Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: little house in the suburbs
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
|Originally posted by LunaMom
if she was nursing the twins on demand it would have been impossible. I can certainly see how scheduling of some sort would be necessary in her situation.
|Originally posted by lenswyf
Routine and schedule are synonyms in the dictionary, but they do mean different things. "Routine" is habit or custom. "Schedule" is agenda, timetable.
I think that all babies eventually settle into a routine by themselves that makes life reasonably predictablebut it's not a hard and fast schedule.
|Originally posted by laralou
My only concession to a schedule is that I try to keep the girls close to being on the same routine. Meaning when I feed one, I offer to the other. I don't refuse to feed one if the other isn't hungry, nor do I keep one up if the other isn't sleepy. They eat when hungry and sleep when sleepy, hopefully together but many times not.
I don't blame people who offer feedings at regular times. I do NOT approve of refusing to feed a baby that is hungry because it isn't the right time. I also do NOT approve of someone that deliberately lets her kids cry to force them to sleep at parent directed times or force them to stay in a playpen or playroom. Refusing to meet your babies needs is not necessary to raise twins. There is always another option like getting a mother's helper.
Sorry to rant but that "you can't raise twins without a schedule" thing is something I hear all the time and it is just not true.
|28 members and 15,357 guests|
|beedub , bethanco04 , cloa513 , coconotcoco , exspeedite49 , floss&ferd , girlspn , hagansauto5 , hillymum , hungarydental , jcdfarmer , Kartik Sharma , lauren , MadeleineAtchley , MeanVeggie , Mody , MommyJen314 , NaturallyKait , nithin a , oaksie68 , perserra32 , prayingforpeace , rahulkumar123 , RollerCoasterMama , sesameseed , shantimama , Shmootzi , Socks|
|Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.|