Is this true birth size and shoe size? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 05:16 PM - Thread Starter
 
mum4boys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Okay I was watching birthday on Discovery channel this morning. It was the midwifery center in Florida. I am not sure what it is called. I really like watching that center as it has good information etc. Anyway one of the midwife's there said that when the woman come in they always ask shoe size. There is a good indication between shoe size, size of the baby and ability to birth the baby naturally with no intervention. For example if you wear a size 8 shoe and the baby is 6 pounds no problem but if you wore a size 5 and the baby is 10 pounds you probably are not going to have a pelvis big enough to birth the baby. I had not heard of this before and was wondering if it was true?

Heidi
mum4boys is offline  
#2 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 05:21 PM
 
crittersmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: half mad and behind the palms
Posts: 1,695
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I dunno I wear a size 10 and yeah my pelvis is pretty dang wide even when not pregnant or overweight i will never be a size 6.I have smaller babies though, my largest was 7 lbs 15 oz.

joy.gifme, herding 5 critters a cat and a dog. DS 11/01, DS 10/04, DD 2/06, DS 5/07 and DD 9/10

crittersmom is offline  
#3 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 05:26 PM
 
crysmomofthree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,872
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My shoe size has changed significantly from when I had my first baby 11 years ago. with my first my shoe was a 7 and my son was 8lbs 14 oz, and I had no problems delivering him, now my shoe size is a 9 and I"m expecting this baby to be about 7lbs maybe 7 and a half? if I go to term
crysmomofthree is offline  
#4 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 05:27 PM
 
Lact-o-Mama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Down by the Bay...
Posts: 691
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hmmm, that sounds kinda strange

I've always believed that women wouldn't bear a child that couldn't fit through their pelvis naturally (albeit moving and contorting during birth are sometimes needed). I read alot about hip-compression during childbirth in one of Ina May's books, really interesting theory about a certain method of pressure being placed startegically on the hips to widen them. Worked for her many, many times

I wear a size 9 and my 2nd was 10lbs and he literally flew out in one push
Lact-o-Mama is offline  
#5 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 05:32 PM
 
Clarinet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,564
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think that's weird . I'm barely a size 7. I had a 6 lb 11 oz'er and an 8 pounder. Maybe because it was my second baby and I kind of knew what to expect and do but the bigger baby was an easier labor and delivery.
Clarinet is offline  
#6 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 05:33 PM
 
kdtmom2be's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lact-o-Mama View Post
I read alot about hip-compression during childbirth in one of Ina May's books, really interesting theory about a certain method of pressure being placed startegically on the hips to widen them. Worked for her many, many times
Oh, we learned that one in our prenatal class, thanks for the reminder. It was really strange though because when we tried it, DH could feel my hips moving but I couldn't feel the difference because of all the relaxin I guess.

I think the shoe size thing is probably a bit of BS. There may be a correlation between hip width and shoe size but I doubt that if you are X shoe size that you can't birth a baby bigger than Y pounds.

Mom to Kayleigh (05/07) Jacob (05/09) and Ned decluttering 615/2010
kdtmom2be is offline  
#7 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 05:46 PM - Thread Starter
 
mum4boys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdtmom2be View Post
Oh, we learned that one in our prenatal class, thanks for the reminder. It was really strange though because when we tried it, DH could feel my hips moving but I couldn't feel the difference because of all the relaxin I guess.

I think the shoe size thing is probably a bit of BS. There may be a correlation between hip width and shoe size but I doubt that if you are X shoe size that you can't birth a baby bigger than Y pounds.
The midwife did not say you cannot, she just said they knew there might be the need for intervention. She said feet size equates to pelvis size the same way your arm length is the same as your height.

I had the same question about my own feet size. First baby was 8 pounds 13 ounces and I wore a size 6 shoe but third child my feet had grown to a monstrous 9 1/2 and I say monstrous because I started off the pregnancy in a size 6 (they did shrink to a size 8 1/2 though after birth) anyway Levi was 7 pounds 11 ounces.

Heidi
mum4boys is offline  
#8 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 05:48 PM
 
JessicaTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 771
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Not true for me. Size 7 shoe, my biggest baby was 10 pounds.

Wife to one : Mama to 4 Gramma to 1 :
JessicaTX is offline  
#9 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 05:51 PM
 
MoonStarFalling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 2,765
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Read the article "pelvises I have known and loved". There's a nice story in there about this.

Homeschooling mom of two plus baby R born December 16 love.gif
MoonStarFalling is offline  
#10 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 05:58 PM - Thread Starter
 
mum4boys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by twinangels04 View Post
Read the article "pelvises I have known and loved". There's a nice story in there about this.

I just came in to post about that article. Also read 3 studies that show no correlation between the two.

Heidi
mum4boys is offline  
#11 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 06:11 PM
 
Carolinamidwife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 7,743
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Sounds like hooey.

After spending many years in the midwifery community I have heard many similar theories, lol.

Amy: Certified Professional Midwife and mom to Max (11) and Stella (6).
Carolinamidwife is offline  
#12 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 09:24 PM
 
Lousli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My mom (a CNM) once told me about the "rule of 5's" meaning ring size 5 or under, height 5' or under and shoe size 5 or under might mean a really small pelvis. Of course, I'm 5' tall, wear a size 5 shoe and a 3.75 ring. So I was a little worried. Turns out I had two preemies, a 5 pound 4 ounce one and a 4 pound 1 ounce one, so I never got to test the "rule" and see if it was true! They both were vaginal though, no tears.
Lousli is offline  
#13 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 10:06 PM
 
bocks_box's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 184
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lousli View Post
My mom (a CNM) once told me about the "rule of 5's" meaning ring size 5 or under, height 5' or under and shoe size 5 or under might mean a really small pelvis. Of course, I'm 5' tall, wear a size 5 shoe and a 3.75 ring. So I was a little worried. Turns out I had two preemies, a 5 pound 4 ounce one and a 4 pound 1 ounce one, so I never got to test the "rule" and see if it was true! They both were vaginal though, no tears.
I think it's just another way to make women doubt their own ability to birth. It was the first comment a nurse made to me when I check in in labor with my first. I am 5' 0" tall, wear a size 5 1/2 ring and a size 4 shoe. I was told I couldn't birth my baby as I was checking into the hospital because of that. I ended up with a c-section 12 hours later for cpd.

My current midwives all think I have a quite roomy pelvic inlet based on their measurements. I'm choosing to believe that, rather than the shoe size thing.
bocks_box is offline  
#14 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 10:15 PM
 
roadfamily6now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Anchorage, ALASKA
Posts: 4,272
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
old wives tale I am sure.
However I do wear an 8 1/2 wide and had a 10lb 4oz baby!
roadfamily6now is offline  
#15 of 22 Old 04-23-2007, 10:37 PM
 
~Megan~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 15,295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Its totally not accurate! Plus how do they know how big the baby will be anyway? Ultrasound is notoriously inaccurate for sizing.

Mom of a 7 yr old, 4 yr old, and 1 yr old. Wow. How did that happen?
~Megan~ is offline  
#16 of 22 Old 04-24-2007, 01:11 AM
 
Doula Gina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: in the moment...
Posts: 273
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
LOL - I'll let you know if I find out. I wear a size 12 and have given birth to a 10lb, 5oz baby. We'll see if this one tests the theory.

(and I'll ask my shorty midwife tomorrow what size shoe she has. She gave birth to an 11lb baby no prob.)
Doula Gina is offline  
#17 of 22 Old 04-24-2007, 01:33 AM - Thread Starter
 
mum4boys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doula Gina View Post
(and I'll ask my shorty midwife tomorrow what size shoe she has. She gave birth to an 11lb baby no prob.)

Well let her know that she cannot, LOL.

Heidi
mum4boys is offline  
#18 of 22 Old 04-24-2007, 09:21 AM
 
Synchro246's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,821
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A friend of mine has like a size 4 shoe size and had a 7+ lb baby. . .

I think the theory is a load of malarky.

I have size gigantic 10ish feet. My baby was 8.5 and malpositioned and I almost couldn't birth him. I think the flexibility of the pelvis, the moldability of the baby's head, and positioning of everyone involved has more to do than actual sizes.

~laura
and planning to eat it again
Synchro246 is offline  
#19 of 22 Old 04-24-2007, 09:25 AM
 
Slingin'Momto4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Doing the babydance!!
Posts: 746
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My shoe size is 8 and my babes were 6.5, 7.7, 7.10, 8.8, 8.6 I guess it rings kind of true for me

Julie (34)
Mom to 3 boys + 3 girls = PERFECTION joy.gif
Collector of TOYS!
Slingin'Momto4 is offline  
#20 of 22 Old 04-24-2007, 10:13 AM
 
kittn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In a perpetual letdown
Posts: 1,377
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
i wear a size 2.5 shoe (yes in kids) and my first was 8 lbs, my third was 7.14 no problem!

Annemarie ~catholic mom of 8 -4 boys (19-16-10-7).Emma)2 girls (3 and 1)Someone new due in April too!An yes I Blog @ You Leave me breadless blog
kittn is offline  
#21 of 22 Old 04-24-2007, 10:21 AM
 
kittn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In a perpetual letdown
Posts: 1,377
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lousli View Post
My mom (a CNM) once told me about the "rule of 5's" meaning ring size 5 or under, height 5' or under and shoe size 5 or under might mean a really small pelvis. Of course, I'm 5' tall, wear a size 5 shoe and a 3.75 ring. So I was a little worried. Turns out I had two preemies, a 5 pound 4 ounce one and a 4 pound 1 ounce one, so I never got to test the "rule" and see if it was true! They both were vaginal though, no tears.
Im 5'1" so a little bigger than just five feet, wear a 3 1/4 ring and wear a size 2.5 shoe. my first and third babies were 8lbs, and 7lbs.14oz. i did have a preemie in the middle at 3lbs.11oz. i did have a tought time the first time but that was more becasue of how the birth went not really my body

Annemarie ~catholic mom of 8 -4 boys (19-16-10-7).Emma)2 girls (3 and 1)Someone new due in April too!An yes I Blog @ You Leave me breadless blog
kittn is offline  
#22 of 22 Old 04-24-2007, 01:51 PM
 
Ianthe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Logan, Utah
Posts: 6,793
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've never met anyone else with small ring fingers! MIne is 3.5!

My grandmother is 5', 5 shoe, and wears a size 3.5 ring, and my dad was 10 lbs : !

stillheart.gif The Hippie & the Marine stillheart.gif  hh2.gif
My boys: S (4) & O (2) & Expecting #3 in Dec. 2011

Ianthe is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off