Prevnar 13-does this imply 13 strains of bacteria at a time? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 4 Old 08-20-2010, 10:54 PM - Thread Starter
 
emiree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Comparing the old Prevnar to the new Prevnar 13...I understand that the vaccine is similar, but does the new vaccine still contain the older less common strains plus new ones for a total of 13? Or is the number irrelevant? Is this sort of like exposing a child to 13 illnesses at once or like doing mulitiple vaccines on one day?
emiree is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 of 4 Old 08-21-2010, 08:10 AM
 
katelove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,889
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by emiree View Post
Comparing the old Prevnar to the new Prevnar 13...I understand that the vaccine is similar, but does the new vaccine still contain the older less common strains plus new ones for a total of 13?
Correct, it will contain 13 different pneumococcal serotypes (out of a possible 93 I believe). Not sure about "less common" though, the product insert for the Australian Previnar7 says that it contains the ones which account for 80% of pneumococcal infections

Quote:
Originally Posted by emiree View Post
Is this sort of like exposing a child to 13 illnesses at once or like doing mulitiple vaccines on one day?
It's a bit like both of those things. It is exposing the child to 13 different strains of pneumococcal, which is designed to stimulate the immune system as if they were exposed to 13 illnesses. It's sort of like doing multiple vaccines, in that you are vaccinating for multiple illnesses but, by using the combined vaccine then they are only getting *one* dose of proteins, carrier, aluminium. If you gave multiple different vaccines then the person would get mulitple exposures to the other ingredients.

Mother of two spectacular girls, born mid-2010 and late 2012  mdcblog5.gif

katelove is online now  
#3 of 4 Old 08-27-2010, 04:03 AM
 
Dixielane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 485
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
So which is worse? Multiple exposure to 13 different bacterias (which isnt something that happens naturally), or the extra exposure to aluminum?

Dixielane (22) Wife to DH,  co-sleeping familybed1.gif, saynovax.gifexclusive BFing, BWing femalesling.GIF
Mommy to DD "S" born May 2010energy.gif & EXPECTING #2!! babyf.gifpos.gif due Jan. 2012
"Trust in the Lord with all your heart"
 
Dixielane is offline  
#4 of 4 Old 08-27-2010, 05:37 AM
 
katelove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,889
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dixielane View Post
So which is worse? Multiple exposure to 13 different bacterias (which isnt something that happens naturally), or the extra exposure to aluminum?
No idea I'm afraid. I might be inclined to think the aluminium is worse as it would certainly be possible to be exposed to 13 different bacteria in a day (although probably not 13 pneumococcal strains ). But that is pure speculation on my part.

Mother of two spectacular girls, born mid-2010 and late 2012  mdcblog5.gif

katelove is online now  
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off