My 3 boys were born in CO, though, where it states the rate is 64% That sounds accurate to me among people with little boys born there in the past decade.
Thanks for the link!
I've been looking at trends in my own hospital over the past 3 years or so. I'd say at least half of our immigrant moms circ their boys, including those who traditionally don't. We'll get mamas in town from Mexico working the farms or just traveling through back to Mexico and many of them who deliver go ahead and circ. I'm not sure why. And we have a huge Bermese population now and they circ without fail. They can't speak any English and I'm hoping the details of the procedure aren't getting lost in translation. But anywho...lost of circs in North Texas. I'd guess that 95% of non-immigrant boys in my area are circed too.
My friend who works in another part of the state said about 75% of boys there are also circed.
Just to address a few things others have mentioned in this thread...Texas does still fund Medicaid circs.
Yes, the stats wouldn't include boys born at home but don't assume most of them escape RIC either. At least in N. TX, many homebirthed and birth center born babies are still circed. I'm a member of a homebirth group in my area and half of the moms report they still circ.
The Utah rates seem too low to me. But I do believe RIC is decreasing somewhat and that is encouraging.
Mom & RN
Pardon the typos - CWOK (cat walking on keyboard)
Now, I'm in Colorado, and our numbers are higher than Texas? I just find that astounding.
Amy, wife to Paul 5/20/01, SAHM to Daniel 5/23/07, Claire 7/15/09, and Elaine 9/4/12
The 9% vs. 31% rate in Canada does indeed reflect the difference between rates at hospital discharge, vs. the number of boys who are ultimately circumcised within the first year of life. It may be that circumcisions are not performed in hospitals in Canada much any more due to lack of reimbursement and general recognition of lack of medical necessity, but that post-hospital circumcision providers are picking up the slack for those parents determined to have it done.
Relaize that the numbers given for the US are also hospital discharge figures. Certainly a number of circumcisions are performed for religious reasons after hospital discharge or in doctor's offices instead of the hospital for whatever reason. So the 55% national circ rate usually quoted only reflects hospital discharge figures and the rates for all circumcision in the first year of life are undoubtedly higher. I believe there was a study in the last few years looking at data in Maryland that showed perhaps 10% higher rates for post hospital infant circs than were reflected in the discharge stats. (I may not be remembering the exact numbers right).
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
yslexic typing with help of preschooler, beware of typos
I had no issues at birth with my two that were born in Ohio, but I hung up signs with huge bold red letters that made my preference quite clear
I have, though, had issues with Dayton Children's Hospital. They haven't ever suggested a circ is necessary, but they are woefully uninformed on the proper care of an intact penis. I sent a nasty gram to the head of Radiology after a nurse tried to retract my son to cath him for a VCUG.
My oldest son was born overseas at a military hospital, and I fended off circumcision numerous times, it got a little ridiculous! Then I asked one of the nurses "what the rate is here for circ?" and she said "oh, it's free, is that why you're declining?" No, I meant the percentage. She estimated it at about 80-85%. Then she stood there waiting for me to say yes, and I just smiled and looked at my son and said "well, you're a lucky one!"
I get told all these "horrible" things that are going to happen since I didn't circ ds! I'm the only one among anyone I know here who didn't circ! It's so sad to me
Kourtney, happily married to my soldier and raising ds 7/08 .... dd 7/10..... and ds 11/11
But those other numbers are very sad
This is such a strange cultural thing and obviously a very state to state culture as well.
Therefore, more Americanized generations of these minority groups will come to see circ as alien, unfamiliar and won't jump on it. That said, pockets of people with these backgrounds will do it just to fit in more. But I think that's why in a state like NY (still between 1/2 and 3/4 but close to 1/2) the lowest rates are in the NYC area where there's a high proportion of Puerto Ricans and other nationalities that don't routinely practice it.
Tallulah Dare 8-01, Marcos Gael 12-04, Cormac Mateo 9-09, Leonidas Ronan 11-11
|55 members and 17,785 guests|
|agentofchaos , Avv821 , babydoulajo , beedub , BirthFree , Bow , Casie77 , CricketVS , Dakotacakes , eattacos , emmy526 , essentiaas13 , Fembot , girlspn , happy-mama , hillymum , jamesmorrow , Janeen0225 , joycef , judybean , JuliaBer , justlizzy , Katherine73 , kathymuggle , Kelleybug , lerlisha , ltruitt , Lucee , mama24-7 , manyhatsmom , Markons92 , Michele123 , moominmamma , MulberryandGrace , mumto1 , NathalieM , NaturallyKait , pokeyac , pulcetti , quantumleap , RollerCoasterMama , samaxtics , SarahBovard , scaramouche131 , seap3 , shantimama , Shmootzi , Skippy918 , Socks , sren , SweetSilver , tiller , Turner58800 , verticalscope|
|Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.|