Circumcision Blurb in Mothering Mag - Page 2 - Mothering Forums

Thread Tools
#31 of 33 Old 03-23-2004, 10:51 PM
somemama's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,592
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The study was done in Great Britain.
somemama is offline  
Sponsored Links
#32 of 33 Old 03-24-2004, 01:29 AM - Thread Starter
*Erin*'s Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: in a magnolia tree
Posts: 2,389
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It seems silly to explain away the STD thing with homosexuality if the point of the article is to discuss why circumcision is unnecessary.
YES. and i also agree with your comment, mothra, that it makes the entire arguement against circ (and mothering) less credible.
i still do not see the point of throwing that sentence in there if not to imply that gay men are more sexually risky, or less desirable than straight sons.

an earlier poster asked if that had anything to do with our son's intactness, or circumsicion-i have a dd, so no decision to make, though if i did have a boy, i'd leave him intact.

Erin, 33, salty southern mama, sitting by the sea with my DH35, DD10, DS4, &DD2!
*Erin* is offline  
#33 of 33 Old 03-24-2004, 08:00 PM
Sustainer's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 10,339
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I was a bit taken aback when I read it, too. My first thought was, "Are they implying that boys who are circumcized are more likely to 'become' gay? That doesn't make any sense!" Then I thought it might be the other way around: A gay man who reads that he is at greater risk for STI's, and then reads the false claim that circumcision reduces the risk of STI's, might run out and get himself a circumcision (since the study was done in Europe, he's less likely to be circumcized in the first place). Unfortunately, this would mean that the idea that intact men actually have a lower risk of STI's might be called into question, because people might attribute the difference to the fact that gay men are more likely to get circumcisions. In order to counter that, we would have to do a study in which both groups are matched for the number of gay men.

-Alice, SAHM to dd (2001) and ds (2004) each of whom was a homebirth.jpg, who each self-weaned at 4.5 years bfolderchild.gif, who both fambedsingle2.gif'd, who were bothcd.gif, and both: novaxnocirc.gif.   Also, gd.gif, and goorganic.jpg!

Sustainer is offline  

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Online Users: 12,486

25 members and 12,461 guests
agentofchaos , Deborah , emmy526 , girlspn , hillymum , jamesmorrow , Janeen0225 , kathymuggle , Kelleybug , leonclaudia593 , Linarsconsuelo , Lucee , momwithmany , moominmamma , MountainMamaGC , mumto1 , nuezraquel10 , pokeyac , redsally , RollerCoasterMama , samaxtics , teacozy , verticalscope
Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.