Why it's pointless to debate anti vaxers article - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 16 Old 07-16-2013, 08:05 PM - Thread Starter
 
whompingwillow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/brave-brave-sir-robin/

 

What do you think? Do you guys agree/disagree with this? 

 

One part of the article 

 

"It has been argued that scientists have a huge advantage in debates because we have the facts on our side. Well, so we do, but that’s not an advantage at all. Rather, it’s a limitation. The audience members who are not scientists can rarely discriminate between facts and pseudofacts. The pseudoscientist has an unlimited supply of sources and claims and validations. He can say whatever he wants. If compelling rhetoric would benefit from any given argument, he can always make that argument. Pseudosciences have typically been designed around compelling rhetorical arguments. The facts of science, on the other hand, rarely happen to coincide with the best possible logic argument. Having the facts on your side is not an advantage, it’s a limitation; and it’s a limitation that’s very dangerous to the cause of science should you throw it onto the debate floor." 

whompingwillow is offline  
#2 of 16 Old 07-17-2013, 05:49 AM
 
kathymuggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,058
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
edited, as the most offensive stuff was removed.  Carry on.  

There is a battle of two wolves inside us.  One is good and the other is evil.  The wolf that wins is the one you feed.

 

Book and herb loving mama to 1 preteen and 2 teens (when did that happen?).  We travel, go to school, homeschool, live rurally, eat our veggies, spend too much time...

kathymuggle is online now  
#3 of 16 Old 07-17-2013, 07:19 AM - Thread Starter
 
whompingwillow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

This is a support forum only isn't it? 

 

I am sure lots of things on the anti vaccine support forum could be found to be offensive.

 

Just looking at the first page there is a post called "

Pro-vax trolls are impersonating disease-injured families on comment boards" 

Many of the comments are something I would consider offensive. Like one asking that this information be made a "sticky" for those on the fence about vaccines basically implying that people should take VPD reaction claims on this site with a grain of salt.  My husbands father died from Hepatitis. So yes, I find it offensive. I'm sure if a similar post was made that you should take any claim of a vaccine reaction with a grain of salt on these forums (including autism) that many anti vaccers would find it offensive, especially if it was asked to be made a sticky. 

 

But maybe I am confused as to what a support forum is? Can people post on them if they find something offensive? 

 

In any case, I edited the first part out.  But I am genuinely confused...

applejuice likes this.
whompingwillow is offline  
#4 of 16 Old 07-17-2013, 09:45 AM
 
Kamiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,923
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

/mod hat

 

Good Morning Ladies -

Imagine my suprise waking up to flags in the mod que. lol.gif Who needs coffee?

Thanks for editting the OP, WhompingWillow.

Kathy, please edit the offensive part out of your post as well.

 

Mindful Vaccination is support only, just as I'm not Vaccinating is support only. I actually clarified things here in this thread (with all the links to Cynthia's thread) http://www.mothering.com/community/t/1386588/mindful-vaccination-transparent-modding - that may help if there is any confusion.

 

 

Ok, must make this brief as my typing arm is numb. Dang, that's a trippy feeling.


sewmachine.gifknit.gifrainbow1284.gifDaughter of Him, Wife and Mother to them partners.gifstillheart.gifstillheart.gifstillheart.gifstillheart.gif,  

heartbeat.gifOne more on the way Fall 2013 pos.gif

 

Kamiro is offline  
#5 of 16 Old 07-17-2013, 09:52 AM - Thread Starter
 
whompingwillow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kamiro View Post

/mod hat

 

Good Morning Ladies -

Imagine my suprise waking up to flags in the mod que. lol.gif Who needs coffee?

Thanks for editting the OP, WhompingWillow.

Kathy, please edit the offensive part out of your post as well.

 

Mindful Vaccination is support only, just as I'm not Vaccinating is support only. I actually clarified things here in this thread (with all the links to Cynthia's thread) http://www.mothering.com/community/t/1386588/mindful-vaccination-transparent-modding - that may help if there is any confusion.

 

 

Ok, must make this brief as my typing arm is numb. Dang, that's a trippy feeling.

 

Thank you for the link!

 

So just for further clarification, even if someone finds something offensive, they are not allowed to post and say so on either of the support forums correct? 

whompingwillow is offline  
#6 of 16 Old 07-17-2013, 10:09 AM
 
kathymuggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,058
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by whompingwillow View Post

 

Thank you for the link!

 

So just for further clarification, even if someone finds something offensive, they are not allowed to post and say so on either of the support forums correct? 

I read the link as well.  It did not mention offensiveness.

 

I would like to ask you, though…do you really want that?  Do you want a forum where you post highly offensive stuff over here, and I post highly offensive stuff over there? I get offensive is somewhat subjective - but let's be real here -something like "baby killer" is obviously offensive and inflammatory, anywhere.  

 

In any event, I will get off your thread now.  

 

To answer the OP - there is very little point in arguing with hard core pro-vaxxers or non-vaxxers, if the goal is to change their mind.   People usually debate for the lurkers or those who are undecided.  


There is a battle of two wolves inside us.  One is good and the other is evil.  The wolf that wins is the one you feed.

 

Book and herb loving mama to 1 preteen and 2 teens (when did that happen?).  We travel, go to school, homeschool, live rurally, eat our veggies, spend too much time...

kathymuggle is online now  
#7 of 16 Old 07-17-2013, 10:25 AM - Thread Starter
 
whompingwillow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathymuggle View Post

I read the link as well.  It did not mention offensiveness.

 

I would like to ask you, though…do you really want that?  Do you want a forum where you post highly offensive stuff over here, and I post highly offensive stuff over there? I get offensive is somewhat subjective - but let's be real here -something like "baby killer" is obviously offensive.

 

In a support forum if those are the rules, then yes.  As long as you aren't making a post attacking a specific person then I would just ignore it.

 

Would you want me to make a post that says I think there should be a sticky for those people on the fence about vaccines that vaccine reactions reported by people on this forum should be taken with a grain of salt?  Because a post just like that is in the anti vaccine support forum, which I find offensive as I have already stated. 

 

Point is, something that is offensive to one side may not be offensive to the other.  Which is part of the reason why there are separate forums with separate rules. 

 

It is just irritating that this is the 2nd time in a couple days that something from the vaccine support forum has been commented on in a non supportive way (which is against the forum rules).  

 

The quote in question was nothing like calling someone a baby killer, thats comparing apples to spaceships. 

whompingwillow is offline  
#8 of 16 Old 07-17-2013, 10:51 AM
 
kathymuggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,058
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by whompingwillow View Post

 

 

The quote in question was nothing like calling someone a baby killer, thats comparing apples to spaceships. 

I used "baby killer" as an example of something either side could say to the other; I was not trying to say they were equal.  

 

So if the rules say we can call vaxxers or non-vaxxers names on support forums - that is fine?  Whatever.  It is hardly the highest use of the fourms. 

 

This is the second time in several days something has been commented on because this is the second time people have felt that others are hiding behind this support forum and quotes to say nasty stuff about non-vaxxers.  You could have very easily posted this thread without the fairly vile link and quote.  

 

If you see someone saying highly offensive stuff about vaxxers on INV, you are more than welcome to flag it to see if a mod thinks it is appropriate.  


There is a battle of two wolves inside us.  One is good and the other is evil.  The wolf that wins is the one you feed.

 

Book and herb loving mama to 1 preteen and 2 teens (when did that happen?).  We travel, go to school, homeschool, live rurally, eat our veggies, spend too much time...

kathymuggle is online now  
#9 of 16 Old 07-17-2013, 10:57 AM - Thread Starter
 
whompingwillow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathymuggle View Post

I used "baby killer" as an example of something either side could say to the other; I was not trying to say they were equal.  

 

So if the rules say we can call vaxxers or non-vaxxers names on support forums - that is fine?  Whatever.  It is hardly the highest use of the fourms. 

 

This is the second time in several days something has been commented on because people are feeling that others are hiding behind this support forum and quotes to say nasty stuff about non-vaxxers.  You could have very easily posted this thread without the fairly vile link and quote.  

 

If you see someone saying highly offensive stuff about vaxxers on INV, you are more than welcome to flag it to see if a mod thinks it is appropriate.  

 

Yes exactly. If you think something is offensive then flag it.  

 

Why the need to make a comment saying " I find this offensive so I'm going to flag it, you should too!"  

 

Just flag it and move on.  Commenting that you are flagging is against the forum rules that she linked, since that is not support.

applejuice likes this.
whompingwillow is offline  
#10 of 16 Old 07-17-2013, 12:35 PM
 
Kamiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,923
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

This forum is for support. Support needs to stay on topic. Please make edits as I've asked, and stop arguing with each other!

Thank you in advance!

 

 

Quote:
So just for further clarification, even if someone finds something offensive, they are not allowed to post and say so on either of the support forums correct?

I'm going to say you're correct on this. If Cynthia or some one says something different, or I forget that I said this - remind me of this post. Preggo brain and all.blush.gif Just flag the post instead of starting a debate in a support forum. Thanks ladies!!


sewmachine.gifknit.gifrainbow1284.gifDaughter of Him, Wife and Mother to them partners.gifstillheart.gifstillheart.gifstillheart.gifstillheart.gif,  

heartbeat.gifOne more on the way Fall 2013 pos.gif

 

Kamiro is offline  
#11 of 16 Old 07-17-2013, 05:48 PM
 
IdentityCrisisMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,744
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)

Me? I say send me some links to a few skeptic sites that aren't so...how do I say this without going against the UA?  

 

...

 

Both Skeptic sites and NFL sites need to be respectful of the reasons behind why people may feel a tendency to think differently than them in order for me to be inclined to read  them. If some alternative site uses cheap shots to get a point across, I pretty much write them off. Same goes for a Skeptic site. To me, we are all emotional decision makers, to imply otherwise while writing articles from such a hotly emotional place lacks self-awareness, which is just too much for me to reconcile when a person is making fun of someone else. That's my two cents. 

dalia, Kamiro and kathymuggle like this.

Mama to DD September 2001 and DD April 2011 *Winner for most typos* eat.gif
IdentityCrisisMama is offline  
#12 of 16 Old 07-17-2013, 05:58 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,345
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Personally I am not a debater at all -- makes me nervous and upset -- and I've gotten tired of trying to discuss scientific concepts with people who think they know a lot, while in reality may have read a lot more than the layperson about one narrow area but have a shaky or nonexistent grasp on science in the broad sense and therefore lack the ability to discuss scientific concepts or put the facts into broader perspective. I agree completely with the quote in the OP, though I do find parts of the article a little snide for my taste. 

applejuice likes this.
erigeron is offline  
#13 of 16 Old 07-17-2013, 06:06 PM
 
IdentityCrisisMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,744
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)

Wompingwillow, will you please PM an admin about combining multiple accounts?:


Mama to DD September 2001 and DD April 2011 *Winner for most typos* eat.gif
IdentityCrisisMama is offline  
#14 of 16 Old 07-17-2013, 08:34 PM
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,061
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Sigh. I miss the old Sel/Del sub-forum.
applejuice and japonica like this.

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#15 of 16 Old 07-19-2013, 06:53 AM
 
japonica's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canada-->Australia
Posts: 979
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)

No kidding. My kids are getting their first (of very few) vaxes in October, but like I feel welcome posting in a forum with posts about "antivaxers." eyesroll.gif

Turquesa and kathymuggle like this.

Mother to DD#1  s/b @40w 2003 for unknown reasons; DD#2   9.5 years old; DS  6 years old 
  Why are daughters protected but not sons?
 
 
 
  
japonica is offline  
#16 of 16 Old 07-19-2013, 07:02 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,345
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I do think that throwing everyone on the spectrum who gives anywhere from 1 vax up to fully vaxed into one subforum doesn't make a lot of sense, although personally I didn't get much out of the subforum back when it was entirely "I'm maybe kind of considering giving one vaccine but I think vaccines are mostly horrible" and "How do I get an exemption?" Not that there aren't still plenty of those posts here.

applejuice likes this.
erigeron is offline  
Reply

Tags
Selective Vaccination

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off