Carob vs. Cocoa/Chocolate/Cacao... - Page 3 - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#61 of 63 Old 10-30-2006, 05:49 PM
AJP
 
AJP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: land of the fruits and nuts
Posts: 1,877
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by toraji View Post
Just to add fuel to the anti-caffeine fire...

caffeine is now being found in high levels as a pollutant in oceans.
That makes sense, that it would pass into and through wastewater treatment the same as drugs. Any idea what impact it has on sea life?

There is no secret ingredient.
AJP is offline  
#62 of 63 Old 10-31-2006, 12:48 AM
 
toraji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rural Upstate NY
Posts: 1,179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJP View Post
That makes sense, that it would pass into and through wastewater treatment the same as drugs. Any idea what impact it has on sea life?
I don't have a whole bunch of info, though it's been shown to contribute to coral reef bleaching. But if caffeine is detrimental to humans, then I can't imagine it being any better for marine life.
Quote:
In their 2001 study on how differences in temperature can cause bleaching in
cnidarians, Sawyer and Muscatine also tested a variety of pharmaceutical
products, one of which being caffeine, for their effects on bleaching in the
Hawaiian reef coral Pocillopora damicornis and the sea anemone Aiptasia
pulchella. They proved that, at concentrations of 25mM, bleaching does occur in
living coral. This occurs because caffeine degrades proteins in the host cells of
the cnidarians, and thus affects their adhesion to their algal symbionts. The
corals realeased a significant amount of the algae after just 1.5 hours. Caffeine
also retards the efficiency of photosynthesis in the zooxanthellae by increasing
the amounts of cyclic AMP, which then subsequently decreases the productivity
of photosystem II
From http://www.urop.uci.edu/SURP/sample_...cology%204.pdf
toraji is offline  
#63 of 63 Old 10-31-2006, 02:08 PM
 
kbchavez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 777
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Does anyone know whether raw or cooked is better for chocolate and carob? The raw foodists obviously tout raw as healthful, but we NT'ers know that some foods are more healthful either with cooking or with traditional processing. Do they have significant anti-nutrients that need to be neutralized? How were they traditionally prepared? I also wonder about maca root. Is raw really better, or would cooked or fermented be superior? Many tubers are toxic raw...

I know that most chocolate processing is unhealthful, but could there be a traditional processing method that makes it better for you than either raw or "conventional"?

Inquiring minds want to know.
kbchavez is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off