Medical Associations recommend Circumcision? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 10 Old 03-16-2005, 08:05 AM - Thread Starter
 
Teresa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 591
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm working on something in which I want to write that 'No Medical Association in the world recommends circumcision.'

But I want to first make sure that it's true!

Any links, resources, etc. would be greatly appreciated.

Teresa
Teresa is offline  
#2 of 10 Old 03-16-2005, 10:57 AM
 
Nathan1097's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Senior-Title-Less!
Posts: 3,534
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You could quote what they have to say. You can always search http://www.cirp.org
Nathan1097 is offline  
#3 of 10 Old 03-16-2005, 12:09 PM
 
Frankly Speaking's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North Atlanta
Posts: 5,162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
To be absolutely accurate and correct, you state "No medical association in the world recommends routine infant circumcision." That is because in parts of Asia and other parts of the world, they let the waters get kind of muddy but they do not circumcise infants but instead, adolescents and teens by social or religious custom and they use those customs as a justification. They also tend to promote some of the myths.

If you are planning on posting this on a debate board, you can expect The AAP's policy statement on circumcision to be liberally interpreted and twisted to fit their needs. The fact is, The AAP's Taskforce on Circumcision reviewed 671 research projects and found that "The risks outweigh the potential benefits." The key word in their statement is "potential." The risks of circumcision are known and well documented even though The AAP's numbers are well known to be far, far below the actual incidence. The definition of "potential" is "capable of existing" or not known to exist. There are no known and conclusive benefits of routine infant circumcision and they have stated such.

If you are posting this information to a debate forum and have any problem, PM me and I'll help you out.




Frank
Frankly Speaking is offline  
#4 of 10 Old 03-16-2005, 12:19 PM
 
calngavinsmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ontario Canada....EH!?!
Posts: 2,079
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Here is a great link for you,
http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/

HTH,
Take care,
Tara

Tara Momma to Callum and Gavin
calngavinsmom is offline  
#5 of 10 Old 03-17-2005, 09:10 PM - Thread Starter
 
Teresa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 591
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Well, here's the rough draft of the statement I'm planning to use which may clarify things a bit:

"The routine practice of surgically removing the most sexually sensitive parts of a child's genitals is extremely rare outside of the United States. The vast majority of the world’s men and women are intact, with the exception of Jewish, Muslim and certain African cultures. No Medical Association in the world recommends these procedures! Healthy girls--and boys--should be left whole, intact and natural."

It will be--when I finish--a printed letter to the editor, not for the internet use.
I just want to make sure that now Medical Association does recommend it!

Teresa
Teresa is offline  
#6 of 10 Old 03-17-2005, 11:57 PM
 
Quirky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 12,070
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm not sure it's accurate to say that routine circumcision is extremely rare outside the US....I think it's roughly accurate to say that 1 million baby boys get cut every year in this country. According to the World Health Organization, 2 million females are at risk of circumcision each year. Islam is a huge religion and there are over 1 billion adherents. I have no idea how many Muslim boys are circed each year (or Jewish boys) but it's probably a sizeable number. And there are other cultures that circumcise boys/men as well, in Africa.

I think it would perhaps be more accurate to say that "The United States is the only developed country to engage in the routine practice etc." or "The United States is the only country to engage in the routine practice of circumcising the majority of newborn boys for non-religious reasons" or something to that effect. Other countries (majority Muslim, Israel) circ most boys at some point, and in many countries most girls are circed as well.

Come visit the NEW QuirkyBaby website -- earn QB Bucks rewards points for purchases, reviews, referrals, and more! Free US shipping on great brands of baby slings and carriers and FREE BabyLegs or babywearing mirror on orders of $100+. Take the QB Quiz for personalized advice!

Quirky is offline  
#7 of 10 Old 03-18-2005, 10:48 AM
 
Frankly Speaking's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North Atlanta
Posts: 5,162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
This is how you would write it to be absolutely accurate with the changes emboldened:



"The routine practice of surgically removing the most sexually sensitive parts of infants genitals is extremely rare outside of the United States. 85% of the world’s men / are intact, with the exception of Jewish, Muslim and certain African cultures. No Medical Association in the world recommends routine circumcision of infants! Healthy girls--and boys--should be left whole, intact and natural."


(1) ~15% of males are circumcised so it can not legitimately stated that it is rare. There would be people that would also contend that the numbers of females circumcised also makes that somewhat common and not rare.

(2) Circumcision of adolescent and teen boys and girls is common in some parts of the world for religious and cultural reasons so to keep your statement correct, you need to put in the qualifier "infant."

(3) Korean and Thai (I believe) medical associations are quite supportive of circumcision of male teens but not infants. Additionally, some of the African medical groups also support circumcision of female adolescents and teens. Use of the word "infant" will get you around these.

Since this is a letter to the editor of an American publication (I suspect) you really don't need to worry too much about absolute accuracy as it is doubtful that anyone will be able to mount a substantial rebuttal. Most of the people who reply to these are woefully ignorant of the facts and tend to spout off all of the old myths and lies. Just be sure you cover all of the big lies and myths.




Frank
Frankly Speaking is offline  
#8 of 10 Old 03-18-2005, 10:53 AM
 
Nathan1097's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Senior-Title-Less!
Posts: 3,534
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankly Speaking
Additionally, some of the African medical groups also support circumcision of female adolescents and teens. Use of the word "infant" will get you around these.
I just talked to my friend from England whose "friend"'s African parents circ'd her only 2 months ago. She's still healing from that (if you can ever really be healed) physically and emotionally. To top it off, she's pregnant from the ordeal and only 15. The parents, btw, are in jail with no chance of parole. She does have support. She says talking to me helps her in some way... she actually came to me to ask about pregnancy symptoms. I just never thought she'd actually be pregnant.
Nathan1097 is offline  
#9 of 10 Old 03-18-2005, 12:00 PM
 
Frankly Speaking's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North Atlanta
Posts: 5,162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
OMG! How did she get pregnant from the circumcision? Did the circumcisor rape her or something?



Frank
Frankly Speaking is offline  
#10 of 10 Old 03-18-2005, 01:29 PM
 
Quirky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 12,070
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Jesus God, I hope she wasn't infibulated. I hope as well she can get some plastic surgery to help repair things - childbirth is very dangerous for infibulated women.

Come visit the NEW QuirkyBaby website -- earn QB Bucks rewards points for purchases, reviews, referrals, and more! Free US shipping on great brands of baby slings and carriers and FREE BabyLegs or babywearing mirror on orders of $100+. Take the QB Quiz for personalized advice!

Quirky is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off