From my textbook: - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-19-2011, 07:48 AM - Thread Starter
 
MisaGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I am taking a physical examination and health assessment course. I thought some here would be interested on the content.

 

"In the circumcised infant, the glans looks smooth with the meatus centered at the tip. While the child wears diapers, the meatus may become ulcerated from ammonia irritation. This is more common in circumcised infants." Then next to that under "abnormal findings" : "Occasionally, ulceration may produce a stricture, shown in by a pinpoint meatus and narrow stream. This increases the risk of urine obstruction." 

 

So that would be viewed as showing a benefit of remaining intact, right?

 

However a little lower on the page it talks about retraction:

 

"If uncircumcised, the foreskin is normally tight during the first 3 months and should not be retracted because of the risk of tearing the membrane attaching the foreskin to the shaft. This leads to scarring and, possibly, to adhesions later in life. In infants older than 3 months of age, retract the foreskin gently to check the glans and meatus. It should return to its original position easily."

 

Sigh. I wonder where they got 3 months from?

 

I have a 4 1/2 year old and a 4 month old. I haven't noted any retraction yet.

 

But there you go for information as to what is being taught about assessment.


Melissa- mom to a boy 9/06 and a new boy 11/10 and married to my best friend 7/02
MisaGoat is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-19-2011, 08:48 AM
 
Ellien C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in the middle ages
Posts: 5,496
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

What is the date on the book?

 

If you are truly interested, you can write the publisher, including better journal articles that advise against retraction.

 

When I worked in publishing we always had a file for reprints and always went through corrections when books were reprinted or revised.


Third generation WOHM. I work by choice.
Ellien C is offline  
Old 04-19-2011, 02:42 PM
 
Ron_Low's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 370
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)

If the book actually says "glands" that's all you need to know about this author's credentials on this subject. 


-Ron
HIS body, HIS decision.
Ron_Low is offline  
Old 04-19-2011, 10:18 PM - Thread Starter
 
MisaGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Ellien C- 2008. Good idea, thanks. I'll have to find the right source/info. 

 

Ron- totally my typo (i had one of each, opps). fixed it now.


Melissa- mom to a boy 9/06 and a new boy 11/10 and married to my best friend 7/02
MisaGoat is offline  
Old 04-19-2011, 11:05 PM - Thread Starter
 
MisaGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I sent an email. I wonder what reply I'll get. 


Melissa- mom to a boy 9/06 and a new boy 11/10 and married to my best friend 7/02
MisaGoat is offline  
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off