"White" Native Americans? - Page 2 - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#31 of 91 Old 01-04-2009, 11:52 PM - Thread Starter
 
lil_miss_understood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,592
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justthatgirl View Post
Why is there such exclusion? Ok, so PART NA. SO SORRY.

Attitudes of exclusion (like this) make it very hard for me to search for my roots and find my way. It's really rude. I'm not looking to appropriate a culture that is not mine. I am looking to discover a culture that my ancestors belonged to, to see what made them tick, how they lived. I want to feel closer to my roots. I can't do that if other NA's insist upon making sure I know that I'm only PART NA.
Not every Native has this attitude. It's generally the attitude of the last 2 generations or so, though. Elders and Medicine People will generally ask you, if you tell them that you're "part" Native, "Which part? Your foot? Where do you stop being Native and start being something else?"
There is a reason why most treaties were worded in such a manner as to include "all descendants until the sun no longer rises"- though that has been largely forgotten and/or ignored by governments, causing Natives to have to claw and fight and scream to have their rights recognized at all. Tribes which once adopted Europeans into their fold fully as brothers of the People have been told that they can only have people with a certain "blood quantum" in the US and will not receive funding for anyone else they recognize- but all tribal members qualify for any funding available to the Tribe. The genocide of the Native people continues under the watchful eye of governments which set it into motion so long ago, perpetuated by the very People being annihilated- as was the plan, according to the Canadian Prime Minister John A. MacDonald.
There is no other culture in the world which requires you to have a certain amount of <whatever culture> blood in order to be recognized or to look a certain way- except *perhaps* for Africans, I'm pretty sure that lighter skinned people of African descent also face this same issue- in order to participate in cultural functions with full support.
I have done a LOT of research into the genocide of the Native Americans and it's something that speaks to me VERY strongly- which is part of the reason why I was chosen as one of the People to carry the stories, although I was also told I was intended to carry the stories to others who, like us, have been inundated by the white culture and are losing our way. Unfortunately, I don't feel I know the stories well enough to tell them properly and there is no way for me to presently return to my Tribal Elders for further training/learning- although they keep telling me that I need to listen to my dreams and I will learn what I need.

Wife of Michael , SAHM to Aristotle 09/99 Raphael 06/07 and Marius 05/09 Known only in dreams but never forgotten: Euphrates Decluttering 290/2010
lil_miss_understood is offline  
#32 of 91 Old 01-05-2009, 12:00 AM - Thread Starter
 
lil_miss_understood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,592
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertpenguin View Post
But since I didn't grow up on the rez, I don't think I could find anyone willing to teach me or anything. I'm just...too white. with white babies. Maybe that isn't what I would find, but I'm really afraid that it is.
It actually may be easier than you think. If you are a tribal member, contact the Band office (is that what it's called in the US?) and they are usually very happy to put you in contact with an Elder who would be willing to teach you. If you're *not* a tribal member, it may be more difficult- requiring documentation etc.
If you just randomly sought someone, well. let's just say good luck. Your best bet would be to go to people you know in the tribe and let them know you're seeking a Medicine Person. Barring that, chances are you're out of luck.

Wife of Michael , SAHM to Aristotle 09/99 Raphael 06/07 and Marius 05/09 Known only in dreams but never forgotten: Euphrates Decluttering 290/2010
lil_miss_understood is offline  
#33 of 91 Old 01-06-2009, 01:06 AM
 
LaffNowCryLater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My BFF is 1/4 and is the palest person I know, she is actually partially albino (yes, there is such a thing- didn't know that until I met her). Her mom who is 1/2 looks 100% stereotypical Anglo as well. Genetics are very weird.

Mom of 3 sons and one daughter
LaffNowCryLater is offline  
#34 of 91 Old 01-06-2009, 09:37 PM
 
Jyotsna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Right here!
Posts: 1,468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm apparently 1/4 native american, but I don't have any proof. My great grandmother is full native american. Everyone approaches me asking me "what are you". I got so annoyed at it that I asked my parents if I was adopted, because everyone says my story doesn't match my looks.

My sister looks more native american than my brother and I do, but I think I am relating to my culture more. I just found out, and so I am a bit overwhelmed knowing that I missed out on knowing about my culture as a young person, so the culture has not assimilated into my brain yet.

Now, when people aske me, "What are you", I respond with 3/4 scottish, and 1/4 native american. People now say, "ah, I see that".

Is there a way to get a blood test to determine where I came from and what my father's history is??? It came from my fathers mothers side. How would that help?

Jyotsna

Vegetarian Hindu, mother to L,P and R. 
Jyotsna is offline  
#35 of 91 Old 01-06-2009, 09:47 PM
 
Sheal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,670
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
My husband is part Iroquois and part Metis. He doesn't speak of that part of his family history and I (Irish\German\French) know more about his inherited culture than he does. The only two people in his family that were ever able to get "status" cards was his cousin and his uncle (in the past his great grandmother and grandfather, opposite sides of his family were full blooded NA).

Learning about his family history and culture and knowing my own I've come to realize something very important for my children as a lesson. It never matters when it comes to blood - we all bleed red. If people chose to treat you like crap then that is something they must live with but it doesn't mean you have to let them make you live with it.

The only person anyone ever has to prove anything to is themselves. You know what and who you are and your opinion of what and who you are is what matters most. A name is just a name, we call lots of things by names and lots of people by names. Some good, some bad, some very ugly but words should never make you feel less than who you are.

I know that's easy said (or written in this case) than done but sometimes it's what it takes to move past it.
Sheal is offline  
#36 of 91 Old 01-07-2009, 12:12 AM
 
Minerva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Downers Grove, IL USA
Posts: 443
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
As I found out recently, I'm part Choctaw. But, since the only documented person so far is one of my third great-grandmothers, it's quite a ways back. I wouldn't ever be legally recognized or anything since the percentage for Choctaw is no less than 1/2. Funny for a group that interbred with everyone who wandered past the villages.

Supposedly one of my cousins is in contact with our ancestral tribe since he's in that area, but I haven't made contact with him yet.

I get a lot of "what are you?"s. I look "ethnic" but not Native (wrong colouring mostly, I think) -- sort of that vaguely Mediterranean look. It's fun keeping people guessing.

2 happy kids makes for a happy mother.

Minerva is offline  
#37 of 91 Old 01-07-2009, 03:16 AM
 
theretohere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,676
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jyotsna View Post
I'm apparently 1/4 native american, but I don't have any proof. My great grandmother is full native american. Everyone approaches me asking me "what are you". I got so annoyed at it that I asked my parents if I was adopted, because everyone says my story doesn't match my looks.

My sister looks more native american than my brother and I do, but I think I am relating to my culture more. I just found out, and so I am a bit overwhelmed knowing that I missed out on knowing about my culture as a young person, so the culture has not assimilated into my brain yet.

Now, when people aske me, "What are you", I respond with 3/4 scottish, and 1/4 native american. People now say, "ah, I see that".

Is there a way to get a blood test to determine where I came from and what my father's history is??? It came from my fathers mothers side. How would that help?

Jyotsna
If your great grandmother is the only NA ancestor- that would make you 1/8.
There are blood tests that can shed some like on genetic heritage, but I don't think it'd be exact enough to pin down a tribe.

To my husband I am wife, to my kids I am mother, but for myself I am just me.
we're : with and : and
theretohere is offline  
#38 of 91 Old 01-09-2009, 04:23 PM
 
EdnaMarie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,148
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm the opposite. I look REALLY native american- people come up to me on the street- but we are not members of a tribe since my grandparents insist they are only Hispanic. We "sound" white. But if you saw us you would know that either we are secretly half Siberian, or Native. But we cannot prove it and cannot join. It's kind of annoying because I wish I could join but due to our grandparents' insistence that they are not native, we cannot.

It's not that the stay-at-home-parent gets to stay home with the kids. The kids get to stay home with a parent. Lucky Mom to DD1 (4 y) and DD2 (18 mo), Wife to Mercenary Dad
EdnaMarie is offline  
#39 of 91 Old 01-09-2009, 06:10 PM
 
mntnmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,835
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My situation isn't the same, but I can relate. I am a "white" Cherokee, a couple generations married out of close tribal affiliations(but I have my card).
I grew up in Muscogee territory in Ok. So not only was I the whitest kid (red hair) who left class every week for "Indian Education", I wasn't even the same tribe as everyone else.
I was never actively ridiculed, but I certainly wasn't included.
My mom, and her mom never put any effort into a tribal connection, or maintaining traditions. I would love to, but feel very akward even identifying myself as Native among groups of people who face all the social problems that go with dark skin in the States.

My DH is anglo/french/Algonquin. He has the dark hair/skin and the "dramatic" nose, with *shocking* electric blue eyes.

Mom of 4 aspiring midwife "Friend"ly seeker
mntnmom is offline  
#40 of 91 Old 01-10-2009, 08:38 PM
 
Missa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
Posts: 334
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My great grandma was Ojibwe and my great grandfather was 1/2 I think. I used to be told all the time when I was younger that I looked NA. My mom is swedish and both my siblings look like her. I went to school with several girls who were full Ojibwe and I swear I looked more NA than one of them. She had this very beautiful blondish hair and I don't think many people would have guessed she was NA. She lived on the reservation for awhile and while I can't say for sure she wasn't teased/excluded but she never mentioned it. She was and is very proud of her family and culture.

I think it is horrible how you are not being fully accepted. Keep your chin up, you do belong!
Missa is offline  
#41 of 91 Old 01-10-2009, 09:59 PM
 
studentmama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: earth
Posts: 2,872
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The root of the significance of only being part indian comes from govt policy. You could only register with the tribe if you were full blood, and if you were mixed between tribes, you were still only considered half indian. Basically it was a really convenient way for the government to get out of it's responsibility towards treaties it signed with different tribes and it also was used to take land and parcel it up from the reservations.
studentmama is offline  
#42 of 91 Old 01-12-2009, 02:59 PM
 
oceanwinds's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 206
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Genetics can be crazy.

My great-grandma was full-blood NA and my great-grandpa was white (he had NA, but it was 4-5 generations back.) They had four children - 3 boys, 1 girl. My grandfather and great-aunt look full-blood NA, but my two great-uncles have very few NA features (mainly around the nose and eye shape.) They have pale skin, blue eyes, blond hair. In a picture of the four of them together, you would never guess they were all siblings.

Mama to: turtle 6August01 and frog 28May05 and ttc#3
oceanwinds is offline  
#43 of 91 Old 01-12-2009, 04:01 PM
 
tallulahma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: detroit
Posts: 2,684
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
my great grandmother was Ojibwe & married an irish immigrant. their daughter (my gma) married a german immigrant.... their son (my dad) married a woman who was polish & german?... i have never had contact with my birthmother & my father passed away.


i have red hair, freckles, pale skin.

Its very unsettling though, when you tell someone "i am german, irish, polish & NA" and they say, "but your not "really" NA". its humorous.... its like, "riiiight, by that same standard, im not "really" german, irish or polish.... so technically not anything?"

Im not trying to go on a res or claim tribal rights or ANYTHING.... i am strictly speaking of when i talk with people & ancestry comes up.

~jen~ )O( mama to k 07/05 o 5/08 and c 12/09
tallulahma is offline  
#44 of 91 Old 01-19-2009, 12:41 AM
 
HarperRose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 10,819
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I picked up a book about Native Americans at Barnes & Noble. Of course, I don't expect it to be thorough, but I'm a little irritated that the Mohegan tribe is never in anything.

Well, unless you count the news when something occurs at Mohegan Sun casino.

 upsidedown.gif  Please see my Community Profile! energy.gif blogging.jpg about Asperger's Syndrome!

HarperRose is offline  
#45 of 91 Old 01-19-2009, 12:49 AM - Thread Starter
 
lil_miss_understood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,592
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justthatgirl View Post
I picked up a book about Native Americans at Barnes & Noble. Of course, I don't expect it to be thorough, but I'm a little irritated that the Mohegan tribe is never in anything.

Well, unless you count the news when something occurs at Mohegan Sun casino.
Interestingly, I was listening to the radio the other night and there was a Mohegan music artist on. She was telling traditional Mohegan stories to a jazzy-type music. It was *awesome*.

Wife of Michael , SAHM to Aristotle 09/99 Raphael 06/07 and Marius 05/09 Known only in dreams but never forgotten: Euphrates Decluttering 290/2010
lil_miss_understood is offline  
#46 of 91 Old 01-19-2009, 12:56 AM
 
earthmama369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 6,989
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My mom's had similar experiences from the other side -- her parents are about as Germanic in appearance as they could be, blond, fair skin, blue eyes, stocky build. My mother has olive-y dark skin, dark brown eyes, and almost black hair. Completely different build and facial features, too. She was always asked if she was adopted, or better yet, if my gram was fooling around on gramp. :

Turns out, according to some family records, that she has a great-grandmother (great-great?) who was Blackfoot. She's totally a genetic copy of her. My mom's actually got darker hair and eyes than my cousins, who are full Tlingit tribe members.
earthmama369 is offline  
#47 of 91 Old 01-19-2009, 02:48 AM
 
HarperRose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 10,819
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacquelineR View Post
Interestingly, I was listening to the radio the other night and there was a Mohegan music artist on. She was telling traditional Mohegan stories to a jazzy-type music. It was *awesome*.
Oh, I wish I'd heard that! How awesome!

 upsidedown.gif  Please see my Community Profile! energy.gif blogging.jpg about Asperger's Syndrome!

HarperRose is offline  
#48 of 91 Old 01-19-2009, 02:51 AM
 
HarperRose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 10,819
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthmama369 View Post
My mom's had similar experiences from the other side -- her parents are about as Germanic in appearance as they could be, blond, fair skin, blue eyes, stocky build. My mother has olive-y dark skin, dark brown eyes, and almost black hair. Completely different build and facial features, too. She was always asked if she was adopted, or better yet, if my gram was fooling around on gramp. :

Turns out, according to some family records, that she has a great-grandmother (great-great?) who was Blackfoot. She's totally a genetic copy of her. My mom's actually got darker hair and eyes than my cousins, who are full Tlingit tribe members.
Oh, that's neat!

My dd, a blonde, brown-eyed little girl, doesn't look much like me. My sons do, but dd resembles dh more, and even that's sketchy. My fil told me recently that she looks quite a bit like his grandmother, almost identical. Fil is half Scandinavian. I think his mother is from Norway.

My friend's dd is the same way. She has odd features that don't AT ALL resemble her mom or dad. It was so unusual, in my friend's opinion, that she took her dd to a geneticist, among other specialists, to figure out what was up. Turns out her dd also resembles a great-grandmother very closely! (She's also vax damaged, which is why my friend had her at a geneticist & other specialists.)

 upsidedown.gif  Please see my Community Profile! energy.gif blogging.jpg about Asperger's Syndrome!

HarperRose is offline  
#49 of 91 Old 01-19-2009, 03:29 AM
 
Swan3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 757
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacquelineR View Post
Most of my family, as I said, are "apples"- totally devoid of the culture. I got lucky and found Elders who would teach me- and then finally found a cousin who's a traditionalist on rez.
I am amazed that despite the rejection you've really made an effort to hold on to the culture and keep it going with your kids. Kudos to you. For me, I've been told that I sound "white" and have suffered some rejection from the Latino community because I don't "sound" Hispanic....never mind that I'm fluent in spoken and written Spanish and have actually made an effort to really embrace and learn about larger Latino culture and history. ARGH.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JacquelineR View Post
I suppose it's not as readily apparent to someone who has already lost their culture how incredibly devastating that is to me. And, honestly, even if I were raising my children near my tribe, they'd still be treated like little white kids by the Natives (I know because that's how *I* was treated and still am- until people find out who my family is and then, again, they're like "OH! The little white Indian!").
My heart breaks reading this. It is unfair and you don't have to accept this rejection or use terms like being a "descendant" if it's not who you are. You know who you are and where you come from and you have every right to claim your heritage as someone with darker skin.

As a side note, I remember speaking with a guy here who was Cree and telling him about my heritage and how I also was part "Indian" (forgive the term - it was the 90s) as most Latin Americans are, just Natives from further south...he was furious and told me I was only part "Indian" if I had a treaty card....So now we're defining who we are by the colonial systems put in place. HA!

The funny part, most people here (I'm in Alberta) assume I'm Native, including Native people!!!

HUGS...
Swan3 is offline  
#50 of 91 Old 01-19-2009, 09:06 AM
 
IsaFrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: now back in Europe
Posts: 1,950
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
paperwork and written proofs can be SO upsetting ....
I can relate totally to the HURT feelings in the original post ....

I'm not NA, nor from the US nor Canada ..... I married in Great Britain and on returning to France, the day my ID card came up for renewal (It's our main proof of nationality over here) I was told I had to to the the "Tribunal" (law court) & took me 3 to 4 months to line up all the papers needed so that I could get another piece of paper to PROVE that I was STILL French in spite of having married a foreigner abroad ....

t'was more than 10 years ago .... don't think I've recovered yet ....
+ never found a civil servant that can show me any official text about that law ... yet the minute I produce that last piece of paper they get so relieved that they'll be able to proceed with whatever procedure I'm trying to do on that day ....

We are what we know we are, whatever the papers say ....
(AND .... "children of the earth" anyway !!!)
IsaFrench is online now  
#51 of 91 Old 01-19-2009, 02:51 PM - Thread Starter
 
lil_miss_understood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,592
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swan3 View Post
I am amazed that despite the rejection you've really made an effort to hold on to the culture and keep it going with your kids. Kudos to you. For me, I've been told that I sound "white" and have suffered some rejection from the Latino community because I don't "sound" Hispanic....never mind that I'm fluent in spoken and written Spanish and have actually made an effort to really embrace and learn about larger Latino culture and history. ARGH.



My heart breaks reading this. It is unfair and you don't have to accept this rejection or use terms like being a "descendant" if it's not who you are. You know who you are and where you come from and you have every right to claim your heritage as someone with darker skin.

As a side note, I remember speaking with a guy here who was Cree and telling him about my heritage and how I also was part "Indian" (forgive the term - it was the 90s) as most Latin Americans are, just Natives from further south...he was furious and told me I was only part "Indian" if I had a treaty card....So now we're defining who we are by the colonial systems put in place. HA!

The funny part, most people here (I'm in Alberta) assume I'm Native, including Native people!!!

HUGS...
Having just moved someplace with a larger Latino (I hope that's not an offensive term?) population (how could it not be larger than Manitoba, where I was raised?), I completely understand people assuming you're Native- and I completely agree that you are. It's often forgotten that most Latin Americans are "descendants" of the Native people from South and Central America- or maybe it's sometimes not acknowledged. Either way, it's a little maddening and I agree that defining ourselves by the colonial systems forced upon us is ridiculous- but that was the entire purpose of the systems, according to John A. McDonald. He said something along the lines of We will divide them eventually and then we will triumph. The Indians will cease to exist.
I don't accept the rejection. I don't use the term "descendant" but, as you can see even here- as well as from your own experiences- it is a constant struggle.
The term Indian doesn't offend me. I often use it myself. As my Gran said, "What I am doesn't change depending on what I'm called and, if the government thinks how I feel about how our people were and are treated will change because of what they call us, they have another thought coming. I've been Indian since I was born and when I die, I will still be Indian."
For me, once I started understanding more about why the rejection was happening, it stopped hurting *as much*. I understand now that it's the colonial system working it's magic and trying to divide The People- and I have changed the attitudes and minds of many of my people by talking to them about this. Why would I sit back and allow the extermination of my people and culture? I realize that some don't see it that way, some have chosen to allow themselves to be "assimilated". I will not go quietly into the night. My ancestors did not fight and die for me to give up everything that meant anything to them. So I fight for recognition and fight to keep the culture which is mine.

Wife of Michael , SAHM to Aristotle 09/99 Raphael 06/07 and Marius 05/09 Known only in dreams but never forgotten: Euphrates Decluttering 290/2010
lil_miss_understood is offline  
#52 of 91 Old 01-19-2009, 03:00 PM
 
tallulahma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: detroit
Posts: 2,684
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacquelineR View Post
Having just moved someplace with a larger Latino (I hope that's not an offensive term?) population (how could it not be larger than Manitoba, where I was raised?), I completely understand people assuming you're Native- and I completely agree that you are. It's often forgotten that most Latin Americans are "descendants" of the Native people from South and Central America- or maybe it's sometimes not acknowledged. Either way, it's a little maddening and I agree that defining ourselves by the colonial systems forced upon us is ridiculous- but that was the entire purpose of the systems, according to John A. McDonald. He said something along the lines of We will divide them eventually and then we will triumph. The Indians will cease to exist.
I don't accept the rejection. I don't use the term "descendant" but, as you can see even here- as well as from your own experiences- it is a constant struggle.
The term Indian doesn't offend me. I often use it myself. As my Gran said, "What I am doesn't change depending on what I'm called and, if the government thinks how I feel about how our people were and are treated will change because of what they call us, they have another thought coming. I've been Indian since I was born and when I die, I will still be Indian."
For me, once I started understanding more about why the rejection was happening, it stopped hurting *as much*. I understand now that it's the colonial system working it's magic and trying to divide The People- and I have changed the attitudes and minds of many of my people by talking to them about this. Why would I sit back and allow the extermination of my people and culture? I realize that some don't see it that way, some have chosen to allow themselves to be "assimilated". I will not go quietly into the night. My ancestors did not fight and die for me to give up everything that meant anything to them. So I fight for recognition and fight to keep the culture which is mine.

~jen~ )O( mama to k 07/05 o 5/08 and c 12/09
tallulahma is offline  
#53 of 91 Old 01-19-2009, 07:08 PM
 
Swan3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 757
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacquelineR View Post
Why would I sit back and allow the extermination of my people and culture? I realize that some don't see it that way, some have chosen to allow themselves to be "assimilated". I will not go quietly into the night. My ancestors did not fight and die for me to give up everything that meant anything to them. So I fight for recognition and fight to keep the culture which is mine.
: Good for you mama, it is your heritage. You know who you are and no one has a right to tell you different. It IS a way to make sure the culture dies...creating division.

I'm so sad that in my mother's country of origin, only 4 or 5 people speak the native language anymore. People were so shamed for speaking it and as bloodlines mixed...it became more and more "convenient" to hide that part of our heritage. I look at pics of my grandma and there's no denying it, I see little trickles in the form of home remedies my mother gave me...and for me, these are the things I hold on to. It's all I've got. I remember growing up and envying the native communities around me and the kids for being brought up to appreciate their culture, I heard a woman speaking to her teen son in Blackfoot and was amazed. I'm glad you're holding on tight, and not letting anyone convince you to let go!
Swan3 is offline  
#54 of 91 Old 01-19-2009, 10:45 PM - Thread Starter
 
lil_miss_understood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,592
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swan3 View Post
As a side note, I remember speaking with a guy here who was Cree and telling him about my heritage and how I also was part "Indian" (forgive the term - it was the 90s) as most Latin Americans are, just Natives from further south...he was furious and told me I was only part "Indian" if I had a treaty card....So now we're defining who we are by the colonial systems put in place. HA!
Now I know what really annoyed me about this part of your post.
Bill C-31, I believe it was. When Bill C-31 was passed in 1985, it caused so much division and dissent amongst the Native population of Canada- and with good reason, in some sense.
If you don't know the history of the Natives in Canada, here's a quick rundown. Treaties were signed, you had to be "full blood" to be assigned a Treaty card/number- if your mother was white, she would be considered Indian, since she had married an Indian. If your father was white, you were white and so was your mother. After the initial assignment of treaty numbers and cards, descendants of these people were given a number based on their forefathers' number. You could lose your "Treaty" for any of the following:
1) going to university
2) joining the military
3) you could sell it to the government
4) if you were woman, marry a white (non-Treaty) man

These were all true until 1936, I believe it was, when they overturned the choice of selling your Treaty- but they did not reinstate any Treaty rights to those people who had opted to sell them. Then in the '60s sometime I believe, you could no longer lose it if you went to University or if you joined the military- again, Treaty rights were not reinstated. The only way to lose your "Treaty" now was to be a woman and marry someone without "Treaty".
With regards to "Treaty" rights, your children were better off if you had them out of wedlock if you were a woman and the father was white. If you married and the marriage ended for any reason, your rights were not reinstated- you could not return to the reservation and usually you were shunned by your family. (I saw with regard to Treaty rights- remember that you could not legally leave the reservation if you were Indian without very specific circumstances being met until the 1960s.) But if you were male and married a white woman, she was welcomed into the community with open arms and a Treaty number just for her!
So, the low down basically is this: You're a Native male, you marry a white woman, have kids who're *technically* 1/2 "blood quantum" but, by law, they are full blooded. One of them is a male who marries a white woman resulting in 1/4 "blood quantum" kids- still considered full blooded. One of them is female, she marries a full blooded Native man and her kids are 3/4 "blood quantum". One of the "1/4 blood quantum" grandkids is male and marries yet another white woman, resulting in 1/8 blood quantum great grandkids STILL considered full blooded. Another of the "3/4 blood quantum" grandkids is female and marries a white man resulting in "3/8 blood quantum" great grandkids- but they're not "Indian" since she has married out.
When Bill C-31 was brought in, it reinstated Treaty rights to women who had married out. It did not take away the rights of anyone who was already registered (including the white women who had married into Treaty).
However, what Bill C-31 *did* do is made it so that if a family "married out" twice in 2 generations, they would lose their Treaty rights. So, for the first time since the amendments removing the loss of Treaty through University or military means, men's children could now lose their Treaties. However, since the white women who married into Treaty were still considered full Treaty (and therefor so were their children regardless of actual "blood quantum"), this Bill didn't really effect their kids. It did, however, effect the kids of any woman who had been "reinstated". Their kids (who, remember, were not raised on reserve, were not usually recognized as part of the Tribe their whole lives, etc etc) suddenly were told "Well, yes, you *are* Indian, but if you don't marry an Indian, your kids aren't." In some cases, this already effected the grandkids. Not so for the men.

Sorry. I'll get off my soap box now. This is really just something that makes my head explode. Perhaps my hatred of the term "white Indian" makes a little more sense now- it was generally used to describe white women who had married Native men specifically for the purpose of getting Treaty rights, and the children of these women. Even if the woman left the man, she retained her Treaty rights as long as she didn't marry a man who didn't have Treaty rights. This meant she could have children with any man she chose to, so long as she didn't marry him, and they would still be considered full blooded Indians.

Wife of Michael , SAHM to Aristotle 09/99 Raphael 06/07 and Marius 05/09 Known only in dreams but never forgotten: Euphrates Decluttering 290/2010
lil_miss_understood is offline  
#55 of 91 Old 01-19-2009, 11:35 PM
 
theretohere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,676
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacquelineR View Post
Now I know what really annoyed me about this part of your post.
Bill C-31, I believe it was. When Bill C-31 was passed in 1985, it caused so much division and dissent amongst the Native population of Canada- and with good reason, in some sense.
If you don't know the history of the Natives in Canada, here's a quick rundown. Treaties were signed, you had to be "full blood" to be assigned a Treaty card/number- if your mother was white, she would be considered Indian, since she had married an Indian. If your father was white, you were white and so was your mother. After the initial assignment of treaty numbers and cards, descendants of these people were given a number based on their forefathers' number. You could lose your "Treaty" for any of the following:
1) going to university
2) joining the military
3) you could sell it to the government
4) if you were woman, marry a white (non-Treaty) man

These were all true until 1936, I believe it was, when they overturned the choice of selling your Treaty- but they did not reinstate any Treaty rights to those people who had opted to sell them. Then in the '60s sometime I believe, you could no longer lose it if you went to University or if you joined the military- again, Treaty rights were not reinstated. The only way to lose your "Treaty" now was to be a woman and marry someone without "Treaty".
With regards to "Treaty" rights, your children were better off if you had them out of wedlock if you were a woman and the father was white. If you married and the marriage ended for any reason, your rights were not reinstated- you could not return to the reservation and usually you were shunned by your family. (I saw with regard to Treaty rights- remember that you could not legally leave the reservation if you were Indian without very specific circumstances being met until the 1960s.) But if you were male and married a white woman, she was welcomed into the community with open arms and a Treaty number just for her!
So, the low down basically is this: You're a Native male, you marry a white woman, have kids who're *technically* 1/2 "blood quantum" but, by law, they are full blooded. One of them is a male who marries a white woman resulting in 1/4 "blood quantum" kids- still considered full blooded. One of them is female, she marries a full blooded Native man and her kids are 3/4 "blood quantum". One of the "1/4 blood quantum" grandkids is male and marries yet another white woman, resulting in 1/8 blood quantum great grandkids STILL considered full blooded. Another of the "3/4 blood quantum" grandkids is female and marries a white man resulting in "3/8 blood quantum" great grandkids- but they're not "Indian" since she has married out.
When Bill C-31 was brought in, it reinstated Treaty rights to women who had married out. It did not take away the rights of anyone who was already registered (including the white women who had married into Treaty).
However, what Bill C-31 *did* do is made it so that if a family "married out" twice in 2 generations, they would lose their Treaty rights. So, for the first time since the amendments removing the loss of Treaty through University or military means, men's children could now lose their Treaties. However, since the white women who married into Treaty were still considered full Treaty (and therefor so were their children regardless of actual "blood quantum"), this Bill didn't really effect their kids. It did, however, effect the kids of any woman who had been "reinstated". Their kids (who, remember, were not raised on reserve, were not usually recognized as part of the Tribe their whole lives, etc etc) suddenly were told "Well, yes, you *are* Indian, but if you don't marry an Indian, your kids aren't." In some cases, this already effected the grandkids. Not so for the men.

Sorry. I'll get off my soap box now. This is really just something that makes my head explode. Perhaps my hatred of the term "white Indian" makes a little more sense now- it was generally used to describe white women who had married Native men specifically for the purpose of getting Treaty rights, and the children of these women. Even if the woman left the man, she retained her Treaty rights as long as she didn't marry a man who didn't have Treaty rights. This meant she could have children with any man she chose to, so long as she didn't marry him, and they would still be considered full blooded Indians.
If it matters to you, I'm revising my opinion of you.

To my husband I am wife, to my kids I am mother, but for myself I am just me.
we're : with and : and
theretohere is offline  
#56 of 91 Old 01-19-2009, 11:51 PM
 
Leta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ishpeming, MI
Posts: 3,597
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I can totally relate to this.

My dad is white- Alsatian and Irish, mostly.

My mom is mutt- on her dad's side, she has heritage from a couple Apalachian tri-racial isolate groups (Melungeon and Lumbee- so Scotch-Irish, Turkish, West African, SE Asian, and several NA tribes, including Cherokee, I've been told, Lakota, although that doesn't make a lot of geographic sense). On her mom's side, she's Welsh and Metis (Anishinaabe and French Canadian, probably with some Finnish and English thrown in).

How do we know this? My mom's cousin, who's mom was at least 1/2 Anashinaabe (again, a child born to a single mom, not much known about the sperm donor, but just to *look* at my Aunt Joyce, you'd guess she was full blood) did about 18 tons of geneology research to get herself registered. Which, happily, she did.

Anyway, I have pale skin and blue eyes. My brother (yes, he's a full brother), on the other hand, doesn't really look white. People often think he's Hispanic, Eurasian, or, you guessed it, Native American. He looks more like my mom, I look more like my dad. I have cousins (children of my mother's full sister; their dad is white- Ashkanazi Jew) who look even less white than my brother does. Nobody can figure out "what" they are though, so they get asked all.the.time.


And now, my own little peanut looks far more like my mom than I do. (My mom looks like a petite, somewhat older, less plastic surgeried Mariah Carey. No, it's not just me. She gets it all the time.)

The good part of all this is that now, where we live, "white Indians" are pretty common. That's because two major ethnic populations here- possibly the largest two, in fact- are Finnish and Anishinaabe. The Indians have been here forever, of course, and the Finnish for close to 300 years. There's been a lot of mixing, and blue eyed, red haired Indians and brown eyed, deeply tanned blondes are relatively common here.

Trying to turn hearts and minds toward universal healthcare, one post at a time.
Leta is offline  
#57 of 91 Old 01-19-2009, 11:58 PM
 
N8'sMom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the golf course
Posts: 1,655
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I hear ya...
If I would leave my hair it's original color and not color it blonde, people could totally tell my ancestry. I have dark skin (even darker in the summer), the cheekbones, the nose, the eyebrows, the eye shape, etc.

But man, around here, if you don't look it, the NAs who do will be kind of mean about it. I wish it wouldn't be like that.

One of my kids looks NA, one doesn't. I don't know how it will be for them in the coming years.
N8'sMom is offline  
#58 of 91 Old 01-20-2009, 12:01 AM - Thread Starter
 
lil_miss_understood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,592
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormerlyKnownAs View Post
My mom is mutt- on her dad's side, she has heritage from a couple Apalachian tri-racial isolate groups (Melungeon and Lumbee- so Scotch-Irish, Turkish, West African, SE Asian, and several NA tribes, including Cherokee, I've been told, Lakota, although that doesn't make a lot of geographic sense). On her mom's side, she's Welsh and Metis (Anishinaabe and French Canadian, probably with some Finnish and English thrown in).
I believe the Cherokee and Lakota were allied, so it doesn't really need to make a lot of geographic sense. You must remember that a great many of the tribes used to be more mobile than they were after the Europeans came.
I have a friend who's Sioux and Ojibwe, which makes NO sense... Until you remember that the two tribes used to have raids on each other and take women as prisoners.

Wife of Michael , SAHM to Aristotle 09/99 Raphael 06/07 and Marius 05/09 Known only in dreams but never forgotten: Euphrates Decluttering 290/2010
lil_miss_understood is offline  
#59 of 91 Old 01-20-2009, 12:04 AM
 
Leta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ishpeming, MI
Posts: 3,597
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ah! Thank you so much, Jacqueline! I have been wondering about this for some time. Off to email Aunt Sue...

Trying to turn hearts and minds toward universal healthcare, one post at a time.
Leta is offline  
#60 of 91 Old 01-20-2009, 12:09 AM - Thread Starter
 
lil_miss_understood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,592
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by theretohere View Post
If it matters to you, I'm revising my opinion of you.
What opinion is that? That I have no idea where my people are coming from when they discriminate against me because of the colour of my skin? That I really just have no clue of the trials and tribulations that my people have gone through in the last several centuries? That I'm just an ignorant white girl trying to "play Indian" because it's "in style"?
You wouldn't be the first one to assume those things, and I doubt you will be the last. I understand and I try very hard not to take offense because I *do* know where it's coming from.

Wife of Michael , SAHM to Aristotle 09/99 Raphael 06/07 and Marius 05/09 Known only in dreams but never forgotten: Euphrates Decluttering 290/2010
lil_miss_understood is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off