Co-sleeper recommendations? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 8 Old 11-01-2012, 01:51 PM - Thread Starter
 
outdoorsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 378
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Hi all. I am newly pregnant (still waiting for first ultrasound). We are thinking about sleeping arrangements well in advance because our bedroom is tight on space. I Googled co-sleepers, and most results were from the same brand (Arm's Reach). I'm just wondering what moms on here would recommend. Can anyone comment on the ClearVue model vs. Mini? Other brands? Other sleeping suggestions? Please keep in mind these parameters: 1 - Our room is small enough that a crib would block the closet; we are interested in a small co-sleeper. 2 - We have decided not to bed-share, partly because we have a waterbed and the soft surface is not appropriate. Thanks in advance.


babyf.gif... due in late June.

outdoorsy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 of 8 Old 11-01-2012, 04:39 PM
 
pokeyac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 3,581
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)

Hi there outdoorsy!  I would love to hear what people have to say too.




Married to a wonderful woman since 2010. Baby boy C arrived in June 2013!

Check out our User Agreement.
pokeyac is online now  
#3 of 8 Old 11-02-2012, 07:36 AM - Thread Starter
 
outdoorsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 378
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Hi Pokey! I was thinking last night -- I kind of imagined that co-sleepers would have a fourth side you could raise if the baby were sleeping unattended, i.e., napping while I'm downstairs throwing in a load of laundry. But it seems like they don't. I guess if we also had a crib in the baby's room, it could nap in there. Also, the co-sleeper is only considered safe until 5 months of age, the website says -- which is less than a typical bassinet. Not very economical!


babyf.gif... due in late June.

outdoorsy is offline  
#4 of 8 Old 11-02-2012, 03:41 PM
 
SplashingPuddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 262
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)

This may not make a difference to Americans but Arms Reach co-sleepers have been banned in Canada for safety reasons. There was a death of a baby in one of them when it was used after the recommended age.  The baby tried to crawl out and got caught between the bed and co-sleeper.  We decided to get a co-sleeper in the US, since they are unavailable in Canada. However, I think it is really important not to use beyond the age recommended.

SplashingPuddle is online now  
#5 of 8 Old 11-02-2012, 08:43 PM
 
Zirconia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 149
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

We used the Arm's Reach Mini Convertible co-sleeper for 5 months and loved it!  In fact, since DD outgrew it, we've struggled to find the right sleeping arrangement.  I could hear her breathing and easily reach out and touch her, but we also had our own space and I could sleep comfortably (we bedshare now, and sometimes I'd love to be able to roll and stretch!).  I usually slept with one hand in the co-sleeper, holding her hand or patting her tummy.  I miss the co-sleeper so much!

 

With the Convertible ones, you can put up the 4th side to make a free-standing bassinet, or you can lower the sleeping surface all the way to the bottom like a pack-n-play.  We actually never used the pack-n-play feature, so the extra cost of the "convertible" vs the "classic" model was wasted on us.  I loved the idea, but we just never detached the thing from the bed.  By the time DD could roll over at 5 1/2 months and couldn't sleep in the raised bassinet, she was too big for it in general - her arms hit the sides as she slept, and she was nearly too long (she's 75th percentile in height).  

 

The Regular sized co-sleeper is a good bit bigger than the Mini, so if you want the convertible feature I'd probably go ahead and get the bigger one so you can use it longer.

 

Also, we have a sleigh bed with a wooden frame, and the co-sleeper wouldn't fit flush against the side of the bed.  It's made for beds that don't have side rails.  We used it anyway, and tightly rolled a rug to wedge in the gap between the bed and co-sleeper.  That was a bummer because it didn't feel as safe (I was constantly checking it) and also put baby a few more inches away from me.

 

I never did find any other options, although we miss the co-sleeper so much that this weekend we're going to try to sidecar the crib.

 

Hope this helps, and congrats!

Zirconia is online now  
#6 of 8 Old 11-07-2012, 11:04 AM - Thread Starter
 
outdoorsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 378
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

SplashingPuddle -- It DOES matter to me if Canada bans something. That's not a good sign. I am already concerned about connecting a co-sleeper to the bed correctly because it appears from the website that you place a strap between the box spring and mattress -- but a waterbed like ours has no box spring, and the mattress is set in a deep wooden frame.

 

Zirconia - Thanks for the comments. I will look at the convertible again. Otherwise we may end up with some sort of crib pushed up against the bed.


babyf.gif... due in late June.

outdoorsy is offline  
#7 of 8 Old 11-08-2012, 08:20 AM
 
Zirconia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 149
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Outdoorsy, I'm sorry, I went all off on a Cosleeper review and didn't quite register that you have a waterbed.  I can't imagine any scenario where a cosleeper would be safe up against a waterbed mattress - you're right, you have to be able to cinch a tight strap to hold the two beds together.  And you would never want baby to roll over next to the soft surface.  I think you will need something with 4 sides, like a freestanding bassinet, cradle, or crib that you can put right next to your bed.

 

When we visited my parents when DD was a newborn, they had a pack-n-play with a bassinet attachment that raised the mattress.  Just like a Cosleeper with the 4th side up, but WAY cheaper!  We added a mattress (because the one that comes with it is basically cardboard).  She always slept really well in it.

 

I wanted a Cosleeper over a pack-n-play because for some reason I thought the Cosleepers were more "natural."  They aren't.  They have polyester and plastic just like the pack-n-plays.  I also wanted it for the 3-sided feature.  But if it doesn't work with your bed (as a 3-sided bassinet), then IMO there's no reason to buy one.

 

HTH!

Zirconia is online now  
#8 of 8 Old 11-08-2012, 11:19 AM - Thread Starter
 
outdoorsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 378
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Zirconia - Agreed! Thank you.


babyf.gif... due in late June.

outdoorsy is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off