200 Clinically Confirmed Reason Not To Eat Wheat - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-07-2012, 09:08 AM - Thread Starter
 
Mirzam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Resistance Free Earth
Posts: 7,612
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/200-clinically-confirmed-reasons-not-eat-wheat

 

 

 

 

Quote:

There is now, however, a huge dataset firmly establishing the likelihood that wheat intolerance, or better yet, wheat toxicity, is a universal, human species-specific problem, occurring only in differing degrees, and mostly sub-clinically, at least through the optic of conventional screenings and technologies.

One must also account for the "invisible thorn," which is wheat lectin – known more technically as Wheat Germ Agglutinin (WGA) -- and which can cause a broad range of adverse health effects, even while being undetected through conventional screenings.  

 


t
 
"There are only two mistakes you can make in the search for the Truth. Not starting, and not going all the way." ~ Mark Passio
Mirzam is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-07-2012, 09:54 AM
 
pek64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I can't believe that humans have been consuming something harmful for so many generations. Personally, I think the problems are the result of what we are doing to wheat (and ALL our food), with genetic modification and chemicals. It is time to return to eating *real* food.
pek64 is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 10:11 AM
 
fgsgreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Great post. Most folks really do not fully comprehend how a 6 billion dollar a year "gluten free" industry reflects just how profound an experience of healing and recovery the gluten-free diet invokes. But, this article shows there are hundreds of studies now confirming the broad-spectrum toxicity of wheat, much of which is subclinical or not diagnosable through conventional screening.

 

Check out the research directly: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/toxic-ingredient/wheat
 

fgsgreen is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 10:21 AM
 
VisionaryMom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,736
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pek64 View Post

I can't believe that humans have been consuming something harmful for so many generations. Personally, I think the problems are the result of what we are doing to wheat (and ALL our food), with genetic modification and chemicals. It is time to return to eating *real* food.

Humans haven't eaten wheat the way that we have for more than about 2 generations. Wheat was cost-prohibitive until governments started subsidizing it and we began to process food to make it cheaper. 


It's us: DH , DS ; DD ; and me . Also there's the . And the 3 . I . Oh, and .
VisionaryMom is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 10:37 AM
 
pek64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by VisionaryMom View Post

Humans haven't eaten wheat the way that we have for more than about 2 generations. Wheat was cost-prohibitive until governments started subsidizing it and we began to process food to make it cheaper. 

What do you mean by 'the way we have'? What about 200-500 years ago? What did people eat? I was taught that the poor ate whole grains, while the rich ate white grains, but they all ate grains. Is. What about the ancient Egyptians? Kamut was discovered in a pyramid, or so I read.

Also, which two generations? Mine is one. My parents? What about their parents?
pek64 is offline  
 

Tags
Health Healing
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off