It takes a village..... - Mothering Forums

 
Thread Tools
#1 of 3 Old 12-29-2004, 05:52 AM - Thread Starter
 
delighted.mama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Midwest.....
Posts: 554
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have been thinking about this a lot more now that dd is getting bigger (3 yrs old) and wonder what the rest of you think? It is very normal in Europe especially for families to live together and for grandparents, uncles, aunts to have constant contact and "help parent" DC's. Grandparents especially have a special role in childrens' lives and parents don't think twice about letting their kids spend lots of time with extended family. This social philosphy, however, is not employed here in the U.S. for a number of reasons...people don't live in the same dwelling, distance, more work opportunities, the break-down of family, etc.

In any case, for the first two years of dd's life, I felt adamantly that there was no reason for her to have extensive contact (like spending the nights) with her grandparents. I really felt like it was totally dh and my responsibility to provide ALL of her nurturing and that I was shirking my duties as a parent if I allowed others to help. Now, however, I am rethinking the whole "It takes a village" philosophy. When dd turned 2, I started letting her spend a night here and there with my parents. My grandmother lives with them and between my dad, mom and grandmother, dd has TONS of attention that she thrives on. It also gives dh and I a little alone time (you know....where you can actually sleep in past 6, not have to fix breakfast, take a leisurely shower ) This summer, I actually let her spend a couple of consecutive nights with my parents. DD loved it and I found myself, guiltily, enjoying the break from her. (FYI my parents live about 30 minutes away)

I've realized that dd learns things from them that I can't provide her with. She learns all sorts of things...new songs, reads new books, new ways of communicating, etc. She loves it and I feel like she is enriched by those experiences. Since having dd#2 (who is 7 weeks old) I am more and more tempted to let dd#1 go over to her grandparents' house. It gives her some one-on-one time that I don't have to give her like I used to. It also gives me time alone with the baby. This past weekend she spent 2 nights with grandparents. Although I missed her, part of me kept thinking how nice it was to have that time to myself and not have the whole responsibility. I didn't have any qualms about the level of care she was receiving. The other part felt guilty for thinking that and feeling like it was a cop-out to let someone else take care of her. But, then I go back to the whole "it takes a village" philosophy.

What do you think about that philosophy, and do your kids have extensive interaction (such as nights, long days, etc) away from you and with a member of your family or other trusted person?

Libby
delighted.mama is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 of 3 Old 12-29-2004, 09:41 AM
Banned
 
WithHannahsHeart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Not only do i find this philosophy valid, i find it absolutely crucial (if it is possible to achieve - obviously for some people's circumstances it is not) to the wellbeing of a family. And crucial to the blossoming and diversity of understanding of my child. My girl has only had two overnights with her Grammy, her closest extended relative, but has spent many daytime hours with her. She thrives in my mother's care and loves her very much; i think this is so wonderful, particularly as i had NO grandparents growing up. I feel, sometimes, that this has left me a bit lopsided emotionally, and i have always grieved what i did not get to have.

I think parents who jealously guard their children til they are school age or soemthing do themselves, their children, and their whole family a great disservice by denying them the unique experience of having a special, one-on-one relationship with their grandparent(s). This does not have to involve overnights always, that should of course be up to the child's level of readiness, but i think at around age two (younger for us, but it varies) a grandparent should be alowed to go off with the child or at least have alone time with that child so they can have their own relationship with the child. How this happens will depend on each family, but i do feel it should happen, if the grandparents can be trusted to care for your child in the way, or at least similar to the way, that you find best.
WithHannahsHeart is offline  
#3 of 3 Old 12-29-2004, 01:09 PM
 
Seasons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Host city of Laundryfest 2009
Posts: 1,533
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
...

The only thing you owe to others is to behave with integrity.
Seasons is offline  
Reply


User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Online Users: 14,724

26 members and 14,698 guests
autumngrey , BirthFree , Deborah , girlspn , greenemami , healthy momma , hillymum , Josiah , katelove , Katherine73 , Kelleybug , lhargrave89 , Michele123 , moominmamma , MountainMamaGC , psimmons , redsally , RollerCoasterMama , sciencemum , sniffmommy , sutton_02 , verticalscope
Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.