soccer and so I like that too. Ds will watch any sport on (as dh put it "if there were season tickets to dog sled racing, he'd go!). I'm actually really fond of curling, but never get to see it anymore. When we lived in Buffalo, it was on Canadian TV regularly. But curling isn't going to win me a lot of popularity contests anywhere, even in Canada!

I work in the legal field, and knowledge of sports is really hit and miss.  The legal industry is full of weirdos, outsiders, insiders, schmoozers, genuinely intellectual types, as well as run-of-the-mill  people who just happen to be lawyers, paralegals, etc.  I would say about 10% of the people in my firm (which comprises about 125 lawyers in my office) are really interested in sports.  Everyone else is a bit too busy with family stuff, personal interests or are just plain workaholics.  Funny, the people who are  most interested in sports are the 20-something guys who are still following college football and stuff like that.  Everyone else grows interested at Super Bowel time if, and only if, the local team is playing.  Honestly, it is not on the radar of a lot people my field in my area.

 

Now, that being said, I grew up in a  college town where sports ruled supreme.  Sports were the life and breath of that town.  People burned (and I think still do) couches in the streets when they won or lost to the rivals and team spirit permeated everything.  It was a small university town and sports were that town's identity.  I moved to a similar town in the north where there were two professional teams (football and baseball) and sports were also the identity of that town.  Sports are talked about in my current city, but it is lower down on the totem poll of subjects.  I'm happily ignorant of all things sports (except for things that truly interest me like marathon runners) and I've managed quite well in conversations.  I would say that the art of listening is more important in some instances than the knowledge of any particular subject and being able to talk about it.  In my line of work, there's nothing wrong with admitting you don't know the subject and asking people to elaborate.  In fact, I think other people like to educate others on certain subjects, especially if they feel they are experts.  I have to deal with a lot of small talk in my daily work and you just learn to roll.  It doesn't necessarily come naturally to me, but I have to do it in my line of work.  I've found a lot of genuine and interesting people, even if their interests don't necessarily interest me.
 

 


"Lawyers, I suppose, were children once." Charles Lamb.
CatsCradle is offline  
#319 of 345 Old 03-22-2012, 11:28 AM
 
Storm Bride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 27,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by LynnS6 View Post

Ah but you know enough about sports to know that the Final Four is a sporting event!

 

Not really. I guessed it was from the context in which Linda on the Move used it in the post that I was replying to.

 

Personally, I think that talking about sports is really useful in the corporate world.

 

LOL. It probably is. There isn't enough money - or anything else - in the world to make me dip my feet into the corporate world any deeper than I already have (some temp work, and a couple of jobs at small branch offices). Sports aren't the reason, but that's just one more reason for me to avoid the corporate world.

 

There are lots of other areas where it's not so important. Talking sports in an English department at a university? Probably only going to engage about 1/3 of the people around you. It's not "essential" knowledge unless you really want to move up in the corporate world. I have not interest in the corporate world, but I do have a mild interest in sports. I like baseball. Dh loves soccer and so I like that too. Ds will watch any sport on (as dh put it "if there were season tickets to dog sled racing, he'd go!). I'm actually really fond of curling, but never get to see it anymore. When we lived in Buffalo, it was on Canadian TV regularly. But curling isn't going to win me a lot of popularity contests anywhere, even in Canada!

 

I know a very little about curling, but only because my ex-boss (my first real boss, and my one actual mentor in the work world - I worked for her for eight years, and loved every minute of it) was on a curling team. She didn't talk about it a lot, because she knew I wasn't into it, but she did talk a little, especially when she had tournaments to attend and things like that. So, at one time, I knew a little bit about curling. I've picked up very minimal knowledge of hockey, baseball, softball (although I don't know the differences between baseball and softball, except for the ball itself - are there any?) and basketball, just from television, books, movies, etc. (and being forced to play them in high school). I know almost nothing about football, except the names of some of the positions and what touchdowns and field goals are. Football gives me a headache. I know nothing about soccer, except what the ball looks like, and that there's a goalie involved (no idea how many players are on the field, even), and you're not supposed to touch the ball with your hands (I think?). None of that stuff is even on my radar, and sports barely exist in my world, except as a waste of space in my daily paper.

I'm glad to hear your opinion about sports and the corporate world, though. I'm about equally uninterested in having anything to do with one as the other.



 


Lisa, lucky mama of Kelly (3/93) ribboncesarean.gif, Emma (5/03) ribboncesarean.gif, Evan (7/05) ribboncesarean.gif, & Jenna (6/09) ribboncesarean.gif
Loving my amazing dh, James & forever missing ribbonpb.gif Aaron Ambrose ribboncesarean.gif (11/07) ribbonpb.gif

Storm Bride is offline  
#320 of 345 Old 03-22-2012, 12:18 PM
 
pickle18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I agree that money shouldn't be synonymous with success - but it is for a lot of people (or, at least, it's a major factor in defining success).  Alot of people also get their jollies from "who they know" and how quickly they can reach people in high places.  Personally, having enough money that I can stay home with my son is important to me - having enough that I can be flashy with my material possessions is not (though not all people with money are...not by a long shot).  Any number of things (including being raised in meager circumstances without enough food, clothing, etc.) can drive people to include money in this definition.  It's certainly not my position to judge others for their own definition just because it's not ascetic enough, any more than I would want to be judged for mine.

 

I think talking about sports and other things that are helpful in the corporate world/upper class are easily taught to your children as tools in their toolbox, depending on the social situation they are in.  They may or may not need them, and they may grow up to move in those worlds or not, whether by their own choice or not.  But it can't hurt to teach them.  Not to mention, many general social graces have been discussed here, which are helpful to all.

 

Your child may want to go to an Ivy League school and be a real mover and shaker in the business world - or they might run from that environment.  Still, even if your child grows up to be a starving artist, she may end up needing to sell herself to galleries, art dealers and potential buyers.  I don't think this thread needs to be about making a value judgment on certain circles of society. You never know whom you might need to associate with, or what circles your children may end up in while trying to achieve their dreams - and I think that's something this thread has presented very well.


~ Lucky wife of DH blowkiss.gifand loving mama to DS biggrinbounce.gif (04/11) ~

 

treehugger.gif * femalesling.GIF * ecbaby2.gif *cd.gif * familybed1.gif * bf.gif * namaste.gif *

pickle18 is offline  
#321 of 345 Old 03-22-2012, 12:33 PM
 
aHikaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: California
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Our family, DH DD and I, are a middle class family.

 

From my own experience, I was raised with both lower class and upper class upbringing, since my parents were divorced and "street" smart is way more important to me than having "class". There are "classy" people that are trashy and vice versa. You can't buy an education or class, it's something you have to want to teach yourself, so unless your traveling to Italy in the near future or your children are curious about the world you live in and what you and your husband choose to do with your personal lives, then let them ask you when they are ready.

 

I plan on raising DD the way I was raised, immersing her in worldly experiences and teaching her how to change the oil in her car. At the end of the day, it's what information that our children retain is what will stay with them for the rest of their lives and if something bad should ever happen in this world, her knowing how to filter water will be more important than her knowing another language she will not use in her daily life. 


Mama to DD(4) energy.gif&  DS baby.gif

aHikaru is offline  
#322 of 345 Old 03-23-2012, 05:44 AM
 
Buzzbuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Its funny -- when I think of "upper class" skills, I think about sports -- the ones the cost lots of money.  So skiing, sailing and, for girls, horse-back riding.  Maybe in some circles or areas of the country shooting as well.

 

 

 

 


I support homebirth that meets the qualifications set forth in the AAP's 2013 policy on homebirth.

Buzzbuzz is offline  
#323 of 345 Old 03-23-2012, 10:50 PM
 
Storm Bride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 27,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by pickle18 View Post

I think talking about sports and other things that are helpful in the corporate world/upper class are easily taught to your children as tools in their toolbox, depending on the social situation they are in.  They may or may not need them, and they may grow up to move in those worlds or not, whether by their own choice or not.  But it can't hurt to teach them.  Not to mention, many general social graces have been discussed here, which are helpful to all.

 

They're only easily taught by some people. I would have no idea how to teach a child to talk about sports, for instance. Conversations about sports make my brain shut down.

 

Your child may want to go to an Ivy League school and be a real mover and shaker in the business world - or they might run from that environment.  Still, even if your child grows up to be a starving artist, she may end up needing to sell herself to galleries, art dealers and potential buyers.  I don't think this thread needs to be about making a value judgment on certain circles of society. You never know whom you might need to associate with, or what circles your children may end up in while trying to achieve their dreams - and I think that's something this thread has presented very well.


Learning to sell oneself is one of the most valuable things a person can learn, no matter what they do. At the very least, they're almost certainly going to face job interviews. I suck at it. I always have, and I probably always will. My mom does, too. We both took an aptitude test years ago (not Myers-Briggs, but that kind ot fhing), and we both scored zero on sales ability. We don't have it. We can't learn it. I've been to job interviews. I know how they work. I suck at them. If I could actually sell myself for what I'm worth to a company, I'd own a house, instead of living in a crappy, too-expensive rented townhouse. But, I don't have it. DS1 has it in spades. He could probably get hired for a job he wasn't qualified for, at twice whta I'd get paid for a job I was highly qualified for, because he can sell. So, again...I think this is a very valuable skill to have, but it's not one I can teach, because I don't understand it. Maybe ds1 can give the other three pointers...although I doubt he's ever really thought about it.

 


Lisa, lucky mama of Kelly (3/93) ribboncesarean.gif, Emma (5/03) ribboncesarean.gif, Evan (7/05) ribboncesarean.gif, & Jenna (6/09) ribboncesarean.gif
Loving my amazing dh, James & forever missing ribbonpb.gif Aaron Ambrose ribboncesarean.gif (11/07) ribbonpb.gif

Storm Bride is offline  
#324 of 345 Old 03-24-2012, 02:58 PM
 
Mom31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: America
Posts: 3,634
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

this whole thread makes my head spin.


mdcblog5.gifsaynovax.giffambedsingle2.gifhomebirth.jpg

 

 

Mom31 is offline  
#325 of 345 Old 03-27-2012, 08:48 AM
 
pickle18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Storm Bride - I don't blame you - sports are not my thing at all!  I guess I wasn't necessarily thinking you could teach your kid the ins and outs of football so much as, let them know that these things are helpful to learn for conversation, and support their interest in learning it or participating in it if they have one.  It doesn't necessarily have to come directly from you - give them access to books, clubs, teams or other opportunities.  If everything I could teach DS was limited by what I'm good at, enjoy, or thoroughly understand - well, that may be a tiny world indeed! smile.gif

 

 

Storm Bride likes this.

~ Lucky wife of DH blowkiss.gifand loving mama to DS biggrinbounce.gif (04/11) ~

 

treehugger.gif * femalesling.GIF * ecbaby2.gif *cd.gif * familybed1.gif * bf.gif * namaste.gif *

pickle18 is offline  
#326 of 345 Old 03-27-2012, 09:28 AM
 
DaughterOfKali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New England
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I'm about to run out right now but will come back to post something later (subbing so I won't forget.)


Independent Consultant- Thirty One Gifts www.mythirtyone.com/ShopLiz

Origami Owl http://lizcioci.origamiowl.com

DaughterOfKali is offline  
#327 of 345 Old 03-27-2012, 08:24 PM
 
Calliope84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 283
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Wow. I read this entire thread. 

 

I think all of you would be interested in the book by Charles Murray - Coming Apart. (Many of you will probably be offended by what the book has to say, though.)

 

Random thoughts...

A Classical education helps you to understand why our culture is the way it is. It isn't a weird sort of indoctrination or an outdated collection of so-called "important" works. It can give you a really deep understanding of the modern world and also help to prepare you for a modern career.

 

Fancy Colorado Ski resort? Vail? Aspen?

 

 

--------

 

OP's question was a valid one, imo. No one is happy or comfortable thinking that OP's kids might have some special cultural norms in store for them that our children don't because we're not "upper class".  

 

My grandparents were working class, my parents were middle class (white collar), and I went to a public school in a poor area and also to a private school where all the kids seemed to have doctors and lawyers for parents. At the moment I don't know what DH and I are. We're both unemployed at the moment and I bet we'd qualify for public assistance. DH was wealthy as a child and they lost it all. My mom remarried into the upper class and my dad also now qualifies as belonging to the "upper class". There is certainly a different lifestyle when you make more money. You can afford things that are well-made, so they don't need to be replaced as often. You sometimes acquire a taste for what most Americans would consider to be weird or "fancy" foods.

 

(That book I mentioned above talks about this... like how the "new upper class" probably drinks beer from a microbrewery and not bud light, buys green products, doesn't smoke cigarettes, shops at whole foods, etc. There is a whole sub-culture and quite frankly, many of you on MDC are well aware of this sub-culture and may be living it - upper class or not.)

 

Someone in this thread was talking about being "subtle" about wealth... and it is true. I remember reading a research paper along these lines and it talked about how those on the cusp of wealth tended to buy the lower cost designer purses and such that very ostentatiously screamed "I can afford this!" because they want to be seen as a member of the class above them. While the really wealthy people purchased the even more expensive stuff that sometimes didn't even have a logo on it (think Louis Vuitton purses). They surveyed people in different zip codes and the people from very wealthy zip codes knew right away which purses were the most expensive ones, while the people from the lower earning zip codes chose the most ostentatious ones as being the most expensive. That term "cultural capital" that everyone has been throwing around... it is real and it applies to SO much more than just handbags. 

 

(Just found it. Google "Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence" to read the PDF if you are interested.)

 

 

I feel like I am straddling two different worlds sometimes, but I don't mind. There are lots of different sub-cultures in this country and we all have some that we feel more comfortable or less comfortable in. OP just wants to ensure her kids feel comfortable in the sub-culture they are being brought up in since she seems to feel unsure about whether or not she can guide them. ---- And these sub-cultures are not just based on money, though as many posters have mentioned, some opportunities do require more money.

Tjej and pickle18 like this.
Calliope84 is offline  
#328 of 345 Old 03-27-2012, 08:58 PM
 
AllyRae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,391
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Linda on the move View Post

I find this thread fascinating, but some points to clarify -----

 

100K for a family of 4 even in a moderate income area isn't enough to live the way many are describing -- with a Merc and black tie events and frequent trips to Europe. Not by a long shot. 

 

 



No kidding.  LOL!  We make about that each year, and as a family of 5, we in no way eat at fancy restaurants.  Chipotle is pushing it at times. LOL!  Our kids don't take violin lessons or ride horses (or even have access to any!).  I have no idea about wines.  My kids get their clothes from a consignment store for the most part.  We don't even have a minivan!  LOL!

 

However, we are fortunate.  We have a house that meets our needs, eat healthy meals daily, and do not want for necessities.  We are not "upper class" even with our income, but we are very very fortunate.

 

That being said, the things I want my kids to learn are the things I would want them to learn regardless of our income:

 

1) Actions speak a whole lot more than being able to throw money at something.  Get your hands dirty and help out others.

 

2) They are no better than anyone else.  They do not have the right to act better than anyone else.  All people have value and need to be treated with respect and dignity.

 

3) Poverty is real.  Poverty is NOT "I can't afford the latest electronic gadget" or "I can't afford a $100 outfit".  Poverty is real, crushing, and devastating.  Poverty can lead to things like human trafficking, parents not being able to raise their own children, and people starving.  It is important to know this, understand this, and do your best to help ease the burden.

 

4) Education is important.  Learn everything you can and try your hardest.  The name of the school is not as important as how you applied yourself.

 

5) Laziness is not an option.  If you want something, you need to work for it. 

 

6) Treat yourself with respect.  Do not harm yourself with drugs, crappy food, or neglecting your own needs.

 

7) You are privileged simply because you have food to eat, clean water to drink, medical care when you are sick, and a roof over your head.  Not everyone is that lucky.  Be thankful that you have it, but understand that there are others that do not have basic needs met.  It's ok to appreciate what you have, but it's essential that you realize that it's not the case everywhere.

 

8) Learn about other cultures in the world.  Appreciate the food, arts, lifestyles, and people from around the world.  The world is huge beyond your own doors. 

 

9) Above all, treat every person with dignity and respect.  Everyone you meet plays a role in the world.  Every race, gender, age, class, etc. of people are important, and they are all humans.

 

As you can tell, we are very very big on teaching our children that there are children in the world who do not have even the basic of needs met.  We want to instill a heart for others.  This is very very important to our family, especially considering our middle child lost her birth family due to oppression and poverty.

 

I don't have "upper class" and "lower class" lessons.  I just want my children to be good humans.


~Brandon Michael (11/23/03), Jocelyn Lily Nữ (2/4/07, adopted 5/28/07 from Vietnam), Amelia Rylie (1/14/09), & Ryland Josef William (9/7/05-9/7/05 @ 41 wks). 
AllyRae is offline  
#329 of 345 Old 03-29-2012, 02:20 PM
 
DaughterOfKali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New England
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by AllyRae View Post

 

That being said, the things I want my kids to learn are the things I would want them to learn regardless of our income:

 

1) Actions speak a whole lot more than being able to throw money at something.  Get your hands dirty and help out others.

 

2) They are no better than anyone else.  They do not have the right to act better than anyone else.  All people have value and need to be treated with respect and dignity.

 

3) Poverty is real.  Poverty is NOT "I can't afford the latest electronic gadget" or "I can't afford a $100 outfit".  Poverty is real, crushing, and devastating.  Poverty can lead to things like human trafficking, parents not being able to raise their own children, and people starving.  It is important to know this, understand this, and do your best to help ease the burden.

 

4) Education is important.  Learn everything you can and try your hardest.  The name of the school is not as important as how you applied yourself.

 

5) Laziness is not an option.  If you want something, you need to work for it. 

 

6) Treat yourself with respect.  Do not harm yourself with drugs, crappy food, or neglecting your own needs.

 

7) You are privileged simply because you have food to eat, clean water to drink, medical care when you are sick, and a roof over your head.  Not everyone is that lucky.  Be thankful that you have it, but understand that there are others that do not have basic needs met.  It's ok to appreciate what you have, but it's essential that you realize that it's not the case everywhere.

 

8) Learn about other cultures in the world.  Appreciate the food, arts, lifestyles, and people from around the world.  The world is huge beyond your own doors. 

 

9) Above all, treat every person with dignity and respect.  Everyone you meet plays a role in the world.  Every race, gender, age, class, etc. of people are important, and they are all humans.

 

As you can tell, we are very very big on teaching our children that there are children in the world who do not have even the basic of needs met.  We want to instill a heart for others.  This is very very important to our family, especially considering our middle child lost her birth family due to oppression and poverty.

 

I don't have "upper class" and "lower class" lessons.  I just want my children to be good humans.


I was going to post something long but I don't have to after reading your post.  You pretty much summed it up.

 

I do live in one of the wealthiest towns in the USA.  The basics that kids are expected to know are Tennis and French.  Parents tend to want kids to know how to dine properly (which fork to use for what; manners; placement of utensils/glasses.)  Sports (soccer, lacrosse, skiing.)

 

Even the kids ask each other where they 'summer'.  The majority of people own at least one summer home (either on the Cape/islands or elsewhere in the world.)

 


Independent Consultant- Thirty One Gifts www.mythirtyone.com/ShopLiz

Origami Owl http://lizcioci.origamiowl.com

DaughterOfKali is offline  
#330 of 345 Old 04-02-2012, 07:30 AM
 
AbbyGrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 741
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

      Quote:

Originally Posted by Calliope84 View Post

OP's question was a valid one, imo. No one is happy or comfortable thinking that OP's kids might have some special cultural norms in store for them that our children don't because we're not "upper class".  

 

It doesn't make me uncomfortable to acknowledge that different groups have different cultural norms. But cultural norms are complex and based on more than simply income, so it doesn't make much sense to me to ask about the norms for certain income brackets. I don't think there's a specific set that apply to those that earn in the low six figures. That seems like a very arbitrary distinction to me. I think that's why it's been difficult to get a consensus on the answer to the OP's question even after seventeen pages. It doesn't appear there's much "class related" knowledge for that income bracket.  
 
Also, low six-figures in a moderate COL area is not what I consider "upper class" or wealthy anyway, although it's certainly a good living. My family has a single income of less than six figures as do many of the people I know. However, many of those in my family's social circle, particularly the dual income families, earn low six figures (I know what they do and where they work, so it's pretty easy to determine...many are probably mid-100's to low 200's). Our lives are definitely more alike than they are different, so I was pretty amused by the implication here that their kids need to know something mine don't.
 
While the people that I know in that higher income bracket might be able to afford more, we all seem to be doing a lot of the same things. We all value education for our children. Some choose private school, but most choose public (and some of the ones I know well that choose private have mentioned they have to make sacrifices in other areas to afford it).  We all seem to be trying to raise our children to be good human beings and good citizens of the world. We all seem to be trying to enrich their lives the best we can. While they might be able to afford more extra-carricular experiences and vacations, they aren't necessarily different ones. They are not vacationing in Vail or hobnobbing with the rich and famous at The Met. To my knowledge, they are not teaching their children how to pair wines or order from menus in various languages (I don't even think there is a restaurant in the area with a menu like that anyway), and I know some would scoff at the idea. We have a lot in common based on our backgrounds, educations, and careers. The income difference just isn't an issue. If we end up in that income bracket, I'm certain I will not be needing to teach my children anything different.   
 
Also, I've never heard any of these people mention taking a cruise or swimming with the dolphins which someone upthread mentioned were standard experiences for children in this income bracket in her area. Those things just don't seem to be priorities for them. I think this is where issues other than income come into play.  
  

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calliope84 View Post

(That book I mentioned above talks about this... like how the "new upper class" probably drinks beer from a microbrewery and not bud light, buys green products, doesn't smoke cigarettes, shops at whole foods, etc. There is a whole sub-culture and quite frankly, many of you on MDC are well aware of this sub-culture and may be living it - upper class or not.)


I'm not quite sure I understand what the author of that book is trying to get at. I mean I do think I know that sub-culture winky.gif, but it has to do with a lot more than income. I know a lot of non-upper class people who fit that description and some high income earners who are much happier with Bud rather than microbrews, who prefer the regular grocery store or Costco over Whole Foods, and who think green products are weird and/or inferior.  

 

AbbyGrant is offline  
Reply

Tags
Parenting

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off