systematic awakening - Mothering Forums

Thread Tools
#1 of 4 Old 03-31-2003, 03:28 AM - Thread Starter
annasmom's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 67
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
So, I was flipping through "what to expect the first year" because it is the end of dd's first year and I wanted to see if I missed anything

Well, as it turns out, I did miss something. I found out (on pg 261) that I am softhearted and weaknerved because I chose not to CIO.

Anyway, the book recommended something called systematic awakening. One is supposed to keep track of the babies sleep schedule for a week and get an idea when exactly they will awaken. Then one is supposed to wake them a half hour before they would awaken naturally, and then just put them back to sleep using whatever methods work (rocking, nursing, etc.).
By lengthening the time between the awakenings and then phasing them out, supposedly the child will sleep through the night.

Is something like this healthy? I am not expecting much from a recommendation from a book that calls me weaknerved...but I was just wondering what others thought.

I would think it would make a very grumpy baby...

ALso, dd went a few weeks waking every 45 minutes. It wasn't long before I was waking every 44 minutes. Wouldn't something like this just shorten the child's sleep cycles?

just curious what other mom's think of this...


mom to Anna...1 yo next week!
annasmom is offline  
Sponsored Links
#2 of 4 Old 03-31-2003, 10:08 PM
BinahYeteirah's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,094
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I read that, too. I think it sounds interesting, but it sounds like too much work for me. For it to work, your child would have to have reasonably regular waking times. My dd doesn't. I could never wake up at predetermined times and do that whole schedule shifting thing. But that's just me...

Maybe someone else can help more. Let us know what you decide !
BinahYeteirah is offline  
#3 of 4 Old 04-01-2003, 01:22 AM
kimbalicious's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: the Beautiful South
Posts: 598
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You know I worked in bookstores for years and always pushed the "What to Expect...." series because so many Mom's and Mom's to be seemed to like them. Once I became pregnant and started reading them I just was shocked at some of the ideas they have and recommended. The systematic awakening system just seems mean. I know I'd be irked (to put it mildly) if someone pulled that stunt on me.

BTW my ob told me to not bother reading the series -- she said they were alarmist. She said if I had them fine, that way no one would give them to me.
kimbalicious is offline  
#4 of 4 Old 04-01-2003, 01:44 AM
oceanbaby's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,167
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would think it would make for one grumpy mama.

That just sounds weird to me. Ds often wakes at the same times during the night, so I'm supposed to set the alarm for 2:30am so I can nurse him to sleep rather than doing it at 3am? I just don't see the point of it.
oceanbaby is offline  

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Online Users: 15,648

23 members and 15,625 guests
beckyleeh , debigebi , Deborah , girlspn , greenemami , hillymum , IsaFrench , katelove , Kate_H21 , lisak1234 , MartinaTempleton , MarylandMommy , Michele123 , moominmamma , Motherof3already , NaturallyKait , pokeyac , RollerCoasterMama , scaramouche131 , sciencemum , worthy , Xerxella
Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.