Join Date: Feb 2005
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
C.- WOHM, CPST Instructor, and all around busy Mama to A.- 02/04, I. 01/07,E. 09/10 and
expecting the surprise of our lives Fall 2012!
|Five years to the term breech trial: The rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial.
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 194(1):20-25, January 2006.
Glezerman, Marek MD
Objective: On the basis of the end points of neonatal morbidity and death, the authors of the term breech trial concluded unequivocally that cesarean delivery was safer for breech babies.
Study design: Analysis of the original and new data gives rise to serious concerns as far as study design, methods, and conclusions are concerned. In a substantial number of cases, there was a lack of adherence to the inclusion criteria. There was a large interinstitutional variation of standard of care; inadequate methods of antepartum and intrapartum fetal assessment were used, and a large proportion of women were recruited during active labor. In many instances of planned vaginal delivery, there was no attendance of a clinician with adequate expertise.
Results: Most cases of neonatal death and morbidity in the term breech trial cannot be attributed to the mode of delivery. Moreover, analysis of outcome after 2 years has shown no difference between vaginal and abdominal deliveries of breech babies.
Conclusion: The original term breech trial recommendations should be withdrawn.
(C) Mosby-Year Book Inc. 2006. All Rights Reserved.
|27 members and 11,817 guests|
|aparent , Cherry_Blossom , Childrenareawesome , CricketVS , eathomem4 , Emilia.H , Emmac , floss&ferd , girlspn , happy-mama , harrietsmama , hillymum , jamesmorrow , kathymuggle , Markons92 , MeanVeggie , momys1 , MountainMamaGC , NaturallyKait , RollerCoasterMama , sren , VsAngela , zannster , Zilver|
|Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.|