Pre-chewed food may pose HIV threat to infants - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-03-2011, 04:16 AM - Thread Starter
 
Minuteman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

An article linked from a MedinePlus mailing-list email.

 

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_115956.html

 

Excerpt:

 

Quote:
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - A new study from South Africa found that more than two-thirds of mothers and other caregivers pre-chew food for their infants -- possibly putting those babies at risk of HIV if the caregiver is HIV-positive.
...
"Once you become aware of the potential risk you have to share it with your patients, you have to make the community aware of the potential risk," Gaur concluded. "These studies should translate in terms of counseling and day-to-day practice."

 

 

Minuteman is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-03-2011, 01:16 PM
 
McGucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: among the wildflowers
Posts: 1,222
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Why is this posted under Circumcision?


 sleepytime.gif I got tired of my signature, but I still love my children and husband and miss my little brotherkid.gif

McGucks is offline  
Old 09-03-2011, 06:28 PM
 
Ron_Low's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 370
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by caedenmomma View Post

Why is this posted under Circumcision?


I think because it represents just another tine on the devil's pitchfork, poking at parents to get them to avoid natural parenting in favor of things that can be sold to them. 

 

Obviously pre-mastication is millions of years old and is no threat.  It's the HIV virus that's the threat. ABC and testing, not packaged baby food, is the answer. 

 

Putting all that aside, at least it's a rare AIDS news item that doesn't mention forced genital cutting to thwart HIV. 


-Ron
HIS body, HIS decision.
Ron_Low is offline  
Old 09-03-2011, 08:25 PM
 
Cyllya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 538
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron_Low View Post

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by caedenmomma View Post

Why is this posted under Circumcision?

 
I think because it represents just another tine on the devil's pitchfork, poking at parents to get them to avoid natural parenting in favor of things that can be sold to them.


Yeah, I does kind of seem relevant, since the least stupid-sounding pro-RIC argument I've heard is, "Men in third-world African countries get AIDS a little less often if they were circ'd as adults; therefore, you should circ your American baby when he's a couple days/hours old."

 

Because, apparently, lots of people are getting HIV not because of evil, evil foreskins but because their caregivers are feeding them HIV-infected blood. I bet education about things like this could go a long way and be more effective the circumcision in these countries.

 



 

 

Cyllya is offline  
Old 09-06-2011, 09:14 AM
 
TyrantOfTheWeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 378
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Maybe the food should be cut up first? That way the risk of it having HIV would be much less.


Mindie, wife to Mark, not-so-crunchy mom to Dylan (4/04); Devon (6/06); Dorothy (9/07); Derek (12/19/09); Daniel (12/18/10); Newbie D (2/22/12)

TyrantOfTheWeek is offline  
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off