Is 37 weeks full term? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-05-2007, 11:48 PM - Thread Starter
 
JanB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've seen people referring to 37 weeks as being full term -- I always thought that 38 was full term?

I am particularly interested in this question right now as I have been having irregular contractions on and off since this afternoon anywhere from 6-20 minutes apart, I am 37 weeks as of tomorrow, and this baby is SERIOUSLY not supposed to come for at least another week. Seriously.
JanB is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-05-2007, 11:50 PM
 
tangomoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If I'd gone into labor at 37 weeks they wouldn't have stopped it. Most of our local docs do consider 37 weeks full term.
tangomoon is offline  
Old 05-05-2007, 11:51 PM
 
Willzmama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 507
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yep, my MW said now that I'm 37 weeks, labor starting any time would not be a concern. But I haven't had any issues with this pregnancy.
Willzmama is offline  
Old 05-05-2007, 11:52 PM
 
Eaglevoice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,334
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
At 37 weeks, most babes have fully functional lungs, so most mw's and dr's consider that to be full term.

Jenn, future midwife, mama to 2 sweet girls (6/05) and (5/07). 
Eaglevoice is offline  
Old 05-05-2007, 11:54 PM - Thread Starter
 
JanB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Cripes. I'm going to drink some water and put my feet up for a while.

(WE ARE SO NOT READY!)
JanB is offline  
Old 05-05-2007, 11:54 PM
 
~Megan~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 15,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think if you go into labor on your own and you are healthy then 37 weeks is fine. My first was born just befor 37 wks and the second around 37.5 weeks.

Mom of a 7 yr old, 4 yr old, and 1 yr old. Wow. How did that happen?
~Megan~ is offline  
Old 05-05-2007, 11:54 PM
 
wisconsingirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Bernardino Mountains of CA
Posts: 132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I just read that 37 weeks is full-term. My ticker on another site said "Congratulations...you're full-term" and I'm 37 weeks today!

Pam
wisconsingirl is offline  
Old 05-05-2007, 11:55 PM
 
SweetTeach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 1,115
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yep, it seems to be the norm to consider 37 full term. Doesn't mean all babies are ready to come at 37 w, but the large majority are fine if born then. My ds2 was born at 37w2d and he was absolutely perfect.

edited to add: sorry to jump in on your ddc- i saw this post when i clicked "new posts". enjoy the rest of your pg!
SweetTeach is offline  
Old 05-05-2007, 11:55 PM
 
Ilana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 478
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
And babies come when THEY are ready, don't forget, NOT when we are

ILANA
Ilana is offline  
Old 05-06-2007, 05:17 AM
 
clavicula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,011
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
after 37 weeks you are considered full term. the lungs and the central nervous system are mature, i guess that's the point.

Liv, SAHM of 3 kiddos 

 

 

 

 

clavicula is offline  
Old 05-06-2007, 05:20 AM
 
Khourtniey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,741
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
37+ is full term.. Anything below that is premature
Khourtniey is offline  
Old 05-06-2007, 12:12 PM - Thread Starter
 
JanB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Well, the ctx are gone this morning (mostly -- I did have one good strong one when I was making the tea) but this was a real wake-up call that I need to finish up the final baby preparations like NOW.

(Of course now that I've said that, I'll go to 40+ weeks, just watch.)
JanB is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 03:05 PM
 
sarabrynn82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 499
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Some docs will even call 36 weeks "term" or at least "near term" (esp with twins). That was the point I had to make it to in order to be eligible for a birth center delivery.

And I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but just a reminder that every woman's gestation is different! One woman may be "term" at 38 weeks, but another maybe not until 42... all babies develop differently. A poor mama that I know from another message board just had a c-section for her twins right at 37 weeks - one of them couldn't suckle and breathe simultaneously and now they are both in the NICU for apnea. The specialist said that they are developmentally more like 35-36 weeks, even though they are *sure* of their date of conception (fertility treatments).

Granted, some come out even earlier and do just fine! Not meant to scare anyone, just a reminder to listen to these babies and let them do their thing!
sarabrynn82 is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 03:12 PM
 
aept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 43
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I know what you mean, as I had always learned that a "full-term" baby was born anywhere from 38-42 weeks. However, my ds was born at 36 weeks and 6 days, and he was considered "premature" by one day - LOL! a 7lb. 15oz preemie - LOL! Apparently 37 weeks is considered full term - or at least no longer "early"?

We had a hospital birth and he was required to do the carseat test - which is non-invasive so we didn't really mind, but he was probably one of the biggest babies to ever have to do that test. Our nurses tried to get him "out of it" but apparently the rules are the rules! (Argh - silly hospitals, sometimes!)
aept is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 04:15 PM
 
roadfamily6now's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Anchorage, ALASKA
Posts: 3,964
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
yes, most OB's and midwives consider 37 weeks full term.

I prefer to think of 40 weeks as full term.
roadfamily6now is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 04:22 PM
 
momto l&a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 13,100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If I had gone into labor at 36 weeks my mw would have been willing to do a hb.

She prefers 38+ weeks though much easier for everybody.
momto l&a is offline  
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off