Rob Schneider Speaks Out Against Vaccines - Page 2 - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-07-2012, 02:08 PM
 
MamaMunchkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by UltraMama View Post

Is it really true that there are no tests like what he said?  A bunch of vaxed kids versus a bunch of unvaxxed kids?  Really?  That can't be true.  Vaccines are tested over and over right?  My doc told me the shots have been thoroughly tested and are extremely safe.  Please someone tell me he is wrong (that Rob is wrong lol, not my Dr!)

 

It was shocking the first time I heard it ...


Pro rights (vaxes).
MamaMunchkin is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-07-2012, 02:39 PM
 
AmandaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 206
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

As a clarification, while I realize it would be fairly ridiculous to mandate that all medications undergo trial/test periods in the decades to see the life long effects, any attempts to forcibly mandate medication (Let alone 70) should require real scientific studies.


lactivist.gifnovaxnocirc.gif Acd.gif'ing, winner.jpg,familybed1.gif,femalesling.GIFread.gif Momma to one DD 1/1/12 ribboncesarean.gif. Trying to goorganic.jpg and hoping for a hbac.gif next time!

AmandaT is offline  
Old 09-07-2012, 04:29 PM
 
minerva23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: down by the riverside
Posts: 494
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MamaMunchkin View Post

 

It was shocking the first time I heard it ...

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by UltraMama View Post

Is it really true that there are no tests like what he said?  A bunch of vaxed kids versus a bunch of unvaxxed kids?  Really?  That can't be true.  Vaccines are tested over and over right?  My doc told me the shots have been thoroughly tested and are extremely safe.  Please someone tell me he is wrong (that Rob is wrong lol, not my Dr!)

 

 

and I am still shocked.

 

Sometimes even the registration trials for vaccines are ridiculous, eg. Tetanol pure was only tested on a total of 52 people!!! The benefit-risk-ratio is calculated according to the side effects observed in this tiny group. Plus only the side effects that occured in these 52 people make it into the product information. What does that tell us? Nothing!

 And given that some of these trials are maybe run only for a period of a few weeks some only until antibodies can be found.

Even in clinical trials with up to 20 000 people, no risks that are rarer than 1 in 3000 are listed. So staying with the tetanus shot example, lets say 600 000 children will be vaccinated 4 times against tetanus and assuming that every 5000th vaccination series leads to the death of one child. This would have only been recognized during the trials by coincidence. When you do the math though and add this up, hypothetically there could be up to 120 death annually without this certain risk being recognized during the trials and consequently it would not be included in the product information. So much for safety of vaccines.


“The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.”
―Socrates

minerva23 is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 01:31 AM
 
Shanesmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 201
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Right on!

Crunchy Christian mama to my home birthed, unvaxed, uncirc boys Shane and Cody!!joy.gif
Shanesmom is offline  
 

Tags
Vaccinations
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off