Amy Parker's hit piece, "Growing Up Unvaccinated," deconstructed. - Page 5 - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#121 of 146 Old 01-29-2014, 03:54 PM
 
fruitfulmomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Between the Rockies and a Flat Place
Posts: 4,233
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Quote:
 As far as I am aware MMR was made available in 1963.  

 

Quote:

 

Looks like it was the measles-only vax that was available in 1968.

 

 

And for our newcomers, please be sure to take a look at the forum guidelines - http://www.mothering.com/community/a/vaccination-forum-guidelines

 

Quote:
I'm Not Vaccinating - This is a support-only forum for those not or those seriously considering not vaccinating. Here we host discussion of issues that arise when choosing to not vaccinate and sharing of resources and information that are related to the no-vax decision. Members who are vaccinating should not post here to debate or argue accuracy or opinion of things posted. 

 

 

 


fruitfulmomma is online now  
#122 of 146 Old 01-29-2014, 03:57 PM
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Outside the hive mind
Posts: 7,451
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)

The single measles vaccine was introduced into the UK in 1968, MMR in 1988. Single measles vaccine was introduced into the US in 1963, but it was a live virus that was administered with measles immunoglobulin because it was so reactive. The attenuated live vaccine was introduced in 1968. There was no MMR vaccine in 1963 in any country. The MMR vaccine became available in the US in 1971.


Rainbow.giftstillheart.gifsmile.gif

 

"If you find from your own experience that something is a fact and it contradicts what some authority has written down, then you must abandon the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings"~ Leonardo da Vinci

Mirzam is online now  
#123 of 146 Old 01-29-2014, 08:55 PM - Thread Starter
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hmhmhmhm View Post

Hi taximom4 - I went to that link you used to source your statement that MMR was not available in the UK until 1998; and that page says nothing of the sort, so I'm wondering where you got that information.  As far as I am aware MMR was made available in 1963.  The NHS link you posted http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/vaccinations/Pages/mmr-vaccine.aspx says that in 1998 a paper was written by Andrew Wakefield that created doubts and controversy around the MMR vaccine.  And then it says that this paper was later completely discredited and Wakefield no longer a doctor in the UK.  In 2010, health experts criticized media reporting of the MMR-autism controversy for triggering a decline in vaccination rates.  
Before publication of Wakefield's findings, the inoculation rate for MMR in the UK was 92%; after publication, the rate dropped to below 80%. In 1998, there were 56 measles cases in the UK; by 2008, there were 1348 cases, with 2 confirmed deaths.  http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/autism/%E2%80%9Cparanoia-strikes-deep%E2%80%9D-mmr-vaccine-and-autism


I understand the worry about not properly understood vaccinations for young children, but I also fear the misunderstanding and false proliferation of side effects caused by vaccines that turn out to be false and cost lives.  

Anyways I'd still like to know where you sourced your information that the MMR vaccine was not available in the UK until 1998.  

Hi, hmhmhmhm, welcome to the forum!

Perhaps you skipped around when you went to the link I posted? It says very clearly, "Since the MMR vaccine was introduced in 1988..." in the fourth paragraph. I'm wondering why you think the MMR was available in 1963, as you didn't post a source for that.

Oh, and you got my name wrong, too.
Taximom5 is offline  
#124 of 146 Old 01-30-2014, 02:14 AM
 
Sukhada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It's not strange to wait 6 months re: HPV. Pre-cancerous cells can take many, many years to transition to cancer and often spontaneously resolve. They often do a repeat pap/wait and see approach before more invasive biopsies or removal of cells.
applejuice likes this.

Mother to a wonderful little girl, born Sept/2011 via h20homebirth.gif and enjoyingbftoddler.giffemalesling.GIFfamilybed1.gifcd.gif

Currently belly.gif(EDD: February 2014)

Sukhada is offline  
#125 of 146 Old 01-30-2014, 06:10 AM
 
serenbat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,328
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 91 Post(s)

This is some good information on fluoride - http://www.dancingwithwater.com/articles/how-to-remove-fluoride-from-water/

 

http://www.brita.net/ae/faqs_contaminations.html?L=24&cat=7#2


 

 pro-transparency advocate

&

lurk.gif  PROUD member of the .3% club!

 

Want to join? Just ask me!

 

"You know, in my day we used to sit on our ass smoking Parliaments for nine months.

Today, you have one piece of Brie and everybody goes berserk."      ROTFLMAO.gif 

serenbat is offline  
#126 of 146 Old 01-30-2014, 06:14 AM
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Outside the hive mind
Posts: 7,451
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Quote:

Thanks for that! 

applejuice likes this.

Rainbow.giftstillheart.gifsmile.gif

 

"If you find from your own experience that something is a fact and it contradicts what some authority has written down, then you must abandon the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings"~ Leonardo da Vinci

Mirzam is online now  
#127 of 146 Old 01-30-2014, 07:09 AM
 
applejuice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: hunting the wild aebelskiever
Posts: 18,628
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)

RE: fluoride.

 

Ever see the huge astronaut-like suit that a water worker wears when fluoride is put into the water? It was put in the press before LA voted to refuse fluoride in its water in 1960s. I will look in my books for it.

Chicharronita and stellanyc like this.

"The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic."
applejuice is offline  
#128 of 146 Old 01-30-2014, 07:15 AM
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Outside the hive mind
Posts: 7,451
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)

Not fluoride, farming GMOs

 


Rainbow.giftstillheart.gifsmile.gif

 

"If you find from your own experience that something is a fact and it contradicts what some authority has written down, then you must abandon the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings"~ Leonardo da Vinci

Mirzam is online now  
#129 of 146 Old 01-30-2014, 09:51 AM - Thread Starter
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by applejuice View Post

RE: fluoride.

Ever see the huge astronaut-like suit that a water worker wears when fluoride is put into the water? It was put in the press before LA voted to refuse fluoride in its water in 1960s. I will look in my books for it.

LA doesn't have fluoridated water? Or did they cave in at a later date?
Taximom5 is offline  
#130 of 146 Old 01-30-2014, 01:13 PM
 
applejuice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: hunting the wild aebelskiever
Posts: 18,628
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)

In 1996, Governor Pete Wilson-R, mandated fluoride in all communities statewide that have 100,000 or more residents. So Los Angeles has fluoride in its water. I helped circulate a petition at the time, but obviously it went no where. This article seems to be all over the place about when LA started to fluoridate, but it is currently fluoridated. 

 

http://articles.latimes.com/2007/dec/22/local/me-fluoride22

 

The first city in the world to fluoridate I believe was Grand Rapids, MI. 

I seem to recall that cancer rates are highest in  cities where the water has been fluoridated for the  longest time. 

And I know for sure that dentists are not moving out of Grand Rapids, MI.

BeckyBird likes this.

"The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic."
applejuice is offline  
#131 of 146 Old 01-30-2014, 04:53 PM - Thread Starter
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sukhada View Post

It's not strange to wait 6 months re: HPV. Pre-cancerous cells can take many, many years to transition to cancer and often spontaneously resolve. They often do a repeat pap/wait and see approach before more invasive biopsies or removal of cells.

 

You are right. I found a few sites saying exactly that. Here is one:  http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/cervical/pathology-and-staging/precancerous-conditions/?region=on

 

However, her story still doesn't ring true.  She says that she was diagnosed with precancerous HPV:  "In my twenties I got precancerous HPV and spent 6 months of my life wondering how I was going to tell my two children under the age of 7 that mummy might have cancer before it was safely removed."

 

​Now, if they knew that she had a "precancerous HPV infection," why would they wait 6 months to see if it would resolve or not? Is she confusing genital warts with precancerous lesions?  Or did her doctors confuse the two?  I ask because most HPV infections do not lead to cancer.

applejuice and sassyfirechick like this.
Taximom5 is offline  
#132 of 146 Old 02-01-2014, 10:00 AM
 
dterpstra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Yes and yes!  I had a facebook friend throw the "Growing Up Unvaccinated" article out there and noticed all of the inconsistencies, but deemed it pointless to argue with her about the consistencies given she (and her faithful "likers") wouldn't know the first thing about what this author claimed to live.  THANK YOU for typing up a valid response on it.  THANK YOU for working to put a stop on ignorant assumptions about the motives behind "anti-vaxers".  I am sure you have many haters for writing this, but know that your utilitarian ways are appreciated by many!  Cheers

applejuice and BeckyBird like this.
dterpstra is offline  
#133 of 146 Old 02-01-2014, 01:11 PM
 
Chloebelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 284
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Great work!

 

Saw this on my news feed a few times, but never read it. I'm finding a lot more propaganda out there these days. It's brewing. The big guys are at work trying to pit pro-vaxers and non-vaxers against each other. Create fear so we'll give up our health freedoms just like we gave up  our privacy freedoms after 911. Sick world.


Non-vaxing, vegetarian, green lovin' mama to two little divas.
Chloebelle is offline  
#134 of 146 Old 02-01-2014, 03:28 PM
 
applejuice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: hunting the wild aebelskiever
Posts: 18,628
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Quote:
 ....wouldn't know the first thing about what this author claimed to live. ...

I grew up never vaccinated in the polio era and I know what this author claimed to live is a BIG FAT LIE.

 

And, welcome, dterpstra, to mdc and to the I Am NOT vaccinating forum.


"The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic."
applejuice is offline  
#135 of 146 Old 02-03-2014, 06:34 PM - Thread Starter
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chloebelle View Post
 

Great work!

 

Saw this on my news feed a few times, but never read it. I'm finding a lot more propaganda out there these days. It's brewing. The big guys are at work trying to pit pro-vaxers and non-vaxers against each other. Create fear so we'll give up our health freedoms just like we gave up  our privacy freedoms after 911. Sick world.

 

Yes, you are right, there is an absolute firestorm of propaganda out there these days. It's like they've declared war on all independent thought.

Taximom5 is offline  
#136 of 146 Old 02-06-2014, 11:02 PM
 
Jean-LucS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

In fact, very nice article ! So well said !

 

Congratulations... :-)

Jean-LucS is offline  
#137 of 146 Old 02-08-2014, 05:25 AM - Thread Starter
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jean-LucS View Post

In fact, very nice article ! So well said !

Congratulations... :-)

Thank you, Jean-LucS, and welcome to the forum!
Taximom5 is offline  
#138 of 146 Old 02-10-2014, 04:26 PM
 
TheSkeptic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I didn't learn anything from this. I was looking for an alternative view to Amy Parker's piece. But all I found was someone talking about it in bold letters. As if that's supposed to mean anything. "Here now look at this." "Now take it even further." This has no value or meaning. It provides no contrast to Parker's piece at all.

I also saw someone quote the forum guidelines about this being a "support only" forum. Are the people here suffering through diseases or depression and is that why they need support only? How can anyone get an educated opinion if they only hear one side? I'm sceptical of everything, vaccines and doctors' opinions included. However, I'm more sceptical of anyone or any place that preaches one side only.

 

TheSkeptic is offline  
#139 of 146 Old 02-10-2014, 04:31 PM
 
fruitfulmomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Between the Rockies and a Flat Place
Posts: 4,233
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Quote:
I also saw someone quote the forum guidelines about this being a "support only" forum. Are the people here suffering through diseases or depression and is that why they need support only? How can anyone get an educated opinion if they only hear one side? I'm sceptical of everything, vaccines and doctors' opinions included. However, I'm more sceptical of anyone or any place that preaches one side only.

This is a sub-forum. There are several other forums with different view points presented. Feel free to browse them if you are not finding what you need here - http://www.mothering.com/community/f/47/vaccinations


fruitfulmomma is online now  
#140 of 146 Old 02-10-2014, 06:39 PM - Thread Starter
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSkeptic View Post
I didn't learn anything from this. I was looking for an alternative view to Amy Parker's piece. But all I found was someone talking about it in bold letters. As if that's supposed to mean anything. "Here now look at this." "Now take it even further." This has no value or meaning. It provides no contrast to Parker's piece at all.

I also saw someone quote the forum guidelines about this being a "support only" forum. Are the people here suffering through diseases or depression and is that why they need support only? How can anyone get an educated opinion if they only hear one side? I'm sceptical of everything, vaccines and doctors' opinions included. However, I'm more sceptical of anyone or any place that preaches one side only.

 

 

Welcome to the forum, TheSkeptic.

 

You need to be able to read and understand beyond simply recognizing which letters are bolded.


The sentences written in bolded font are an explanation of the tactics Amy Parker used in her attempt to take down vaccine critics (and we're not even discussing why someone would find it necessary to "take down" critics rather than coming up with a valid answer to the criticisms).

The quotes immediately following those sentences demonstrate the point.

The "take it even further" illustrated the pattern she employed, where, for every point she made (even if it was in error), she tried to make it seem stronger by giving a second, grossly exaggerated, even completely unrealistic example.

 

Perhaps you didn't read the 2"edited to add" sections, each separated by a line of asterisks.  The first ETA section points out 9 fairly major errors or inconsistencies in Amy Parker's article.   Since her piece has so many obvious errors and inconsistencies, contrast to her piece is hardly necessary.

 

As fruitfulmomma pointed out, you are welcome to browse other forums if you are not finding what you need here.  You are also welcome to write your own contrast piece to Amy Parker's.

Chicharronita and BeckyBird like this.
Taximom5 is offline  
#141 of 146 Old 02-11-2014, 11:55 AM
 
Chicharronita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: In the Candyland of my Imagination
Posts: 1,576
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)

Hey Taximom5, I just wanted to thank you for the Amy Parker hit piece deconstruction, and express my wonder at the fact this one thread has garnered over 55,000 views! Good work.

applejuice and kathymuggle like this.

Chicharronita is offline  
#142 of 146 Old 02-11-2014, 12:10 PM - Thread Starter
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)

Aw, gee, thanks, Chicharronita!  I love both your username and your avitar!

Chicharronita likes this.
Taximom5 is offline  
#143 of 146 Old 02-11-2014, 08:17 PM
 
Viola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 23,378
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSkeptic View Post
 
I also saw someone quote the forum guidelines about this being a "support only" forum. Are the people here suffering through diseases or depression and is that why they need support only? How can anyone get an educated opinion if they only hear one side? I'm sceptical of everything, vaccines and doctors' opinions included. However, I'm more sceptical of anyone or any place that preaches one side only.

 

 

This is a support forum.  We have a debate forum.  If you wish to debate, go to Vaccinations Debate. If you wish to post about the benefits of full immunizations done on the standard schedule, go to Vaccinating on Schedule Knowing that this is a support forum and choosing to engage in debate here is against our posting policy, and your posts will be removed. Mothering wishes to have places where people can go for support and information, whether they vaccinate on schedule, delay or selectively immunize, or do not immunize.  There is also debate.  You can be sure that many members who choose to post in the Vaccination forum are aware of the things going on in the sub forums, but moderation is more streamlined with this approach.

applejuice and sassyfirechick like this.
Viola is online now  
#144 of 146 Old 02-19-2014, 12:03 PM - Thread Starter
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)

When I wrote the OP, it didn't occur to me to look for proof of who is pulling the strings at Voices For Vaccines (who published Amy Parker's hit piece).  

I'm glad to post here that someone has done just that:

http://vactruth.com/2014/02/19/cdc-and-emory-university/

Voices for Vaccines: 11 Facts Show How it’s a Propaganda Ploy for Emory University, CDC, and Big Pharma

 

Vactruth is not I site I like or recommend, generally, but maybe they are improving things over there.  At any rate, this article is very illuminating, and I'm so glad they did the research to find evidence of pharma-pulled strings at Voices For Vaccines .  Not that it's a surprise to any of us, but it sure is nice to see the proof.

 

I'm betting that there some of the members over there who haven't quite given up all of their questions surrounding vaccine safety.  I wouldn't be surprised if they start distancing themselves from Voices For Vaccines...

Taximom5 is offline  
#145 of 146 Old 04-10-2014, 05:37 AM - Thread Starter
 
Taximom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Does anybody else wonder what Amy Parker thinks of the latest vicious bullying attempts, such as the recent Time Magazine piece by Jeffrey Kluger?
Mirzam and applejuice like this.
Taximom5 is offline  
#146 of 146 Old 04-10-2014, 05:57 AM
 
emmy526's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)

I've noticed her piece is circulating again on fb

applejuice likes this.
emmy526 is offline  
Reply

Tags
Vaccinations

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off