Which do you think is more likely? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 8 Old 06-25-2011, 09:10 PM - Thread Starter
 
Ann-Marita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,580
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Given that our Constitution calls for equal protection under the law,

 

And given the federal law against ALL forms of female genital cutting,

 

Which do you think is more likely:

    1) minor boys will get legal protection against all forms of male genital cutting

or

    2) some forms of genital cutting will be permited for minor girls?

 

 

My recent experience has been that more people seem willing to allow SOME forms of FGC, in order to keep their cultural beliefs regarding MGC, rather than examine our culture's penchant toward MGC objectively and conclude that all minors (both boys and girls) deserve genital integrity.

 

 


Ann-Marita. I deleted my usual signature due to, oh, wait, if I say why, that might give too much away. 

Ann-Marita is offline  
#2 of 8 Old 07-03-2011, 07:28 PM
 
jessjgh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Shore MA
Posts: 4,956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Well the AAP did try to change the FGM law last year to suggest that minor cutting be permitted in some cases for girls-- and it kinda blew up on them-- but they DID actually outline a new policy with the suggestion- to the point that it was final, approved, and published.  Thankfully, quickly retracted, but it is seriously scary and disappointing that it went that far to begin with.  (You can google AAP retracts female genital mutilation  or somethign similar to bring up more articles:  http://www.icgi.org/2010/06/aap-retracts-proposal-to-circumcise-girls/    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/722840   )

 

I think 1 makes the most sense, of course.  No cutting for minors. Period.

 

Jessica


Jessica..lady.gifintactlact.gif Falling in love all over again..... 
Dhprivateeyes.gif, Joshua rolleyes.gif Rebeccagrouphug.gifand dog2.gif.    candle.gif for Laura
jessjgh1 is offline  
#3 of 8 Old 07-27-2011, 04:24 PM - Thread Starter
 
Ann-Marita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,580
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Thanks for the reply, Jessica.

 

Yes, I agree that no genital cutting for minors seems like the most logical position.  But I am sometimes amazed by the mental hoops Americans are able to jump through in order to keep believing that genital cutting of girls is Bad, but genital cutting of boys is not big deal and a parental decision.


Ann-Marita. I deleted my usual signature due to, oh, wait, if I say why, that might give too much away. 

Ann-Marita is offline  
#4 of 8 Old 07-28-2011, 04:20 PM
 
Polly Intactly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I hope all is made illegal. But that would have to include, eventually, the stopping of female ear piercing of infants too? (yes, I mutialted my baby girl too and now regret it dearly)

Polly Intactly is offline  
#5 of 8 Old 07-31-2011, 08:25 AM
 
QueenOfTheMeadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: with the wildlife
Posts: 18,213
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Moving this to TCAC since the Intactivism forum is for actionable posts, not just discusions. Thanks!

 
QueenOfTheMeadow is offline  
#6 of 8 Old 07-31-2011, 11:11 AM - Thread Starter
 
Ann-Marita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,580
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Oh, thank you!  You know, I was unsure of  which forum to put this in.  I guess I chose incorrectly.  That might explain why I got so few responses.

 

Anyone want to join the discussion now?


Ann-Marita. I deleted my usual signature due to, oh, wait, if I say why, that might give too much away. 

Ann-Marita is offline  
#7 of 8 Old 07-31-2011, 11:28 AM - Thread Starter
 
Ann-Marita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,580
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Polly Intactly, I did not pierce my daughter's ears.  But more out of a tradition of ear piercing being a "coming of age" thing for us, than awareness of body integrity issues.  Don't beat yourself up.  We do what we think is good, and when we know better, we do better.

 

 


Ann-Marita. I deleted my usual signature due to, oh, wait, if I say why, that might give too much away. 

Ann-Marita is offline  
#8 of 8 Old 07-31-2011, 06:54 PM
 
PuppyFluffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 9,177
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Tis a difficult question to answer.  I do not think our culture is ready and willing to look at this issue honestly and understand and agree that gentital cutting is inappropriate for children - of all genders (male, female and intersexed).  I also do not think that our culture is ready to legalize female genital cutting.

 

The proposed San Francisco ballot initiative that would make circumcision of minor males was just rejected by a judge because the state cannot regulate medical procedures through a ballot initiative.  I do not know if there are plans to appeal that decision.  I think the San Francisco initiative has brought and will continue to bring necessary attention to the fact of our cultural hypocrisy.  I see the judges move as opening the door to testing the medical validity of circumcision.  The AAP does not recommend it and as far as I am aware, no medical organization in the world officially recommends it.  It is known as a cosmetic procedure.  Perhaps the way to turn the thinking of Americans on this issue is to teach them that this is a cosmetic procedure and that a child does not need cosmetic alteration.

 

I want to make a small correction to Jessica's comment above.  The AAP did not seek to change the federal law in regards to FGM, they sought to suggest that doctors offer a "ritual nick" to the clitoris in an effort to meet the cultural/religious requirement of FGM, thus sparing the child a more drastic cutting experience.  It was a position paper if I recall correctly.   It got a huge firestorm of protest.  Google it!  The reactions of people were quite strong against it.....yet the blinders remain firmly in place in regards to cutting boys.


"To err is human, to forgive, canine." - Unknown
PuppyFluffer is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off