Department of health and human services telling media outlets to be "pro vaccine" - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 10 Old 11-11-2010, 01:04 AM - Thread Starter
 
littlec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)

Well, not in those words exactly. But look at this interview. Is this scary/shocking to anyone else?

 

 http://www.rd.com/health-slideshows/h1n1-the-report-card/article174741.html

 

The part I'm referencing:

 

 RD:What can be done about public mistrust of vaccines?
KS:There are groups out there that insist that vaccines are responsible for a variety of problems despite all scientific evidence to the contrary. We have reached out to media outlets to try to get them to not give the views of these people equal weight in their reporting to what science has shown and continues to show about the safety of vaccines.

 

Thoughts?


"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect." ~Mark Twain

 


 
littlec is online now  
#2 of 10 Old 11-18-2010, 12:00 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I think it is awful but not really shocking. The mainstream media is FULL of all kinds of propaganda. It's really sad but true.


.
Karamom is offline  
#3 of 10 Old 11-18-2010, 05:46 AM
 
carriebft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,947
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I agree with them about the "equal weight" thing. I don't think the public is served by having a blanket "equal weight" on issues policy in the media. It's the same policy that leads to horrible articles on circumcision and birth, IMO. It also leads to a lot of unsupported statements in the media.

 

 

I think weight should be given, in health/science stories, according to the evidence. So if you are reporting on vaccines and autism, more time/weight should be given to where there is more evidence. personal accounts have their place but should be tempered by the issues surrounding using such things as "data".


"Parents are simply trustees; they do not own the bodies of their children"-Norm Cohen  Martial arts instructor intactlact.gifhomebirth.jpgnak.gif and mom to 4: DD1 (1/05) DS (7/06) DD2 (5/08) DD3 (2/11)
carriebft is offline  
#4 of 10 Old 11-18-2010, 10:05 AM
 
Arduinna's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 32,629
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by littlec View Post

Well, not in those words exactly. But look at this interview. Is this scary/shocking to anyone else?

 

 http://www.rd.com/health-slideshows/h1n1-the-report-card/article174741.html

 

The part I'm referencing:

 

 RD:What can be done about public mistrust of vaccines?
KS:There are groups out there that insist that vaccines are responsible for a variety of problems despite all scientific evidence to the contrary. We have reached out to media outlets to try to get them to not give the views of these people equal weight in their reporting to what science has shown and continues to show about the safety of vaccines.

 

Thoughts?


Basically same old same old. Media outlets are already used by government entities ( and others) to form the opinions they want us to have. I rarely see medical issues covered in a neutral fashion in the media.

Arduinna is offline  
#5 of 10 Old 11-20-2010, 01:39 PM
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,050
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)

Yup.  The CDC's been in on it, too: http://www.cdc.gov/healthmarketing/entertainment_education/tips/immuniz.htm

 

The hand that rocks the media cradle is the hand that rules the world. 


In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#6 of 10 Old 11-20-2010, 08:40 PM
 
caned & able's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bridgeport, ME
Posts: 999
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I have heard radio personalities in the past discuss vaccines and been sympathetic to parents whose children were damaged by vaccines; these would be Ed Imus, Rush Limbaugh, George Nory, and Tammy Bruce.  I have not heard much about vaccines more recently on these shows, but I do know that other radio people more recently have maligned anyone who would suspect vaccines of damaging any one at all.  It seemed to me to be an organized assault on persons like Jenny McCarthy.  

 

Editted to add that I do recall Bill Maher making anti-vaccine statements.  

caned & able is offline  
#7 of 10 Old 11-21-2010, 02:08 PM
 
angelpie545's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Near water, with a refreshing rain
Posts: 6,674
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

 You know, it is somewhat interesting that media outlets choose to attack Jenny McCarthy.  If I'm remembering correctly, she's publicly said that she believes vaccines are necessary and that we need them.  I think it's because they feel she promotes the vaccine/autism connection theory because of her experiences with her own son. 


Bethany, crunchy Christian mom to Destiny (11) Deanna (9), and Ethan (2)

angelpie545 is offline  
#8 of 10 Old 11-21-2010, 03:41 PM
 
Norasmomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The sunny side of the mountains
Posts: 4,403
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

And this is surprising?  Mainstream media is always spouting things that are crap. 


Me Wife to T (14 years)Mama to Princess(4) and Monster Boy(my 1 year old ):
Norasmomma is offline  
#9 of 10 Old 11-25-2010, 08:09 AM
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,050
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)


I'm not sure I follow.... Do you mean that major media should not present the public with different views on a policy issue?

 

Whether popular culture should give "equal weight" to various policy issues issues--and whether Uncle Sam should be directly meddling in the speech and artistic expression of producers and screenplay writers--are two entirely separate questions. 

Quote:
Originally Posted by carriebft View Post

I agree with them about the "equal weight" thing. I don't think the public is served by having a blanket "equal weight" on issues policy in the media.


In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#10 of 10 Old 11-25-2010, 09:18 AM
 
carriebft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,947
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Both sides do not have "equal weight:" in evidence or science. Take circumcision: there is very little evidence on the pro side, even when we accept the UTI and HPV studies, these differences are so small that they do not change the minds of major medical organizations. Yet, when the media covers circumcision, they give "equal time" "equal weight" to both sides or they lean to the pro circ side, the side with less evidence.

 

With vaccines, there is the same problem. (though I think since the Chicago Tribune and many others have stepped up recently, this has been less of an issue) I think the Tribune did the right thing with their article series on Lupron and Autism. They gave very little credence to the side using this therapy. While we did hear some stories of "success", these were surrounded by the ethical issues, science/lack of science, etc. Yes, the articles ended up coming off "anti Lupron therapy to cure/treat autism", but that is where the evidence is.


"Parents are simply trustees; they do not own the bodies of their children"-Norm Cohen  Martial arts instructor intactlact.gifhomebirth.jpgnak.gif and mom to 4: DD1 (1/05) DS (7/06) DD2 (5/08) DD3 (2/11)
carriebft is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off