HPV news - Mothering Forums

Thread Tools
#1 of 3 Old 04-23-2013, 05:23 PM - Thread Starter
serenbat's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,699
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)



surprise surprise -


Disclosure: The study was funded in part by Merck.





of course not -


“there was no unusual pattern or clustering to the deaths that would suggest that they were caused by the vaccine.”

Meanwhile, Merck is benefitting tremendously from vaccine sales. The vaccine is expected to reach $1 billion in sales next year, and could reach more than $4 billion in sales in five years, according to Wall Street analysts.


ANTI-GMO too! & Proud of it!  
 pro-transparency advocate
  PROUD member of the .3% club!
Want to join? Just ask me!
"You know, in my day we used to sit on our ass smoking Parliaments for nine months.
Today, you have one piece of Brie and everybody goes berserk."       
serenbat is offline  
Sponsored Links
#2 of 3 Old 04-23-2013, 06:23 PM
Taximom5's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)

Interesting that they think that the only possibility that the deaths would be caused by the vaccine would be if they were clustered (i.e., all girls received vaccines from the same batch) or...if there were an unusual pattern?  Can someone explain what exactly that would mean?


Isn't there already an obvious unusual pattern, in that a significant number of the girls affected severely by Gardasil are high-level athletes?  We see cheerleaders, soccer players, figure skaters, dancers, gymnasts, volleyball players, etc., all having severe reactions.  That's sure as heck a pattern.

Why isn't it being recognized and investigated?


Why is the medical community so rigidly glued to the unreasonable idea that if a vaccine causes an adverse affect, it doesn't count unless every single recipient reacts the same way?

applejuice likes this.
Taximom5 is offline  
#3 of 3 Old 04-29-2013, 01:53 PM
minerva23's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: down by the riverside
Posts: 570
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)


Seems to be working for genital warts. We will know more in 20 years time if it also protects against cancer. Meanwhile the side effects are still underreported. And that is a good point mentioning about the athletes! There should be an investigation into that too. But since not all our metabolisms work the same, each one of us will be affected differently by the same drug.

“The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.”

minerva23 is offline  


User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off