Strep, scarlet fever (maybe) - treat or not treat - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-07-2009, 09:33 PM - Thread Starter
 
Keeping up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 655
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Lost my original way too long post ... and need to go make dinner

1. Five year old boy diagnosed with strep - he has no symptoms what so ever (i.e no sore throat, no rash). He had a high fever a few days ago. Do I treat with antibiotics?
2. He was only taken to the walk-in clinic because I think my daughter is possibly at the tail end of scarlet fever and impetigo. (Sunburn like rash, white around the eyes/mouth, rash travels down neck) Rash follows on high fever for a week - about two weeks ago. She wasn't tested.

So - do I treated an child with no symptoms for strep. If so, is it OK not to treat a child that more than likely (in my opinion) had a strep infection (perhaps not strep throat) and likely still does because of the 'scarlet fever' rash.

Off to make dinner.
Keeping up is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-07-2009, 11:43 PM
 
sophiesgrandma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I believe if the child was tested positive for strep then antibiotics are a must. If your little boy tested positive then treat with antibiotics. Test your girl also and treat accordingly. Alot of times when someone in the family has strep, all should be tested. Strep could lead to scarlet fever and/or reumatic fever which can cause permanent heart damage.
sophiesgrandma is offline  
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off